The Use of Medicinal Leeching in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Background: The medicinal leech has been used in plastic surgery to resolve venous congestion that can threaten the viability of tissue transfer. Within the context of breast surgery, venous congestion is a pertinent consideration for reconstructive and non-reconstructive breast surgery such as mammoplasty and mastopexy. However, leeching is closely associated with complications such as infection, pain, and anaemia. This is the first systematic review that examines the methodology, efficacy, and post therapeutic outcome data across all existing studies on medicinal leeching in breast surgery. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to November 2023 was conducted. Inclusion criteria included studies reporting on the use of leeches to resolve venous congestion in any breast surgery. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series tool was used for bias analysis. Descriptive statistics were undertaken in Microsoft Excel. Results: A total of 18 studies with a combined sample size of 28 were examined, including 4 case series and 14 case reports. Patients mostly underwent reconstructive breast surgery (75%). The median number of leeches used was two, with a median number of three leeching sessions per day and 3 days of leeching. Medicinal leeching successfully prevented the loss of 75% of all tissue transfers. The complication rate was high at 81.14% and mainly included infection and anaemia. Conclusions: Medicinal leeching is an effective method to relieve venous congestion in breast surgery but must be judiciously used within the clinical context of the patient to maximise efficacy and mitigate harm from complications.

Cranioplasty is not required in the reconstruction of small combined scalp and calvarial defects.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of scalp malignancies may include the need for craniectomy. The decision to perform cranioplasty is not straightforward and is frequently subjective. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes after reconstruction of complex scalp and calvarial defects by comparing patients with and without cranioplasty. METHODS: Retrospective review of the clinical records of a consecutive series of patients who underwent scalp soft tissue reconstruction after craniectomy for malignancy or osteoradionecrosis between 2014 and 2022 at Royal Melbourne Hospital was conducted. Demographics, previous treatments, surgical details, and post-operative complications were assessed. Traumatic injuries and decompressive craniectomies were excluded. Minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in the study. Indications for surgery included skin malignancies, osteoradionecrosis, or both. There was one reconstructive failure (in the non-cranioplasty group). Infection and metalware exposure were common complications in patients who underwent cranioplasty (38.5%). No patient developed neurological symptoms subsequent to craniectomy. One patient needed revision surgery due to esthetic reasons (cranioplasty group). Transposition flaps were associated with more complications and revision procedures. CONCLUSION: Combined scalp and calvarial defects pose a difficult reconstructive challenge. Stable soft tissue coverage is more reliably achieved with free flap reconstruction. Cranioplasty is not always mandatory and should be reserved for cases with a very large bony defect or when the defect is located in a cosmetically sensitive area.

Comparative Antimicrobial Activity of Commercial Wound Care Solutions on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilms.

BACKGROUND: Biofilms represent a complex milieu of matrix-enclosed microorganisms, which can significantly contribute to the pathology of chronic wounds. In this study, we compare the activity of 3 commercial antimicrobial wound care solutions, Vashe (HOCl based), PhaseOne (HOCl based), and Sulfamylon (mafenide acetate), for their in vitro activity against bacterial and fungal biofilms. METHODS: Reference and clinical isolates of 6 Gram-negative bacterial species (36 total strains), 3 Gram-positive bacteria (21 strains), and 3 Candida species (9 strains) were used to create biofilms. Various working concentrations of the 3 antiseptic agents were incubated with the biofilms in microwell plates; they were monitored from 1 minute to 24 hours to compare bacterial and fungal viability through colony forming unit analysis. RESULTS: Vashe and PhaseOne displayed excellent bactericidal and fungicidal activity, whereas Sulfamylon demonstrated minimal activity against the biofilms tested. With the exception of Candida albicans, all biofilms were eliminated at either 1 or 10 minutes using Vashe and PhaseOne solutions. In most cases, mafenide was unable to eliminate both bacterial and fungal biofilms, even with 24 hours of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Biofilms represent a major clinical challenge, with no clear consensus for treatment of chronic wounds or prosthetic devices. Our results suggest that hypochlorous acid-based wound solutions such as Vashe and PhaseOne are more efficacious than mafenide in eliminating bacterial and fungal biofilms. Further studies are necessary to investigate and compare the in vivo efficacy of these products in clinical care.