The reporting of gastric band slip and related complications; a review of the literature.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity. Long-term complications include band slippage, gastric pouch dilatation and gastric erosion. Rates of band slippage reported in the literature range from less than 1% to over 20%. The aim of this review was to explore whether differences in the reporting of this complication contributed to the variability in this outcome measure. A full literature search was undertaken using EMBASE and MEDLINE search engines. Forty studies were selected for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each was scrutinised for outcome reporting methods and related fields. Accurate definitions for relevant terms were derived from the best available evidence. Considerable variations in device deployed, operative approach, band fixation technique, and outcome reporting mechanisms were seen between the studies. The explanation and definition of terms used within manuscripts were also seen to vary between studies. A consensus needs to be reached on how best to report complications such as gastric band slippage. We suggest which information should be included by authors to allow for accurate and reproducible reporting of such outcomes in the future.

Fixation of the access-port is not required in gastric banding.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is increasingly performed in patients with morbid obesity. Suturing of the access-port in LAGB can be difficult and time consuming but is felt necessary by many surgeons to prevent migration and facilitate band adjustments. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 226 patients underwent LAGB with the MIDband. All surgery was performed by the pars flaccida approach. The access-port was positioned in a subcutaneous pouch adjacent to the left hypochondrial port site and was not secured. Regular follow-up and band fills were offered. All band or port-related complications were duly recorded. A patient satisfaction survey was also conducted among 50 randomly selected post-banding patients. RESULTS: Mean age was 41.65 years (range 18-73 years) and mean BMI was 45.85 kg/m2 (range 34.0-74.93 kg/m2). The access-port was inaccessible at first attempt in 5 (2%) patients. 4 of these required radiological imaging to identify the port orientation and 1 required multiple attempts at port puncture with subsequent re-operation due to tube puncture. 91% of patients reported no significant trouble other than mild discomfort and prominence of the port. CONCLUSION: This study shows non-fixation of the access-port to be safe and effective with good patient acceptability. In addition, it avoids the need for regular X-ray localization of the port.