RESUMO
We provide evidence from comparisons of populations of Drosophila that evolutionary correlations between longevity and stress resistance break down over the course of laboratory evolution. Using 15 distinct evolutionary regimes, we created 75 populations that were differentiated for early fecundity, longevity, starvation resistance, desiccation resistance, and developmental time. In earlier experiments, selection for postponed aging produced increases in stress resistance, whereas selection for increased stress resistance produced increases in longevity. Direct estimates of correlations also indicated an antagonistic relationship between early fecundity on one hand and longevity or stress resistance on the other. Laboratory evolution of extreme values of stress resistance, however, led to a breakdown in these evolutionary relationships. There was no evidence that these significant changes in correlation resulted from genotype-by-environment interactions or inbreeding. These findings suggest that correlations between functional characters are not necessarily durable features of a species, and that short-term evolutionary responses cannot be extrapolated reliably to longer-term evolutionary patterns.
Assuntos
Drosophila melanogaster/classificação , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Animais , Animais de Laboratório/genética , Evolução Biológica , Dessecação , Drosophila melanogaster/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Meio Ambiente , Fertilidade/genética , Genótipo , Imunidade Inata/genética , Longevidade/genética , Filogenia , Seleção Genética , TempoRESUMO
We trace the evolutionary correlation between stress resistance and longevity in populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for stress resistance over many generations. Females selected for desiccation resistance and both females and males selected for increasing starvation resistance initially show concurrent increases in longevity, but then begin to decrease in longevity, even as stress resistance continues to increase. We demonstrate that the correlation between two fitness traits can change and that this change is due to sustained selection rather than a genotype-by-environment interaction or inbreeding depression. The breakdown in evolutionary correlation we report underscores the difficulty of extrapolating the results from short-term selection experiments to predictions of long-term evolution.