Is Obesity a Risk Factor for Disorders of Amniotic Fluid?

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies show conflicting evidence as to whether obesity in the absence of other medical or pregnancy-related conditions contributes to amniotic fluid disorders. The purpose of this study is to determine the association between late-pregnancy obesity with oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index [AFI] ≤5 cm or maximum vertical pocket [MVP] <2 cm) and/or polyhydramnios (AFI ≥24 cm or MVP ≥8 cm). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 961 women with singleton gestations who had one or more obstetrical ultrasounds at a single institution at 36 0/7 weeks gestation or beyond between August 1, 2015, and May 1, 2020. Patients were included if they had valid pregnancy dating and a documented AFI and/or MVP. Patients were categorized based on body mass index or BMI (eg, normal, overweight, Class I Obesity, Class II Obesity, or Class III Obesity). RESULTS: A total of 6.2% of patients met criteria for oligohydramnios based on AFI, MVP or both (n = 60). There was no significant association between oligohydramnios and increasing BMI, regardless of obesity class (P = .21). In terms of polyhydramnios, 5.6% of patients met criteria based on AFI, MVP, or both (n = 54). Similarly, there was also no significant association between polyhydramnios and increasing BMI, regardless of obesity class (P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated maternal BMI was not significantly associated with disorders of amniotic fluid, regardless of the severity of obesity.

Effects of lamotrigine and lithium on body weight during maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of lamotrigine maintenance therapy on body weight was assessed retrospectively in analyses of data from two double-blind, placebo- and lithium-controlled, 18-month studies in patients with bipolar I disorder (n = 227 for lamotrigine, 190 for placebo, 166 for lithium). METHODS: Endpoints included mean change in weight, the percentage of patients with > or = 7% change (increase, decrease, fluctuation) in weight, and the percentage of patients with weight-related adverse events during double-blind treatment. RESULTS: Mean weight remained stable during maintenance therapy with lamotrigine. In a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis, mean changes in weight (kg) at week 52 were -1.2 with lamotrigine, +0.2 with placebo, and +2.2 with lithium [estimated difference (95% CI) lamotrigine minus placebo = -1.3 (-3.6, 0.9), p = 0.237; lithium minus placebo = +2.0 (-0.3, 4.4), p = 0.094; lithium minus lamotrigine = +3.4 (1.4, 5.4), p < 0.001]. Analyses were truncated at week 52 because of the high incidence of missing data at later time points. The percentages of patients with a >/=7% weight gain, during randomized treatment, were 10.9%, 7.6% and 11.8% for the lamotrigine, placebo, and lithium groups, respectively. The percentages of patients with a > or = 7% weight loss, during randomized treatment, were 12.1%, 11.5%, and 5.1% for the lamotrigine, placebo, and lithium groups, respectively. The percentage of patients with a > or = 7% weight loss did not significantly differ between lamotrigine and placebo but was significantly higher with lamotrigine than lithium. The incidences of > or = 7% weight changes and of weight changes reported as adverse events were comparable between active treatments and placebo. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine was associated with stable body weight during 1 year of treatment and was comparable to placebo in mean weight change, incidence of clinically significant weight change, and incidence of weight changes reported as adverse events in patients with bipolar disorder. Lithium was associated with weight gain, but the magnitude of lithium-associated weight gain was lower in the current analysis than in previous studies.

Safety and tolerability of lamotrigine for bipolar disorder.

Tolerability and safety are important considerations in optimising pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder. This paper reviews the tolerability and safety of lamotrigine, an anticonvulsant recommended in the 2002 American Psychiatric Association guidelines as a first-line treatment for acute depression in bipolar disorder and one of several options for maintenance therapy. This paper reviews the tolerability and safety of lamotrigine using data available from a large programme of eight placebo-controlled clinical trials of lamotrigine enrolling a total of nearly 1800 patients with bipolar disorder. This review is the first to collate all the safety information from these clinical trials, including data from four unpublished studies. The results these trials in which 827 patients with bipolar disorder were given lamotrigine as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for up to 18 months for a total of 280 patient-years of exposure demonstrated that lamotrigine is well-tolerated with an adverse-event profile generally comparable with that of placebo. The most common adverse event with lamotrigine was headache. Lamotrigine did not appear to destabilise mood and was not associated with sexual adverse effects, weight gain, or withdrawal symptoms. Few patients experienced serious adverse events with lamotrigine, and the incidence of withdrawals because of adverse events was low. Serious rash occurred rarely (0.1% incidence) in the clinical development programme including both controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials. These findings - considered in the context of data showing lamotrigine to be effective for bipolar depression - establish lamotrigine as a well-tolerated addition to the psychotropic armamentarium.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation.

Sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) is a unique, non-nicotine smoking cessation aid that is hypothesised to act upon neurological pathways involved in nicotine dependence. Pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies reveal that bupropion SR is metabolised by multiple pathways with no single pathway predominating. When one pathway is inhibited, others are available to compensate. Therefore, only a few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions involving bupropion SR have been observed, although the potential for interactions exists, as with any extensively metabolised drug. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of data from patients receiving daily oral doses of 100mg, 150mg, or 300mg reveal that the anti-smoking efficacy of bupropion SR is directly related to dose. The incidences of dry mouth and insomnia were directly related to bupropion plasma concentrations while the incidence of anxiety was inversely proportional to bupropion plasma concentrations. To maximise efficacy (with an acceptable safety profile), the optimal daily dose for the majority of patients is 300mg.