The yield of chromosomal microarray in pregnancies with congenital cardiac defects and normal noninvasive prenatal screening.

BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis to noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with congenital heart anomalies is currently limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in fetuses with congenital heart defects by its various subtypes following a normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN: Using a population-based, countrywide computerized database, we retrieved the reports of all pregnancies undergoing chromosomal microarray analysis because of congenital heart defects through the years 2013-2019. We examined the risk of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis results and compared it with the results of a local cohort of low-risk pregnancies. Of 5541 fetuses, 78 (1.4%) showed abnormal results. The residual risk of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis results was calculated using several options-trisomies 21, 18, and 13; sex chromosome aneuploidies; 22q11.2 deletion, and deletions and duplications of at least 10 MB in size (genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening)-following the exclusion of theoretically detectable noninvasive prenatal screening anomalies. RESULTS: Of the 1728 fetuses with congenital heart defects, 93 (5.4%) showed clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.1). The result of pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects was compared with the results of the control population. Unique variants were found in 15 pregnancies (16.1%). The detection rate of noninvasive prenatal screening in isolated congenital heart defects varied from 1.0% (aimed at 3 common trisomies) to 2.2% (aimed at 5 common aneuploidies and 22q11.2 deletion) using noninvasive prenatal screening. In nonisolated congenital heart defects, the noninvasive prenatal screening detection rates ranged from 7.8% (aimed at common autosomal trisomies) to 9.2% using genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results following normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 2.0% to 2.8% in isolated congenital heart defects and 4.5% to 5.9% in nonisolated cases and was significantly higher than those of the control cohort in all noninvasive prenatal screening options. In addition, the residual risk following noninvasive prenatal screening aimed at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was significantly higher than those of the control cohort for most specific congenital heart defect subtypes, except for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery. CONCLUSION: The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects following normal noninvasive prenatal screening was higher than those in pregnancies with normal ultrasound in most isolated and nonisolated congenital heart defect subtypes. This information should be taken into account by obstetricians and genetic counselors when considering the option of diagnostic testing.

The phenotype of 15 cases with rare 8q24.13-q24.3 deletions-A new syndrome or still an enigma?

Diagnosis of rare copy number variants (CNVs) with scarce literature evidence poses a major challenge for interpretation of the clinical significance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results, especially in the prenatal setting. Bioinformatic tools can be used to assist in this issue; however, this prediction can be imprecise. Our objective was to describe the phenotype of the rare copy number losses encompassing the 8q24.13-q24.3 locus, and to find common features in terms of genomic coordinates, gene content, and clinical phenotypic characteristics. Appropriate cases were retrieved using local databases of two largest Israeli centers performing CMA analysis. In addition, literature and public databases search was performed. Local database search yielded seven new patients with del (8)(q24.13q24.3) (one of these with an additional copy number variant). Literature and public databases search yielded eight additional patients. The cases showed high phenotypic variability, ranging from asymptomatic adults and fetuses with normal ultrasound to patients with autism/developmental delay (6/11 postnatal cases, 54.5%). No clear association was noted between the specific disease-causing/high-pLI gene content of the described del (8)(q24.13q24.3) to neurodevelopmental disorders, except for a possibly relevant locus encompassing the KCNQ3 gene. We present the challenges in classification of rare variants with limited clinical information. In such cases, genotype-phenotype correlation must be assessed with extra-caution and possibly using additional methods to assist the classification, especially in the prenatal setting.

Is fetal isolated double renal collecting system an indication for chromosomal microarray?

Introduction: Duplication of the renal collecting system is one of the most common variants of urinary tract anatomy. The objective of our study was to examine the risk for chromosomal aberrations in this isolated prenatal sonographic finding.Methods: Data from all chromosomal microarray analyses (CMA) reported to the Ministry of Health between January 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively obtained from a computerized database. All pregnancies with a sonographic diagnosis of the isolated duplex renal collecting system and documentation of CMA result were included. Rate of abnormal CMA findings was compared to the general population risk, based on a systematic review encompassing 9272 cases with normal ultrasound and a local data of 5541 pregnancies undergoing CMA due to maternal request.Results: Two pathogenic CMA finding was found amongst 143 pregnancies with double collecting system (1.4%), not significantly different from the risk for abnormal CMA results in the general population. In addition, five variants of unknown significance were demonstrated (3.5%).Conclusion: To our best knowledge, this analysis is the first report describing the rate of chromosomal anomalies in pregnancies with isolated duplex renal collecting system. Its results suggest that routine invasive prenatal testing with CMA analysis in such cases is no more useful than in the general population. Prospective well-adjusted studies are needed to guide the optimal management of these pregnancies.

Based on a cohort of 52,879 microarrays, recurrent intragenic FBN2 deletion encompassing exons 1-8 does not cause Beals syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA) is a rare connective tissue disorder, associated with heterozygous mutations in the FBN2 gene. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of an intragenic deletion encompassing exons 1-8 of FBN2 gene in Israeli population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search for intragenic FBN2 microdeletions was performed in two databases of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) - genetic laboratory of a tertiary medical center (the primary cohort) and one of the largest Israeli health maintenance organizations (replication cohort). RESULTS: Overall, 52,879 microarray tests were searched for FBN2 microdeletions. The primary cohort constituted of 18,301 CMA tests, among which 33 intragenic FBN2 microdeletions in unrelated individuals were found (0.18%). Prenatal prevalence of this variant was 0.23% (28/12,604), and specifically in low risk pregnancies - 0.29% (22/7464). Of the 28 cases with known parental origin, 27 (96.4%) were of full or partial Ashkenazi Jewish ethnic background. The approximate allele incidence in the Ashkenazi Jewish origin was 0.4% (18/4961). Combined with the 34,578 CMA tests in the replication cohort, the overall frequency of FBN2 microdeletions was 0.24% (125/52,879). None of the pre- or postnatal cases had any clinical manifestations of CCA. DISCUSSION: Intragenic FBN2 microdeletions are found in one of every 420 CMA analyses in Israeli population, and in particular one of every 340 low-risk pregnancies. Due to high allele incidence in Ashkenazi Jewish population (1:275), we suggest that FBN2 gene deletion detected by CMA among Ashkenazi Jews should be interpreted as benign copy number variant.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results From Pregnancies With Various Ultrasonographic Anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: To examine chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with various ultrasonographic anomalies and to characterize the copy number variants in diverse fetal phenotypes. METHODS: We retrospectively examined chromosomal microarray analyses of amniocenteses performed nationwide as a result of fetal ultrasonographic anomalies (structural defects, fetal growth restriction, and polyhydramnios) between January 2013 and September 2017. The rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray findings was compared between the different phenotypes and with a previously described control population of 15,225 pregnancies with normal ultrasonographic findings. RESULTS: Clinically significant chromosomal microarray aberrations were detected in 272 of 5,750 pregnancies (4.7%): 115 (2%) karyotype-detectable and 157 (2.7%) submicroscopic. Most commonly detected copy number variants were 22q11.21 deletions (0.4%) followed by 22q11.21 gain of copy number (0.2%). Specific copy number variants detected among pregnancies with abnormal ultrasonographic findings were up to 20-fold more prevalent compared with low-risk pregnancies. Some variants were associated with specific phenotypes (eg, 22q11.21 microdeletions with cardiovascular and 17q12 microdeletions with genitourinary defects). CONCLUSION: The rate of abnormal amniotic chromosomal microarray analysis results is twice that of karyotypic abnormalities in pregnancies with various abnormal ultrasonographic findings.

When genotype is not predictive of phenotype: implications for genetic counseling based on 21,594 chromosomal microarray analysis examinations.

PurposeTo compare the frequency of copy-number variants (CNVs) of variable penetrance in low-risk and high-risk prenatal samples and postnatal samples.MethodsTwo cohorts were categorized according to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) indication: group I, low-risk prenatal-women with uneventful pregnancy (control group); group II, high-risk prenatal-women whose fetuses had congenital malformations; and group III, postnatal-individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, or multiple congenital anomalies. CNVs were categorized based on clinical penetrance: (i) high (>40%), (ii) moderate (10-40%), and (iii) low (<10%).ResultsFrom 2013 to 2016, 21,594 CMAs were performed. The frequency of high-penetrance CNVs was 0.1% (21/15,215) in group I, 0.9% (26/2,791) in group II, and 2.6% (92/3,588) in group III. Moderate-penetrance CNV frequency was 0.3% (47/15,215), 0.6% (19/2,791), and 1.2% (46/3,588), respectively. These differences were statistically significant. The frequency of low-penetrance CNVs was not significantly different among groups: 0.6% (85/15,215), 0.9% (25/2,791), and 1.0% (35/3,588), respectively.ConclusionHigh-penetrance CNVs might be a major factor in the overall heritability of developmental, intellectual, and structural anomalies. Low-penetrance CNV alone does not seem to contribute to these anomalies. These data may assist pre- and posttest CMA counseling.