Estimates of repeatability and correlations of hemoparasites infection levels for cattle reared in endemic areas for Rhipicephalus microplus.

Rhipicephalus microplus is a vector of cattle tick fever, a disease caused by the protozoans Babesia bovisand B. bigemina, and also anaplasmosis, produced by the Rickettsiales Anaplasma marginale. These tick-borne pathogens cause considerable losses to Brazilian livestock breeders and represent an obstacle to the expanded use of taurine breeds due to their higher sensitivity to ticks and hemoparasites compared to zebu breeds. Differences in the susceptibility to hemoparasites were also verified within breeds, suggesting that may be possible to select a most resistant phenotype. Therefore, repeatability of R. microplus counts and copy number of hemoparasites DNA were estimated, along with correlations between themselves, aiming to verify if those measures can be used as parameters to classify animals according to their parasite resistance degrees. Forty-two Canchim females kept on pastures naturally infested by ticks were evaluated for the level of infestation by R. microplus and infection by B. bovis, B. bigemina, and A. marginale. Twenty-four evaluations were performed once a month, for adult female ticks counts and blood samplings. The experimental period was divided into four phases, according to the animals age range: Phase 1: 8 to 13 months (collections 1 to 6); phase 2: 14 to 19 months (collections 7 to 12); phase 3: 20 to 25 months (collections 13 to 18), and phase 4: 26 to 31 months (collections 19 to 24). Blood samples were submitted to absolute quantification of hemoparasites DNA sequences using qPCR. The hemoparasite and tick counts data were transformed for normalization and were analyzed using mixed models. Among three species of hemoparasites studied, A. marginale presented the highest level of infection. During phase 3, B. bigemina presented higher infection levels (p < 0.05) compared to B. bovis, whereas no differences were observed in other phases. Estimated repeatabilities for parasite infection levels varied from low to moderate during our experiment. There were low correlations between tick counts and parasite infection levels, and between parasite infection levels from different species by themselves. Based on these results, under conditions of the present study, we suggest that it is possible to identify animals presenting a most resistant phenotype against infection by both hemoparasites and ticks. Moreover, the animal age may be an important factor related to resistance against these pathogens. The data obtained shed more light on the resistance to hemoparasites studied.

Neither quantification by qPCR nor quantitative Elisa can be used to discriminate Angus cattle for resistance/susceptibility to Babesia bovis.

With the aim of finding quantitative phenotypic traits that can be used to discriminate the levels of resistance/susceptibility to Babesia bovis, we estimated the repeatability and correlation between the level of infection, determined by the number of copies of a fragment of the gene that encodes cytochrome B (NC mt-cyB) of B. bovis, and the levels of the anti-B. bovis antibodies, in blood samples collected from 51 Angus cattle on two different occasions. Samples with the anticoagulant EDTA were used for DNA extraction and without anticoagulant for separation of the blood serum. The quantification of the NC mt-cyB of B. bovis was carried out by the quantitative PCR technique (qPCR), while the anti-B. bovis IgG antibody titers (S/P) were quantified by the ELISA method. The NC and S/P data were log10-transformed to improve the approximation to the normal distribution and were analyzed using mixed models. The correlations between NC mt-cyB and S/P were estimated, as well as the repeatability values for each trait. The results obtained showed the high sensitivity of the techniques, with 100% of the animals being positive for B. bovis, detected by both the serological and molecular tests. The correlations estimated between NC and S/P were low, 0.10 and 0.12, in the first and second collection, respectively. The repeatability estimated for NC was 0.06, whereas for the S/P it was 0.42. The low correlations between S/P and NC in the two collections demonstrated that the variation in the NC value is independent of the level of antibodies. This results indicated that animals with a higher levels of antibodies against B. bovis in the first collection continued to have a higher levels in the second one. However, the very low values for the repeatability value of NC, and for the correlations between S/P and NC, demonstrates that neither NC or S/P could be used to discriminate animals for resistance/susceptibility to B. bovis.