Real study: Re-treatment evaluated on visual acuity for Lucentis® in neovascular AMD.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of a monthly injection of Lucentis® until stable visual acuity (VA) is obtained for three consecutive months without exudation in patients with neovascular age macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Prospective, single-center, non-controlled trial including naïve AMD patients with neovascularization. An assessment of VA and a spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline and every month. Monthly injections of Lucentis® were performed over three months. The monthly injections were then continued until three consecutive stable VA results were obtained with no signs of exudation. RESULTS: Fifteen out of the 21 patients included were anatomically good responders. A mean gain of +14Le (9) was obtained up to the point at which there was no exudation. There was no additional gain from this point until 3 consecutive stable VA results were obtained. During the PRN phase, an additional mean gain of +3.2Le (7.7) was obtained. CONCLUSION: This initial VA-guided regimen with ranibizumab might prevent the slight decrease in VA observed during the first year of PRN studies.

[Uveitis: Diagnostic work-up. Recommendations from an expert committee]. / Prise en charge diagnostique des uvéites : recommandations d'un groupe d'experts.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic work-up of uveitis involves many uncertainties. Search for an etiology should take into account the epidemiology of uveitis and focus on the most severe diseases or those, which can be treated. This work was undertaken to establish recommendations for the diagnosis work-up of uveitis. METHODS: Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary panel of 15 experts, including internists, ophthalmologists and a rheumatologist and are based on a review of the literature with regard to effectiveness of investigations and the results of the ULISSE study, which is the first prospective study assessing the efficiency of a standardized strategy for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis. Children, immunocompromised patients, severe retinal vasculitis and specific ophthalmological entities are excluded from these recommendations. RESULTS: Investigations should be first guided by the history and physical examination. Serological screening for syphilis is the only test appropriate in all forms of uveitis. If no diagnosis is made after this stage, we propose investigations guided by the anatomic characteristics of uveitis. It includes HLA B27 testing (in unilateral acute anterior non-granulomatous uveitis), serum angiotensin converting enzyme, interferon-gamma release assay and chest CT (chronic uveitis), cerebral MRI and anterior chamber tap with IL10 analysis (intermediate or posterior uveitis in patients over 40 years). Investigations ordered in the absence of orientation are almost always unhelpful. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a strategy for the etiologic diagnosis of uveitis. The recommendations should be updated regularly. The efficiency of more invasive investigations has yet to be evaluated.