Results from the Survey of Antibiotic Resistance (SOAR) 2009-11 in Vietnam.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the susceptibility of respiratory tract infection pathogens collected between 2009 and 2011 from the SOAR study in Vietnam. METHODS: MICs were determined using Etest(®) and susceptibility was assessed using CLSI, EUCAST and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) breakpoints. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-nine Streptococcus pneumoniae and 195 Haemophilus influenzae were collected from 11 centres. Overall, 4.8% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin susceptible (CLSI oral and EUCAST breakpoints). Using CLSI intravenous breakpoints, 86.9% were penicillin susceptible. Susceptibility to high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (or amoxicillin) using PK/PD breakpoints, cefuroxime (using CLSI or PK/PD breakpoints), cefaclor (CLSI breakpoint) and azithromycin (CLSI breakpoint) was 96.9%, 18.7%, 8% and 4.2%, respectively. Ofloxacin susceptibility was 93.4% by CLSI but 0% by EUCAST. All S. pneumoniae were fully vancomycin susceptible. S. pneumoniae from children were significantly less susceptible to most antimicrobials than those from the elderly. For ofloxacin, however, the reverse was true.Among H. influenzae isolates, 40.5% produced ß-lactamase and 13.8% were ß-lactamase negative but ampicillin resistant (BLNAR) by CLSI. H. influenzae were highly susceptible (97.4%) in vitro to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and also to ceftriaxone by CLSI and PK/PD breakpoints but not EUCAST breakpoints. However, BLNAR isolates should be considered clinically resistant, with susceptibility reduced to 84.1%. With EUCAST breakpoints, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid susceptibility was lower, at 63.1%. Azithromycin susceptibility was 79.5% (CLSI). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to antibacterials in Vietnam was high, with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid being the most active agent. Ceftriaxone was highly active against H. influenzae while ofloxacin appeared highly active against S. pneumoniae using CLSI but not by EUCAST breakpoints. Ongoing surveillance through SOAR will further assist in understanding susceptibility trends over time.

Evaluating protocols for normalizing forearm electromyograms during power grip.

Many studies use a reference task of an isometric maximum voluntary power grip task in a mid-pronated forearm posture to normalize their forearm electromyographic (EMG) signal amplitude. Currently there are no recommended protocols to do this. In order to provide guidance on the topic, we examined the EMG amplitude of six forearm muscles (three flexors and three extensors) during twenty different maximal voluntary efforts that included various gripping postures, force and moment exertions and compared them to a frequently used normalization task of exerting a maximum grip force, termed the reference task. 16 participants (8 male and 8 female, aged 18-26) were recruited for this study. Overall, maximal muscle activity was produced during the resisted moment tasks. When contrasted with the reference task, the resisted moment tasks produced EMG activity that was up to 2.8 times higher (p<0.05). Although there was no one task that produced greater EMG values than the reference task for all forearm muscles, the resisted flexor and extensor moment tasks produced similar, if not higher EMG activity than the reference task for the three flexors and three extensor muscles, respectively. This suggests that researchers wishing to normalize forearm EMG activity during power gripping prehensile tasks should use resisted flexor and extensor moment tasks to obtain better estimates of the forearm muscles' maximum electrical activation magnitudes.