Teledermatology-based presurgical management for nonmelanoma skin cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To date, no previous experiences of teledermatology (TD) as a preoperative management facility have been published. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate a store-and-forward TD (SFTD) system aimed at the presurgical management of nonmelanoma skin cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a multicenter, longitudinal, descriptive, and evaluative pilot study. Patients included in the TD-based surgical referral system presented with a nonmelanoma skin cancer or a fast-growth vascular tumor suitable for surgery under local anesthesia. Waiting intervals and on-the-day cancellation rates were evaluated and compared with a sample of patients managed through the conventional system. The accuracy of the diagnoses yielded and of the surgical techniques planned through teleconsultation was also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean waiting interval was 26.10 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 24.51-27.70] in patients managed through TD and 60.57 days (95% CI, 56.20-64.93 days; n=92; p < .001) in the conventional system. On-the-day surgery cancellation was 2.99% (95% CI, 1.52%-4.46%) for the TD series and 8.85% (95% CI, 5.62%-11.81%; p<.005) in the conventional system. The accuracy of the telediagnoses was kappa=0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89). The agreement rate between the surgical technique planned through teleconsultation and the technique finally performed was kappa=0.75 (95% CI, 0.04-0.79). CONCLUSION: SFTD has been demonstrated to be effective and accurate as a preoperative tool for nonmelanoma skin cancer, avoiding unnecessary visits to the hospital and shortening the waiting intervals to the surgical treatment.

Store-and-forward teledermatology in skin cancer triage: experience and evaluation of 2009 teleconsultations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a store-and-forward teledermatology system aimed at the routine triage of patients with skin cancer. DESIGN: A multicenter, longitudinal, 4-phase, descriptive and evaluation study of a referred sample of patients attended through teleconsultation between March 2004 and July 2005 (n = 2009). Clinical and dermoscopical examination and histopathological study were considered the gold standard. SETTING: A skin cancer unit of a public university hospital and 12 primary care centers in southern Spain. PATIENTS: The study population comprised patients with circumscribed lesions fulfilling at least 1 of the following criteria: changes in ABCD criteria (asymmetry, border irregularity, color variegation, and diameter >6 mm), recent history, multiple melanocytic lesions, symptoms, and/or patient's application for surgical treatment and concern about moles. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnosis, diagnostic category (malignant lesions, high-risk lesions, benign lesions, special lesions, and other lesions), diagnostic confidence level on a 3-point scale, and management decision (referral vs nonreferral) were listed after the evaluation of each teleconsultation. A face-to-face evaluation and biopsy of selected patients were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The filtering percentage, as the percentage of patients not referred to the face-to-face clinic, as well as waiting intervals and pick-up or skin cancer detection rates were evaluated as effectiveness indicators. Reliability measures (kappa agreement), accuracy, and diagnostic performance indicators (validity) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The filtering percentage was 51.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.00%-53.40%). The waiting interval to attend the clinic was 12.31 days (95% CI, 8.22-16.40 days) through teledermatology and 88.62 days (95% CI, 38.42-138.82 days; P<.001) for the letter referral system. Pick-up rates were 2.02% (95% CI, 1.10%-2.94%) for malignant melanoma and 27.94% (95% CI, 24.98%-30.90%) or 1:3.71 for patients with any malignant or premalignant lesion. Intraobserver agreement was kappa = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.93) for the management decision and kappa = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.96) for the diagnosis. Interobserver concordance was kappa = 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88) for the management decision and kappa = 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91) for the diagnosis. Accuracy was kappa = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.84). Sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00); specificity, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.69); pretest likelihood, 0.42 (95% CI, 0.37-0.47); positive posttest likelihood, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.61-0.69); and negative posttest likelihood, 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.05). CONCLUSION: Store-and-forward teledermatology has demonstrated in this series to be an effective, accurate, reliable, and valid approach for the routine management of patient referrals in skin cancer and pigmented lesion clinics.