Sulfonamide bioisosteres of niclosamide enhance antibacterial activity of colistin and bacitracin.

Multicomponent therapy combining antibiotics with enhancer molecules known as adjuvants is an emerging strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance. Niclosamide is a clinically relevant anthelmintic drug with potential to be repurposed for its inherent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria and its ability to potentiate the antibacterial activity of colistin against susceptible and resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Herein, sulfonamide analogs of niclosamide were prepared and found to enhance colistin activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The ability of niclosamide and the new sulfonamide analogs to synergize with bacitracin against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was also discovered.

Exploring Structure-Activity Relationships of Niclosamide-Based Colistin Potentiators in Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Colistin is primarily used as a last resort antibiotic against highly resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Rising rates of colistin resistance, however, may limit future use of this agent. The anthelmintic drug niclosamide has been shown to enhance colistin activity in combination therapy, but a detailed structure-activity relationship (SAR) for niclosamide against GNB has yet to be studied. A series of niclosamide analogs were synthesized to perform an SAR, leading to the discovery of a lead compound that displayed comparable colistin-potentiating activity to niclosamide with reduced cytotoxicity. Overall, this work provides important insights into synthetic strategies for the future development of new niclosamide derivatives and demonstrates that toxicity to mammalian cells can be reduced while maintaining colistin potentiation.

Sulopenem: An Intravenous and Oral Penem for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.

Sulopenem (formerly known as CP-70,429, and CP-65,207 when a component of a racemic mixture with its R isomer) is an intravenous and oral penem that possesses in vitro activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant, extended spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-producing, multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales. Sulopenem is being developed to treat patients with uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) as well as intra-abdominal infections. This review will focus mainly on its use in UTIs. The chemical structure of sulopenem shares properties of penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Sulopenem is available as an oral prodrug formulation, sulopenem etzadroxil, which is hydrolyzed by intestinal esterases, resulting in active sulopenem. In early studies, the S isomer of CP-65,207, later developed as sulopenem, demonstrated greater absorption, higher drug concentrations in the urine, and increased stability against the renal enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 compared with the R isomer, which set the stage for its further development as a UTI antimicrobial. Sulopenem is active against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. Sulopenem's ß-lactam ring alkylates the serine residues of penicillin-binding protein (PBP), which inhibits peptidoglycan cross-linking. Due to its ionization and low molecular weight, sulopenem passes through outer membrane proteins to reach PBPs of Gram-negative bacteria. While sulopenem activity is unaffected by many ß-lactamases, resistance arises from alterations in PBPs (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]), expression of carbapenemases (e.g., carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia), reduction in the expression of outer membrane proteins (e.g., some Klebsiella spp.), and the presence of efflux pumps (e.g., MexAB-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), or a combination of these mechanisms. In vitro studies have reported that sulopenem demonstrates greater activity than meropenem and ertapenem against Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and Staphylococcus epidermidis, as well as similar activity to carbapenems against Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes. With some exceptions, sulopenem activity against Gram-negative aerobes was less than ertapenem and meropenem but greater than imipenem. Sulopenem activity against Escherichia coli carrying ESBL, CTX-M, or Amp-C enzymes, or demonstrating MDR phenotypes, as well as against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, was nearly identical to ertapenem and meropenem and greater than imipenem. Sulopenem exhibited identical or slightly greater activity than imipenem against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative anaerobes, including Bacteroides fragilis. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous sulopenem appear similar to carbapenems such as imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and doripenem. In healthy subjects, reported volumes of distribution (Vd) ranged from 15.8 to 27.6 L, total drug clearances (CLT) of 18.9-24.9 L/h, protein binding of approximately 10%, and elimination half-lives (t½) of 0.88-1.03 h. The estimated renal clearance (CLR) of sulopenem is 8.0-10.6 L/h, with 35.5% ± 6.7% of a 1000 mg dose recovered unchanged in the urine. An ester prodrug, sulopenem etzadroxil, has been developed for oral administration. Initial investigations reported a variable oral bioavailability of 20-34% under fasted conditions, however subsequent work showed that bioavailability is significantly improved by administering sulopenem with food to increase its oral absorption or with probenecid to reduce its renal tubular secretion. Food consumption increases the area under the curve (AUC) of oral sulopenem (500 mg twice daily) by 23.6% when administered alone and 62% when administered with 500 mg of probenecid. Like carbapenems, sulopenem demonstrates bactericidal activity that is associated with the percentage of time that free concentrations exceed the MIC (%f T > MIC). In animal models, bacteriostasis was associated with %f T > MICs ranging from 8.6 to 17%, whereas 2-log10 kill was seen at values ranging from 12 to 28%. No pharmacodynamic targets have been documented for suppression of resistance. Sulopenem concentrations in urine are variable, ranging from 21.8 to 420.0 mg/L (median 84.4 mg/L) in fasted subjects and 28.8 to 609.0 mg/L (median 87.3 mg/L) in those who were fed. Sulopenem has been compared with carbapenems and cephalosporins in guinea pig and murine systemic and lung infection animal models. Studied pathogens included Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, B. fragilis, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, and Serratia marcescens. These studies reported that overall, sulopenem was non-inferior to carbapenems but appeared to be superior to cephalosporins. A phase III clinical trial (SURE-1) reported that sulopenem was not non-inferior to ciprofloxacin in women infected with fluoroquinolone-susceptible pathogens, due to a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in sulopenem-treated patients at the test-of-cure visit. However, the researchers reported superiority of sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid over ciprofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs in women infected with fluoroquinolone/non-susceptible pathogens, and non-inferiority in all patients with a positive urine culture. A phase III clinical trial (SURE-2) compared intravenous sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid with ertapenem in the treatment of complicated UTIs. No difference in overall success was noted at the end of therapy. However, intravenous sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil was not non-inferior to ertapenem followed by oral stepdown therapy in overall success at test-of-cure due to a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the sulopenem arm. After a meeting with the US FDA, Iterum stated that they are currently evaluating the optimal design for an additional phase III uncomplicated UTI study to be conducted prior to the potential resubmission of the New Drug Application (NDA). It is unclear at this time whether Iterum intends to apply for EMA or Japanese regulatory approval. The safety and tolerability of sulopenem has been reported in various phase I pharmacokinetic studies and phase III clinical trials. Sulopenem (intravenous and oral) appears to be well tolerated in healthy subjects, with and without the coadministration of probenecid, with few serious drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported to date. Reported TEAEs affecting ≥1% of patients were (from most to least common) diarrhea, nausea, headache, vomiting and dizziness. Discontinuation rates were low and were not different than comparator agents. Sulopenem administered orally and/or intravenously represents a potentially well tolerated and effective option for treating uncomplicated and complicated UTIs, especially in patients with documented or highly suspected antimicrobial pathogens to commonly used agents (e.g. fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli), and in patients with documented microbiological or clinical failure or patients who demonstrate intolerance/adverse effects to first-line agents. This agent will likely be used orally in the outpatient setting, and intravenously followed by oral stepdown in the hospital setting. Sulopenem also allows for oral stepdown therapy in the hospital setting from intravenous non-sulopenem therapy. More clinical data are required to fully assess the clinical efficacy and safety of sulopenem, especially in patients with complicated UTIs caused by resistant pathogens such as ESBL-producing, Amp-C, MDR E. coli. Antimicrobial stewardship programs will need to create guidelines for when this oral and intravenous penem should be used.

A niclosamide-tobramycin hybrid adjuvant potentiates cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa.

There is an urgent need for new therapies to overcome antimicrobial resistance (AMR) especially against Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Multicomponent therapy combining antibiotics with enhancer molecules known as adjuvants is an emerging strategy to combat AMR. We have previously reported tobramycin-based adjuvants which are able to potentiate various antibiotics. In order to expand the repertoire of tobramycin hybrid adjuvants, a new hybrid containing niclosamide, an FDA approved anthelmintic which has recently demonstrated a variety of interesting biological effects, was synthesized. It was found that this conjugate can potentiate several antibiotics against multidrug-resistant GNB, including the recently approved siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol. 8 µg ml-1 of the niclosamide-tobramycin hybrid in combination therapy against a pandrug-resistant strain of P. aeruginosa was able to lower the cefiderocol MIC 32-fold, from 8 µg ml-1 to 0.25 µg ml-1 in iron-rich media where siderophore uptake is reduced. These results indicate that a niclosamide-tobramycin hybrid adjuvant can serve to potentiate a newly approved antibiotic.

Dioctanoyl Ultrashort Tetrabasic ß-Peptides Sensitize Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria to Novobiocin and Rifampicin.

Recently reported peptidomimetics with increased resistance to trypsin were shown to sensitize priority multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria to novobiocin and rifampicin. To further optimize proteolytic stability, ß-amino acid-containing derivatives of these compounds were prepared, resulting in three dioctanoyl ultrashort tetrabasic ß-peptides (dUSTBßPs). The nonhemolytic dUSTBßP 3, comprised of three ß3-homoarginine residues and two fatty acyl tails eight carbons long, enhanced the antibacterial activity of various antibiotics from different classes. Notably, compound 3 retained the ability to potentiate novobiocin and rifampicin in wild-type Gram-negative bacteria against MDR clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae. dUSTBßP 3 reduced the minimum inhibitory concentration of novobiocin and rifampicin below their interpretative susceptibility breakpoints. Furthermore, compound 3 exhibited improved in vitro stability (86.8 ± 3.7% remaining) relative to its α-amino acid-based counterpart (39.5 ± 7.4% remaining) after a 2 h incubation in human plasma.

Lefamulin: A Novel Oral and Intravenous Pleuromutilin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.

Lefamulin is a novel oral and intravenous (IV) pleuromutilin developed as a twice-daily treatment for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). It is a semi-synthetic pleuromutilin with a chemical structure that contains a tricyclic core of five-, six-, and eight-membered rings and a 2-(4-amino-2-hydroxycyclohexyl)sulfanylacetate side chain extending from C14 of the tricyclic core. Lefamulin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S bacterial ribosomal subunit in the peptidyl transferase center (PTC). The pleuromutilin tricyclic core binds to a pocket close to the A site, while the C14 side chain extends to the P site causing a tightening of the rotational movement in the binding pocket referred to as an induced-fit mechanism. Lefamulin displays broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as against atypical bacteria that commonly cause CABP. Pleuromutilin antibiotics exhibit low rates of resistance development and lack cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes due to their unique mechanism of action. However, pleuromutilin activity is affected by mutations in 23S rRNA, 50S ribosomal subunit proteins rplC and rplD, ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-F transporter proteins such as vga(A), and the methyltransferase cfr. The pharmacokinetic properties of lefamulin include: volume of distribution (Vd) ranging from 82.9 to 202.8 L, total clearance (CLT) of 19.5 to 21.4 L/h, and terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of 6.9-13.2 h; protein binding of lefamulin is high and non-linear. The oral bioavailability of lefamulin has been estimated as 24% in fasted subjects and 19% in fed subjects. A single oral dose of lefamulin 600 mg administered in fasted patients achieved a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 1.2-1.5 mg/L with a time of maximum concentration (Tmax) ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 h, and an area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) of 8.5-8.8 mg h/L. The pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of lefamulin efficacy is the free plasma area under the concentration-time curve divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC24h/MIC). Lefamulin efficacy has been demonstrated using various animal models including neutropenic murine thigh infection, pneumonia, lung infection, and bacteremia. Lefamulin clinical safety and efficacy was investigated through a Phase II clinical trial of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI), as well as two Phase III clinical trials of CABP. The Phase III trials, LEAP 1 and LEAP 2 established non-inferiority of lefamulin to moxifloxacin in both oral and IV formulations in the treatment of CABP. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have each approved lefamulin for the treatment of CABP. A Phase II clinical trial has been completed for the treatment of ABSSSI, while the pediatric program is in Phase I. The most common adverse effects of lefamulin include mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal-related events such as nausea and diarrhea. Lefamulin represents a safe and effective option for treating CABP in cases of antimicrobial resistance to first-line therapies, clinical failure, or intolerance/adverse effects to currently used agents. Clinical experience and ongoing clinical investigation will allow clinicians and antimicrobial stewardship programs to optimally use lefamulin in the treatment of CABP.

Dilipid Ultrashort Tetrabasic Peptidomimetics Potentiate Novobiocin and Rifampicin Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

The development of new antibacterial agents and therapeutic approaches is of high importance to address the global problem of antibiotic resistance. Although antimicrobial peptides are known to synergize with certain antibiotics, their clinical application is limited by their systemic toxicity, protease instability, and high production cost. To overcome these problems, nine dilipid ultrashort tetrabasic peptidomimetics (dUSTBPs) were prepared consisting of three basic amino acids separated by a molecular scaffold, bis(3-aminopropyl)glycine, and were ligated to two fatty acids. Several nonhemolytic dUSTBPs were shown to enhance the activity of several antibiotics against pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria. More importantly, dUSTBP 8, consisting of three l-arginine units and a dilipid of 8 carbons long, potentiated novobiocin and rifampicin consistently against multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacteriaceae. Preliminary studies suggested that dUSTBPs were likely to potentiate antibiotics through outer membrane permeabilization and/or disruption of active efflux and that dUSTBP 8 exhibited enhanced resistance to trypsin in comparison to the previously described di-C9-KKKK-NH2 antibiotic potentiator. The antibacterial activity of rifampicin and novobiocin was enhanced by dUSTBP 8 comparable to other known outer membrane permeabilizing potentiators including the gold standard polymyxin B nonapeptide. Our results indicate that ultrashort tetrabasic peptidomimetics are potent adjuvants that repurpose novobiocin and rifampicin as potent agents against priority MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Omadacycline: A Novel Oral and Intravenous Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic Agent.

Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic developed as a once-daily, intravenous and oral treatment for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Omadacycline, a derivative of minocycline, has a chemical structure similar to tigecycline with an alkylaminomethyl group replacing the glycylamido group at the C-9 position of the D-ring of the tetracycline core. Similar to other tetracyclines, omadacycline inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. Omadacycline possesses broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic, anaerobic, and atypical bacteria. Omadacycline remains active against bacterial isolates possessing common tetracycline resistance mechanisms such as efflux pumps (e.g., TetK) and ribosomal protection proteins (e.g., TetM) as well as in the presence of resistance mechanisms to other antibiotic classes. The pharmacokinetics of omadacycline are best described by a linear, three-compartment model following a zero-order intravenous infusion or first-order oral administration with transit compartments to account for delayed absorption. Omadacycline has a volume of distribution (Vd) ranging from 190 to 204 L, a terminal elimination half-life (t½) of 13.5-17.1 h, total clearance (CLT) of 8.8-10.6 L/h, and protein binding of 21.3% in healthy subjects. Oral bioavailability of omadacycline is estimated to be 34.5%. A single oral dose of 300 mg (bioequivalent to 100 mg IV) of omadacycline administered to fasted subjects achieved a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 0.5-0.6 mg/L and an area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) of 9.6-11.9 mg h/L. The free plasma area under concentration-time curve divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (i.e., fAUC24h/MIC), has been established as the pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of omadacycline antibacterial efficacy. Several animal models including neutropenic murine lung infection, thigh infection, and intraperitoneal challenge model have documented the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of omadacycline. A phase II clinical trial on complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and three phase III clinical trials on ABSSSI and CABP demonstrated the safety and efficacy of omadacycline. The phase III trials, OASIS-1 (ABSSSI), OASIS-2 (ABSSSI), and OPTIC (CABP), established non-inferiority of omadacycline to linezolid (OASIS-1, OASIS-2) and moxifloxacin (OPTIC), respectively. Omadacycline is currently approved by the FDA for use in treatment of ABSSSI and CABP. Phase II clinical trials involving patients with acute cystitis and acute pyelonephritis are in progress. Mild, transient gastrointestinal events are the predominant adverse effects associated with use of omadacycline. Based on clinical trial data to date, the adverse effect profile of omadacycline is similar to studied comparators, linezolid and moxifloxacin. Unlike tigecycline and eravacycline, omadacycline has an oral formulation that allows for step-down therapy from the intravenous formulation, potentially facilitating earlier hospital discharge, outpatient therapy, and cost savings. Omadacycline has a potential role as part of an antimicrobial stewardship program in the treatment of patients with infections caused by antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistant Gram-positive [including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)] and Gram-negative pathogens.

Polybasic peptide-levofloxacin conjugates potentiate fluoroquinolones and other classes of antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

To address the rising threat of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, new therapeutic strategies must be developed. Efficacious drug combinations consisting of existing antibiotics and enhancer biomolecules called adjuvants offers a viable strategy. We have previously reported antibiotic hybrids consisting of tobramycin appended to different fluoroquinolones that possess potential as stand-alone antimicrobials as well as adjuvants. Herein, we report the synthesis of polybasic peptide-levofloxacin conjugates based on these tobramycin-fluoroquinolone hybrids. It was found that conjugating polybasic peptides to the fluoroquinolone levofloxacin, along with the addition of an aliphatic hydrocarbon tether, resulted in the ability of these compounds to potentiate fluoroquinolones and other antibiotics against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. The conjugates were able to potentiate ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against MDR clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and to a lesser extent, Acinetobacter baumannii. Preliminary data revealed that the conjugates interfered with active efflux of fluoroquinolones in P. aeruginosa. In addition, synergy was observed with a wide array of other antibiotics against P. aeruginosa, including those that suffered from restricted outer membrane penetration, suggesting that in addition to blocking active efflux, the polybasic peptide-levofloxacin conjugates possessed the ability to disrupt and permeabilize the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria.

Development of dilipid polymyxins: Investigation on the effect of hydrophobicity through its fatty acyl component.

Continuous development of new antibacterial agents is necessary to counter the problem of antimicrobial resistance. Polymyxins are considered as drugs of last resort to combat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Structural optimization of polymyxins requires an in-depth understanding of its structure and how it relates to its antibacterial activity. Herein, the effect of hydrophobicity was explored by adding a secondary fatty acyl component of varying length onto the polymyxin structure at the amine side-chain of l-diaminobutyric acid at position 1, resulting to the development of dilipid polymyxins. The incorporation of an additional lipid was found to confer polymyxin activity against Gram-positive bacteria, to which polymyxins are inherently inactive against. The dilipid polymyxins showed selective antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Moreover, dilipid polymyxin 1 that consists of four carbon-long aliphatic lipids displayed the ability to enhance the antibacterial potency of other antibiotics in combination against P. aeruginosa, resembling the adjuvant activity of the well-known outer membrane permeabilizer polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN). Interestingly, our data revealed that dilipid polymyxin 1 and PMBN are substrates for the MexAB-OprM efflux system, and therefore are affected by efflux. In contrast, dilipid polymyxin analogs that consist of longer lipids and colistin were not affected by efflux, suggesting that the lipid component of polymyxin plays an important role in resisting active efflux. Our work described herein provides an understanding to the polymyxin structure that may be used to usher the development of enhanced polymyxin analogs.