Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Actas Urol Esp ; 40(4): 229-36, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26672677

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The use of flexible ureterorenoscopy for treating kidney stones has increased in recent years, with considerable worldwide variation in the surgical technique and indications. OBJECTIVES: To determine the current practice, technique variations, use and indications of flexible ureterorenoscopy for treating kidney stones in Latin American. METHODS: We sent (by email and web link) an anonymous questionnaire with 30 questions on flexible ureterorenoscopy for treating kidney stones to Latin American urologists from January 2015 to July 2015. We collected the responses through the Survey Monkey system. RESULTS: A total of 283 urologists in 15 Latin American countries participated (response rate, 10.8%); 254 answered the questionnaire completely; 52.8% were urologists from Mexico and 11% were from Argentina; 11.8% of the responders stated that they performed >100 cases per year; 15.2% considered ureterorenoscopy as the treatment of choice for stones >2cm, and 19.6% performed ureterorenoscopy in single stages for calculi measuring >2.5cm. Some 78.4% use fluoroscopy, 69.1% use a ureteral sheath in all cases, 55.8% place double-J catheters at the end of surgery, 37.3% considered a stone-free state to be 0 fragments, and 41.2% use plain radiography to assess the stone-free condition. CONCLUSIONS: Most participating urologists consider flexible ureterorenoscopy as the first-choice treatment for stones <2cm; a small percentage of these urologists perform >100 ureterorenoscopies per year. More than half of the urologists routinely used fluoroscopy and ureteral access sheath; the most common method for determining the stone-free state is plain abdominal radiography.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser , Padrões de Prática Médica , Ureteroscópios , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Urologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , América Latina
2.
Chemosphere ; 58(11): 1563-9, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15694476

RESUMO

Samples of soil, sediment and pine needles from the Reggio Emilia area were analysed in order to estimate the environmental pollution caused by an MSWI. PCDD/PCDF, PCB, PAH and metals were analysed in the collected samples. The data obtained showed relatively low pollution levels. Indeed, the PCDD/PCDF and PCB data were comparable to the values usually found in the grazing areas of the European Union countries. Metal concentrations in soils and sediments may be related to local geological occurrences and to agricultural activities. PAH values are significantly lower than the limit values set by the Italian law.


Assuntos
Benzofuranos/análise , Incineração , Metais Pesados/análise , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/análogos & derivados , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/análise , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Centrais Elétricas , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Dibenzofuranos Policlorados , Geografia , Sedimentos Geológicos/análise , Itália , Solo/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA