Toxicologic analysis of 35 drugs in post mortem human blood samples with focus on antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic drugs.

Antiarrhythmic and antihypertensive drugs are frequently encountered in post mortem analysis, and the question may arise as to whether they were administered in therapeutic doses, and if they were taken in accidental, intentional, or suicidal overdose scenarios. Therefore, a novel analytical method was developed and validated for the quantification of 35 drugs with toxicological relevance, including antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic drugs (ajmaline, amlodipine, amiodarone, atenolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol, clonidine, desethylamiodarone, diltiazem, donepezil, doxazosin, dronedarone, esmolol, flecainide, lercanidipine, lidocaine, metoprolol, nebivolol, nimodipine, pindolol, prajmaline, propafenone, propranolol, sotalol, urapidil, and verapamil), as well as other medications commonly found in combination (sildenafil, tadalafil, atorvastatin, clopidogrel, dapoxetine, memantine, pentoxifylline, rivastigmine, and ivabradine). The method enables simultaneous identification and quantification in blood samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Validation exhibited excellent linearity across the concentration range for all analytes. Precision and accuracy were within acceptable limits, with bias and relative standard deviation (RSD) values consistently below 9 % and 10 %, respectively. Selectivity and specificity assessments confirmed the absence of any interference from contaminants or co-extracted drugs. The method demonstrated very high sensitivity, with limits of detection (LOD) as low as 0.01 ng/ml and limits of quantification (LOQ) as low as 0.04 ng/ml. Extraction recovery exceeded 57.5 % for all analytes except atenolol, and matrix effects were <17 % for all analytes except pindolol. Processed sample stability evaluations revealed consistent results with acceptable deviations for all analytes. In addition, the method was specifically tested for the use in post mortem analysis. The applicability of our method was demonstrated by the analysis of two authentic human autopsy blood samples.

Chiral analysis of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA and MDA enantiomers in human hair samples.

A novel analytical method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of the R/S-enantiomers of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA and MDMA in hair samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). This method involved a straightforward derivatization step with dansyl chloride and the use of a chiral column, enabling the separation and quantification of all eight enantiomers in a single analysis. The method exhibited excellent linearity across a concentration range of 0.03-3.00 ng/mg for each enantiomer. Precision and accuracy were within acceptable limits, with bias and relative standard deviation (RSD) values consistently below 6% and 9%, respectively. Selectivity and specificity assessments confirmed the absence of any interference from contaminants or co-extracted drugs. The method demonstrated high sensitivity, with limits of detection (LOD) below 8 pg/mg and limits of quantification (LOQ) below 19 pg/mg for all analytes. Extraction recovery exceeded 79%, and matrix effects were minimal for all analytes. Processed sample stability evaluations revealed consistent results with deviations below 11% for all analytes. Application of the method to 32 authentic human hair samples provided valuable insights into amphetamine use patterns, allowing differentiation between medical amphetamine consumption and illicit use based on enantiomeric composition. Additionally, the method detected co-use of methamphetamine, MDA or MDMA in some samples, highlighting its applicability in drug monitoring and real-life case scenarios within a forensic institute. This innovative analytical approach offers a sensitive and selective method for enantiomeric differentiation of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA and MDMA in human hair samples, providing a valuable tool for forensic and clinical investigations.

Morphine concentrations in fatalities after palliative treatment of acute burn injury.

The evaluation of a morphine concentration in postmortem blood is routine for a forensic toxicologist. We here report three fatal cases where we found high morphine concentrations with 7.96, 4.30, and 5.82 mg/l in femoral blood that have to be estimated as unusually high. All these individuals died due to severe burn injuries and obtained morphine in the context of their palliative care in the last hours of their lives. According to the autopsy results, the cause of death in case 1 was burn disease with burns of about 90% of the body surface area (BSA), case 2 burn trauma, and case 3 burn shock. Besides morphine, propofol, fentanyl, sufentanil, midazolam, diazepam, lorazepam, cefazolin, and rocuronium were detected in femoral blood. The findings fitted well with the detailed clinical documentation. Further evidence of therapeutic concentrations of quetiapine, duloxetine, and melperone could be matched to preexisting medication of the individuals. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling (PBPK) was applied, developed for the intravenous administration of morphine, to find an explanation for the high morphine concentrations in femoral blood. Quantification of morphine in body fluids and tissue was performed to calculate morphine tissue concentration ratios to the morphine concentration in femoral blood. The presented cases show that pharmacokinetic simulations can reflect decreased renal clearance and decreased hepatic metabolism in general. However, this prediction is not sufficient to explain the high morphine concentrations in femoral blood measured here. It can be assumed that burn shock in particular leads to altered pharmacokinetics, namely decreased distribution of morphine.