RESUMO
Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHstat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the Task Force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in JDR Clinical and Translational Research, the Journal of the American Dental Association, and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Saúde Bucal , Humanos , Saúde Bucal/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Pesquisa em Odontologia/normas , Guias como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Lista de Checagem , Editoração/normas , Relatório de Pesquisa/normasRESUMO
Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force's writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and CONSORT harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces 7 new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Saúde Bucal , Humanos , Saúde Bucal/normas , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Pesquisa em Odontologia/normas , Relatório de Pesquisa/normas , Guias como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Editoração/normasRESUMO
Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the Oral Health Statistics Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to task force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the task force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in JDR Clinical and Translational Research, the Journal of the American Dental Association, and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.
RESUMO
Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research-statisticians and trialists from academia and industry-identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the Oral Health Statistical (OHStat) Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force's writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials harms guidelines and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces 7 new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental researches into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Considering evidence of closing the gender gap in dental scholarship, this study assessed women's participation as authors, reviewers, and members of the editorial board for The Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA) from 2000 through 2022. METHODS: The study authors downloaded author names from PubMed and retrieved names of reviewers and editorial board members from JADA's pages. The authors used Gender-API software to determine gender on the basis of first names. They used logistic regression to test for trends. RESULTS: From January 2000 through December 2022, there were 2,935 full-length articles, 2,775 reviewers, 4 editors in chief, and 85 editorial board members. The percentage of women authors increased by 1.2% annually (95% CI, 1.03% to 1.33%), reaching 47% in 2022. First authorship increased by 2.1% annually (95% CI, 1.84% to 2.39%) and has been at more than 50% since 2016. In articles with multiple authors, there was a modest increase; second authorship increased 0.7% annually (95% CI, 0.36% to 1.09%) and last authorship by 0.7% (95% CI, 0.03% to 1.00%). Women reviewers increased 0.8% annually (95% CI, 0.68% to 0.97%), but the percentage of women on the editorial board did not increase significantly and was 41% in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: It was anticipated that 50% of JADA authors would be women by 2024. However, women are still underrepresented on the editorial board. A comprehensive effort is needed to foster role models, provide mentorship opportunities for women, and support women's professional advancement in dental research and publications. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Gender-based disparities affect women in dental education and clinical practice. Serving as an editorial board member, reviewer, or author can affect academic promotion and the type of scientific investigation being conducted and indirectly affects women's health outcomes.
Assuntos
American Dental Association , Autoria , Equidade de Gênero , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Odontólogas/estatística & dados numéricos , MasculinoRESUMO
Background: Armenia has trained physicians to practice family medicine (FM) for over 20 years. The pediatric population comprises a significant proportion of patients seen by FM practices, yet to date, there have been no studies assessing the knowledge and self-efficacy of FM physicians regarding pediatric care. As the first step is needs assessment to improve the quality of care, this study aims to assess the self-efficacy and knowledge of FM physicians regarding the care of pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: We distributed a survey to attendees at an FM conference in Lori Province, Armenia. The survey instrument assessed demographics and experience, self-efficacy in providing pediatric care, and pediatric knowledge via questions adapted from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants were female. Roughly half (45%) had trained through an FM residency program, while the remainder had retrained to become FM physicians following a residency in another field. Almost all (97%) practiced outside of the capital city, Yerevan. About half believed that their didactic (51%) and clinical education (48%) prepared them either "extremely" or "very" well. Overall, there was no clear relationship between participants' reported self-efficacy in a given area of pediatrics and their score in that area on the knowledge portion of the survey. Conclusions: Our findings reveal opportunities for improvement in knowledge related to pediatric care in FM physicians in Armenia, as well as a lack of relationship between reported self-efficacy and knowledge. Thus, future programs should not rely solely on self-reported gaps to identify or prioritize areas of focus. Further study is recommended in other specialties in Armenia and internationally to improve future programs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system in Armenia follows the Franco-German model in which physician - nurse dyads staff ambulances. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of EMS nurses regarding pediatric rapid assessment and resuscitation. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-administered survey study of a convenience sample of 200 out-of-hospital emergency nurses in June and July 2015. RESULTS: Response rate was 87.5%. Half of respondents failed to achieve the pre-defined passing score of 70% on the 10-question knowledge test (sample mean 6.32 ± 1.85 SD). Test score was positively correlated with pediatric training, current pediatric continuing medical education (CME), years with EMS and female gender. Questions regarding recognition of shock and initiation of neonatal and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation were most frequently missed. Nurses were least confident in their ability to care for neonates and infants. 79.4% indicated that they would benefit from further pediatric training, and 86.1% indicated that knowledge from the Anglo-American model of emergency medicine could improve pediatric emergency care (PEC) in Armenia. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for additional PEC training and continuing education for EMS nurses in Yerevan, Armenia. Training EMS nurses would improve first responder awareness of pediatric acute management and resuscitation and enhance the quality of emergency care of children.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Armênia , Atitude , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency pediatric care curriculum (EPCC) was developed to address the need for pediatric rapid assessment and resuscitation skills among out-of-hospital emergency providers in Armenia. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of EPCC in increasing physicians' knowledge when instruction transitioned to local instructors. We hypothesize that (1) EPCC will have a positive impact on post-test knowledge, (2) this effect will be maintained when local trainers teach the course, and (3) curriculum will satisfy participants. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental, pre-test/post-test study over a 4-year period from October 2014November 2017. Train-the-trainer model was used. Primary outcomes are immediate knowledge acquisition each year and comparison of knowledge acquisition between two cohorts based on North American vs local instructors. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize results. Pre-post change and differences across years were analyzed using repeated measures mixed models. RESULTS: Test scores improved from pretest mean of 51% (95% CI 49.6 to 53.0%) to post-test mean of 78% (95% CI 77.0 to 79.6%, p < 0.001). Average increase from pre- to post-test each year was 27% (95% CI 25.3 to 28.7%). Improvement was sustained when local instructors taught the course (p = 0.74). There was no difference in improvement when experience in critical care, EMS, and other specialties were compared (p = 0.23). Participants reported satisfaction and wanted the course repeated. In 2017, EPCC was integrated within the Emergency Medicine residency program in Armenia. DISCUSSION: This program was effective at impacting immediate knowledge as well as participant satisfaction and intentions to change practice. This knowledge acquisition and reported satisfaction remained constant even when the instruction was transitioned to the local instructors after 2 years. Through a partnership between the USA and Armenia, we provided OH-EPs in Armenia with an intensive educational experience to attain knowledge and skills necessary to manage acutely ill or injured children in the out-of-hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: EPCC resulted in significant improvement in knowledge and was well received by participants. This is a viable and sustainable model to train providers who have otherwise not had formal education in this field.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Limited field of view cone-beam computed tomography (LFOV CBCT) is the primary imaging modality recommended for treatment planning before endodontic microsurgery (EMS). Persistent apical periodontitis, often treated with EMS, results in changes in the buccal cortical plate that may detrimentally impact prognosis. The accuracy of a preoperative LFOV CBCT to predict intraoperative findings is unclear. METHODS: Electronic health records (EHRs) of EMS performed at 2 endodontic offices between 2016 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. EHR data extracted were documented for surgical findings of intact buccal cortical plate, fenestration, dehiscence, and height of remaining buccal collar of bone. Two calibrated, independent reviewers evaluated presurgical LFOV CBCTs in the multiplanar paraxial and parasagittal planes at 2 different reconstructed viewing plane thicknesses. Reviewer findings were compared with EHR documentation. Data were analyzed by using χ2, logistic regression, and multivariable analysis. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Within the 125 EMS cases included in the study, the EHR prevalence of intact buccal cortical plate was 49%, dehiscence 7%, and fenestration 44%. The imaging predictive value, whether it was negative (NPV) or positive (PPV), was higher when predicting presence of buccal bone (PPV of intact buccal cortical plate = 86.5%; NPV of dehiscence = 96%; NPV of fenestration = 89%). Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 80%-90%. Accuracy in prediction was high for all variables, exceeding 80%. Accuracy was not significantly influenced by reconstructed viewing slice thickness, viewing plane, or reviewer. CONCLUSION: Preoperative LFOV CBCT was highly discriminatory and accurately predicted intraoperative buccal cortical bone status, especially intact buccal cortical plate and fenestration.
Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Microcirurgia , Osso Cortical/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Opioid prescriptions have the potential for misuse. In October 2014, the federal schedule II prescribing mandate reclassified hydrocodone combination products from schedule III to schedule II drugs that required a written prescription. The aim of this study was to evaluate the opioid-prescribing practices in a graduate endodontic clinic (GEC) before and after the mandate. METHODS: Electronic health records from all patients treated in the GEC from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively for opioid prescribing, the date of prescription, and the Current Dental Terminology code. Where opioid prescribing was documented in the electronic health record, additional data were extracted about pulpal and periapical diagnosis, pain level, opioid type, and prescription details. Prescribing rates were calculated and analyzed by using chi-square, analysis of variance, logistic regression, and multivariable analysis. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Overall, 4851 patients underwent 7841 procedures; 92.2% of patients were never prescribed opioids. The remaining 380 patients underwent 420 procedures, and 509 prescriptions were provided. Prescribing rates were 7.5% (228/3021) before versus 4.0% (192/4820) after the mandate (P < .001). Hydrocodone combinations were the most prescribed opioid (77%, 392/509). Tramadol prescribing increased after the mandate (P = .023). Multivariable analysis showed significantly higher prescribing for apicoectomy procedures (P < .001). Preoperative pulpal and periapical diagnosis and pain level were not significantly associated with opioid prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: An overall reduction in opioid-prescribing rates occurred coincidentally with the 2014 federal mandate. The lack of correlation between prescribing and pain level highlighted the need for evidence-based rather than habitual prescribing protocols in the GEC.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Endodontia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Substâncias Controladas , Endodontia/educação , Humanos , Hidrocodona/uso terapêutico , Dor , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 2A6 enzyme (CYP2A6), an essential hepatic enzyme involved in the metabolism of drugs, is responsible for a major metabolic pathway of nicotine. Variation in the activity of polymorphic CYP2A6 alleles has been implicated in inter-individual differences in nicotine metabolism. AIMS: The objective of the current study was to assess the association between the smoking status and the cytochrome P450 2A6 enzyme (CYP2A6) genotype in Jordanians. METHODS: In the current study, 218 (117 Male and 101 female) healthy unrelated Jordanian volunteers were recruited. CYP2A6*1B, CYP2A6*4 and CYP2A6*9 were determined and correlated with subject smoking status. RESULTS: *1A/*1A was the most common genetic polymorphism in the overall study population, with no significant frequency differences between smokers and non-smokers. When the population was divided according to gender, only male smokers showed a significant correlation between genotype and smoking status. Considering the CYP2A6*9 genotype, the results showed differences in distribution between smokers and non-smokers, but only women showed a significant association between CYP2A6*9 allele genotype and smoking status. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that there is a significant association between CYP2A6*9 genotype and smoking status. They also show that CYP2A6 genotype is significantly influenced by gender.
Assuntos
Citocromo P-450 CYP2A6/genética , Nicotina/metabolismo , Fumar/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alelos , Variação Biológica Individual , Sistema Enzimático do Citocromo P-450/metabolismo , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Jordânia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimorfismo Genético , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The design of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium (TM) dental implants promises improved osseointegration, especially when grafting materials such as demineralized bone matrix are used; however, studies are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare TM implants with conventional titanium alloy (Ti) implants with and without demineralized bone matrix in terms of peri-implant bone remodeling in the first year after implant loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A chart review was used for all patients receiving Tapered Screw-Vent Ti and TM implants. Implants were placed and restored by a single provider between 2011 and 2015. Peri-implant bone remodeling was compared by using a paired t test (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 82 patients received 205 implants, 44 TM and 161 Ti implants (control). No implants failed in the TM group (survival rate of 100%), and 3 implants in total, 1 immediate, failed in the Ti groups (survival rate of 98.1%). TM implants exhibited a 0.28-mm bone gain on average, whereas the control group demonstrated 0.20 mm of marginal bone loss after the first year of implant loading. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the odds of having bone loss was 64% less (odds ratio: 0.36; 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.94) in the TM group than in the Ti group after controlling for bone grafting, implant location, immediate placement, bone type, and pretreatment bone level. CONCLUSIONS: TM implants exhibited less peri-implant bone loss than the control Ti implants.
Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Implantes Dentários , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Humanos , Porosidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tantálio , Titânio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Purpose: Assess how pediatric dentists (PD) and general practitioners (GP) manage after-hours pediatric dental emergencies according to perceived urgency. Methods: A survey was e-mailed to PD and GP in North Carolina. Participants responded to management of 18 cases (primary and permanent dentition) according to perceived urgency. Repeated-measures logistic regression was used to analyze factors influencing perception of clinical scenarios. Results: Response rates for PD and GP were 45.5% and 36.3%, respectively. Perceived urgency varied by clinical scenarios, dentition (primary vs. permanent), and practitioner (PD vs. GP) (P<.001). Practitioners with fewer years in practice or seeing fewer pediatric patients managed more cases as urgent. Traumatic injuries in primary dentition (intrusion, pulp exposure, palatal displacement, avulsion) were managed as more urgent by GP than PD (P<.001). Emergencies related to infection and permanent dentition were perceived similarly by PD and GP. Conclusions: Clinical scenarios highlighted disagreement in the management of after-hours pediatric dental emergencies between GP and PD, especially trauma in primary dentition. General practitioners tended to refer to an ED or see urgently, and PD tended to defer care. By identifying needs for improved education in dental trauma management, we can increase utilization of the dental home, avoiding use of overburdened EDs.
Assuntos
Plantão Médico , Odontólogos , Tratamento de Emergência , Odontologia Geral , Padrões de Prática Odontológica , Traumatismos Dentários/terapia , Criança , Inquéritos de Saúde Bucal , Polpa Dentária/lesões , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Palato/lesões , Ligamento Periodontal/lesões , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Raiz Dentária/lesõesRESUMO
With a significant need for more general dentists to provide care for pediatric patients, previous studies have found that community-based clinical training experience with children increased dental students' willingness to provide care to pediatric patients after graduation. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of community-based clinical training with pediatric patients on dental students' self-perceived confidence in treating pediatric patients, both overall and related to specific procedures. Of the total 105 fourth-year dental students at one U.S. dental school invited to participate in the study in academic year 2011-12, 76 completed the survey about their community-based dental education (CBDE), for a 72% response rate. Over half of the respondents (55%) reported feeling more confident in treating pediatric patients after their rotations. The increase in confidence was not associated with demographics. The placement of sealants (p=0.0022) and experience in giving local anesthesia (p=0.0008) were the two procedures most strongly associated with the increase in confidence. Also, these students received more experience in pulp therapy, extractions, and treating children up to three years of age during their community-based rotations than in the school-based clinic. In this study, greater exposure to pediatric dental clinical experiences during CBDE increased the students' confidence in treating pediatric patients. These results suggest that community-based experiences are useful in supplementing the school-based pediatric clinical experience, including increasing entry-level dentists' confidence in treating pediatric patients.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Odontologia Comunitária/educação , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Educação em Odontologia , Autoimagem , Estudantes de Odontologia/psicologia , Adulto , Criança , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Autorrelato , VirginiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinical practice and published evidence by dental faculty and graduating students of the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry. METHODS: A questionnaire previously developed by the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network with 12 clinical scenarios was administered to VCU faculty and graduating students. Responses were scored as either consistent or inconsistent with published evidence and then analyzed for differences between dental faculty, graduating students, and the national results. RESULTS: There were 43 dental faculty members with at least half-time student contact who responded to the survey. Faculty concordance ranged from 33% to 100%, and general practice faculty had the highest concordance (82%). Eighty-five of the graduating class of 98 responded to the survey, and student concordance ranged from 18% to 92% and averaged 67%. General practice faculty had higher concordance with published evidence than recently graduated dental students. CONCLUSIONS: Graduating students and dental faculty demonstrated higher concordance with evidence-based practice than practitioners in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. General practice dental faculty demonstrated adequate concordance, but students demonstrated only a medium-level concordance. Practitioners involved in teaching dental students are better able to keep up with evolving evidence and are better able to demonstrate evidence-based practice.
Assuntos
Docentes de Odontologia , Universidades , Odontologia , Humanos , Estudantes de Odontologia , VirginiaRESUMO
This study examined pediatric dentists' perspectives on the types of dental services general dentists provide to children who are 0-3 years old. A web-based survey was sent to 5185 pediatric dentists and 769 (14.8%) responded. Among the respondents, 58% agreed with general dentists' providing an age 1 dental visit. Only 24% agreed with general dentists' performing complex behavior management techniques, such as sedation, to patients aged 0-3 years. Those respondents who taught pediatric dentistry full time were more likely to agree with general dentists' providing an age 1 dental visit (P = 0.0088). Those who reported that their own dental school had adequately prepared them for this type of age 1 visit were also more in agreement (P < 0.0001). The results of this study promote better understanding of pediatric dentists' perceptions of the level of collaboration between general dentists and pediatric dentists; the types of oral health services general dentists can provide for children aged 0-3 years; and the anticipated level of competency of entry-level general dentists.
Assuntos
Assistência Odontológica para Crianças , Odontólogos/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papel Profissional/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To test a more frequent preventive recall strategy following full-mouth dental rehabilitation (FMDR) in children with early childhood caries (ECC). METHODS: Patients were randomized into two groups: controls, who were scheduled to return at six-month intervals (6-MR); and the intervention group, who were scheduled to return at three-month intervals (3-MR and 6-MR). At baseline and at each recall, a caries risk assessment (CRA) and dental exam were completed. Analyses followed CONSORT recommendations, resulting in three analyses: intent-to-treat; per-protocol; and an actual recall analysis. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in CRA at six months (P>0.7); per-protocol analysis showed borderline significance (P>.08); and actual recall analysis showed a statistically significant difference in CRA at six months (P=.021). For patients with both 3-MR and 6-MR, 44 percent were assessed at a high caries risk level; for patients with only a 6-MR, 72 percent were assessed as a high caries risk level (P=.021). No significant differences were found in caries incidence at six months. CONCLUSIONS: Following full-mouth dental rehabilitation, patients who returned for follow-ups at both three- and six-month intervals had a greater decrease in caries risk level compared to patients seen at six-month follow-up intervals.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Assistência Odontológica para Crianças , Cárie Dentária/prevenção & controle , Cárie Dentária/reabilitação , Agendamento de Consultas , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Dietary supplement effects and drug interactions can lead to significant adverse health events, thus potentially impacting the safe delivery of oral healthcare. This study sought to determine the frequency of, and factors impacting, dietary supplement use among 209 dental patients and whether the design of a medical history questionnaire influences reporting of supplement use. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups in which they completed either a standard medical history questionnaire (n = 107) or the same questionnaire with an additional item about dietary supplement use (n = 102). All patients were then administered a survey with questions about their demographics, their use and knowledge of dietary supplements, and the person or persons who recommended dietary supplement use to the patient. While 62% of the total population (130/209) reported supplement use, specific prompting nearly doubled the number of supplements reported (mean with prompting: 1.53; mean without prompting: 0.76; P < 0.0001). Patients younger than 30 years of age reported significantly less dietary supplement use than all other age groups except the 30-40 age group (P = 0.0003). An estimated 70% of all respondents were not aware of potentially detrimental side effects of dietary supplement use or possible interactions with conventional drug therapies. Since patients tended to report a greater use of dietary supplements when specifically asked about their use on a medical history questionnaire, a checklist or set of designated questions may be a suitable first step toward gathering this essential information.