Civilian Ballistic Injuries to the Atlantoaxial Spine: A Single Institution Case Series.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Describe the injury characteristics of ballistic fractures involving the atlantoaxial spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Civilian gunshot wounds to the spine are an increasingly common injury in the United States. Civilian studies have focused on ballistic injuries to the entire spine as opposed to a region-specific fashion. Only a single 10-patient case series investigating ballistic fractures to the upper cervical spine (C1 and C2) exists, leaving a large gap in the understanding of this injury complex. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. Extracted data included patient demographics, neurological status on presentation, fracture morphology, assessment of stability, other associated injuries, and surgical procedures performed. Proportional analysis was performed to characterize the fractures and their associated neurological injuries. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were identified, with 86% being male with an average patient age of 30.0 ± 10.36 years (mean ± SD). Fracture morphology was characterized using proportional analysis. Initial neurological exams were either ASIA A or ASIA E, without any incomplete injuries noted. Patients who sustained a transcanal injury did not show any neurological improvement. The initial in-hospital mortality rate was 5.6%, with a 1-year mortality rate of 8.3%. There is a high incidence of associated vascular injury (66%) and mandible fracture (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Ballistic penetrating trauma to the atlantoaxial spine often results in complex injury patterns necessitating multidisciplinary care with high rates of morbidity and mortality. If neurological deficits are present initially, they are often complete. Two thirds of patients sustained an associated vascular injury, which should be screened for with CT angiography.

A predictive model of motor deficit in civilian ballistic lumbosacral spine injuries.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Civilian gunshot wounds to the spine are an increasingly common injury in the USA. A majority of the available research is focused on a military population suffering high energy missile injury. Minimal research has focused on civilian ballistic injuries to the lumbosacral spine as the available studies focus on the entire spine due to limited numbers. PURPOSE: Characterize ballistic injuries to the lumbosacral spine and develop a model to predict the presence of neurological deficit based upon a patients presenting fracture morphology. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred forty-eight consecutive patients that were presented to an urban level 1 trauma center with ballistic injures to the spine involving the levels L1-S2. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Neurological status at presentation and final follow up using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained, and retrospective chart review was performed. Extracted data included patient demographics, neurological status on presentation and final follow-up, fracture morphology, assessment of stability, other associated injuries, and surgical procedures performed. Proportional analysis was performed to characterize the fractures and their associated neurological injuries. Chi-square testing was done to identify fracture characteristics associated with neurologic injury. A multiple logistical regression was performed using fracture characteristics highly associated with neurological deficit to develop a model to predict neurologic deficit. The model was then validated with a receiver operator curve. RESULTS: Of the 148 patients, 14 patients underwent spinal surgery with the most common indication being decompression and foreign body removal. There was a high incidence of intra-abdominal injury (73.6%). Fractures were characterized by level, affected vertebral component, and spinal canal involvement. Neurological injury was classified using the ASIA scale at presentation and final follow up. Odds-ratios of vertebral fracture characteristics showed neurologic deficit was highly associated with pedicle fractures (OR=9.07 [4.14-21.54] - 95% CI), lamina fractures (OR=6.42 [3.16-13.62] - 95% CI), facet fractures (OR=5.95 [2.90-12.79] - 95% CI), intra-canal bone (OR=12.79 [5.98-29.05] - 95% CI), and an intra-canal trajectory (OR=1078 [4.48-28.98]) - 95% CI. Multiple logistic regression was performed to construct a predictive model of neurologic deficit which showed that intra-canal trajectory, pedicle fracture and facet fracture are associated with neurologic deficit. An ROC curve was made with an area of 0.849 ([0.7853 to 0.9128 - 95% CI], p<.0001) demonstrating a good model fit. CONCLUSIONS: Ballistic injuries to the lumbosacral spine involve complex injury patterns in an often polytraumatized patient. Fractures involving the pedicle, lamina, and facet are highly associated with neurologic injury, as is a trans-canal trajectory. A patients fracture morphology can be used to predict if a neurologic deficit is present.

Duration and Magnitude of Opioid Use After Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study performed in a nationwide insurance claims database. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the duration and magnitude of post-operative opioid prescriptions after minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion (MIS SIJF) as compared to other common spine surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MIS SIJF has been reported to significantly improve quality of life and reduce pain. However, there is a paucity of reported data on post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing MIS SIJF for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. METHODS: A nationwide insurance claims database was queried to identify 4,666 patients who underwent MIS SIJF. Patients were stratified by pre-operative opioid use: Opioid naïve, sporadic use, or chronic use were respectively defined as 0,1, or≥2 opioid prescriptions filled within 6 months prior to surgery. Duration of opioid use was defined by the time between MIS SIJF and last opioid prescription filled while magnitude of opioid use was determined by milligram morphine equivalents filled by 30 days post-operation. This opioid use data was compared to that of other common spine surgeries. RESULTS: Patients undergoing MIS SIJF continued to fill opioid prescriptions 1-year post-operatively at significantly higher proportions than those undergoing other common spine procedures assessed by prior literature within each of the pre-operative opioid use cohorts (chronic: 73% vs. 49-62%; P <0.0001, sporadic: 39% vs. 23-28%; P <0.0001, opioid naïve: 22% vs. 15-18%; P <0.0001). Chronic users filled the highest opiate dosages during the 30-day post-operative period, filling on average 64.75 MME/d compared to 19.75 MME/d and 24.25 MME/d by the opioid naïve and sporadic users, respectively. CONCLUSION: After MIS SIJF, opioid naïve patients use fewer opioids and for a shorter period of time compared to patients with sporadic or chronic pre-operative opioid use. MIS SIJF may result in less effective pain reduction when compared to other common spine surgeries evaluated via identical methodology.

Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Have Increased Readmission Rates, Emergency Room Visits, and Costs Following a Hallux Valgus Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) tend to have more complications, higher readmission rates, and increased costs following orthopaedic procedures. This study evaluated patients undergoing hallux valgus correction for their odds of increased (1) readmission rates, (2) emergency room (ER) visits, and (3) costs. METHODS: Patients undergoing hallux valgus corrections with OUD history were identified using a national Medicare administrative claims database of approximately 24 million orthopaedic surgery patients. OUD patients were matched to non-opioid use disorder (NUD) patients in a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index (ECI), diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and tobacco use. The query yielded 6318 patients (OUD = 1276; NUD = 5042) who underwent a hallux valgus correction. Primary outcomes analyzed included odds of 90-day readmission rates, 30-day ER visits, and 90-day episode-of-care costs. Demographics, odds ratios (ORs), ECI, and cost were assessed as appropriate using a Pearson χ2 test, logistic regression, and a t test. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics between OUD and NUD patients. OUD patients had higher incidence and odds of 90-day readmission (9.56% vs 6.04%; OR = 1.55; P < .001) and 30-day ER visits (0.86% vs 0.35%; OR = 2.42; P = .021) and incurred greater 90-day episode-of-care costs ($7208.28 vs $6134.75; P < .001) compared with NUD patient controls. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the possible influence of OUD on higher odds of readmission, ER visits, and costs following a hallux valgus correction. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Watercraft propellers as a mechanism of orthopaedic injuries: injury patterns, management, and complications.

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Recreational watercraft use is popular across the United States, and there is a high rate of injury associated with the use and misuse of these vehicles. Watercraft propeller injuries represent a particularly devastating mechanism of injury. We aim to describe and analyze the range of orthopaedic injuries sustained from a watercraft propeller with a particular focus on the mechanism, injury pattern, management, and complications associated with these unique, high-energy injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 42 patients who sustained injuries from watercraft propeller that presented to a level 1 trauma center was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, surgical management, antibiotic use, and complications. RESULTS: Forty-two patients sustained 96 fractures. Ninety-one fractures (94.8%) were open and 5(5.2%) were closed. Twenty (20.8%) were of the upper extremity, 70(72.9%) were of the lower extremity, and 6(6.3%) were of the pelvic ring. The majority of open fractures were Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA or greater (54, 59.3%). There were 9 total infections affecting 8 of 96 fracture sites (cumulative risk of 8.3%), and other complications included stiffness (3), heterotopic ossification (1), non-union (1), flap failure (1), DVT (2), PE (1), and systemic infection (1) for a total of 19 complications. CONCLUSIONS: Watercraft propellers often result in devastating injuries with high rates of morbidity. The high rate of open fractures and neurovascular injury, necessity for multiple surgeries, and extended length of hospital stay show the need for continued awareness about boat safety and the danger of propellers.