A comparison of two different management plans for patients requiring both carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a prophylactic operation that is used to mitigate the risk of stroke caused by embolism of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid bifurcation. Previously, the large, multicentre, randomised, controlled GALA study found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients treated using general or local anaesthesia. While this study provided important insights into disease outcomes based on treatment modalities, it did not answer questions regarding the safety of CEA under local anaesthesia in patients at high risk for cardiovascular complications. Here, we examined the use of two different management plans in patients requiring both carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in terms of their effects on hospital mortality. METHODS: Thirty-four patients consecutively operated on in our cardiovascular department were included in this analysis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the anaesthetic management plan. The first group consisted of patients who underwent CEA and CABG under general anaesthesia in the same session (GA group); the second group consisted of patients who initially underwent CEA under cervical block anaesthesia followed by CABG under general anaesthesia in a separate session (CB-GA group). These two groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications and hospital mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction was higher in the CB-GA group, with four patients experiencing postoperative myocardial infarction, compared to no patients in the GA group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients requiring CEA and CABG, performing both operations under general anaesthesia in the same session was safer than initially performing CEA under cervical block anaesthesia followed by CABG under general anaesthesia.

Effect of iloprost on renal function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a clinical study.

PURPOSE: Renal dysfunction remains a serious complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. To date, a number of different strategies, including new pharmacologic agents, off-pump and cardiopulmonary bypass techniques have been used to avoid it, but none of them proves the excellent result. METHODS: Between April 2009 to September 2011, 185 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing elective CABG were included the study. Iloprost was given with the onset of rewarming period at a dose of 1.25-2.5 ng/kg/min and it was ended together with the ending of CPB in 94 patients and remaining were in the control group. Creatinine clearance (CCr) and GFR were measured at the time of hospitalisation and on day first and fifth postoperatively. Serum potassium level was determined every 6 hours, during the first 24 hours postoperatively, and every 12 hours for the next 72 hours, and glomerular filtration rate was estimated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative comorbidity. There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidity or mortality between either of the two groups that completed the study. However, urine output during the operation was significantly higher in the study group. An increase in creatine levels was more common in the control group. Development of a new CCr less than 50 ml/min was also significantly higher in the control group, postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that prophylactic intravenous iloprost administration after initiation of a rewarming period during CPB in patients undergoing CABG surgery is associated with improved renal function, compared with conventional treatment in well-hydrated patients. It also has a good safety profile and is generally well tolerated.