Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: a review on behalf of the CC AFU.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is on the rise among individuals aged 70 and older. While the gold standard for treatment remains surgical resection, some elderly and frail patients with comorbidities are not eligible for this procedure. In selected cases, percutaneous thermal ablation, such as cryotherapy, microwave and radiofrequency, offers less invasive options. General anesthesia is sometimes necessary for such treatments, but most of the procedures can be conducted using mild or deep conscious sedation. This approach is preferably recommended for small cT1a tumors situated at a distance from the renal hilum and/or ureter. Active surveillance remains an alternative in the case of small low grade RCC although it may induce anxiety in certain patients. Recent research has highlighted the potentials of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) as a non-invasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for small renal tumors. This narrative review aims to explore recent advances in SABR for localized RCC, including appropriate patient selection, treatment modalities and administration, as well as efficacy and tolerance assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a literature review using the terms [Kidney cancer], [Renal Cell Carcinoma], [Stereotactic radiotherapy], [SBRT], and [SABR] in the Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases, focusing on prospective and relevant retrospective studies published in English. RESULTS: Studies report local control rates ranging from 70% to 100% with SABR, highlighting its efficacy in treating RCC. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is approximately -5 to -17 mL/min over the years following SABR. Common toxicities are rare, primarily CTCAE grade 1, include fatigue, nausea, chest or back pain, diarrhea, or gastritis. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) may be considered as a viable option for patients with localized RCC who are not suitable candidates for surgery with a high local control rate and a favorable safety profile.. This approach should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting and results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited.

Short-term Darolutamide (ODM-201) Concomitant to Radiation Therapy for Patients with Unfavorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: The Darius (AFU-GETUG P15) Phase 2 Trial Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a standard of care for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, 6 months of ADT generates multiple side effects impacting quality of life (QoL). Darolutamide (an androgen receptor targeting agent [ARTA]) is associated with low blood-brain barrier penetrance and less drug-drug interaction. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a combination of 6 months of darolutamide with EBRT to treat patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The DARIUS trial is a multicenter randomized non comparative phase 2 trial, randomizing the 6-months darolutamide + EBRT arm versus 6-months ADT + EBRT in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint is a biological response defined as prostate-specific antigen ≤0.1 ng/ml at month six of darolutamide or ADT. The key secondary endpoints are biochemical recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, safety, and QoL. Ancillary studies using radiomics and genomic classifier are planned. Sixty-two patients will be included. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In this population of patients requiring ADT combined with EBRT, the use of an ARTA alone, such as darolutamide, may demonstrate antitumoral efficacy while minimizing toxicity and maintaining QoL. Limitations are mainly inherent to the open-label design of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of darolutamide + EBRT compared with 6 months of ADT + EBRT may be efficient in terms of a biological response, avoiding toxicity and altered QoL attributable to ADT in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: The ongoing DARIUS clinical trial assesses short-term (6 months) darolutamide treatment in association with external beam radiation therapy in men with localized prostate cancer. The trial investigates whether single-agent darolutamide can improve the biological response while maintaining a favorable tolerability profile.

Radiation Proctitis in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated by Chemoradiation: Analysis and Predictive Factors From a Retrospective Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Radiation proctitis is a misunderstanding complication of chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. The objective of our study is to provide a detailed description and analysis of predictive factors associated with radiation proctitis in a retrospective cohort of patients treated by chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: All patients treated by exclusive chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer from 2011 to 2017 were included in the study. A bivariate analysis was conducted to establish correlations between the occurrence of radiation proctitis and various clinical and technical variables. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included in the study. The mean dose (SD) to the planning target volume was 47.1 Gy (6.2). Fifty-nine (46.1%) patients underwent brachytherapy. Sixteen patients (12.5%) developed radiation proctitis, grade 2 or higher in 12 patients (9.3%). In univariate analysis, anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatments (P=0.039), older age (P=0.049), rectal volume irradiated at 40 Gy (P=0.01) and 30 Gy (P=0.037) were significantly associated with the occurrence of a grade ≥2 radiation proctitis. The delivered dose to 2 cm3 of rectum (D2cm3) showed a potential association with the occurrence of radiation proctitis of all grades (P=0.064). CONCLUSION: This study highlights clinical and technical factors that should be considered in assessing the risk of radiation proctitis. These results contribute to a better understanding of this complication.

The impact of sarcopenia on survival and treatment tolerance in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia appears to be a negative prognostic factor for poor survival outcomes and worse treatment tolerance in patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We evaluated sarcopenia's impact on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and chemo-radiation tolerance in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) from a monocentric observational study. METHODS: We identified patients with HNC treated by CRT between 2009 and 2018 with pretreatment imaging using positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans (PET/CT). Sarcopenia was measured using the pretreatment PET/CT at the L3 vertebral body using previously published methods. Clinical variables were retrospectively retrieved. RESULTS: Of 216 patients identified, 54 patients (25.47%) met the criteria for sarcopenia. These patients had a lower mean body mass index before treatment (21.92 vs. 25.65 cm/m2 , p < 0.001) and were more likely to have a history of smoking (88.89% vs. 71.52%, p = 0.01), alcohol use (55.56% vs. 38.61%, p = 0.03) and positive human papilloma virus status (67.74% vs. 41.75%, p = 0.011). At 3 years of follow-up, OS and DFS were 75% and 70% versus 82% and 85% for sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients, respectively (p = 0.1 and p = 0.00015). On multivariate analysis, sarcopenia appeared as a pejorative factor on DFS (hazard ratio 2.174, p = 0.0001) in the overall cohort. Sarcopenic patients did not require more chemotherapy and radiation-treatment interruptions and did not suffer from more chemo-induced and radiation-induced grade 3-4 toxicities than their non-sarcopenic counterparts. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia in HNSCC patients is an independent adverse prognostic factor for DFS after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Providing Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Access to Brachytherapy: Experience from a Referral Network for Women Treated in Overseas France.

Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is part of the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Access to IGABT is limited in many regions, thus leading to treatment care disparities. We report the experience of a referral network for women with LACC between radiotherapy facilities in Overseas France and Gustave Roussy. This is a retrospective review of patients with LACC referred to Gustave Roussy, for pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) image-guided adaptive BT after initial radiation therapy in the French overseas between 2014 and 2021. Sixty-four patients were eligible to receive IGABT. Overall treatment time (OTT) was 60.5 days (IQR: 51−68.5). The median follow-up time was 17 months. At two years, estimated probabilities of LC, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were 94.6% (95% CI: 88.9−100.0%), 72.7% (95% CI: 61.1−86.5%), and 82.5% (95% CI: 72.0−94.5%). In multivariable analysis, a D90CTVHR < 85GyEQD2 and a CTVHR volume > 40 cm3 were significant for poorer PFS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) and poorer OS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.004). The centralization of this advanced technique to expert centers requires a well-defined workflow and appropriate dimensioning of resources to minimize OTT.

Re-irradiation of recurrent vertebral metastasis after two previous spinal cord irradiation: A case report.

Background: Management of a recurrent vertebral metastasis in a situation of previously irradiated spinal cord is a challenging clinical dilemma. Case presentation: We report a first case of second retreatment of a spinal metastasis initially irradiated with standard radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), who subsequently progressed with imaging-confirmed local tumor progression at the same level. After a third course of irradiation with SBRT, a complete response was achieved. After 8 months of follow-up, the patients remain free of local recurrence. Conclusion: A third course of vertebral irradiation for a recurrent vertebral metastasis failing to two previous irradiations, in this particular case, have shown the feasibility and efficacy of the technique as a salvage treatment option. This approach could be used in a selected group of patient if an adequate dose is delivered to the target while observing critical tissue tolerance limits.