Factors associated with having uncontrolled asthma in rural Appalachia.

BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory disease disproportionately affects residents of Appalachia, particularly those residing in Central Appalachia. Asthma is particularly burdensome to Central Appalachian residents regarding cost and disability. Improving our understanding of how to mitigate these burdens requires understanding the factors influencing asthma control among individuals with asthma living in Central Appalachia, specifically rural Kentucky. METHODS: This community-based, cross-sectional epidemiologic study used survey data to identify characteristics associated with uncontrolled and controlled asthma. The designation of "uncontrolled asthma" was based on a self-report of ≥ 2 asthma exacerbations in the past year. Individuals with ≤ 1 or no exacerbations were considered to have controlled asthma. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests assessed the association between categorical variables and asthma control categories. Logistic regression was conducted to determine the impact of factors on the likelihood of uncontrolled asthma. RESULTS: In a sample of 211 individuals with self-reported asthma, 29% (n = 61, 46 females) had uncontrolled asthma. Predictors of uncontrolled asthma included depression (odds ratio 2.61, 95% CI 1.22-5.61, p = .014) and living in multi-unit housing (odds ratio 4.99, 95% CI 1.47-16.96, p = .010) when controlling for age, sex, financial status, and occupation. Being overweight or obese was not a predictor of uncontrolled asthma. Physical activity and BMI did not predict the likelihood of uncontrolled asthma. CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant challenges rural communities in Appalachian Kentucky face in managing asthma. Factors like depression, housing conditions, and a lack of self-management strategies play pivotal roles in asthma control in this population.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the asthma Action plan questionnaire (AAPQ).

OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical and psychometrically sound tool to evaluate caregiver knowledge of their child's asthma action plan (AAP). METHODS: A pilot study was conducted in a sample of 40 caregivers of children with asthma to assess the content validity, item difficulty, and item discrimination of the Asthma Action Plan Questionnaire (AAPQ). The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of the AAPQ's scoring rubric were also examined. Subsequently, a large-scale study was conducted in a sample of 80 caregivers of children with asthma and 40 caregivers of children without current asthma and no prior exposure to patients with asthma to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and known-groups validity of the AAPQ. RESULTS: The 7-item AAPQ demonstrated acceptable content validity (a scale-content validity index of 0.98) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha =.63 and mean inter-item correlation coefficient of .20) and very strong test-retest reliability over a two-to-four-week period (r = .88, p < .001). The AAPQ discriminated between caregivers of children with asthma and caregivers of children without asthma (M ± SD 8.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.3 ± 1.7, p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The AAPQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire that provides an assessment of caregivers' knowledge of their child's AAP and can guide educational interventions by healthcare providers.

Respiratory Interventions, Hospital Utilization, and Clinical Outcomes of Persons with COPD and COVID-19.

Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) impacted outcomes of persons with chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study investigated the differences in respiratory interventions, hospital utilization, smoking status, and 30-day readmission in those with COPD and COVID-19 based on hospital survival status. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2020 to October 2020 and included persons with COPD and COVID-19 infection. We examined respiratory interventions, hospital utilization and outcomes, and 30-day hospital readmission. Chi-square test analysis was used to assess categorical variables, and t-test or Mann-Whitney was used to analyze continuous data based on normality. Results: Ninety persons were included in the study, 78 (87%) were survivors. The most common comorbidity was hypertension 71 (78.9%) (p = 0.003). Twenty-two (24%) persons were intubated, from whom 12 (15%) survived (p < 0.001). There were 25 (32.1%) and 12 (100%), (p < 0.001) persons who required an ICU admission from the survivor and non-survivor groups, respectively. Among the survivor group, fifteen (19%) persons required 30-day hospital readmission. Conclusion: Persons with COPD and COVID-19 had a lower mortality rate (13%) compared to other studies in the early pandemic phase. Non-survivors had increased ICU utilization, endotracheal intubation, and more frequent application of volume control mode. Discharging survivors to long-term acute care facilities may reduce 30-day hospital readmissions.

RT education and COVID-19 pneumonia discharge quality.

Background: There is a lack of data assessing the influence of respiratory therapist (RT) education on clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of RTs holding advanced degrees or completing adult critical care competencies on discharge outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Study Design and Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included adults with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the hospital for at least three days between March-May 2020. The academic degree held by each RT was considered advanced (baccalaureate or higher) or associate degree. Discharge outcomes were considered good, compromised, or poor when subjects' hospital discharge was directly to home, long-term care facility/rehabilitation center, or hospice/died, respectively. A time-to-event multi-state regression model was used to determine the impact of RT academic degree and adult critical care competencies on discharge outcomes using α=0.05. Results: A total of 260 subjects (median age 59 y; 166 males) received clinical care from 132 RTs. RT median professional experience was six y (IQR 3-11), 70.8% had an advanced degree, and 70.8% completed adult critical care competencies. The time-to-event multi-state regression model showed that patients with >85% exposure to RTs with advanced degrees transitioned 3.72 times more frequently to good outcomes than RTs without advanced degrees (p=.001). Similarly, patients with >85% exposure to RTs with adult critical care competencies transitioned 5.10 times more frequently to good outcomes than RTs without adult critical care competencies (p<.001). Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received greater than 85% of their care by RTs who earned advanced degrees or completed adult critical care competencies had improved discharge outcomes. This preliminary work suggests that advancing education for the respiratory therapist workforce may improve the discharge quality of patients with acute respiratory failure and should be further explored.

DLCO Biologic Quality-Control Findings From a Multi-Center Global Study.

BACKGROUND: The 2017 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) standards specify a control rule for assessing biologic quality control (BioQC) but have limited guidance on how to establish expected values for control rule variables. This study aimed to determine expected values for DLCO BioQC using coefficient of variation (CV) and compare that the mean ± 2 SD control rule yields the same precision as mean ± 12% of the mean. METHODS: DLCO BioQC data were collected from a multi-center inhaled medication study. This descriptive study spanned 42 months ending in 2018. The annual DLCO CV was based upon 10 DLCO values separated by at least 5 d. The root mean square CV (RMSCV) was computed for each year and Friedman test evaluated within subject annual CV changes. Ninetieth percentile values were computed for annual control rule limits/mean DLCO. RESULTS: Of 217 BioQCs, the study's first year had 168 subjects with fewer in subsequent years. Annual CV values from RMSCV were 5.3, 4.5, and 4.6% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No change was seen in the CV for those subjects with data for all 3 years, n = 24, P = .07. The 90th percentile of measurements 2 SD/mean DLCO were 15, 12.4, and 11% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A DLCO BioQC CV ≤ 6% is achievable across multiple sites, technologists, and brands of equipment. This CV value assures that measurements for control rule variables emerge from an expected range. A control rule of mean ± 2 SD appeared to yield similar results as the mean ± 12% of the mean rule reported in the 2017 ATS/ERS DLCO standards.

Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Pulmonary Function Testing Interpretation: An American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Evidence Review and Research Statement.

BACKGROUND: Calls have been made to discontinue the routine use of race and ethnicity in medicine. Specific to respiratory medicine, the use of race- and ethnicity-specific reference equations for the interpretation of pulmonary function test (PFT) results has been questioned. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Three key questions were addressed: (1) What is the current evidence supporting the use of race- and ethnicity-specific reference equations for the interpretation of PFTs? (2) What are the potential clinical implications of the use or nonuse of race and ethnicity in interpreting PFT results? and (3) What research gaps and questions must be addressed and answered to understand better the effect of race and ethnicity on PFT results interpretation and potential clinical and occupational health implications? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A joint multisociety (American College of Chest Physicians, American Association for Respiratory Care, American Thoracic Society, and Canadian Thoracic Society) expert panel was formed to undertake a comprehensive evidence review and to develop a statement with recommendations to address the research questions. RESULTS: Several assumptions and gaps, both in the published literature and in our evolving understanding of lung health, were identified. It seems that many past perceptions and practices regarding the effect of race and ethnicity on PFT results interpretation are based on limited scientific evidence and measures that lack reliability. INTERPRETATION: A need exists for more and better research that will inform our field about these many uncertainties and will serve as a foundation for future recommendations in this area. The identified shortcomings should not be discounted or dismissed because they may enable flawed conclusions, unintended consequences, or both. Addressing the identified research gaps and needs would allow a better-a more informed-understanding of the effects of race and ethnicity on PFT results interpretation.

Variations in FVC and FEV1 Biologic Quality Control Measures in a Global Multi-Center Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although quality control standards are recommended to ensure accurate test results, the coefficient of variation for the FVC and FEV1 biologic quality control (BioQC) is not specified. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate variations in spirometry BioQCs in a large and diverse cohort of individuals to determine an acceptable standard for the coefficient of variation. METHODS: The FVC and FEV1 biologic control data were secondary analyses from an inhaled medication trial that was conducted over 3 y ending in 2018 that included 114 laboratories. Results were sent to a central repository for expert review. The FVC and FEV1 coefficients of variation were based upon a minimum of 10 spirometry values annually separated by at least 5 d. A second method of computing the coefficient of variation used 10 values within 28 d. Descriptive statistics were computed. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to compare whether the median coefficient of variation values between the 2 methods differed, tested at α = 0.05 using SPSS. RESULTS: Of 249 biologic control participants, 170 met the first year's inclusion criteria. The coefficient of variation for the 5-d separated method was < 5% for 94.1% of FVC and 93.5% of FEV1 values in the first year. By year 3, 90% of FVC and FEV1 coefficient of variation values were < 4%. The medians for the 5-d separated and the 28-d measure showed no difference for either FVC coefficient of variation or FEV1 coefficient of variation, Z = -1.764, P = .78, and Z = -0.980, P = .33, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interlab biologic control variation values of < 4% for FVC and FEV1 are achievable; however, individual labs should strive to attain lower values. Acceptable coefficients of variation can be achieved within 28 d.

Relationship Between Respiratory Muscle Strength, Handgrip Strength, and Muscle Mass in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Minimal information is available to validate measurement of respiratory muscle strength (RMS) in the clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) with handgrip strength (HGS) and cross sectional muscle area obtained via diagnostic abdominal computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measures of MIP, MEP, SNIP, and HGS were obtained from individuals that participated in a previously published study; individuals who had an abdominal CT completed with (±)7 days of obtaining RMS measures were included. Both RMS and HGS were measured within 48-72 hours of admission; for RMS, the highest absolute (cm H2 O) and percent predicted values were recorded, and the average of 3 HGS measurements (kg) was documented. Cross-sectional muscle area (cm2 ) at the third lumbar region was recorded. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between variables. RESULTS: A total of 35 participants were included. HGS was correlated to absolute MIP (rs = 0.62, rs = 0.61), MEP (rs = 0.74, rs = 0.73), and SNIP (rs = 0.58, rs = 0.54) for males and females, respectively. Crosss-sectional muscle area was correlated with absolute MIP (rs = 0.66), MEP (rs = 0.58), and SNIP (rs = 0.783) for men and absolute SNIP (rs = 0.56) among women. CONCLUSION: Measures of RMS represent a promising assessment of muscle mass and function among hospitalized patients.

Adequacy of the Provider Workforce for Persons With Cardiopulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Access and quality of health care for cardiopulmonary disease in the United States ranks poorly compared with economically similar nations. No recent comprehensive assessment of the cardiopulmonary workforce is available. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate current published evidence about the workforce caring for persons with cardiopulmonary disease. METHODS: This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Structured searches of medical databases were conducted to find studies published from 2006 through 2016. Because of the paucity of quantitative data retrieved, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Thematic analyses were performed on 15 identified articles through a process of open and axial coding. RESULTS: There is published evidence of current and projected workforce shortages in all clinical settings where care of persons with cardiopulmonary disease occurs. Advanced practice providers complete much of their cardiopulmonary training on the job. The aging population and the advent of new medical interventions are projected to increase growth in health-care demand. Some physicians limit hiring of advanced practice providers because of a deficiency in formal cardiopulmonary training. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap in care between the needs of persons with cardiopulmonary disease and cardiopulmonary providers. Strategies resolving this problem may include one or more approaches that reduce the administrative burden associated with current care and assure the availability of suitably trained providers.

Predicting Respiratory Therapists' Intentions to Use the Modified Early Warning Score by Using an Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model.

BACKGROUND: The modified early warning score (MEWS) is used to detect early clinical deterioration and to escalate care as needed. Respiratory therapists (RTs) usually do not use the MEWS even when it is implemented as a default in the electronic health record system. This study explored whether the technology acceptance model could predict the intentions of RTs to use the MEWS. METHODS: A validated survey that uses a pretest/posttest design was used to determine the effect of an educational intervention (lecture and interactive small group session) on RTs' MEWS knowledge. We also measured key determinants of the intention by RTs to use the MEWS based on the constructs of the technology acceptance model. The survey was distributed to 75 RTs employed at a Midwestern academic medical center. RESULTS: There was a 61% survey response rate. Statistical analysis of the survey data demonstrated that the educational intervention increased the MEWS knowledge score from 2.0 before education to 4.0 after education (P < .001). Moreover, there was a statistically significant increase in the behavioral intention score, from 3.0 before education to 4.0 after education (P < .001). Partial least squares structural equation modeling revealed that MEWS knowledge influenced perceived ease of use, which influenced attitude, which influenced behavioral intention. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous studies have demonstrated that a change in behavioral intention is a good predictor of change in behavior. The increase in the RTs' knowledge, attitude, and behavioral intention scores after MEWS education indicated that these RTs may be more inclined to use the MEWS if they were educated about its clinical relevance and if their attitude toward using it were favorable. Analysis of the study results also indicated that the technology acceptance model could serve as a framework to guide respiratory care managers in the development of strategies to successfully implement new systems or processes that are intended to be used by RTs.

Communication of Career Pathways Through Associate Degree Program Web Sites: A Baseline Assessment.

BACKGROUND: The American Association for Respiratory Care sponsored a series of conferences that addressed the competency of the future workforce of respiratory therapists (RTs). Based upon the findings from those conferences, several initiatives emerged that support RTs earning a baccalaureate (or bachelor's) degree. The objective of this study was to identify the ways that associate degree programs communicate career pathways toward a baccalaureate degree through their Web sites. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study used a random sample of 100 of the 362 associate degree programs approved by the Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care. Data were collected from 3 specific categories: demographic data, baccalaureate completion information, and the Web page location for the program. The presence of statements related to any pathway toward a bachelor's degree, transfer credits, articulation agreements, and links for baccalaureate completion were recorded. The descriptive statistics in this study were reported as total numbers and percentages. RESULTS: Of the 100 programs in the random sample, only 89 were included in the study. Only 39 (44%) programs had links on their program Web site that had any content related to bachelor's degrees, 16 (18%) identified college transfer courses toward a bachelor's degree, and 26 (29%) programs included baccalaureate articulation agreements on their Web site. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of associate degree programs communicated career pathway information to their prospective and current students through program Web sites. An informative Web site would make the path more transparent for entry-level students to meet their future educational needs as their careers progress.

Utilizing Respiratory Therapists to Reduce Costs of Care.

INTRODUCTION: Changes to the reimbursement of respiratory care services over the past 26 years make it imperative that respiratory therapists (RTs) demonstrate cost savings to establish their value. Therefore, this systematic review evaluated the cost-related impacts from utilizing RTs to deliver care when compared to other care providers. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used to guide the search process. The study addressed articles across all age groups and care settings that compared the cost of care provided by RTs to a comparison group. Studies were excluded if they were not written in English, described care provided outside of the United States, did not provide quantitative data, or lacked a comparison group. RESULTS: A total of 4,120 articles emerged from the search process, of which 60 qualified for a full text review. Cost savings were evaluated for the 28 articles included in this review, noting the study design, the specific respiratory care practice, use of protocols, clinical setting, and age group. The most frequently studied topic was mechanical ventilation, which along with disease management represented by the most randomized, controlled trials for the study design. The clinical practice area notably absent was home care. CONCLUSIONS: Although cost comparisons across studies could not be made due to the inconsistent manner in which data were reported, evidence demonstrated that care provided by RTs yielded both direct and indirect cost reductions, which were achieved through protocol utilization, specialized expertise, and autonomous decision making. The care provided was consistent with care provided by other disciplines. It is critical for the respiratory care profession to highlight key clinical practice areas for future research, to establish uniform reporting measures for outcomes, and to foster the development of future respiratory care researchers to affirm the value that respiratory therapists add to patient care.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Written Dry Powder Inhaler Instructions and Health Literacy in Subjects Diagnosed With COPD.

BACKGROUND: Improper inhaler use results in decreased drug deposition in the lungs. The impact of health literacy and poor vision on the patient's ability to learn inhaler technique by reading instructions has not been confirmed. This study evaluated the effectiveness of learning inhaler technique from written instructions and the impact of health literacy for patients diagnosed with COPD who used a dry powder inhaler (DPI). METHODS: This pilot study recruited subjects diagnosed with COPD. A trained assessor scored subjects' inhaler technique before and after reading the appropriate American College of Chest Physicians handouts. Peak inspiratory flows (PIFs) were measured using an InCheck Dial. Health literacy was measured by the S-TOFHLA (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults), and visual acuity was measured by a Snellen chart. Associations between health literacy and visual acuity and changes in subjects' inhaler technique scores were assessed by Spearman's rho. Inhaler technique change scores were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at P = .05. RESULTS: Of the 24 participants enrolled, 63% were female, mean age was 65.6 y, and 83% were Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease air-flow limitation 2 or 3. Wilcoxon scores were significant for improved total scores for both the Diskus and HandiHaler, with medians improving from 6.5 to 7.0 (interquartile range 6.0-7.8) (P = .047) and from 6.0 to 7.5 (interquartile range 7.0-9.0) (P = .002), respectively. The minimum required PIF was achieved by 93.8% of the Diskus and 94.4% of the HandiHaler groups. There were no associations detected between the handout intervention (Diskus and HandiHaler) and health literacy level and vision. CONCLUSIONS: The educational handouts for DPIs helped participants already using a DPI to improve their inhaler technique. Stable participants diagnosed with COPD are able to generate appropriate PIFs to properly use DPIs. Neither vision nor health literacy was associated with the inability to learn inhaler technique from patient education inhaler device handouts.

Effective education parameters for trigger remediation in underserved children with asthma: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of asthma is highest in minority children living in urban areas. Pediatric asthma research has focused on self-management education and trigger remediation using a multi-trigger, multi-component educational intervention approach. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify common educational parameters of these proposed interventions. The review also sought to identify which clinical outcomes improved with multi-trigger, multi-component educational interventions. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, SCOPUS and ProQuest Dissertations were searched between 2000 to 2014 using the following terms: asthma; urban population or poverty area; environmental remediation; health education; allergens or dust mites or cockroaches or mold or mice or rats. STUDY SELECTIONS: Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) participants were minority children identified as underserved; 2) there was a multi-trigger and multi-component intervention; 3) asthma severity was classified as persistent; and 4) asthma control was classified as not well controlled. RESULTS: A total of 531 articles were retrieved of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. The interventions lacked consistency in their explanation. Most studies were vague in reporting pedagogical methods and educational content. Few studies reported a theoretical framework to guide their approach. Over half the studies did not report a learning assessment nor health literacy of the caregiver or the child with asthma. Yet all of the findings demonstrated statistically significant results in some or all of their primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Overall, the research lacked clarity in the approach to impact asthma outcomes and reduces the opportunity to substantiate the findings through replication.

Asthma Control Assessment Tools.

Both the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3 and the 2015 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines identify achieving and maintaining asthma control as goals of therapy, and they emphasize periodic assessment of asthma control once treatment is established. Accurate assessment of asthma control is difficult due to the complexity of asthma control and due to the limitations in the traditional methods of assessment, such as lung function tests, physician assessment, and patients' self-assessment. Relying solely on the role of lung function tests is insufficient to reflect the status of asthma control, since patients with asthma may have normal spirometry between exacerbations. Clinicians often overestimate the level of asthma control. Similarly, it is not uncommon for patients to overestimate how well their asthma is controlled, and, therefore, they under-report asthma symptoms and fail to recognize the impact that asthma has on their daily life. As a result, several tools have been developed to quantify the level of asthma control, identify patients at risk, and evaluate the effect of asthma management. This review examines the commonly used asthma control assessment tools in terms of content, psychometric properties, methods of administration, limitations, and ability to reflect the overall status of asthma control, which can aid clinicians in selecting the most appropriate tool for their needs.

The current impact of entry-level associate and baccalaureate degree education on the diversity of respiratory therapists.

INTRODUCTION: Transitioning from an associate degree to a baccalaureate degree for respiratory therapists has been suggested as a new entry-level educational standard. One potential risk for this change is that it may limit the diversity of potential applicants for entry-level education. A diverse workforce is important to achieve the goal of reducing healthcare disparities. This study evaluated characteristics of therapists who completed associate and baccalaureate degree entry-level education. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data collected from the 2009 AARC Respiratory Therapist Human Resource Survey explored relationships between the choice of entry-level associate or baccalaureate education and variables of gender, race, salary, career advancement, and job satisfaction. RESULTS: There were no differences between therapists with entry-level associate and baccalaureate degrees in gender, race, number of additional healthcare credentials, numbers of life support credentials, wages, delivering respiratory care by protocol, and job satisfaction. There were significantly higher percentages of advanced academic degrees, desire to pursue a higher academic degree, registered respiratory therapist credentials, total National Board for Respiratory Care credentials, and leadership roles for therapists with baccalaureate entry-level degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Current entry-level associate and baccalaureate degree graduates have similar gender and race proportions. This finding challenges concerns that an entry-level baccalaureate degree would decrease the diversity of the respiratory therapist workforce.

A guideline-based approach to asthma management.

The management of asthma has dramatically improved in recent years because of a better understanding of the disease and an organized approach to therapy. All of the various components and tools for evaluating individuals with asthma may be found in the Expert Panel Report Guidelines by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, initially published in 2007. These comprehensive guidelines help health care professionals care for individuals with asthma throughout their lifespan. This article will assist the health care provider to use these evidence-based guidelines.