Impact of COVID-19 on posttraumatic stress disorder in ICU survivors: a prospective observational comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) can affect one in five ICU survivors. At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, admission to the ICU for COVID-19 was stressful due to the severity of this disease. This study assessed whether admission to the ICU for COVID-19 was associated with a higher prevalence of PTSD compared with other causes of ICU admission after adjustment for pre-ICU psychological factors. METHODS: This prospective observational comparative cohort study included 31 ICUs. Eligible patients were adult ICU survivors hospitalized during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in France, regardless of the reason for admission. The prevalence of presumptive diagnosis of PTSD at 6 months was assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Sociodemographics, clinical data, history of childhood trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire [CTQ]), and exposure to potentially traumatic events (Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 [LEC-5]) were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 778 ICU survivors included during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in France, 417 and 361 were assigned to the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts, respectively. Fourteen (4.9%) and 11 (4.9%), respectively, presented with presumptive diagnosis of PTSD at 6 months (p = 0.976). After adjusting for age, sex, severity score at admission, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU duration, CTQ and LEC-5, COVID-19 status was not associated with presumptive diagnosis of PTSD using the PCL-5. Only female sex was associated with presumptive diagnosis of PTSD. However, COVID-19 patients reported significantly more intrusion and avoidance symptoms than non-COVID patients (39% vs. 29%, p = 0.015 and 27% vs. 19%, p = 0.030), respectively. The median PCL-5 score was higher in the COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 cohort (9 [3, 20] vs. 4 [2, 16], p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Admission to the ICU for COVID-19 was not associated with a higher prevalence of PTSD compared with admission for another cause during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. However, intrusion and avoidance symptoms were more frequent in COVID-19 patients than in non-COVID-19 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03991611, registered on June 19, 2019.

The Effects of a Laparoscopy by Single-Port Endoscopic Access in Benign Adnexal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) offers advantages over conventional laparoscopy (CL) in benign adnexal surgery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. SETTING: Gynecology-Obstetrics Unit of the University Hospital of the Conception in Marseille, France. PATIENTS: Patients older than 18 years requiring ovarian cystectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy by laparoscopy for symptomatic ovarian cysts requiring benign or prophylactic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: In the case of ovarian cysts, premenopausal patients typically undergo a unilateral cystectomy, whereas postmenopausal patients undergo a unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy upon a patient's request. In cases requiring prophylactic surgery, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. All participants were randomly assigned to either the LESS or the CL group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients in both groups reported similar levels of pain at 24 hours: Simple Numerical Scale was 1.3 (standard deviation, 1.5) in the LESS group vs 1.7 (standard deviation, 1.5) in the CL group (p = .12), and there were no significant differences in postoperative pain at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 7 days. Furthermore, there was no difference in analgesic consumption. Regarding intraoperative criteria, the only difference was the longer operating time in the LESS group than the CL group. We also found that patients' satisfaction with their scar at 1 month may be higher with LESS than with CL. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the 2 techniques in postoperative pain, although the LESS technique necessitated a longer operative time than the CL technique, while providing better aesthetic result patients.

ON/OFF non-motor evaluation: a new way to evaluate non-motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: NMF are currently poorly evaluated in therapeutic decisions. A quantification of their severity would facilitate their integration. The objective of this study was to validate an autoquestionnaire evaluating the severity of non-motor fluctuations (NMF) in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Patients with PD were included in presurgical situation for deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nuclei. They participated in the PREDISTIM cohort (a study evaluating the predictive factors for therapeutic response of subthalamic stimulation in PD) in 17 centres in France. Our questionnaire, resulting from previous phases of development, included 11 non-motor symptoms (NMS). Their severity ranged from 0 to 10 and was assessed in OFF and then ON-Dopa to study their fluctuations. RESULTS: 310 patients were included, of whom 98.8% had NMS and 98.0% had NMF. Each NMS was significantly improved by L-Dopa (decrease in severity score ranging from 43.1% to 69.9%). Fatigue was the most frequent and most severe NMS. NMS were considered more bothersome than motor symptoms by 37.5% of patients in OFF-Dopa and 34.9% in ON-Dopa. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first questionnaire allowing a real-time quantification of the severity of NMS and their fluctuation with levodopa. It was able to confirm and measure the effect of L-dopa and show differences according to the patients and the NMS. It differs from other questionnaires by its measurement at a precise moment of the severity of the NMS, allowing its use during pretherapeutic assessments.Our questionnaire has been validated to measure the severity of NMF. It will be able to quantify the non-motor effect of anti-parkinsonian treatments and could facilitate the integration of NMF in therapeutic decisions.

Health care management adequacy among French persons with severe profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: The care organization of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) varies by country according to the health care system. This study used a large sample of French individuals with severe PIMD/polyhandicap to assess: 1) the adequacy of care setting over a 5-year period and 2) health care consumption. METHODS: The longitudinal study used data from the French EVALuation PoLyHandicap (EVAL-PLH) cohort of persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap who were receiving managed in specialized care centres and residential facilities. Two assessments were performed: wave 1 (T1) in 2015-2016 and wave 2 (T2) in 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old; and severe PIMD. The adequacy of the care setting was based on the following: i) objective indicators, i.e., adequacy for age and adequacy for health status severity; ii) subjective indicators, i.e., self-perception of the referring physician about medical care adequacy and educational care adequacy. Health care consumption was assessed based on medical and paramedical care. RESULTS: Among the 492 persons assessed at the 2 times, 50% of individuals at T1 and 46% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting based on age and severity. Regarding global subjective inadequacy, the combination of medical adequacy and educational adequacy, 7% of individuals at T1 and 13% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting. At T2, a majority of individuals were undermonitored by medical care providers (general practitioners, physical medicine rehabilitation physicians, neurologists, orthopaedists, etc.). Important gaps were found between performed and prescribed sessions of various paramedical care (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychomotor therapy, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed key elements of inadequate care management for persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap in France. Based on these important findings, healthcare workers, familial caregivers, patients experts, and health decision-makers should develop appropriate care organizations to optimize the global care management of these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02400528, registered 27/03/2015.

Legalisation of euthanasia and assisted suicide: advanced cancer patient opinions - cross-sectional multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: The French government voted a new law in February 2016 called the Claeys-Leonetti Law, which established the right to deep and continuous sedation, confirmed the ban on euthanasia and ruled out physician-assisted suicide. The aim of this work was to gather the opinion of patients on continuous sedation and the legalisation of medical assistance in dying and to explore determinants associated with favourable and unfavourable opinions. METHODS: This was a French national prospective multicentre study between 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: 331 patients with incurable cancer suffering from locally advanced or metastatic cancer in 14 palliative care units were interviewed. 48.6% of participants expressed a favourable opinion about physician-assisted suicide and 27.2% an unfavourable opinion about its legalisation. Regarding euthanasia, 52% of patients were in favour of its legalisation. In univariate analysis, the only factor determining opinion was belief in God. CONCLUSIONS: While most healthy French people are in favour of legalising euthanasia, only half of palliative care patients expressed this opinion. Medical palliative care specialists were largely opposed to euthanasia. The only determining factor identified was a cultural factor that was independent of the other studied variables. This common factor was found in other studies conducted on cohorts from other countries. This study contributes to the knowledge and thinking about the impact of patients' personal beliefs and values regarding their opinions about euthanasia and assisted suicide. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03664856.

Development and initial validation of a screening tool for visual ability/performance of people with polyhandicap.

BACKGROUND: Visual impairments are common in people with polyhandicap although they are poorly assessed. However, evaluation of the visual abilities of these people is critical to determining treatment for impairments. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an easy-to-use visual-behavioural scale for assessing the visual abilities of people with polyhandicap. METHODS: The development of the Visual Assessment for People with Polyhandicap (VA-PLH) involved 2 steps: i) construction of the scale and ii) field validation. Participant selection criteria were aged > 3 years, age at onset of cerebral lesion < 3 years, a combination of motor impairment and profound intellectual impairment associated with restricted mobility (Gross Motor Function Classification System levels [GMFCS] III, IV or V), and everyday life dependence (Functional Independency Measure [FIM] <55). Vision assessment by both an orthoptist and an ophthalmologist was the reference against which were analysed the items of the scale completed by local health care workers. Acceptability, validity, and reliability were analysed. RESULTS: Amongst the 232 participants included, 217 had a complete assessment, and 33% were < 18 years of age. Ocular abnormalities were reported in 83% of participants. Visual ability was altered or insufficient in 60% of participants. The final version of the VA-PLH included 3 items related to visual reaction (Area Under Curve Receiver Operating Characteristic = 0.83). Participants were considered at-risk if they had at ≥ 1 of 3 signs present (sensitivity 83% and specificity 73%). The scale's reliability was satisfactory CONCLUSION: The VA-PLH scale provides an easy-to-use, reliable and valid measure of visual status for people with polyhandicap and may be used both in clinical practice and clinical research. In addition, this study provides an overview of the diversity of visual impairments in a large population of people with polyhandicap, showing that most experience visual challenges.

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy versus botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: results of a double-blind randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising technique for treating refractory gastroparesis. We present the first double-blind randomized study comparing the clinical efficacy of G-POEM versus pyloric botulinum toxin injection (BTI). METHODS: This randomized study, conducted in two expert centers, enrolled patients with refractory gastroparesis, medically managed for >6 months and confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), into two groups, G-POEM versus BTI, with follow-up of 1 year. The primary end point was the 3-month clinical efficacy, defined as a >1-point decrease in the mean Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score. Secondary end points were: 1-year efficacy, GES evolution, adverse events, and quality of life. RESULTS: 40 patients (22 women; mean age 48.1 [SD 17.4]), with mean symptom duration of 5.8 (SD 5.7) years, were randomized. Etiologies included idiopathic (n=18), diabetes (n=11), postoperative (n=6), and mixed (n=4). G-POEM showed a higher 3-month clinical success than BTI (65% vs. 40%, respectively; P=0.10), along with non-significantly higher 1-year clinical success (60% vs. 40%, respectively) on intention-to-treat analysis. The GCSI decreased in both groups at 3 months and 1 year. Only three minor adverse events occurred in the G-POEM group. The GES improvement rate was 72% in the G-POEM group versus 50% in the BTI group (non-significant). CONCLUSION: G-POEM seems to have a higher clinically relevant success rate than BTI, but this was not statistically demonstrated. This study confirms the interest in treatments targeting the pylorus, either mechanically or chemically, for managing refractory gastroparesis.

Polyhandicap, profound intellectual multiple disabilities : Concept and definition of a highly specific public health issue.

OBJECTIVES: The concept of polyhandicap first emerged in the late '60s in France, with actually a consensus on its definition. This consensus has yet to be reached internationally. The absence of an international consensus on a definition and name for persons with polyhandicap limits progress in research and health planning for these people. METHODS: This article describes the history of the emergence of the concept of polyhandicap in France and internationally. RESULTS: The emergence of the concept and definition of polyhandicap is part of the history of the development of special education and care for children with disabilities started at the end of the 19th century and during the first half of the 20th century. In France, between 1970 and 2002, working groups composed of professionals and family associations gradually developed and refined the definition of polyhandicap, differentiating it from other clinical entities such as cerebral palsy. Internationally, the term polyhandicap is used in 4 European countries: in France where it first appeared, in Italy, in French-speaking Belgium, and in French-speaking Switzerland but also outside the EU. Various terms may be used around the world to describe clinical entities similar to polyhandicap; the most frequently used in the literature is the term Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities (PIMD) or PIMD Spectrum which does not systematically refer to an early brain injury. DISCUSSION: We are currently in the process of internationalizing the concept and definition of polyhandicap, and hopefully, as was the case for cerebral palsy in the 2000s, the various research teams working on this subject around the world will create collaborations and research networks targeting this specific population. CONCLUSION: A consensus around a precise definition of polyhandicap is important to ensure that these people are recognized for their uniqueness and specific qualities and to provide them adapted care.

Parents' experiences of parenting a child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in France: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Parents of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) play a major and often lifelong role in the care and support of their child. A better understanding of parents' perspectives regarding their experiences of parenting their child with PIMD is essential to support them more effectively. Although this topic has been explored extensively in Anglo-Saxon and Northern European countries, little is known about the experience of these parents in a highly institutionalized context such as that in France. OBJECTIVE: We explored parents' experiences of the activities they performed to care for their child with PIMD (namely, the 'parenting work') in the French context. METHOD: Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone with 34 parents of persons with PIMD aged 8-35. The resulting data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The analysis highlighted the diversity of activities performed by parents as well as the influence of context on the forms of this parenting work. Five themes were developed: (1) navigating the challenges of obtaining medical recognition; (2) negotiating a concealed domain and becoming an expert; (3) unfolding medical and medicosocial care management; (4) navigating the challenges of daily living and (5) shaping one's child's possibilities. CONCLUSION: This study offers a better understanding of the challenges, levers and expectations of parents of children with PIMD in France. Contextual factors such as the lack of knowledge of PIMD among health professionals, access to knowledge and know-how associated with care management, the administrative complexity of access to care and equipment, institutional issues (e.g., professional turnover) and societal ableism (e.g., access to infrastructures, interpersonal discrimination) shape the work parents perform to support their child's needs. It is necessary to consider contextual aspects to better support these parents and their children. Suggestions for applications are provided in the discussion. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: One of the researchers, a parent of a child with PIMD, supported the research design and provided feedback on the study's procedures and manuscript.

Effectiveness of Surgeon-Performed Paravertebral Block Analgesia for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In minimally invasive thoracic surgery, paravertebral block (PVB) using ultrasound (US)-guided technique is an efficient postoperative analgesia. However, it is an operator-dependent process depending on experience and local resources. Because pain-control failure is highly detrimental, surgeons may consider other locoregional analgesic options. Objective: To demonstrate the noninferiority of PVB performed by surgeons under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), hereafter referred to as PVB-VATS, as the experimental group compared with PVB performed by anesthesiologists using US-guided technique (PVB-US) as the control group. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-center, noninferiority, patient-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted from September 8, 2020, to December 8, 2021, patients older than 18 years who were undergoing a scheduled minimally invasive thoracic surgery with lung resection including video-assisted or robotic approaches were included. Exclusion criteria included scheduled open surgery, any antalgic World Health Organization level greater than 2 before surgery, or a medical history of homolateral thoracic surgery. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to an intervention group after general anesthesia. They received single-injection PVB before the first incision was made in the control group (PVB-US) or after 1 incision was made under thoracoscopic vision in the experimental group (PVB-VATS). Interventions: PVB-VATS or PVB-US. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was mean 48-hour post-PVB opioid consumption considering a noninferiority range of less than 7.5 mg of opioid consumption between groups. Secondary outcomes included time of anesthesia, surgery, and operating room occupancy; 48-hour pain visual analog scale score at rest and while coughing; and 30-day postoperative complications. Results: A total of 196 patients were randomly assigned to intervention groups: 98 in the PVB-VATS group (mean [SD] age, 64.6 [9.5] years; 53 female [54.1%]) and 98 in the PVB-US group (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [11.5] years; 62 male [63.3%]). The mean (SD) of 48-hour opioid consumption in the PVB-VATS group (33.9 [19.8] mg; 95% CI, 30.0-37.9 mg) was noninferior to that measured in the PVB-US group (28.5 [18.2] mg; 95% CI, 24.8-32.2 mg; difference: -5.4 mg; 95% CI, -∞ to -0.93; noninferiority Welsh test, P ≤ .001). Pain score at rest and while coughing after surgery, overall time, and postoperative complications did not differ between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: PVB placed by a surgeon during thoracoscopy was noninferior to PVB placed by an anesthesiologist using ultrasonography before incision in terms of opioid consumption during the first 48 hours. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04579276.

BDNF as potential biomarker of epilepsy severity and psychiatric comorbidity: pitfalls in the clinical population.

BACKGROUND: Several studies implicate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. In particular, preclinical data suggest that lower serum BDNF is a biomarker of epilepsy severity and psychiatric comorbidities. We tested this prediction in clinical epilepsy cohorts. METHODS: Patients with epilepsy were recruited from 4 epilepsy centers in France and serum BDNF was quantified. Clinical characteristics including epilepsy duration, classification, localization, etiology, seizure frequency and drug resistance were documented. Presence of individual anti-seizure medications (ASM) was noted. Screening for depression and anxiety symptoms was carried out in all patients using the NDDI-E and the GAD-7 scales. In patients with positive screening for anxiety and/or depression, detailed psychiatric testing was performed including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), STAI-Y, Holmes Rahe Stressful Events Scale and Beck Depression Interview. Descriptive analysis was applied. Spearman's test and Pearson's co-efficient were used to assess the association between BDNF level and continuous variables. For discrete variables, comparison of means (Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney u-test) was used to compare mean BDNF serum level between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed using a regression model. RESULTS: No significant correlation was found between serum BDNF level and clinical features of epilepsy or measures of depression. The main group-level finding was that presence of any ASM at was associated with increased BDNF; this effect was particularly significant for valproate and perampanel. CONCLUSION: Presence of ASM affects serum BDNF levels in patients with epilepsy. Future studies exploring BDNF as a possible biomarker of epilepsy severity and/or psychiatric comorbidity must control for ASM effects.

Determinants of adherence and consequences of the transition from adolescence to adulthood among young people with severe haemophilia (TRANSHEMO): A multicentric French national observational cross-sectional study based on the FranceCoag registry.

INTRODUCTION: It is necessary to gain insights into adherence to healthcare in people with severe haemophilia (PwSH), especially during the transition from paediatric to adult care, which is an important phase in lives of young people with childhood chronic disease. This adherence can be considered as a marker of successful transition. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the quantitative phase of the TRANSHEMO project was to compare the adherence to healthcare between adolescents and young adults (YAs) with severe haemophilia. The secondary objective was to identify the determinants (facilitators and barriers) of this adherence and associations between these determinants. METHODS: A multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017-2019 on PwSH aged between 14 and 17 years (adolescents) or between 20 and 29 years (YAs), included in the FranceCoag registry and having completed the questionnaires. The adherence to healthcare (treatment regimens and clinical follow-up) was compared between adolescents and YAs using the chi-squared test. The determinants of this adherence were analysed by structural equation modelling. RESULTS: There were 277 participants, 107 adolescents, and 170 YAs. The rate of adolescents adhering to healthcare was 82.2%, while the rate of YAs was 61.2% (p < .001). The barriers to the adherence to healthcare were being YA, having repeated at least one school grade and presenting mental health concerns. CONCLUSION: Adolescents had better adherence to healthcare than YAs. According to the determinants enlightened in this project, targeted supportive strategies and adapted therapeutic education programs can be developed for young PwSH to facilitate their adherence to healthcare.

Standardized Stretching Postural postures to treat low-back pain in pregnancy: the GEMALODO randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Two-thirds of pregnant women suffer from low-back pain during pregnancy, which leads to negative effects on quality of everyday life. According to the literature, an 8- to 12-week program of adapted physical activity during pregnancy has proven its efficacy in treatment of low-back pain and functional disability. Stretching Postural is a nondynamic technique using muscular contractions and stretches that act mainly on the back and that can be practiced alone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of an 8-week program of standardized Stretching Postural postures in low-risk pregnant women suffering from low-back pain. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial in 1 French university hospital. Women with a singleton low-risk pregnancy between 15 and 32 weeks of gestation and with back, lumbar, or sacroiliac pain were randomly assigned (1:1) to either undergo an 8-week program of standardized Stretching Postural with basic advice (intervention group) or to receive basic advice only (control group). Both groups received ergonomic advice and encouragement to practice physical activity. The primary endpoint was the pain assessment at 8 weeks (defined by the mean pain level estimated by women in the previous week, scored on a numeric scale from 0 to 10). Secondary endpoints were pain after 4 weeks of follow-up, quality of life (12-item Short Form Survey), satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Change), and delivery outcomes. The main analysis was intention-to-treat. RESULTS: From January 2019 to August 2020, 60 women were randomized: 30 were assigned to the intervention group and 30 to the control group. The mean level of pain at 8 weeks was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (1.6±1.4 vs 4.1±2.2; P<.01). The mean 12-item Short Form Survey scores were significantly higher in the posture group than in the control group (Physical Component Score, 45.7±7.8 vs 37.4±8.5; P<.01; Mental Component Score, 54.3±5.8 vs 50.4±7.1; P=.04), and the Patient Global Impression of Change score was also significantly higher (6.1±1.5 vs 3.9±2.3; P<.01). No adverse effects were found. CONCLUSION: Stretching Postural appears to be a safe and efficient nondrug therapy to treat low-back pain during low-risk pregnancy.

Interferential therapy for chronic constipation in adults: The CON-COUR randomizedcontrolled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation (CC) is a frequent condition, and the first-line treatment includes dietary rules, the use of laxatives, and biofeedback for evacuation disorders. However, almost half of the patients are dissatisfied with their current treatment. We report the first double-blind randomized multicenter trial assessing the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical stimulation by interferential therapy (IFT) in the treatment of CC in adults. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was conducted at 7 centers in France. The primary endpoint was 8-week efficacy as defined by the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements during the last 4 weeks of the 8-week stimulation period. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the effects of IFT on symptoms (Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnair (PAC-SYM)), quality of life (QOL) (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life), Colonic transit time (CTT), anorectal manometry, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The proportion of 8-week responders was not significantly different between the two groups (73.2% in the IFT group vs. 67.1% in the sham group). After 8 weeks of stimulation, the mean overall PAC-SYM score and the mean reduction in the overall PAC-SYM score were significantly greater in the IFT group than in the sham group. No differences were observed concerning CTT, anorectal manometry, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, IFT can significantly alleviate the symptoms and improve the QOL of CC patients. It can be assumed that new treatments require different modes of evaluation and that the assessment of patient-reported outcomes may become a priority among therapeutic targets of CC. Trial registration number NCT02381665.

The falciform/round ligament "flooring," an effective method to reduce life-threatening post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage occurrence.

PURPOSE: Late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) represents the most severe complication after pancreatic surgery. We have measured the efficacy of major vessels "flooring" with falciform/round ligament to prevent life-threatening grade C late PPH after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent PD and DP between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed on a prospectively maintained database. The cohort was divided in two groups: "flooring" vs. "no flooring" method group. The "no flooring" group had omental flap interposition. Patient characteristics and operative and postoperative data including clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), late PPH (grade B and C), and 90-day mortality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty patients underwent pancreatic resections, including 143 PD and 97 DP. The "flooring" method was performed in 61 patients (39 PD and 22 DP). No difference was found between the two groups concerning severe morbidity, CR-POPF, delayed PPH, and mortality rate. The rate of patients requiring postoperative intensive care unit was lower in the "flooring" than in the "no flooring" method group (11.5% vs. 25.1%, p = 0.030). Among patients with grade B/C late PPH (n = 30), the rate of life-threatening grade C late PPH was lower in the "flooring" than in the "no flooring" method group (28.6% (n = 2/7) vs. 82.6% (n = 19/24), p = 0.014). Risk factor analysis showed that the "flooring" method was the only protective factor against grade C late PPH occurrence (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The "flooring" method using the falciform/round ligament should be considered during pancreatectomies to reduce the occurrence of life-threatening grade C late PPH.

Awake prone position in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: a randomised crossover study using electrical impedance tomography.

Background: The goal of this study was to determine whether an awake prone position (aPP) reduces the global inhomogeneity (GI) index of ventilation measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Methods: This prospective crossover study included COVID-19 patients with COVID-19 and ARF defined by arterial oxygen tension:inspiratory oxygen fraction (P aO2 :F IO2 ) of 100-300 mmHg. After baseline evaluation and 30-min EIT recording in the supine position (SP), patients were randomised into one of two sequences: SP-aPP or aPP-SP. At the end of each 2-h step, oxygenation, respiratory rate, Borg scale and 30-min EIT were recorded. Results: 10 patients were randomised in each group. The GI index did not change in the SP-aPP group (baseline 74±20%, end of SP 78±23% and end of aPP 72±20%, p=0.85) or in the aPP-SP group (baseline 59±14%, end of aPP 59±15% and end of SP 54±13%, p=0.67). In the whole cohort, P aO2 :F IO2 increased from 133±44 mmHg at baseline to 183±66 mmHg in aPP (p=0.003) and decreased to 129±49 mmHg in SP (p=0.03). Conclusion: In spontaneously breathing nonintubated COVID-19 patients with ARF, aPP was not associated with a decrease of lung ventilation inhomogeneity assessed by EIT, despite an improvement in oxygenation.

Does fecal calprotectin increase may be linked to lactose intolerance in patients with irritable bowel syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a multifactorial condition without any specific investigation. Fecal calprotectin (FC) may be elevated in IBS without any explanation. In addition, some patients with IBS have symptoms related to lactose intolerance. Our main aim was to investigate whether an increase in FC could be related to lactose intolerance in patients with IBS. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, all patients with IBS who have underwent a FC test and a lactose respiratory test within a period of less than 6 months were eligible. A FC greater than or equal to 50 µg/g was considered abnormal. RESULTS: Severnty-six patients (48 females), mean age 38±15 years were included. Symptoms were respectively: bloating in 57%, diarrhea in 76% and abdominal pain in 46% of cases. Among the 76 patients: 22 (29%) had FC≥50 µg/g and 9/22 (41%) had a positive lactose test. No significant relationship could be identified between the increase in FC and the lactose test positivity. The value of the FC was also not related to the subtype of IBS or the positivity of the glucose test. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the increase in FC was not significantly related to the presence of lactose intolerance. Nevertheless, our work, despite its originality, is limited by its retrospective nature and small number of patients. Future studies including larger numbers of patients may identify the causes of elevated FC in patients with IBS to individualize different subgroups of patients to best adapt therapeutic management.

Mortality among inpatients with bipolar disorders and COVID-19: a propensity score matching analysis in a national French cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with bipolar disorders (BDs) are at an increased risk of mortality. We aimed to establish whether health outcomes and care differed between patients infected with COVID-19 with BD and patients without a diagnosis of severe mental illness. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of all patients with identified COVID-19 and respiratory symptoms who were hospitalized in France between February and June 2020. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: In total, 50 407 patients were included, of whom 480 were patients with BD. Patients with BD were 2 years older, more frequently women and had more comorbidities than controls without a diagnosis of severe mental illness. Patients with BD had an increased in-hospital mortality rate (26.6% v. 21.9%; p = 0.034) and similar ICU admission rate (27.9% v. 28.4%, p = 0.799), as confirmed by propensity analysis [odds ratio, 95% confidence interval (OR, 95% CI) for mortality: 1.30 (1.16-1.45), p < 0.0001]. Significant interactions between BD and age and between BD and social deprivation were found, highlighting that the most important inequalities in mortality were observed in the youngest [OR, 95% CI 2.28 (1.18-4.41), p = 0.0015] and most deprived patients with BD [OR, 95% CI 1.60 (1.33-1.92), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients with BD were at an increased risk of mortality, which was exacerbated in the youngest and most deprived patients with BD. Patients with BD should thus be targeted as a high-risk population for severe forms of COVID-19, requiring enhanced preventive and disease management strategies.