The LUNAR project: A description of the population of individuals who seek health care at emergency departments.

INTRODUCTION: Although little information exists about the consumers of emergency services and their illness behaviors, such information is essential for decision making by providers, administrators, and policy makers. The purpose of the LUNAR Project was to describe the population of individuals who seek health care at emergency departments. METHODS: After they attended a training course, 90 emergency nurses served as site coordinators in 89 emergency departments in 35 states. A standardized protocol was used to collect data retrospectively from 140 randomly selected patient records at each site. The final sample included 12,422 ED patients. RESULTS: Overall, 52% of the patient visits were for nonurgent care, 40% were for urgent care, and 8% were for emergent care. Most visits occurred between 10 AM and 8 PM and peaked at 6 PM. Children and younger adults were the largest consumers of services, primarily for nonurgent care. The most frequent reasons for visits were fever, chest pain, and abdominal pain, and the most common discharge diagnoses were middle ear infection, chest pain, and acute upper respiratory infection. DISCUSSION: The profile of ED patients showed a need for new types of services to provide nonurgent care and new interventions for preventing illnesses and injuries commonly treated in the emergency department.

Perceptions of kidney transplant by persons with end stage renal disease.

This prospective, descriptive research study sought to identify factors that influence the pursuit of kidney transplant by persons with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Four research questions explored various areas about kidney transplants, including overall knowledge, reasons for wanting/not wanting a kidney transplant, sources of information, views of how one's life could change, and interest in receiving a transplant. A prospective, descriptive study was designed that used both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection. A random sample of 115 persons from a total population of 450 individuals, currently undergoing treatment in 1 of 3 dialysis facilities in a mid-Atlantic state. was obtained. Two nurse interviewers used four instruments during a 1-hour, structured interview completed at the facility. The results show that: (a) two-thirds of the sample population underestimated the current success rate of transplantation; and (b) over half never discussed transplants with family members. Implications for health care providers are discussed in this article.

Preparing to change from acute to community-based care. Learning needs of hospital-based nurses.

OBJECTIVE: Increasingly, professional nurses will be required to function in practice settings other than acute care, yet little is known about how nurses perceive the skill sets required to practice in these nonacute care settings. This study explores nurses' perceptions and needs concerning the transition from acute to home care and community-based healthcare facilities. BACKGROUND: Because the healthcare reform environment of the 1990s mandates changes in the ways hospitals and hospital nurses care for patients, many nurses in acute care settings anticipate that their roles will include or perhaps shift completely to practice in the home and other community-based settings. How professional nurses perceive the skills required to practice in these nonacute care settings may well influence their willingness to accept work redesign initiatives and voluntary employment transitions that involve working outside the hospital setting. METHODS: Based on focus groups and the literature a three-part 56-item questionnaire was developed as the study instrument to assess skill needs and concerns related to functioning in the acute, home, and community-based setting. A total of 879 nurses representing various specialties in healthcare institutions in the Philadelphia and five-county surrounding areas participated. RESULTS: Test retest for the study instrument was 0.87 for a 2-week period, and alpha coefficients ranged from 0.90 to 0.94. Multivariate analyses revealed that proficiency on certain skill items in the acute care setting predicted feelings of proficiency in home and community-based settings. Based on regression and discriminant function analyses, top predictors and differentiators of proficiency in the nonacute care settings were wound care and dressing, knowledge of community resources, diabetic education, patient and family advocacy, communication with third-party payers, and neonatal care. CONCLUSIONS: Some nurses, such as those working in critical care, perceive themselves as being able to function proficiently in a wide variety of care settings-acute home, and community based. Furthermore, certain acute care skills were identified as top differentiators of proficiency in nonhospital settings, thus providing direction for nursing administrators and academic institutions. In addition, the tool developed for the study can serve as a self-assessment for individual nurses.

A Delphi study on research priorities for trauma nursing.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize research questions of importance to trauma patient care and of interest to trauma nurses. METHOD: A three-round Delphi technique was used to solicit, identify, and prioritize problems for trauma nursing research. In round 1, experienced trauma nurses (N = 208) generated 513 problems, which were analyzed, categorized, and collapsed into 111 items for subsequent rounds. Round 2 participants rated each research question on a 1 to 7 scale on two criteria: impact on patient welfare and value for practicing nurses. Group median scores provided by 166 round 2 respondents and respondents' individual round 2 scores were indicated on the round 3 questionnaire. Subjects rated the questions again on the same criteria and indicated whether nurses, independently or in collaboration with other health professionals, should assume responsibility for that research. Median and mean scores and rank order were determined for each item. RESULTS: Respondents who completed all three rounds (n = 137) had a mean of 8.3 years of trauma experience. Nine research questions ranked within the top 20 on both criteria. The two research questions that ranked highest on both criteria were: What are the most effective nursing interventions in the prevention of pulmonary and circulatory complications in trauma patients? and What are the most effective methods for preventing aspiration in trauma patients during the postoperative phase? The third-ranked question regarding patient welfare was: What psychological and lifestyle changes result from traumatic injury? Regarding value for practicing nurses, What are the most effective educational methods to prepare and maintain proficiency in trauma care providers? ranked third. CONCLUSION: These research priorities provide impetus and direction for nursing and collaborative investigation in trauma care.

Research priorities for burn nursing: rehabilitation, discharge planning, and follow-up care.

Fourteen of the 101 research questions that were proposed in the Burn Nursing Delphi study by Marvin et al. (J Burn Care Rehabil 1991;12:190-7) were concerned with the rehabilitation, discharge planning, and follow-up care of patients with burns. Questions that were ranked as top priorities for patient welfare related to control of postburn itching, prevention of contractures, and effective means of community-based follow-up to meet physical, social, and emotional needs of patients and families. Burn nurses identified the study of nursing interventions that are the most effective means for preparing patients, families, and community nurses for posthospitalization care as the research priority that has the greatest potential impact on the profession of burn nursing. Respondents to the Delphi study favored a collaborative approach to research for most of the questions in the rehabilitation subgroup. Suggestions are made for nurses who wish to take the lead in designing and implementing qualitative and quantitative studies that relate to the increasingly prevalent problems that are encountered by survivors of burn injury.

Research priorities for burn nursing: report on physiologic issues.

This Delphi study was designed and conducted to identify the issues of greatest concern to care of patients with burns and to the profession of burn nursing, so that nursing research could be directed toward these ends. One hundred and one questions were prioritized by the 94 participants who completed the four sequential rounds of questionnaires. A total of 11 questions (10.9%), which addressed physiologic-based issues, were identified.

Research priorities for burn nursing: nursing recruitment, retention, and other administrative issues.

This Delphi study was designed to identify nursing research priorities. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires that contained 101 potential research questions. Twenty questions addressed nursing administrative issues. In this category, the highest priority for potential impact on patient welfare related to the cost-effectiveness of various infection control measures. Questions concerning recruitment, retention, staffing, and cost/quality issues had the highest priority for research that could have an impact on the profession of nursing.

Research priorities for burn nursing: report of the psychosocial issues group.

This study was designed to identify nursing research priorities in burn care. The Delphi technique of sequential questionnaires was used for data collection. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires. One hundred and one research questions were identified, and priorities were assigned according to their impact on patient welfare and on the profession of burn nursing. Twenty-two of these research questions concerned psychosocial issues. This group of questions was then analyzed for priority research issues. The top five ranked questions in the psychosocial issues group for impact on patient welfare concerned: (1) stress reduction techniques, (2) social reentry strategies, (3) management of psychosis and post-traumatic stress disorder, (4) strategies to assist patients with impaired communication capabilities, and (5) the role of recovered burn survivors in encouraging patient compliance with treatments. Similarly, the top five ranked questions for impact on the profession of burn nursing concerned: (1) stress reduction strategies, (2) coping techniques for burn survivors, (3) management of psychosis and post-traumatic stress disorder, (4) nursing's supportive role in regard to "do not resuscitate" orders, and (5) coping strategies to be used with patients who express a desire to die.

Research priorities for burn nursing: patient, nurse, and burn prevention education.

Fifteen of the 101 research questions that were assigned priorities in the Burn Nursing Delphi study by Marvin et al. (Marvin JA, Carrougher GJ, Bayley EW, Weber B, Knighton J, Rutan RL. Burn nursing Delphi study: setting research priorities. J BURN CARE REHABIL 1991;12:190-7) addressed education from the perspectives of patients, their families, and burn nurses; the study also addressed the issue of burn prevention education. Questions concerning patient education were assigned the highest priority in this education subgroup with respect to the potential for research that would have an impact on patient welfare. The question that rated highest as a priority for its potential impact on the profession of burn nursing addressed the core competencies needed for safe and effective burn nursing practice. Prevention education was generally found to be a low priority in the Delphi study. Many of the questions in the education subgroup can best be answered by comparative or experimental studies designed to explain and predict the effects of various teaching strategies on behavioral outcomes. Research on patient, nurse, and burn prevention education provides a fertile ground for nurse researchers and an opportunity to contribute knowledge of vital importance to clinicians, educators, managers, and the public.

Research priorities for burn nursing. Report of the Wound Care and Infection Control Group.

This study was designed to identify research priorities in burn nursing. The Delphi technique of sequential questionnaires was used for data collection. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires. One hundred one research questions were identified and prioritized according to impact on the welfare of patients with burns and impact on the profession of burn nursing. Twenty-three of these research questions concerned issues of wound care or infection control. This group of questions was further analyzed to determine priority research issues. The five most highly ranked questions in the category of wound care/infection control with regard to impact on patient welfare concerned healing of donor sites and skin grafts, wound cleansing, and the effect of pressure garments on wound healing. Similarly, the five most highly ranked questions with regard to impact on the profession of burn nursing concerned the impact of combining patients with burns and patients without burns in the same unit, healing of donor sites and skin grafts, care of the patient with burns who also has acquired immune deficiency syndrome, infection control, and dressing of the burn wound.

Wound healing in the patient with burns.

The burn wound presents many unique challenges to the nurse who promotes optimal wound healing. Nursing care includes meticulous attention to the prevention of infection, wound cleansing and debridement, and application of topical antibacterial agents. Preparation of graft recipient sites, care of graft and donor sites, and use of various biologic and synthetic wound coverings are required. An interdisciplinary approach that provides for adequate nutrition, fosters physical function, and supports psychologic adjustment to altered self-concept is required for holistic healing of the burn wound.