Association of Pharmacogenomic Phenotypes in CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A5 on Polypharmacy in Veterans.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) utilizes a pharmacogenomic (PGx) program that analyzes specific "pharmacogenes." This study evaluates the effect that pharmacogenes may have on prevalence of polypharmacy. This retrospective cohort study included patients with VA prescriptions who underwent PGx testing. We quantified prescriptions active or recently expired at the time of PGx testing. We constructed two co-primary polypharmacy (≥10 medications) end points: (i) based on all medications and (ii) requiring that at least one medication was affected by a pharmacogene of interest. Pharmacogenes and actionable phenotypes of interest included poor and ultrarapid metabolizers for CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 and intermediate and normal metabolizers for CYP3A5. Patients were classified as having 0, 1, and 2+ total phenotypes across all genes. Of the 15,144 patients screened, 13,116 met eligibility criteria. Across phenotype cohorts, there was no significant association with polypharmacy using all medications, number of total medications, or number of medications affected by phenotypes. However, there was a significant difference in patients with polypharmacy prescribed ≥1 medication impacted by PGx across phenotype groups: 2,514/4,949 (51%), 1,349/2,595 (52%), 204/350 (58%) (P = 0.03, OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.67). The median number of medications affected by PGx phenotypes with ≥1 PGx-impacted medication across phenotype groups was a median of 0 (IQR 0, 0), 0 (IQR 0, 0), and 1 (IQR 0, 1) (P < 0.001). In patients prescribed ≥1 medication impacted by PGx, those with more actionable pharmacogenomic phenotypes were more likely to meet polypharmacy criteria.

Workforce readiness for pharmacogenomics and key elements for sustainment within the Veterans Health Administration.

Aim: Understanding barriers and facilitators to pharmacogenomics (PGx) implementation and how to structure a clinical program with the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Materials & methods: Healthcare provider (HCP) survey at 20 VA facilities assessing PGx knowledge/acceptance and qualitative interviews to understand how best to design and sustain a national program. Results: 186 (12% response rate) surveyed believed PGx informs drug efficacy (74.7%) and adverse events (71.0%). Low confidence in knowledge (43.0%) and ability to implement (35.4-43.5%). 23 (60.5% response rate) interviewees supported a nationally program to oversee VA education, consultation and IT resources. Prescribing HCPs should be directing local activities. Conclusion: HCPs recognize PGx value but are not prepared to implement. Healthcare systems should build system-wide programs for implementation education and support.

Pharmacogenetic testing and monitoring of complete blood counts among Veterans newly prescribed thiopurine treatments: a retrospective cohort study.

Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing before initiation of thiopurine treatment and CBC monitoring post-initiation helps avoid adverse events and ensure patient safety. This study aims to evaluate trends in PGx testing and CBC monitoring among Veterans prescribed azathioprine, thioguanine, or mercaptopurine to demonstrate VA's efforts to improve medication safety after an adverse event. To assess testing patterns, we used VA electronic health report data to identify 20,524 Veterans who first began thiopurine treatment between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021. Aggregate monthly counts of thiopurine prescriptions and associated lab tests were tabulated, and the trend in the proportion of patients tested was analyzed using the Mann-Kendall test. The proportion of patients undergoing PGx testing rose from 30.0% in 2010 to 47.5% in late 2014 (July-December). However, PGx testing and overall testing only increased slightly after the sentinel event, and orders levelled off over time at slightly lower levels than before the sentinel event. Very little change was seen in the overall proportion of individuals receiving any testing across all patients with new prescriptions from the time of the sentinel event in 2014 to the end of 2021. A large portion of patients prescribed thiopurine drugs did not receive testing that could help prevent the development of potential adverse events, leading to a predominantly reactive approach. Increased PGx testing may result in a more proactive approach to the prevention of adverse events due to genetic interaction.

Veterans Health Administration: Implementation of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support with statin medications and the SLCO1B1 gene as an exemplar.

PURPOSE: To describe the implementation of clinical decision support tools for alerting prescribers of actionable drug-gene interactions in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). SUMMARY: Drug-gene interactions have been the focus of clinicians for years. Interactions between SCLO1B1 genotype and statin medications are of particular interest as these can inform risk for statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). VHA identified approximately 500,000 new users of statin medications prescribed in VHA in fiscal year 2021, some of whom could benefit from pharmacogenomic testing for the SCLO1B1 gene. In 2019, VHA implemented the Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) program to offer panel-based, preemptive pharmacogenomic testing and interpretation. The PHASER panel includes SLCO1B1, and VHA utilized Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium statin guidelines to build its clinical decision support tools. The program's overarching goal is to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions such as SAMS and improve medication efficacy by alerting practitioners of actionable drug-gene interactions. We describe the development and implementation of decision support for the SLCO1B1 gene as an example of the approach being used for the nearly 40 drug-gene interactions screened for by the panel. CONCLUSION: The VHA PHASER program identifies and addresses drug-gene interactions as an application of precision medicine to reduce veterans' risks for adverse events. The PHASER program's implementation of statin pharmacogenomics utilizes a patient's SCLO1B1 phenotype to alert providers of the risk for SAMS with the statin being prescribed and how to lower that risk through a lower dose or alternative statin selection. The PHASER program may help reduce the number of veterans who experience SAMS and may improve their adherence to statin medications.

Integrating pharmacogenomics into precision pain management.

Studies suggest wide heterogeneity in pain management response. Improved methods of pain pharmacotherapy are urgently needed to improve clinical response and safety profile of analgesics. The study or application of how genetics influence response to medications is called pharmacogenomics (PGx). PGx testing is a tool that may support more precise selection and dosing of pain medicines. PGx guidelines exist for drug-gene interactions with high levels of evidence and can be applied in clinical practice for more precise care in patients with cancer. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) is a publicly funded international consortium of experts who curate published PGx data and create peer-reviewed guidelines on how to translate PGx results into actionable prescribing decisions. Given the immense need to improve pain management, it is important to increase awareness and consider application of CPIC guidelines to pain management strategies. This commentary concisely describes how PGx can be used to aid in more precise applications of pain pharmacotherapy based on the CPIC guidelines.

Ordering and Interpreting Precision Oncology Studies for Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Primer.

Background: The promise of precision oncology can only be realized when genetic alterations are identified that can be leveraged to improve response and minimize toxicity. Identifying those alterations requires the knowledge to order the right test and to interpret the results correctly. This primer is designed to help clinicians order the appropriate testing for patients with specific malignancies and to give them an informed approach to interpretation. Observations: Germline DNA is usually acquired from peripheral blood, buccal swab, or saliva collection in patients with a metastatic malignancy and can provide treatment options otherwise not available. However, germline testing does not indicate alterations that arise solely in tumor tissue. Somatic testing may be performed on primary tumor, metastatic biopsy, or circulating tumor DNA when the alteration is present at the time that the tumor developed and expected to be carried through the evolution of the tumor. Conclusions: The rapid growth in technology and ability to enhance understanding of relevant tumor biology continues to improve the therapeutic landscape for individuals dealing with malignancy as does our ability to find targetable genetic alterations with the potential for meaningful clinical benefit.

Best-worst scaling methodology to evaluate constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: application to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased demand for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing to guide antidepressant use, little is known about how to implement testing in clinical practice. Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a stated preferences technique for determining the relative importance of alternative scenarios and is increasingly being used as a healthcare assessment tool, with potential applications in implementation research. We conducted a BWS experiment to evaluate the relative importance of implementation factors for PGx testing to guide antidepressant use. METHODS: We surveyed 17 healthcare organizations that either had implemented or were in the process of implementing PGx testing for antidepressants. The survey included a BWS experiment to evaluate the relative importance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs from the perspective of implementing sites. RESULTS: Participating sites varied on their PGx testing platform and methods for returning recommendations to providers and patients, but they were consistent in ranking several CFIR constructs as most important for implementation: patient needs/resources, leadership engagement, intervention knowledge/beliefs, evidence strength and quality, and identification of champions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using choice experiments to systematically evaluate the relative importance of implementation determinants from the perspective of implementing organizations. BWS findings can inform other organizations interested in implementing PGx testing for mental health. Further, this study demonstrates the application of BWS to PGx, the findings of which may be used by other organizations to inform implementation of PGx testing for mental health disorders.

Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor Genomic Profiling to Guide First-Line Targeted Therapy Selection in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of 10 oncogenes, targeted gene panel testing (TGPT) of 4 oncogenes, and no tumor profiling over the lifetime for patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' perspective was conducted. METHODS: A decision analytic model used 10 000 hypothetical Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to simulate outcomes associated with CGP (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, MET, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, RET, ROS1), TGPT (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ROS1), and no tumor profiling (no genes tested). First-line targeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned if actionable gene variants were detected; otherwise, nontargeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned. Model inputs were derived from randomized trials (progression-free survival, adverse events), the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare (drug costs), published studies (nondrug cancer-related management costs, health state utilities), and published databases (actionable variant prevalences). Costs (2019 US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% per year. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses used 1000 Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: No tumor profiling was the least costly/person ($122 613 vs $184 063 for TGPT and $188 425 for CGP) and yielded the least QALYs/person (0.53 vs 0.73 for TGPT and 0.74 for CGP). The costs per QALY gained and corresponding 95% confidence interval were $310 735 ($278 323-$347 952) for TGPT vs no tumor profiling and $445 545 ($322 297-$572 084) for CGP vs TGPT. All probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations for both comparisons surpassed the willingness-to-pay threshold ($150 000 per QALY gained). CONCLUSION: Compared with no tumor profiling in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, tumor profiling (TGPT, CGP) improves quality-adjusted survival but is not cost-effective.

Drug-drug-gene interaction risk among opioid users in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

ABSTRACT: Response to analgesic therapy is influenced by several factors including genetics and drug-drug interactions. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants in the CYP2D6 gene modify response to opioids by altering drug metabolism. We sought to determine the potential impact of PGx testing on the care of Veterans with noncancer pain prescribed opioids metabolized by CYP2D6 (codeine, hydrocodone, or tramadol). A retrospective analysis was performed within the Veterans Health Administration evaluating prescription records for pain medications metabolized by CYP2D6 and interacting drugs from 2012 to 2017. Among 2,436,654 Veterans Health Administration pharmacy users with at least 1 opioid prescription, 34% met the definition of chronic use (longer than 90 days with more than 10 prescriptions or 120 days-supply). Opioids were commonly coprescribed with antidepressants interacting with CYP2D6 (28%). An estimated 21.6% (n = 526,905) of these patients are at an elevated risk of an undesirable response to their opioid medication based on predicted phenotypes and drug-drug interactions: 3.5% are predicted CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers and at increased risk for toxicity, 5.4% are poor metabolizers at higher risk for nonresponse, and 12.8% are normal or intermediate metabolizers coprescribed a CYP2D6 inhibitor leading to phenoconversion into poor metabolizer. Despite the high rate of coprescription of opioids and interacting drugs, CYP2D6 testing was infrequent in the sample (0.02%), and chart review suggests that test results were used to optimize antidepressant treatments rather than pain medications. Using PGx testing combined with consideration of phenoconversion may allow for an enhanced precision medicine approach to pain management in Veterans.

Multisite evaluation of institutional processes and implementation determinants for pharmacogenetic testing to guide antidepressant therapy.

There is growing interest in utilizing pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing to guide antidepressant use, but there is lack of clarity on how to implement testing into clinical practice. We administered two surveys at 17 sites that had implemented or were in the process of implementing PGx testing for antidepressants. Survey 1 collected data on the process and logistics of testing. Survey 2 asked sites to rank the importance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs using best-worst scaling choice experiments. Of the 17 sites, 13 had implemented testing and four were in the planning stage. Thirteen offered testing in the outpatient setting, and nine in both outpatient/inpatient settings. PGx tests were mainly ordered by psychiatry (92%) and primary care (69%) providers. CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 were the most commonly tested genes. The justification for antidepressants selected for PGx guidance was based on Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines (94%) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; 75.6%) guidance. Both institutional (53%) and commercial laboratories (53%) were used for testing. Sites varied on the methods for returning results to providers and patients. Sites were consistent in ranking CFIR constructs and identified patient needs/resources, leadership engagement, intervention knowledge/beliefs, evidence strength and quality, and the identification of champions as most important for implementation. Sites deployed similar implementation strategies and measured similar outcomes. The process of implementing PGx testing to guide antidepressant therapy varied across sites, but key drivers for successful implementation were similar and may help guide other institutions interested in providing PGx-guided pharmacotherapy for antidepressant management.

Evaluation of the Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) clinical program at initial test sites.

Aim: The first Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for the Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans pharmacogenomic clinical testing program is described. Materials & methods: Surveys evaluating implementation resources and processes were distributed to implementation teams, providers, laboratory and health informatics staff. Survey responses were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs to identify implementation barriers. The Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change strategies were used to address implementation barriers. Results: Survey response rate was 23-73% across personnel groups at six Veterans Affairs sites. Nine Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs were most salient implementation barriers. Program revisions addressed these barriers using the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change strategies related to three domains. Conclusion: Beyond providing free pharmacogenomic testing, additional implementation barriers need to be addressed for improved program uptake.

North Carolina's multi-institutional pharmacogenomics efforts with the North Carolina Precision Health Collaborative.

The North Carolina Precision Health Collaborative is an interdisciplinary, public-private consortium of precision health experts who strategically align statewide resources and strengths to elevate precision health in the state and beyond. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a key area of focus for the North Carolina Precision Health Collaborative. Experts from Atrium Health's Levine Cancer Institute, Duke University/Duke Health System, Mission Health and the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill/UNC Health System have collaborated since 2017 to implement strategic PGx initiatives, including basic sciences research, translational research and clinical implementation of germline testing into practice and policy. This institutional profile highlights major PGx programs and initiatives across these organizations and how the collaborative is working together to advance PGx science and implementation.

Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) clinical program.

In 2019, the Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated US healthcare system, started the Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) clinical program that provides multi-gene pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for up to 250,000 veterans at approximately 50 sites. PHASER is staggering program initiation at sites over a 5-year period from 2019 to 2023, as opposed to simultaneous initiation at all sites, to facilitate iterative program quality improvements through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Current resources in the PGx field have not focused on multisite, remote implementation of panel-based PGx testing. In addition to bringing large scale PGx testing to veterans, the PHASER program is developing a roadmap to maximize uptake and optimize the use of PGx to improve drug response outcomes.

Evaluation and optimization of a clinical pharmacist driven transitions of care model for malignant hematology.

PURPOSE: To implement and optimize a pilot transitions of care model for scheduled chemotherapy admissions in patients with hematologic malignancies at our institution.Methodology: We utilized the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) quality improvement technique to prospectively measure success of interventions related to improving transitions of care processes that occurred in multiple stages including development of standardized operating procedures, electronic medical record documentation, and education to the malignant hematology multidisciplinary group. Chart review was performed retrospectively for at least nine patients per PDSA cycle. Areas of intervention addressed and measured regarding communication between the ambulatory care and acute care settings included: admission purpose, processes related to insurance benefits investigations for specialty medications required in the post-discharge setting, and plan for growth factors, prophylactic antimicrobials, and follow-up.Results and conclusions: We included 28 patients and performed a total of three PDSA cycles demonstrating specific improvements in: communication regarding status of benefits investigations performed for specialty medications prior to admission, resolution of these benefits investigations at various time points, improvement in efficient use of the electronic medical record for chemotherapy orders, and patient instructions for appropriate use of prophylactic antimicrobials. Although improvement was noted initially with prescribing of discharge antiemetics and antimicrobials, regression to baseline was noted with the third PDSA cycle.

An Evaluation of the Effect of Pharmacist-Led Comprehensive Chemotherapy Consultation Services on Outpatient Appointment Adherence.

BACKGROUND: The North Carolina Cancer Hospital at the University of North Carolina Medical Center serves patients with a variety of malignant conditions and discharges more than 130 patients each month. Processes to improve transitions of care prompted implementation of a first-cycle, pharmacist-led chemotherapy consultation service on the inpatient oncology units. This process provides education to improve patient engagement and activation. High patient activation has been associated with better patient outcomes; poor patient activation has been associated with increased health care costs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of pharmacist-led comprehensive chemotherapy consultation services on adherence to outpatient follow-up appointments within 30 days of discharge. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review. This study consisted of 2 groups: adult patients who received comprehensive consultation services between April 2017 and September 2017 and a 2:1 historical group of adult control patients randomly selected from a list of patients who received their first cycle of chemotherapy during a hospital admission between April 2014 and April 2017. The primary endpoint was the effect of comprehensive consultation services on adherence to outpatient follow-up appointments within 1 month after discharge. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included in this study. The percentage of appointments attended was 98.0% for the intervention group and 92.3% for the control group (P = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pharmacy consultation in the inpatient oncology setting is associated with improved adherence to outpatient appointments within 30 days of discharge. This represents the first published data on pharmacist interventions resulting in improved outpatient appointment adherence. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was contributed by the Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA). This publication was also supported by Grant Number UL1TR002489 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences at the National Institutes of Health. Auten reports fees from PTCE and ASHP/ACCP, unrelated to this study. Clark reports consulting fees from Ellion Benson Research, unrelated to this study. The other authors do not have any conflicts of interest to report. This study was presented as a trainee poster on April 5, 2019, at the HOPA Ahead 15th Annual Conference in Fort Worth, TX.

A chemotherapy privileging process for advanced practice providers at an academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists are advanced practice providers who are highly trained and qualified healthcare professionals that can help support traditional demands on oncologists' increased time in direct patient care. The purpose of this study was to detail and assess the creation of a privileging process for this group of medical professionals within an academic medical center. Obtaining the designation of limited oncology practice provider (LOPP) gives the right to modify chemotherapy orders and to order supportive care medications. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team developed a comprehensive training process inclusive of required educational domains, knowledge goals, and educational activities to become an LOPP. In 2018, five years after the implementation of the privileging process, a survey was distributed to assess perceptions of the training process and integration of LOPPs within oncology practice. RESULTS: Most oncologists noted that working with LOPPs is beneficial to oncology practice (94%) and that they make modifying chemotherapy orders more efficient (87%). Greater than 82% of LOPPs also reported that their privileges streamline the chemotherapy process and make them feel valuable. CONCLUSION: The creation of the LOPP designation is an effective way to integrate nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists within oncology practice. The inclusion of a focused privileging process ensures the safety of cancer care provided and has created a streamlined process for chemotherapy modifications and supportive care.

Demonstrating the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team.

INTRODUCTION: Although many oncology pharmacists are embedded members within the healthcare team, data documenting their contributions to optimal patient outcomes are growing. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team and describe the knowledge, skills, and functions of the oncology pharmacist. METHODS: A systematic literature review of articles that were published on PubMed between January 1951 and October 2018 was completed. Identified abstracts were reviewed and included if they focused on measuring the value or impact of the oncology pharmacist on provider/patient satisfaction, improvement of medication safety, improvement of quality/clinical care outcomes, economics, and intervention acceptance. Review articles, meta-analysis, and studies not evaluating oncology pharmacist activities were excluded. Studies were thematically coded into four themes (clinical care, patient education, informatics, and cost savings) by 10 oncology pharmacists. RESULTS: Four-hundred twenty-two articles were identified, in which 66 articles met inclusion criteria for this review. The selected literature included 27 interventional and 38 descriptive studies. The value of the oncology pharmacist was demonstrated by published articles in four key themes: clinical care, patient education, informatics, and cost savings. CONCLUSION: With an expected shortage of oncology physicians and the ongoing development of complex oncology therapies, the board-certified oncology pharmacist is well suited to serve as a physician extender alongside nurse practitioners and/or physician assistants as the medication expert on the oncology care team. The demonstrated value of the oncology pharmacist supports their role as frontline providers of patient care.

Patient engagement in first cycle comprehensive chemotherapy consultation pharmacist services and impact on patient activation.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems and policy makers worldwide are demonstrating interest in shared decision making, which requires patient activation. Patient activation can be measured using a validated tool called the patient activation measure-10. First cycle comprehensive chemotherapy consultation services (3CS) is provided by an oncology pharmacy team member during a patient encounter at the beginning of the patient's treatment for cancer. METHODS: This was a single center, prospective, non-randomized, observational clinical study in patients with cancer who required a new chemotherapy plan. A baseline patient activation measure-10 survey was administered and a pharmacy team member met with the patient to complete the first cycle 3CS encounter. Within two business days of that encounter, a second patient activation measure-10 survey was administered, and thus, patients served as their own control. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, of which 36 completed the study. Mean patient activation measure-10 scores measured at baseline and two business days after the 3CS encounter were significantly different (68.5 ± SD 14.7 vs. 75.0 ± SD 14.3, p = 0.001). This difference persisted when evaluated by gender (female: 70.0 ± SD 14.8 vs. 81.6 ± SD 10.5, p = 0.001; male: 66.1 ± SD 14.8 vs. 70.8 ± SD 14.7, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that cancer patients had significantly increased patient activation scores after engagement in a 3CS encounter provided by an oncology pharmacy team. Further studies are needed to verify these data in a larger population, different healthcare settings, and to evaluate for patients who have solid tumor malignancies.

Layered learning pharmacy practice model in Ethiopia.

PURPOSE: Ethiopia is home to a growing population of more than 100 million people. Healthcare in the region functions with a shortage of oncologists. Pharmacists as well as other healthcare providers can assist with expanding patient access to cancer care. A pilot project was proposed to provide education, determine areas to expand pharmacy services in oncology, and recommend interventions at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital and Addis Ababa University. METHODS: A layered learning practice model comprising of a clinical pharmacist, a post-graduate year two oncology pharmacy resident, and two fourth-year student pharmacists was constructed for the experience. Through collaboration with the College of Pharmacy at Addis Ababa University, an international experience was developed to provide education and advance pharmacy practice at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. RESULTS: Based on findings from a needs assessment, the participants collaborated with key stakeholders to develop practices and procedures for the implementation of high-dose methotrexate and for comprehensive chemotherapy order review. In addition, 17 didactic lectures were provided to nine students enrolled in the Master of Pharmacy in Pharmacy Practice at the College of Pharmacy at Addis Ababa University. CONCLUSION: This experience provided educational and clinical impact using a layered learning practice model, consisting of a clinical pharmacist, pharmacy resident, and pharmacy students in an international setting. There is significant potential for clinical pharmacy to positively impact patient care in the oncology setting in Ethiopia. Future initiatives for advancement include the safe handling of hazardous agents, additional therapeutic drug monitoring, and outpatient oncology pharmacist practice.