Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(9): 5843-5851, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35666412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Expedited or delayed surgery for colon cancer without appropriate work-up increases mortality risk. We sought to identify what patient, social, and hospital factors were associated with timely, guideline-adherent work-up for colon cancer. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 19,046 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database linked with Medicare administrative claims who underwent elective surgery for colon cancer between 2010 and 2015 was performed. Primary outcome was receipt of complete preoperative work-up (colonoscopy, imaging, tumor marker evaluation) and timely surgery within 60 days of diagnosis. Patients were stratified into four groups: (1) adherent; (2) early surgery (< 30 days) with incomplete work-up; (3) surgery between 30 and 60 days with incomplete work-up; and (4) late surgery (> 60 days) with/without work-up. Characteristics were compared and multinomial logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 46.2% of patients received adherent care, 33.1% had early surgery and inadequate work-up, 10.3% had appropriately timed surgery but incomplete work-up, and 10.4% underwent late surgery. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that older, female, Black, and unmarried patients as well as patients living in areas with higher rates of poverty were more likely to receive non-adherent care. A greater proportion of patients at teaching hospitals received complete work-up (57.6% vs. 49.5%) but also underwent late surgery (12.4% vs. 8.6%) compared with non-teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Patient, societal, and hospital factors impact whether patients receive guideline-adherent colon cancer care. Interventions are needed to improve access to timely and guideline-adherent cancer care as a possible mechanism to combat surgical disparities.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Medicare , Idoso , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Surg Res ; 267: 224-228, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34157491

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Workplace diversity is beneficial and results in new ideas and improved performance. Within surgery leadership, the gender gap is improving, but still present. Given the increasing number of women surgery department chairs, we aimed to examine the association of surgery chair gender with division and residency program director gender. We hypothesized that surgery departments with female leadership would have an increase in gender diversity compared to departments led by male chairs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A list of all surgery departments were compiled from the Society of Surgical Chairs website. Gender of department chair, division director and residency program director were examined and compared. Chair position term length was determined based on online public announcements, publicly available curriculum vitae, and institutional profile biographies. RESULTS: Of 178 department chairs included, 10.7% were female, and 89.3% were male. There was no difference in female residency program director leadership between female versus male led programs (42.1 versus 26.1%, P= 0.147). Of the programs with female department chairs, only 29.4% had any female division directors compared to 54.6% led by male chairs (P= 0.055). When examining departments with ≥5 division directors, there was no difference in the average number of female division directors within departments led by female versus male chairs. There was a significant difference in length of surgery chairship, with female chairs holding the position for fewer years than male chairs (median time 5.3 (IQR = 3.4-5.8) versus 7.0 (IQR=4.3-12.3) years, P= 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Female department chair leadership was not associated with increased diversity in divisional leadership compared to departments of surgery led by males.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Estudos Transversais , Docentes de Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Liderança , Masculino , Pesquisadores , Estados Unidos
3.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 58(2): 208-212, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30553746

RESUMO

The purpose of our study was to examine the preoperative clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings associated with peroneal pathology in chronic lateral ankle instability patients, as well as the clinical factors associated with peroneal lesions being detected on MRI. Peroneal pathology was determined from intraoperative findings. Patients with/without peroneal pathology were compared regarding their preoperative clinical findings. MRI reports were examined to determine the sensitivity of detecting peroneal pathologies. Clinical factors were compared between patients (N = 238) with undetected and detected peroneal lesions on MRI. Conservative treatment, preoperative physical therapy, and lack of a traumatic inciting event were associated with peroneal pathology. MRI had a sensitivity of 61.11% for detecting peroneal pathology. No clinical factors were significantly different between "detected" and "undetected" cases. Certain historical factors were associated with peroneal pathology in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability, and MRI had a high false-negative rate. Surgeons should exercise caution when ruling out peroneal pathology based on preoperative physical examination or MRI.


Assuntos
Articulação do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Instabilidade Articular/diagnóstico por imagem , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Adulto , Articulação do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tendinopatia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tendinopatia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Surg Res ; 232: 271-274, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30463729

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Organ transplant volume is at an all-time high. Prospective applicants often utilize individual programs' websites for information when deciding if and where to apply for fellowship training. Accessibility and content from one program's website to the next is highly variable and may contribute to the selection of programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accessibility and content of abdominal transplant surgery fellowship websites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) website provides a complete list of abdominal transplant fellowship programs in the United States. A Google search was performed to determine the presence and accessibility of a program's website. Available websites were evaluated on the presence of 20 content criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-five programs in the United States were identified using the ASTS directory. Websites for fifty-one (78%) fellowship programs were identified. Three-fourths of websites contained 50% or less of the 20 evaluated data points, whereas 24% of websites contained 5 or less criteria. The most and least included data points were program description (100%) and on-call expectations (10%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accessibility and content of a program's website is one major factor that can influence a potential applicant's decision on where to pursue transplant surgery fellowship training. This study revealed that a significant percentage of programs fail to provide a functional website. Of the fifty-one programs that did have websites, information deemed important to prospective applicants may be considered inadequate.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Bolsas de Estudo , Internet , Transplante de Órgãos/educação , Cirurgiões/educação , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA