First-Line Immune Combination Therapies for Nonclear Cell Versus Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Multicenter Data From Germany.

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to compare treatment outcomes of clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) versus non-ccmRCC (nccmRCC) patients who received first-line immune combination therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within our retrospective multi-institutional consecutive database of eight tertiary-care centers, we identified mRCC patients treated with first-line immune combination therapies between 11/2017 and 12/2022. Using log-rank analysis and multivariable Cox regression, we tested for differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of nccmRCC versus ccmRCC patients. Covariables consisted of age at diagnosis, sex, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk groups, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and sarcomatoid feature. RESULTS: Of 289 study patients, 39 (13%) patients harbored nccmRCC. Median OS was 37 months versus not reached for ccmRCC versus nccmRCC patients (P = .6). Median PFS was 13 versus 15 months (P = .9). Multivariable Cox regression models did not identify nccmRCC as an independent predictor of higher overall mortality in mRCC patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23; P = .6) or a higher progression rate (HR: 1.0; P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: In our real-world multi-institutional study, no differences in OS and PFS between ccmRCC and nccmRCC patients receiving first-line immune combination treatment were observed, even after adjustment for important patient and tumor characteristics. More prospective trials in nccmRCC patients are needed.

Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions.

Objectives: Although biomarkers predicting therapy response in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real-world first-line mRCC cohort. Methods: Metastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO-based first-line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda et al., patients were defined as 'CRP flare-responder', 'CRP responder' and 'non-CRP responder'; according to Ishihara et al., patients were defined as 'normal', 'normalised' and 'non-normalised' based on their early CRP kinetics. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared, and treatment outcome was measured by overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: Out of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare- (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non-CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non-normalised group. Conclusion: Different early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first-line mRCC therapy in a large real-world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.

C-reactive protein flare predicts response to anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Robust biomarkers to predict response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) are still in demand. Recently, early C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics and especially the novel CRP flare-response phenomenon has been associated with immunotherapy response. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational study comprising 154 patients with mUC treated with ICB to evaluate the predictive value of a previously described on-treatment CRP kinetics: CRP flare responders (at least doubling of baseline CRP within the first month after initiation of ICB followed by a decline below baseline within three months), CRP responders (decline in baseline CRP by ≥ 30% within three months without a prior flare) and the remaining patients as CRP non-responders. CRP kinetics groups were correlated with baseline parameters, PD-L1 status, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Objective response was observed in 57.1% of CRP responders, 45.8% of CRP flare responders and 17.9% of CRP non-responders (P < 0.001). CRP flare response was associated with prolonged PFS and OS (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, CRP flare responders showed a risk reduction of ∼70% for tumour progression and death compared to CRP non-responders. Subgroup analysis of CRP flare responders revealed that patients with a long-flare response (completed flare-response kinetics ≥6 weeks on-treatment) showed even more favourable outcomes following ICB (HR = 0.18, 95%-CI: 0.07-0.48, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CRP (flare)response robustly predicts immunotherapy response and outcomes in mUC independent of PD-L1 status. Thus, early on-treatment CRP kinetics is a promising low-cost and easy-to-implement biomarker to optimise therapy monitoring in patients with mUC treated with ICB.

[Robot-assisted surgery as an elective-fascinating lesson(s)?] / Wahlfach Robotische Chirurgie ­ Faszination Lehre(n)?

BACKGROUND: Even though robot-assisted operations have evolved to a standard procedure in surgery, they are underrepresented in the curriculum of current medical students. OBJECTIVES: We present our experience and findings in Germany's first elective "Robot-assisted surgery" at a urological department for undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten undergraduates in their final years were taught the theoretical basics and practical skills in robot-assisted surgery within six lessons each lasting 2 h, including the opportunity to observe a live robot-assisted surgery. The increase of knowledge (ten multiple-choice questions) and skills (exercises Camera 0, Clutch, and Sea Spikes 1) on a robotic simulation device were quantified including an evaluation of the student's perspective. RESULTS: The 10 participants had a significant increase in knowledge and gave at a median of 3.5 additional correct answers in the final assessment (p = 0.011). For two out of three practical exercises, the overall score significantly increased (Camera 0 and Sea Spikes 1, for both p < 0.05), but for the exercise "Clutch", only economy of motion significantly improved (p = 0.028). The elective was evaluated (very) good and the willingness of the participants to become urologists significantly increased (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: There is a great interest of many undergraduate medical students in robot-assisted surgery. Offering an elective appears to be an excellent format to teach the theoretical background and practical skills in robotic (urologic) surgery. Moreover, such an elective could raise more attention to the field of urology and might attract future colleagues.