Clinical Capacity Building Through Partnerships: Boots on the Ground in Global Neurosurgery.

Global neurosurgery seeks to provide quality neurosurgical health care worldwide and faces challenges because of historical, socioeconomic, and political factors. To address the shortfall of essential neurosurgical procedures worldwide, dyads between established neurosurgical and developing centers have been established. Concerns have been raised about their effectiveness and ability to sustain capacity development. Successful partnerships involve multiple stakeholders, extended timelines, and twinning programs. This article outlines current initiatives and challenges within the neurosurgical community. This narrative review aims to provide a practical tool for colleagues embarking on clinical partnerships, the Engagements and assets, Capacity, Operative autonomy, Sustainability, and scalability (ECOSystem) of care. To create the ECOSystem of care in global neurosurgery, the authors had multiple online discussions regarding important points in the practical tool. All developed tiers were expanded based on logistics, clinical, and educational aspects. An online search was performed from August to November 2023 to highlight global neurosurgery partnerships and link them to tiers of the ECOSystem. The ECOSystem of care involves 5 tiers: Tiers 0 (foundation), 1 (essential), 2 (complexity), 3 (autonomy), and 4 (final). A nonexhaustive list of 16 neurosurgical partnerships was created and serves as a reference for using the ECOSystem. Personal experiences from the authors through their partnerships were also captured. We propose a tiered approach for capacity building that provides structured guidance for establishing neurosurgical partnerships with the ECOSystem of care. Clinical partnerships in global neurosurgery aim to build autonomy, enabling independent provision of quality healthcare services.

Achieving Equity Through Global Neurosurgery Research.

Since the release of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery report in 2015, there has been an increase in the number of published papers on global neurosurgery, gaining widespread support from major neurosurgery journals. However, there remains no consensus on what may be considered part of global neurosurgery literature. Here, we propose that global neurosurgery research encompasses all scholarly work that measure, explore, or address inequity in the care of neurosurgical disease. We describe the growth of global neurosurgery research, cite landmark papers, and discuss barriers to participation, particularly among neurosurgeons in low- and middle-income countries. We introduce the 3Rs framework, advocating for global neurosurgery research that is rigorous, responsive, and responsible. This narrative review aims to guide young neurosurgeons and other researchers interested in the field, and to provide a framework through which global neurosurgery practitioners and advocates can evaluate previously accomplished work, paving the way toward neurosurgery that is timely, safe, and affordable to all.

Education and Training in Global Neurosurgery: The Quest for Diversity and Equitable Collaborations.

Education and training are essential components of global neurosurgery because they provide a sustainable solution to address the workforce deficits in the neurosurgical burden of disease. Neurosurgery training programs and opportunities exist in most areas of the world, but some countries still lack formal mechanisms to train future generations. In this special article, we review the neurosurgical workforce deficit, characterize factors influencing the absence or inadequacy of neurosurgical training, and identify strategies that could facilitate global efforts in building a stronger workforce. We summarize the key neurosurgical training models worldwide and the factors influencing the standardization of neurosurgical education by region. In addition, we evaluate the "brain drain" issue in the larger context of the healthcare workforce and propose solutions to mitigate this phenomenon in neurosurgical practice. Future generations of neurosurgical trainees depend on our efforts to intensify and expand education and training in this new virtual era. As we look to the future, we must prioritize education to strengthen the future neurosurgeons who will lead and shape the frontiers of our field.

Global Neurosurgery: A Path Forward Through Health System Strengthening.

The future of global neurosurgery should focus on addressing the unmet neurosurgical need from a health system approach should we hope to achieve sustainable and ethical change. In this article, we review the global building blocks, as defined by the World Health Organization, and use this framework to propose strategies to strengthen neurosurgical care on the global frontier. The targets for Universal Healthcare Coverage by 2030, as outlined by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, are reviewed, and the role of neurosurgeons in addressing the global targets is discussed. Surgical indicators according to the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery are also reviewed, and neurosurgical indicators are proposed according to the 6 surgical indicators of the commission. The execution of these global targets and indicators within the context of health system strengthening will be a persistent challenge, given the complexity of health system and its components. The neurosurgical community must continue to support, promote, and diversify collaborations, especially among deserts of neurosurgical care across the world. Innovative technology and education are essential to this global dilemma.

Global Neurosurgery: An Overview.

In the following article, we define the practice of global neurosurgery and review the major historical events defining this movement within the larger context of global surgery. The current state of the neurosurgical workforce, disease burden, and ongoing collaborative efforts are highlighted. Ethical practice leading the sustainability is discussed, as well as future targets for the global community as we look beyond the next decade of opportunities to affect the neurosurgical burden of disease.

A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) are methods of data analysis used to synthesize information presented in multiple publications on the same topic. A thorough understanding of the steps involved in conducting this type of research and approaches to data analysis is critical for appropriate understanding, interpretation, and application of the findings of these reviews. METHODS: We reviewed reference texts in clinical neuroepidemiology, neurostatistics and research methods and other previously related articles on meta-analyses (MAs) in surgery. Based on existing theories and models and our cumulative years of expertise in conducting MAs, we have synthesized and presented a detailed pragmatic approach to interpreting MAs in Neurosurgery. RESULTS: Herein we have briefly defined SRs sand MAs and related terminologies, succinctly outlined the essential steps to conduct and critically appraise SRs and MAs. A practical approach to interpreting MAs for neurosurgeons is described in details. Based on summary outcome measures, we have used hypothetical examples to illustrate the Interpretation of the three commonest types of MAs in neurosurgery: MAs of Binary Outcome Measures (Pairwise MAs), MAs of proportions and MAs of Continuous Variables. Furthermore, we have elucidated on the concepts of heterogeneity, modeling, certainty, and bias essential for the robust and transparent interpretation of MAs. The basics for the Interpretation of Forest plots, the preferred graphical display of data in MAs are summarized. Additionally, a condensation of the assessment of the overall quality of methodology and reporting of MA and the applicability of evidence to patient care is presented. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of pragmatic guides to appraise MAs for surgeons who are non-statisticians. This article serves as a detailed guide for the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with examples of applications for clinical neurosurgeons.

Low-grade glioma of the temporal lobe and tumor-related epilepsy in children.

PURPOSE: Low-grade glioma is the most common brain tumor among children and adolescents. When these tumors arise in the temporal lobe, patients frequently present with seizures that are poorly controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Here we summarize the clinical features, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, surgical treatment, and outcomes of pediatric patients with low-grade gliomas in the temporal lobe. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on pediatric low-grade gliomas in the temporal lobe, focusing on cohort studies and systematic reviews that described surgical treatment strategies and reported both oncologic and epilepsy outcomes. RESULTS: The differential diagnoses of pediatric low-grade gliomas in the temporal lobe include ganglioglioma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma, papillary glioneuronal tumor, pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, angiocentric glioma, and polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young. There is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach for these tumors: lesionectomy alone, or extended lesionectomy with anterior temporal lobectomy, with or without removal of mesial temporal structures. Gross total resection and shorter preoperative duration of epilepsy are strongly associated with favorable seizure outcomes, defined as Engel Class I or Class II, approaching 90% in most series. The risk of surgical complications ranges from 4 to 17%, outweighing the lifetime risks of medically refractory epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with temporal low-grade glioma and tumor-related epilepsy are best managed by a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery team. Early and appropriate surgery leads to prolonged survival and a greater likelihood of seizure freedom, improving their overall quality of life.

The Neurosurgical Workforce of the Philippines.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: No study has comprehensively examined the delivery of neurosurgical care in the Philippines, a lower-middle-income country in Southeast Asia with a total population of 109 million. We aimed to quantify the workforce, map the distribution, and characterize the clinical practice of neurosurgeons across the 17 regions and 81 provinces of the Philippines. METHODS: An online survey was sent to all fellows of the Academy of Filipino Neurosurgeons and all graduates of neurosurgical training programs in the country. Neurosurgeons who have been in active clinical practice for at least 1 year were eligible to participate. A database of Filipino neurosurgeons was generated through personal communications, correspondence with neurosurgery departments, and accessing publicly available information. The top neurosurgical procedures were identified to estimate the overall volume of neurosurgical disease. RESULTS: There are 174 neurosurgeons practicing in the Philippines or approximately one neurosurgeon for every 600 000 people. In 9 provinces, neurosurgeons were only available part-time, and 35 provinces had no neurosurgeons at all, equivalent to an underserved population of 24 million people. Among 99 survey respondents, the median numbers of neurosurgical consults and operations every month were 30 (IQR:35) and 8 (IQR:8), respectively. The top neurosurgical procedures were burr holes/craniotomy for traumatic brain injury, craniotomy for stroke, and biopsy/resection of brain tumors. There are an estimated 93 498 cases requiring essential neurosurgery every year. CONCLUSION: Although positive trends have been observed in the number, distribution, and composition of neurosurgeons in the Philippines, there remains a large workforce deficit that needs to be addressed to provide timely, quality, and affordable neurosurgical care to the entire population.

Reducing the Gap in Neurosurgical Education in LMICs: A Report of a Non-Profit Educational Program.

INTRODUCTION: Central to neurosurgical care, neurosurgical education is particularly needed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where opportunities for neurosurgical training are limited due to social and economic constraints and an inadequate workforce. The present paper aims (1) to evaluate the validity and usability of a cadaver-free hybrid system in the context of LMICs and (2) to report their learning needs and whether the courses meet those needs via a comprehensive survey. METHODS: From April to November 2021, a non-profit initiative consisting of a series of innovative cadaver-free courses based on virtual and practical training was organized. This project emerged from a collaboration between the Young Neurosurgeons Forum of the World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS), the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, and UpSurgeOn, an Italian hi-tech company specialized in simulation technologies, creator of the UpSurgeOn Box, a hyper-realistic simulator of cranial approaches fused with augmented reality. Over that period, 11 cadaver-free courses were held in LMICs using remote hands-on Box simulators. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight participants completed an online survey after course completion of the course. The anatomical accuracy of simulators was overall rated high by the participant. The simulator provided a challenging but manageable learning curve, and 86% of participants found the Box to be very intuitive to use. When asked if the sequence of mental training (app), hybrid training (Augmented Reality), and manual training (the Box) was an effective method of training to fill the gap between theoretical knowledge and practice on a real patient/cadaver, 83% of participants agreed. Overall, the hands-on activities on the simulators have been satisfactory, as well as the integration between physical and digital simulation. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrated that a cadaver-free hybrid (virtual/hands-on) training system could potentially participate in accelerating the learning curve of neurosurgical residents, especially in the setting of limited training possibilities such as LMICs, which were only worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Greatest Healthcare Disparity: Addressing Inequities in the Treatment of Childhood Central Nervous System Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

The antithesis between childhood cancer survival rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC) represents one of healthcare's most significant disparities. In HICs, the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer, including most brain tumors, exceeds 80%. Unfortunately, children in LMICs experience far worse outcomes with 5-year survival rates as low as 20%. To address inequities in the treatment of childhood cancer and disease burden globally, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. Within this initiative, pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG) represents a unique opportunity for the neurosurgical community to directly contribute to a paradigm shift in the survival outcomes of children in LMICs, as many of these tumors can be managed with surgical resection alone. In this chapter, we discuss the burden of pediatric LGG and outline actions the neurosurgical community might consider to improve survival for children with LGG in LMICs.

The Role of Registries in Neurotrauma Research: Translating Data Into Health Policy That Enhances Patient Care Comment on "Neurotrauma Surveillance in National Registries of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Comparative Analysis of Data Dictionaries".

The paucity of robust neurotrauma data is felt most in regions that experience a higher burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The scoping review done by Barthélemy et al provides insight into the current state of national registries in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) while also exploring the tools required to standardize data collection. In this commentary, we reflect on the barriers to data collection (ie, creation and maintenance of a TBI registry) and explore how registries can aid both scientific output and preventative public awareness campaigns that may pave the way to improved health policy and social change that avert mortality and morbidity from TBI.

Needs, Roles, and Challenges of Young Asian Neurosurgeons.

BACKGROUND: Asia has a marked shortage of neurosurgical care, with approximately 2.5 million critical cases left untreated. The Young Neurosurgeons Forum of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies surveyed Asian neurosurgeons to identify research, education, and practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a pilot-tested e-survey was circulated to the Asian neurosurgical community from April to November 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize variables pertaining to demographics and neurosurgical practices. The chi-square test was used to explore the relationship between World Bank income level and variables on neurosurgical practices. RESULTS: A total of 242 responses were analyzed. Respondents were mostly from the low- and middle-income countries (70%). Most represented institutions were teaching hospitals (53%). More than 50% of the hospitals had between 25and 50 neurosurgical beds. Access to an operating microscope (P = 0.038) or image guidance system (P = 0.001) appeared to increase in correlation to a higher World Bank income level. Limited opportunities for conducting research (56%) and hands-on operating opportunities (45%) were leading challenges in daily academic practice. The leading challenges were limited numbers of intensive care unit beds (51%), inadequate or absent insurance coverage (45%), and lack of organized perihospital care (43%). Inadequate insurance coverage decreased with increasing World Bank income levels (P < 0.001). Organized perihospital care (P = 0.001), regular magnetic resonance imaging access (P = 0.032), and equipment necessary for microsurgery (P = 0.007) increased with higher World Bank income levels. CONCLUSIONS: Improving neurosurgical care hinges on regional and international collaboration and national policies to ensure universal access to essential neurosurgical care.

The role of neurosurgery in advancing pediatric CNS tumor care worldwide.

Introduction: There is substantial inequity in survival outcomes for pediatric brain tumor patients residing in high-income countries (HICs) compared to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address disparities in pediatric cancer survival, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC) to expand quality care for children with cancer. Research question: To provide an overview of pediatric neurosurgical capacity and detail the burden of neurosurgical diseases impacting children. Material and methods: A narrative review of the current context of global pediatric neurosurgical capacity as it relates to neurooncology and other diseases relevant to children. Results: In this article, we provide an overview of pediatric neurosurgical capacity and detail the burden of neurosurgical diseases impacting children. We highlight concerted advocacy and legislative efforts aimed at addressing unmet neurosurgical needs in children. Finally, we discuss the potential implications of advocacy efforts on treating pediatric CNS tumors and outline strategies to improve global outcomes for children with brain tumors worldwide in the context of the WHO GICC. Discussion and conclusion: With both global pediatric oncology and neurosurgical initiatives converging on the treatment of pediatric brain tumors, significant strides toward decreasing the burden of pediatric neurosurgical diseases will hopefully be made.

Time to Care: Analysis of Time Differences and Outcomes in the Management of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury for a High-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Country.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cranial trauma is the leading cause of acquired death and disability in children worldwide. However, trauma resources vary widely among countries. We sought to compare management and timely access to care between a level 1 U.S. pediatric trauma center and a tertiary referral hospital in a lower-middle-income country to assess whether system and resource differences influence care and outcomes. METHODS: We compared data from 214 pediatric head trauma admissions to Philippine General Hospital (Manila) with 136 children from the TRACK-TBI pediatrics study cohort at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Admitted MGH patients were compared with the Philippine cohort regarding demographics; mechanism of injury; times to neurosurgical consult, imaging, and surgery; in-hospital mortality; and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Age (9 years), gender distribution (67% male), and presenting Glasgow Coma Scale scores were similar (P = 0.10) between sites. More children had intracranial injury in the Philippine cohort (73% vs. 60%; n = 319) and more underwent neurosurgery (27% vs. 4%). Times to consult, imaging, and surgery were longer in the Philippines (12.3 vs. 6.5, 12.0 vs. 2.8, and 45.4 vs. 5.6 hours, respectively). In-hospital mortality across all admissions was similar between cohorts (3% vs. 0%; P = 0.09), but significantly higher in the most severe Philippines cases (31% vs. 0%, P=0.04). Length of stay was longer (5 vs. 2 days; P < 0.001) in the Philippine cohort. CONCLUSIONS: High-income country status correlated with faster care, shorter hospitalizations, and better outcomes among severe cases. Prompt care through sophisticated trauma system implementation may improve pediatric health in resource-limited settings.

Analysis of YouTube videos on hydrocephalus in the local language: matching content with the needs of caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: Studies that evaluate YouTube videos on hydrocephalus often exclude non-English-language videos, even though hydrocephalus is more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries where English may not be widely understood. This study had two aims: to analyze the engagement, content, and quality of YouTube videos on hydrocephalus in the Filipino language, and to determine whether the videos' content matched the information needs of caregivers of children with hydrocephalus in the Philippines. METHODS: The authors conducted an online survey among caregivers of patients with hydrocephalus, recruited through the Facebook page of the Hydrocephalus Foundation of the Philippines Inc. Data on demographics, social media use, and language and content preferences were collected. In parallel, the authors systematically evaluated the engagement and content of three groups of YouTube videos on hydrocephalus: 1) most viewed Filipino-language videos, 2) most viewed English-language videos, and 3) same-age English-language videos, matched to the first group based on upload date. The quality of the Filipino-language videos was assessed using the DISCERN criteria. RESULTS: Among 280 respondents, 91% watched videos on hydrocephalus online and 89% preferred videos in Filipino. Compared with same-age English videos, Filipino videos had greater engagement, indicated by a higher median number of likes (40 vs 8, p = 0.005) and comments (8.5 vs 1, p = 0.007). English and Filipino videos emphasized similar topics on hydrocephalus, but the latter were more likely to discuss treatment cost and to solicit donations. Caregivers were most interested in the long-term care of patients with hydrocephalus, discussed only in 10 of 72 videos (14%) overall. The mean DISCERN score for Filipino videos was 30.1 ± 7.7, indicating poor quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap between the information needs of Filipino caregivers and the content of YouTube videos on hydrocephalus. Neurosurgeons can serve as creators, resource persons, or curators of content, ensuring that up-to-date, accurate, and credible health information on hydrocephalus is available to caregivers in their preferred language.

Variation in postoperative outcomes of patients with intracranial tumors: insights from a prospective international cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the international variation in surgical neuro-oncology practice and 30-day outcomes of patients who had surgery for an intracranial tumor during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We prospectively included adults aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery for a malignant or benign intracranial tumor across 55 international hospitals from 26 countries. Each participating hospital recorded cases for 3 consecutive months from the start of the pandemic. We categorized patients' location by World Bank income groups (high [HIC], upper-middle [UMIC], and low- and lower-middle [LLMIC]). Main outcomes were a change from routine management, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 30-day mortality. We used a Bayesian multilevel logistic regression stratified by hospitals and adjusted for key confounders to estimate the association between income groups and mortality. RESULTS: Among 1016 patients, the number of patients in each income group was 765 (75.3%) in HIC, 142 (14.0%) in UMIC, and 109 (10.7%) in LLMIC. The management of 200 (19.8%) patients changed from usual care, most commonly delayed surgery. Within 30 days after surgery, 14 (1.4%) patients had a COVID-19 diagnosis and 39 (3.8%) patients died. In the multivariable model, LLMIC was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 2.83, 95% credible interval 1.37-5.74) compared to HIC. CONCLUSIONS: The first wave of the pandemic had a significant impact on surgical decision-making. While the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days after surgery was low, there was a disparity in mortality between countries and this warrants further examination to identify any modifiable factors.

Pediatric Neurosurgical Capacity for the Care of Children With CNS Tumors Worldwide: A Cross-Sectional Assessment.

PURPOSE: Efforts to address inequities in the treatment of pediatric CNS tumors and the burden of childhood cancer globally have prompted the designation of low-grade glioma as one of six index cancers for the World Health Organization Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. Understanding the importance of neurosurgical interventions and evaluating pediatric neurosurgical capacity may identify critical interventions to improve outcomes for children with low-grade glioma and other CNS tumors. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey assessing pediatric neurosurgical practice and capacity was distributed to members of the International Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery. The survey included 36 items covering domains including patient volume, available infrastructure, scope of practice, case distribution, and multidisciplinary care. RESULTS: Responses from 196 individuals from 61 countries, spanning all WHO regions, were included. Ninety-six (49.0%) were from high-income countries, 57 (29.1%) were from upper-middle-income countries, 42 (21.4%) were from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 1 was (0.5%) from a low-income country. Most respondents had a catchment population of ≥ 1 million and indicated the availability of basic neurosurgical resources such as a dedicated neurosurgical operating theater and surgical microscope. The presence of a neurosurgical intensive care unit, inpatient rehabilitation services, and infection monitoring showed similar availability across country groups. Quantitative scoring of 13 infrastructure and service items established that fewer resources were available in low-income countries/LMICs and upper-middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. The volume of pediatric CNS tumor cases and case distribution did not vary according to World Bank country groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of pediatric neurosurgical capacity across the globe, establishing variability of resources on the basis of the country income level. Our findings suggest that pediatric neurosurgeons in LMICs may benefit from key neurosurgical instrumentation and increased support for multidisciplinary brain tumor programs and childhood cancer research efforts.

Global Epidemiology of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Craniosynostosis leads to craniofacial deformity and may result in raised intracranial pressure, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial issues if left untreated. The global epidemiology of craniosynostosis is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate global birth prevalence. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Articles were screened by title and abstract and then full text. Meta-analysis of birth prevalence was conducted. Birth prevalence figures were combined with metrics detailing the number of births in 2019 to estimate the number of children worldwide born with craniosynostosis annually. RESULTS: Of 1378 resultant articles, 24 studies were included, including 20 providing data for craniosynostosis overall and 9 for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. World Health Organization regions of included studies were 9 (37.5%) European Region, 8 (33.3%) Region of the Americas, 4 (16.7%) Western Pacific region, 2 (8.3%) African Region, and 1 (4.2%) Eastern Mediterranean Region. Lower middle-income countries represented only 4% of study manuscripts. The overall birth prevalence of craniosynostosis was 5.9 per 10,000 live births (20 studies; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4; I2 = 100%). The birth prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 5.2 per 10,000 live births (9 studies; 95% CI: 3.4, 7.3; I2 = 98%). The number of children born globally with craniosynostosis in 2019 was estimated to be 84,665 (95% CI: 55,965, 120,540), including 72,857 (95% CI: 47,637, 120,280) with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Craniosynostosis is a common condition that affects the neurocognitive and craniofacial skeletal development of children worldwide. Initiatives to scale up capacity for craniosynostosis epidemiologic research and clinical care are warranted, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

The Value and Potential of Qualitative Research Methods in Neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value and potential of qualitative research to neurosurgery and provide insight and understanding to this underused methodology. METHODS: The definition of qualitative research is critically discussed and the heterogeneity within this field of inquiry explored. The value of qualitative research to the field of neurosurgery is articulated through its contribution to understanding complex clinical problems. DISCUSSION: To resolve some of the misunderstanding of qualitative research, this paper discusses research design choices. We explore approaches that use qualitative techniques but are not, necessarily, situated within a qualitative paradigm in addition to how qualitative research philosophy aids researchers to conduct interpretive inquiry that can reveal more than simply what was said by participants. Common research designs associated with qualitative inquiry are introduced, and how complex analysis may contribute more in-depth insights is explained. Approaches to quality are discussed briefly to support improvements in qualitative methods and qualitative manuscripts. Finally, we consider the future of qualitative research in neurosurgery, and suggest how to move forward in the qualitative neurosurgical evidence base. CONCLUSIONS: There is enormous potential for qualitative research to contribute to the advancement of person-centered care within neurosurgery. There are signs that more qualitative research is being conducted and that neurosurgical journals are increasingly open to this methodology. While studies that do not engage fully within the qualitative paradigm can make important contributions to the evidence base, due regard should be given to immersive inquiry within qualitative paradigms to allow complex, in-depth, investigations of the human experience.