Evaluation of sensitivity and inter- and intra-observer variability in the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus with enhanced magnification endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnification endoscopy with acetic acid or dye for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus is presently undergoing clinical evaluation. Current studies report good accuracy in predicting specialized intestinal metaplasia. To date, however, there is no definitive information on the inter- and intra-observer variability of these methods applied to the diagnosis of normal and dysplastic Barrett's mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients with endoscopically suspected Barrett's esophagus were investigated prospectively with the zoom endoscope after contrast enhancement of the mucosa with 1.5% acetic acid. Two hundred and twenty-three enlarged and histologically investigated areas of gastric, cardiac, normal and dysplastic Barrett's mucosa were photodocumented and in randomized sequence presented to 4 endoscopists in a blinded manner (2 with and 2 without experience of zoom endoscopy for evaluation). The reference for the first evaluation (A1) was standard endoscopic photographs of the respective, histologically confirmed mucosal entity. In a second evaluation (A2), the pictures were again interpreted by the same blinded investigators, but this time a modified pit-pattern classification as proposed by Sharma et al. was employed as the evaluation reference. RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity for specialized intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus calculated for the A1 evaluation ranged -- investigator dependently -- from 54.9% to 80.7% and for A2 from 42.2% to 81.5%. The inter- and intra-observer variability for the evaluation procedure A1 and A2 was high (all kappa values <0.4). In particular, the inexperienced investigators demonstrated high intra-observer variability and low sensitivity in comparison with the experienced investigators. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of Barrett's mucosa using enhanced magnification endoscopy after acetic acid instillation is associated with a high level of interobserver variability. One reason is a frequent mismatch between cardiac mucosa and non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa.

Sclerosing cholangitis following severe trauma: description of a remarkable disease entity with emphasis on possible pathophysiologic mechanisms.

AIM: Persistent cholestasis is a rare complication of severe trauma or infections. Little is known about the possible pathomechanisms and the clinical course. METHODS: Secondary sclerosing cholangitis was diagnosed in five patients with persistent jaundice after severe trauma (one burn injury, three accidents, one power current injury). Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed with regard to possible trigger mechanisms for cholestasis, and the clinical course was recorded. RESULTS: Diagnosis of secondary sclerosing cholangitis was based in all patients on the primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-like destruction of the intrahepatic bile ducts at cholangiography after exclusion of PSC. In four patients, arterial hypotension with subsequent ischemia may have caused the bile duct damage, whereas in the case of power current injury direct thermal damage was assumed to be the trigger mechanism. The course of secondary liver fibrosis was rapidly progressive and proceeded to liver cirrhosis in all four patients with a follow-up >2 years. Therapeutic possibilities were limited. CONCLUSION: Posttraumatic sclerosing cholangitis is a rare but rapidly progressive disease, probably caused by ischemia of the intrahepatic bile ducts via the peribiliary capillary plexus due to arterial hypotension. Gastroenterologists should be aware of this disease in patients with persistent cholestasis after severe trauma.

Ten years experience with piezoelectric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones.

BACKGROUND: A critical review of the experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) of gallbladder stones is needed to clarify whether this method should continue to be applied to patients. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones were treated by piezoelectric ESWL according to a prospective protocol between 1988 and 1997. ESWL treatment was limited to a maximum of three (solitary stones <20 mm diameter) to five sessions (larger solitary or multiple stones) and 3000 pulses per session. Univariate and multivariate analyses of pretreatment and treatment variables were performed to investigate their impact on fragmentation efficacy and stone clearance. A tree-based analysis was used to identify prognostically homogenous subgroups of individuals with maximum benefit from ESWL. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight patients, 76% female and 24% male, with a mean age of 46 (SD, 13) years, were selected for evaluation. Cox regression analysis identified three pretreatment variables with significant prognostic impact: (1) number of gallstones >1 (relative risk, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.9-3.5)), (2) size of stones >17 mm (1.7 (1.4-2.2)), and (3) computed tomography (CT) density of stones >55 Hounsfield units (H) (1.4 (1.1-1.8)). According to tree-based analysis, the stone clearance rate after 1 year was 85% (95% CI, 75-91%) for solitary stones <16 mm, 79% (70-86%) for solitary stones > or =16 mm with a CT density <84 H, 45% (32-55%) for solitary stones > or =16 mm with a CT density > or =84 H, and 42% (30-51%) for multiple stones. Five years after stone clearance, recurrence occurred in 43% of patients (95% CI, 39-47%). CONCLUSIONS: ESWL treatment showed an acceptable stone clearance in the case of small solitary gallbladder stones (<16 mm) or larger solitary stones with a CT density <84 H, but a very low success rate in the case of multiple stones. The poor long-term success, however, is an important argument against the use of ESWL of gallbladder stones.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones in cystic duct remnants and Mirizzi syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of bile duct calculi is established, there are few studies of the value of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct remnant stones and for Mirizzi syndrome. METHODS: Patients who required extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones were identified in a cohort of 239 patients with bile duct stones treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy between January 1989 and December 2001 at a single institution. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone contact. OBSERVATIONS: Six women (age range 19-85 years) underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones after failure of endoscopic treatment measures. Three of the patients presented with retained cystic duct remnant calculi (one also had Mirizzi syndrome type I), and 3 presented with Mirizzi syndrome type I. The stones were fragmented successfully by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in all patients; the fragments were extracted endoscopically in 5 patients. Endoscopy plus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was definitive treatment for all patients except one who subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones in a cystic duct remnant and in Mirizzi syndrome can be successfully treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in conjunction with endoscopic measures. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is especially useful when surgery is contraindicated.

Pancreatic duct stones in chronic pancreatitis: criteria for treatment intensity and success.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate interventional endoscopic management of pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis by describing therapeutic methods and defining factors that predict technical success. METHODS: Records were retrospectively analyzed for 125 patients with symptoms caused by chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic duct stones (single 43, multiple 82) treated by interventional endoscopy, including extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 85% of patients (11 patients by mechanical lithotripsy, 114 by piezoelectric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy). There were no serious complications from lithotripsy. Univariate analysis disclosed a statistically significant association between treatment success and patient age as well as prepapillary location of stones. A greater therapeutic effort was necessary in patients with stones located in the tail of the pancreas, 2 or more stones, a stone 12 mm or more in diameter, or who have had a longer duration (>8 years) of the disease. However, with exception of the last parameter, correction for multiple testing of data removed statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy enhances endoscopic measures for treatment of pancreatic duct stones when mechanical lithotripsy fails. Middle-aged patients in the early stages of chronic pancreatitis with stones in a prepapillary location proved to be the best candidates for successful treatment. Unfavorable patient-related or morphologic factors can be compensated for through more intense efforts at therapy.