Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 123(5): 477-81, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19128521

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Young's syndrome describes a combination of male infertility, azoospermia, bronchiectasis and sinusitis. Although Young's syndrome is a well accepted disorder within the realms of infertility medicine, it is also accepted as being a potential cause of sino-nasal disease which is rarely seen by otolaryngologists. However, the significance of the sinus component within this triad is not fully understood. To gain further insight into the relationship of sinusitis with Young's syndrome, we reviewed all of the currently available published literature. RESULTS: Within the reviewed literature, the diagnosis of sinusitis in Young's syndrome was crude and poorly defined; there was little emphasis on sinus disease in most publications. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of Young's syndrome is reported to be declining, and the level of evidence regarding sinus disease within this syndrome is limited to case series only. There is, in fact, little evidence to support Young's syndrome being a significant aetiological factor for sinus disease, nor indeed to support the existence of Young's syndrome as an entity in its own right. The only documented aetiological factor is mercury exposure in childhood, an event that is seldom currently encountered; this would support our theory of the extinction of the condition. As an incidental finding, we found that the term Young's syndrome refers to two different medical conditions.


Assuntos
Azoospermia/epidemiologia , Bronquiectasia/epidemiologia , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Azoospermia/complicações , Bronquiectasia/complicações , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Sinusite/complicações , Síndrome
3.
J Laryngol Otol ; 119(1): 16-8, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15807956

RESUMO

Thirty-two members of staff from the Ear, Nose and Throat Department at Warrington General Hospital were asked to estimate blood loss in commonly encountered epistaxis scenarios. Results showed that once the measured volume was above 100 ml, visual estimation became grossly inaccurate. Comparison of medical and non-medical staff showed under-estimation was more marked in the non-medical group. Comparison of doctors versus nurses showed no difference in estimation, and no difference was found between grades of staff.


Assuntos
Epistaxe/sangue , Determinação do Volume Sanguíneo , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Julgamento , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Recursos Humanos em Hospital
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA