Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 21(5): 461-8, 2014 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24721414

RESUMO

CONTEXT AND AIM: Guidelines have been published regularly since 2010 by the ANSM (the Health Products Safety Agency) advising against antitussive drugs for infants because of their inefficacy and their side effects (convulsions, respiratory congestion). Antihistamines, mucolytics, and terpene-based suppositories have theoretically disappeared from infant pharmacopoeia. We assessed the degree of compliance with these guidelines on the part of health professionals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2012 to August 2012, 198 general practitioners and 44 pediatricians were assessed in the Alpes-Maritimes department of France by means of questionnaires. At the same time, an analysis of medical prescriptions was sought from the Regional Directorate of Medical Services (RDMS) of the PACA-Corse region Health Insurance. RESULTS: The rate of noncompliance with the contraindications was 14.9% (17.7% general practitioners and 2.3% pediatricians). The RDMS study showed a slight decrease in prescriptions for antitussives not recommended from 2011 to 2012: -21% for pediatricians, -15.5% for generalist physicians. CONCLUSION: Continued educational and informative campaigns are therefore needed to stop medical prescriptions of cough medicines for infants, which should also involve parents.


Assuntos
Antitussígenos , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Antitussígenos/efeitos adversos , Antitussígenos/uso terapêutico , Contraindicações , Expectorantes/efeitos adversos , Expectorantes/uso terapêutico , França , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Supositórios , Terpenos/efeitos adversos , Terpenos/uso terapêutico , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 21(5): 469-75, 2014 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726669

RESUMO

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Although commonplace and usually not serious, acute cough in the context of upper respiratory tract infection is a frequent reason for consultation and generates significant parental anxiety. Parents often request active drug intervention. Following the contraindications in infants of mucolytics, Hélicidine(®), antihistamines, and terpene-based suppositories, issued between 2010 and 2011 by the Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), we wished to assess whether these contraindications were known by parents and applied in pharmacies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An assessment of compliance with these contraindications was made by a double declarative prospective observational study in Nice, first with 29 pharmacists and pharmacy technicians (4-25 August 2012) and then with 289 parents of infants (December 2011 to April 2012). RESULTS: The rate of noncompliance with contraindications was 23.8 % for parents and 34.5 % of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Consumption of cough medicines was inversely correlated to the ability to perform a correct nasal wash (OR=2.3). Only 21 % of parents used nasal wash properly. Full-time work was a risk factor for noncompliance with contraindications (OR=1.91). CONCLUSION: ANSM contraindications still have a limited impact on pharmacists and families. Therefore, efforts must be pursued to stop delivering cough medicines for infants. The information and educational campaigns should also involve parents and help to improve nasal wash use.


Assuntos
Antitussígenos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Expectorantes , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Letramento em Saúde , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos , Pais/educação , Farmacêuticos , Terpenos , Extratos de Tecidos , Antitussígenos/efeitos adversos , Antitussígenos/uso terapêutico , Contraindicações , Expectorantes/efeitos adversos , Expectorantes/uso terapêutico , França , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Lavagem Nasal/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Supositórios , Terpenos/efeitos adversos , Terpenos/uso terapêutico , Extratos de Tecidos/efeitos adversos , Extratos de Tecidos/uso terapêutico
3.
Int J Epidemiol ; 35(2): 479-87, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16434429

RESUMO

Since 1993, many studies on the health of Persian Gulf War Veterans (PGWV) have been undertaken. These studies have concluded that there has been an increased mortality due to external causes, no excess of recognized diseases, and no effect on PGWV children. When compared with the non-deployed, PGWV have reported a higher frequency of infertility as well as different symptoms, but a specific Gulf War syndrome was not identified. In October 2000, the French government asked an independent working group to analyse the scientific literature on PGWV health. The group concluded that an exhaustive study of French PGWV was to be undertaken. The objectives of this study were to describe the exposures of PGWV in the operations theatre, to report on the symptoms and diseases that occurred in PGWV and their children during and after the military campaign, and to explore the possibility of a Gulf War syndrome. This exhaustive cross-sectional study, which included all civilians and troops who served in the Gulf from August 1990 to July 1991, began in January 2002. Data were collected by postal self-administered questionnaires. A standardized clinical evaluation was performed by 27 clinics of occupational diseases and nine military hospitals. Symptoms and diseases which appeared after the campaign are described. To date, among 20,261 PGWV, 5,666 participated in the study (28%). The most frequent symptoms described since the return from the Gulf were headaches (83%), neurological or psychological symptoms, and back pain. Apart from well-known symptoms associations (respiratory, neurocognitive, psychological and musculo-skeletal syndromes), no other cluster was highlighted by our analysis.


Assuntos
Guerra do Golfo , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Golfo Pérsico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Dor nas Costas/epidemiologia , Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Síndrome do Golfo Pérsico/etiologia , Veteranos
4.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 53(1): 69-75, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15888991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aims of our study were to examine the factors associated with cervical screening in women whose tests are supported by a national health insurance scheme, the Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale. METHODS: A self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 10,000 adults aged 20 to 60 years old living in France and insured with the Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale. Response rate was 66.5% (N=6,518). RESULTS: Of the 3,741 women aged 20 to 60 years old, 88.5% have had at least one cervical smear. Mean age for the first cervical smear was 29.3 years (95% CI: 29.0-29.6). Preventive practices (mammogram, cervical smear and fecal occult-blood testing) were strongly related. The predictive factors for cervical smear during the past three years included: age between 30 and 49 years, marital status (married, separated or divorced), the socioeconomic status (unskilled workers reported cervical smears less often than women from other socioeconomic status). Consulting a gynaecologist in the past twelve months increased 9-fold the probability of having a cervical smear and 2-fold when consulting a general practitioner compared to women who consulted neither a gynecologist nor a general practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: In a population whose tests were supported by a national health scheme, the socioeconomic status was one of the determinants of Pap smear.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , França , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA