Reconsidering S100B: Why it is time to abandon its use in detecting disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Especially in the era of successful systemic therapy, there is an urgent need to detect early disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. This study investigates if serum S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) can detect disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG). Adult AJCC 8th stage III melanoma patients in whom serum S100B was measured as part of follow-up from January 2010 until April 2023 were included. The association between serum S100B and disease recurrence was evaluated using standard definitions for sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients were included (mean age was 60.4 years, 53.1 % were female). Most patients were classified as stage IIIB (39, 26.5 %) and IIIC (73, 49.7 %). During median follow-up of 56 months, 69 (46.9 %) patients experienced disease recurrence. Seventeen out of 18 patients with elevated serum S100B (≥0.15 µg/L) experienced disease recurrence (PPV of 94.4 %). However, 52 out of 69 patients with disease recurrence had normal serum S100B (sensitivity of 24.6 %). Eight out of 17 (47.1 %) patients were asymptomatic (P = 0.608), twelve (70.6 %) patients had at least four distant metastases (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The clinical value of serum S100B to detect disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients is negligible since only one out of four patients with disease recurrence have elevated serum S100B. Furthermore, half of stage III melanoma patients with elevated S100B experienced symptoms, and most patients already have multiple distant metastases.

Systemic therapy timing and use in patients with advanced melanoma at the end of life: A retrospective cohort study.

Novel systemic therapies for advanced melanoma improve survival, but carry potential serious side effects and high costs. This study aimed to assess the timing and use of systemic therapies in the months before death. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (July 2017-June 2020) who died before July 2020 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We evaluated the timing of systemic therapies within 30 days and 3 months before death, and studied patient and tumor characteristics associated with systemic therapy use between diagnosis and death. Out of 1097 patients 68% received systemic therapy. Almost 25% and 10% started a new therapy within 90 days and within 30 days before death, respectively. Female sex, elevated LDH, BRAF mutation, poor ECOG performance status (≥3), and high comorbidity index reduced the odds of receiving immune therapy. Poor performance status and high comorbidity decreased the odds for both therapies. A considerable number of patients started systemic therapy shortly before death, emphasizing the importance of considering potential benefits and drawbacks through shared decision-making.

The age-related impact of surviving sarcoma on health-related quality of life: data from the SURVSARC study.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data of sarcoma survivors are scarce and the impact of age remains unclear. The aims of this population-based study were to (i) compare HRQoL scores amongst three age-groups [adolescents and young adults (AYA, aged 18-39 years), older adults (OA, aged 40-69 years) and elderly (aged ≥70 years)]; (ii) compare HRQoL of each sarcoma survivor age group with an age- and sex-matched normative population sample; (iii) determine factors associated with low HRQoL per age group. METHODS: Dutch sarcoma survivors, who were 2-10 years after diagnosis, were invited to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-questions questionnaire on HRQoL. RESULTS: In total, 1099 survivors (58% response rate) completed the questionnaire: 186 AYAs, 748 OAs and 165 elderly. The median time since diagnosis for all patients was 5.2 years. Bone sarcomas were seen in 41% of AYAs, 22% of OAs and in 16% of elderly survivors (P < 0.01). AYA and OA survivors reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful worse physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning compared with a matched norm population, which was not the case for elderly survivors. AYAs reported significantly worse scores on emotional and cognitive functioning compared with OA and elderly survivors. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, osteosarcoma and chordoma were the subtypes of which survivors reported the lowest HRQoL scores in comparison with the norm. For all age groups, chemotherapy, having a bone sarcoma and having comorbidities were most frequently associated with low scores on HRQoL subscales, whereas a shorter time since diagnosis was not. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide sarcoma survivorship study, the disease and its treatment had relatively more impact on the HRQoL of AYA and OA survivors than on elderly survivors. These results emphasise the need for personalised follow-up care that not only includes risk-adjusted care related to disease relapse, but also age-adjusted care.

Impact of extent of disease on 1-year healthcare costs in patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: retrospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this retrospective observational study was to determine the impact of the extent of peritoneal disease on 1-year healthcare costs in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) who undergo cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). The extent of peritoneal disease, expressed by the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), directly affects the complexity of CRS + HIPEC and ultimately survival outcomes. The impact of the PCI on treatment-related healthcare costs remains unknown. METHODS: Data from patients with colorectal PM who underwent CRS + HIPEC between January 2012 and November 2017 were extracted retrospectively from an institutional database. Patients were divided into four subgroups with PCI scores ranging from 0 to 20. Treatment-related costs up to 1 year after CRS + HIPEC were obtained from the financial department. Differences in costs and survival outcomes were compared using the χ2 test and Kruskal-Wallis H test. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included (PCI 0-5, 22 patients; PCI 6-10, 19 patients; PCI 11-15, 17 patients; PCI 16-20, 15 patients). Median (i.q.r.) costs were significantly increased for the PCI 11-15 and PCI 16-20 groups (€51 029 (42 500-58 575) and €46 548 (35 194-60 533) respectively) compared with those for the PCI 0-5 and PCI 6-10 groups (€33 856 (25 293-42 235) and €39 013 (30 519-51 334) respectively) (P = 0·009). CONCLUSION: Treatment-related healthcare costs are significantly increased among patients with extensive tumour burden (PCI score 10 or above) who undergo CRS + HIPEC for the treatment of colorectal PM.

ANTECEDENTES: El objetivo de este estudio observacional retrospectivo fue determinar el impacto de la extensión de la enfermedad peritoneal sobre los costes de atención médica al año en pacientes con metástasis peritoneales (peritoneal metastases, PM) de origen colorrectal que se someten a cirugía citorreductora con quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, CRS + HIPEC). La extensión de la enfermedad peritoneal, expresada por el índice de carcinomatosis peritoneal (peritoneal cancer index, PCI), afecta directamente a la complejidad de la CRS + HIPEC y, en última instancia, a los resultados de supervivencia. El impacto de la PCI en los costes de la atención médica relacionados con el tratamiento sigue siendo desconocido. MÉTODOS: Los datos de pacientes con PM de origen colorrectal que se sometieron a CRS + HIPEC entre enero de 2012 y noviembre de 2017 se extrajeron retrospectivamente de una base de datos institucional. Los pacientes se dividieron en cuatro subgrupos con PCI que variaron de 0 a 20. Los costes relacionados con el tratamiento hasta un año después de la CRS + HIPEC se obtuvieron del departamento financiero. Las diferencias en los costes y los resultados de supervivencia se compararon mediante los tests χ2 y de Kruskal-Wallis H. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 73 pacientes (PCI 0-5, 22 pacientes; PCI 6-10, 19 pacientes; PCI 11-15, 17 pacientes y PCI 16-20, 15 pacientes). Los costes medios aumentaron significativamente para los grupos PCI 11−15 y PCI 16−20 (51.029€ (rango intercuartílico, RIQ) 42.500€−58575€)) y 46.548€ (RIQ 35.194€-60.533€), respectivamente)) en comparación con los de los grupos PCI 0−5 y PCI 6-10 (33.856€ (RIQ 25.293€−42.23€) y 39.013€ (RIQ 30.519€-51.334€), respectivamente, P = 0,009). CONCLUSIÓN: Los costes de la atención médica relacionados con el tratamiento aumentan significativamente entre los pacientes con una carga tumoral extensa (es decir, PCI ≥ 10) que se someten a CRS + HIPEC para el tratamiento de PM de origen colorrectal.

Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility and safety of performing diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) routinely in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). Methods: Data for consecutive patients who underwent DLS between 2012 and 2018 were extracted retrospectively from an institutional database. The primary outcome was the degree of visibility of the abdominal cavity during DLS. Good laparoscopic evaluation of the abdominal cavity was defined as visibility of at least the regions of the diaphragm, pelvis and small bowel. Secondary outcomes were reasons for perioperative exclusion for CRS + HIPEC, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or above) and difference in overall survival (OS) between patients deemed suitable or unsuitable for CRS + HIPEC. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. Results: Some 184 patients were analysed. Good laparoscopic evaluation was possible in 138 patients (75·0 per cent), and 24 (13·0 per cent) had conversion to an open procedure. Ninety-three patients (50·5 per cent) were excluded for CRS + HIPEC, most commonly because of absence of colorectal PM (34 patients, 37 per cent) or extensive disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index 20 or above) (33 patients, 35 per cent). Major complications occurred in five patients (2·7 per cent), with no postoperative deaths. Median OS was significantly decreased in patients who were excluded due to extensive disease (14 (95 per cent c.i. 10 to 18) months) compared with patients suitable for CRS + HIPEC (36 (27 to 45) months) (P < 0·001). Conclusion: Routinely performing DLS in patients with suspicion of colorectal PM to evaluate suitability for CRS + HIPEC is feasible and safe, avoiding the morbidity of an unnecessary laparotomy in patients with extensive disease.

Antecedentes: El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar la viabilidad y seguridad de realizar una laparoscopia diagnóstica (diagnostic laparoscopy, DLS) de rutina en pacientes con sospecha de metástasis peritoneal (peritoneal metastasis, PM) de origen colorrectal para evaluar la idoneidad para la cirugía citorreductora con quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (cytoreductive surgery + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, CRS+HIPEC). Métodos: Los datos de los pacientes consecutivos que fueron sometidos a DLS entre 2012 y 2018 se obtuvieron retrospectivamente de una base de datos institucional. La visualización de al menos las regiones de los diafragmas, pelvis e intestino delgado se definió como una correcta evaluación laparoscópica de la cavidad abdominal. Los resultados secundarios fueron las complicaciones postoperatorias mayores (Clavien­Dindo grado ≥ III), razones para la exclusión perioperatoria para CRS+HIPEC y diferencia en supervivencia global (overall survival, OS) entre pacientes que se consideraron apropiados y no apropiados para CRS+HIPEC. Se realizaron análisis de Kaplan­Meier y análisis de riesgos proporcionales. Resultados: Se analizaron 181 pacientes. En 138 pacientes (75,0%) fue posible una adecuada evaluación laparoscópica, mientras que 24 casos (13%) fueron convertidos a un procedimiento abierto. Se excluyeron 93 (50,5%) pacientes para CRS+HIPEC, más comúnmente por la ausencia de PM colorrectales (36,6%) o enfermedad extensa (37,6%). En cinco pacientes aparecieron complicaciones mayores (2,7%), sin mortalidad postoperatoria. La mediana de la OS disminuyó de forma significativa en pacientes que fueron excluidos debido a enfermedad extensa (14 meses, i.c. del 95% 10­18) en comparación con pacientes idóneos para CRS+HIPEC (35 meses, i.c. del 95% 30­40, P < 0,0001). Conclusión: La realización rutinaria de DLS en pacientes con sospecha de PM de origen colorrectal para evaluar la idoneidad de la CRS+HIPEC es viable y segura. La morbilidad de una laparotomía innecesaria puede prevenirse en pacientes con enfermedad extensa o ausencia de PM colorrectales.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a feasibility and safety study.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis typically involves cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and if possible, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, a substantial percentage of patients never receive adjuvant chemotherapy because of postoperative complications. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be beneficial in this setting, so we assessed its feasibility and safety when used before cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. METHODS: In this non-randomized, single-center, observational feasibility study, patients were scheduled to receive six cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin before cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Computed tomography was performed after the third and sixth chemotherapy cycles to evaluate tumor response, and patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC if there were no pulmonary and/or hepatic metastases. Postoperative complications, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, were compared with those of a historic control group that received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 14 patients included in the study, 4 and 3 had to terminate neoadjuvant chemotherapy early because of toxicity and tumor progression, respectively. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC were performed in eight patients, and the timing and severity of complications were comparable to those of patients in the historic control group treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with peritoneal metastases due to colorectal carcinoma can be treated safely with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before definitive therapy with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR 3905, registered on 20th march, 2013, http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3905.

Pelvic lymph node dissection in metastatic melanoma to the groin should not be abandoned yet.

BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been a plea to abandon the pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma to the groin. A trend towards a conservative surgical treatment is already evolving in several European countries. The purpose of this study is to identify factors associated with pelvic nodal involvement, in order to improve selection of patients whom might benefit from a pelvic nodal dissection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data concerning patients who underwent an inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) with pelvic lymph node dissection for metastatic melanoma at the University Medical Center Groningen. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with pelvic nodal involvement. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for 18F-FDG PET + contrast enhanced CT-scan and 18F-FDG PET + low dose CT-scan. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-twenty-six ILND's were performed in 223 patients. The most common histologic subtype was superficial spreading melanoma (42.6%). In patients with micrometastatic disease, 15.7% had pelvic nodal involvement vs 28.2% in patients with macrometastatic disease (p: 0.030). None of the characteristics known prior to the ILND, were associated with pelvic nodal involvement. Imaging methods were unable to accurately predict pelvic nodal involvement. Negative predictive value was 78% for 18F-FDG PET + low dose CT-scan and 86% for an 18F-FDG PET + contrast enhanced CT-scan. CONCLUSION: There are no patient- or tumor characteristics available that can predict pelvic nodal involvement in patients with melanoma metastasis to the groin. As no imaging technique is able to predict pelvic nodal involvement it seems unjust to abandon the pelvic lymph node dissection.

Fractures after multimodality treatment of soft tissue sarcomas with isolated limb perfusion and radiation; likely to occur and hard to heal.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment associated fractures (TAFs) are known severe side effects after surgery and radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). There is no literature about TAF after multimodality treatment with isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for locally advanced STS. This study aimed to analyze predictive factors, treatment and outcome for TAF after multimodality treatment with ILP. METHOD: Out of 126 consecutive patients undergoing ILP after 1991 till now, 25 patients were excluded due to no surgery or direct amputation at initial surgery. Therefore, 101 patients were at risk and 12 developed a TAF (12%). RESULTS: The majority of tumors was located at the upper leg and knee (N = 60), and 11 patients developed a TAF (18%) after median 28 (5-237) months. Twenty-five tumors were located at the lower leg, and 1 patient developed a TAF after 12 months (4%). No patients with a tumor at the upper extremities (N = 16) developed a TAF. Ten out of 12 patients with a fracture received adjuvant RT with a dose of 50 Gy, and a median boost dose of 18 (10-20) Gy. Predictive factors were periosteal stripping, age over 65 years at time of treatment and tumor size after ILP ≥10 cm. Multivariate analysis showed periosteal stripping and tumor size after ILP ≥10 cm as significant predictive factors. The majority of the fractures were treated with intramedullary nailing. Only one of 12 patients without radiotherapy reached bone union (8%). The median survival after developing TAF was 18 (1-195) months. CONCLUSION: The overall risk of TAF after multimodality treatment with ILP was relatively high with 15% at ten years. The incidence of TAF for patients with tumors located at the thigh and knee after resection with periosteal stripping and radiotherapy was even >50%. The treatment of these fractures is challenging due to the high non-union rate, requiring an extensive orthopedic oncological TAF experience.

[Using the greater omentum for the treatment of tissue damage after radiotherapy]. / Het omentum majus voor de behandeling van weefselschade ontstaan na radiotherapie.

Four patients presented with tissue damage after having surgery and radiotherapy for a malignancy. Two patients presented with ischaemic tissue damage many years after treatment--a woman aged 71 presented 40 years after and a man aged 56 presented 12 years after treatment. A 44-year-old-woman presented with chronic seroma after surgical resection, which had been aggravated by radiotherapy. In a man aged 48, a chronic infection in irradiated tissue did not respond to antibiotics. These complications proved to be resistant to conservative treatment and surgery was indicated. All patients underwent resection of the damaged irradiated tissues and transposition of the greater omentum, which proved to be effective. The pedicled omentoplasty is able to transpose well-vascularized tissue with angiogenetic and immunological properties to tissues with no spontaneous healing capacity.

Positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer using (18)F-3'-deoxy-3'-fluoro-l-thymidine ((18)F-FLT)-a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study investigated the feasibility of (18)F-3'-deoxy-3'-fluoro-l-thymidine ((18)F-FLT) as a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for the visualisation of breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer underwent (18)F-FLT-PET prior to surgery. The uptake of (18)F-FLT was determined in the primary tumour and in the axilla. RESULTS: Eight tumours were visualized by (18)F-FLT-PET with a mean uptake value (SUV(mean)) of 1.7 and mean tumour-non-tumour ratio (TNT) of 5.0. In seven patients, axillary lymph-node metastases were found at pathological examinations, however, (18)F-FLT-PET showed uptake in only two large (and clinically evident) lymph-node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FLT shows uptake in most primary breast tumours and in large axillary lymph-node metastases.