RESUMO
Background: The Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI), is a crucial validated surgical tool used for predicting fertility outcomes in women with endometriosis. This study aims to assess the concordance between a preoperative clinical and instrumental EFI evaluation (uEFI) and the EFI score obtained during an exploratory laparoscopy prior to surgery (sEFI). Methods: This study presents preliminary data from a broader observational cohort study. The Least Function score for the uEFI was calculated using a modified version of the original surgical EFI by incorporating a clinical examination, advanced ultrasound, and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy). Results: The preoperative estimation of the EFI (uEFI) demonstrated a high concordance (k = 0.695, ρs = 0.811) with the sEFI. Remarkably, the surgical interventions led to a significant improvement in the EFI values, with 80% of the intermediate EFI transitioning to a high level, thereby highlighting the positive impact of surgery on fertility outcomes. Conclusion: This study highlights the accuracy of preoperative EFI estimation (uEFI) and its strong agreement with intraoperative assessment. It underscores the potential of a preoperative management tool to guide the allocation of infertile women with endometriosis to operative laparoscopy, direct assisted reproductive technology (ART), or spontaneous attempts at pregnancy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical technique, assess feasibility, efficacy, and safety of peritonectomy and/or resection of mesentery (P-Rme) during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: In April 2009 we registered a protocol study on the safety and feasibility of P-Rme. In the period April 2009-December 2022, 687 patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer underwent VPD. One hundred and twenty-nine patients (18.7%) had extensive disease on the mesentery and underwent P-Rme. Feasibility was assessed as the number of procedures completed. Efficacy was measured as the rate of Complete Resection (CR). Safety was defined by the intra- and post-operative morbidity rate specifically associated with these procedures. RESULTS: In all patients P-Rme was successfully completed. P-me was performed in 82 patients and R-me in 47, both procedures in 23 patients. CR was achieved in all 129 patients with an efficacy of 100%. Intra-operatively 5 patients out of 129 experienced small bowel loop surgical devascularization. They required small bowel resection and anastomosis. The procedure specific morbidity was 3.8%. No post-operative complication was related to P-Rme. At 64 months median follow-up, survival outcomes in the study group were similar to patients in the control group. CONCLUSION: Overall, almost 20% of the VPD patients needed P-Rme to obtain a CR. P-Rme was a safe and effective step during VPD. The rate of CR in the study group was 100% achieved thanks to the addition of the P-Rme. No procedure specific post-operative complications occurred but 3.8% of the patients had unplanned additional surgery related to these procedures.