The Effect of Different Propofol-Ketamine Combinations on Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Adenoidectomy and Tonsillectomy Surgery.

PURPOSE: Emergence delirium (ED) after sevoflurane anesthesia remains a serious issue in children. We aimed to compare different ratios of propofol-ketamine combinations to determine a better option for preventing ED. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: In this study, 112 children aged between 3 and 12 years who underwent adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy were recruited. Propofol 1 mg kg-1 + ketamine 1 mg kg-1 (1:1 ratio), propofol 1.5 mg kg-1 + ketamine 0.75 mg kg-1 (2:1 ratio), propofol 2 mg kg-1 + ketamine 0.66 mg kg-1 (3:1 ratio), and propofol 3 mg kg-1 were applied at induction of anesthesia for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Fentanyl 1 mcg kg-1 and rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 were applied at induction, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and O2/N2O mixture for all participants. Intravenous morphine 0.1 mg kg-1 was applied for postoperative analgesia in the last 10 minutes of surgery. ED was defined as a Watcha score of ≥3. Demographics, hemodynamics, extubation time, Watcha scores, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scores, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), rescue analgesic requirement, and postoperative complications were recorded. FINDINGS: ED was significantly higher at 10 and 20 minutes in Group IV. Eighteen children experienced ED in PACU, (3, 2, 2, and 11 children in Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively). Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scores were significantly different at all times. Rescue analgesics were required by 3 children (10.7%) in Group I, 2 (7.1%) in Group II, 2 (7.1%) in Group III, and 10 (35.7%) in Group IV (P = .012). The PACU stay was 21.9 ± 6.4 in Group I, 18.7 ± 6.3 in Group II, 16.7 ± 5.8 in Group III, and 17.4 ± 5.8 in Group IV. Nystagmus was observed in three children in Group I. CONCLUSIONS: To addition of ketamine to propofol during the induction of sevoflurane anesthesia can reduce the ED and analgesic requirements in children. A propofol-to-ketamine ratio of 3:1 provided better postoperative recovery with less pain and ED, without prolonging the PACU length of stay.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Breast Reduction Surgery: A Prospective Randomized and Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block used for analgesia of the chest and abdominal wall. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative analgesic efficacy of bilateral single-shot ESPB at T5 vertebral level in breast reduction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult female patients scheduled for breast reduction surgery were included and randomly allocated to two groups to receive either preoperative ESPB with a local anesthetic mixture of 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, 5 mL 2% lidocaine, and 5 mL saline, or sham block. Patients in both groups received intraoperative remifentanil infusion and, postoperatively, morphine via the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. The primary outcome was 24-h total morphine consumption, and secondary outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity, time to first PCA request, supplement analgesic requirements, functional recovery, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and side effects and complications. RESULTS: The 24-h total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the ESPB group vs. the sham group (mean ± SD, 6.7 ± 3.9, and 13.9 ± 5.7 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Compared with sham block, ESPB reduced pain scores, intraoperative opioid consumption, supplement analgesic requirements, delayed time to first PCA request, and improved functional recovery and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In breast reduction surgery, preoperative single-shot ESPB reduces perioperative opioid consumption and provides adequate pain relief within 24 h postoperatively compared to systemic analgesics alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03621345 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effects of Ketamine Infusion on Oxygenation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Ketamine changes respiratory mechanics, provides airway relaxation, and alleviates bronchospasm in patients with pulmonary disease. This study investigated the effect of a continuous infusion of ketamine during thoracic surgery on arterial oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) and the shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: Thirty patients older than 40 years, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and undergoing lobectomy were recruited for this study. Patients were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 groups. At the induction of anaesthesia, group K received intravenous (iv) 1 mg kg-1 ketamine as a bolus and followed by 0.5 mg kg-1 h-1 infusion until the end of the operation. Group S received the same amount of 0.9% saline as a bolus at induction and followed by a 0.5-mL kg-1 h-1 infusion of 0.9% saline until the end of the operation. PaO2 and PaCO2 values, FiO2 levels, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, peak airway pressure (Ppeak), plateau airway pressure (Pplat), dynamic compliance, and shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) were recorded during two-lung ventilation as a baseline and at 30 (one-lung ventilation, OLV-30) and 60 (OLV-60) minutes during one-lung ventilation. RESULTS: PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2 values, and Qs/Qt ratio were similar between the 2 groups at OLV-30 minute (P = .36, P = .29, P = .34). However, at OLV-60 minute, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 values were significantly increased, and Qs/Qt ratios were significantly decreased in group K than in group S (P = .016, P = .011, P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a continuous infusion of ketamine and desflurane inhalation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during one-lung ventilation increase arterial oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) and decrease shunt fraction.

The Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane in Children With Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to compare the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of propofol and sevoflurane in children with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD) undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Single center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Children ages 1-10 years with CCHD undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomized to receive general anesthesia with either sevoflurane (group S) or propofol (group P). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) occurrence was assessed at the end of the surgery and at the sixth, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours. Blood samples were obtained at 4 times: after anesthesia induction (T0), after release of the aortic cross-clamp (T1), at the end of the surgery (T2), and at the postoperative 24th hour (T3). The serum levels of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha, and the total antioxidant status (TAS) and total oxidant status, were analyzed. RESULTS: SIRS was more common in group S than in group P at all times (p = 0.020, p = 0.036, p = 0.004, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the groups in the mean tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6 levels at any time. The TAS level at T2 was higher in group P than group S (p = 0.036). The serum TAS level increased at T2 compared with T0 in group P, but it decreased in group S (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: The results showed that propofol provided a greater antioxidant effect and reduced SIRS postoperatively more than sevoflurane in children with CCHD undergoing cardiac surgery.

Bilateral erector spinae plane blocks in children undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized, controlled study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the hypothesis that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) provides efficient analgesia and reduces postoperative morphine consumption in children undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy. DESIGN: A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: A tertiary university hospital, operating room and intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Forty children aged 2-10 years, who underwent cardiac surgery with median sternotomy. The patients were randomly divided into the block group (Group B) and the control group (Group C). INTERVENTIONS: Group B (n = 20) were treated with ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB at the level of the T4-T5 transverse process, whereas no block was administered in Group C (n = 20). In all children, intravenous morphine at 0.05 mg/kg was used whenever the modified objective pain score (MOPS) ≥4 for postoperative analgesia. MEASUREMENTS: The MOPS and Ramsay sedation score (RSS) were assessed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h postoperatively. Total morphine consumption at 24 h, extubation time and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was also evaluated and recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Bilateral ESPB significantly decreased the consumption of morphine in the first 24 h, postoperatively. During the postoperative 24-h follow-up, 11 children in Group C requested morphine and the cumulative dose of morphine was 0.83 ± 0.91 mg, while 4 children in Group B requested morphine and the cumulative dose of morphine was 0.26 ± 0.59 mg (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference between Groups B and C in terms of MOPS and RSS values, extubation time or length of ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with bupivacaine provides efficient postoperative analgesia and reduces postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Vasopressors for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Spinal Induced Hypotension during Caesarean Section.

Vasopressors have currently become the mainstay therapy for the management of spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) as the major mechanism of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia is the loss of arteriolar tone produced by sympathetic block. Vasopressors for the prophylaxis and treatment of SIH have been the subject of a significant amount of research, yet remain an attractive and important clinical problem. This review will highlight controversies and recent research on the use of vasopressors for both prophylaxis and treatment of SIH. For decades, ephedrine was considered to be the best vasopressor for the management of maternal hypotension. However, its use has been reported to be associated with a 5-fold increased risk of foetal acidosis than phenylephrine. At present, phenylephrine is the vasopressor of choice for preventing and treating SIH at caesarean section. However, its use is often associated with a decreased heart rate and low cardiac output state owing to the lack of ß-mimetic activity. Norepinephrine has been introduced as an alternative vasopressor for preventing and treating SIH because of its additional ß-mimetic activity. However before its routine clinical use, a further series of studies are needed to establish its efficacy and safety for both the mother and foetus.

The effect of epinephrine for the treatment of spinal-hypotension: comparison with norepinephrine and phenylephrine, clinical trial / O efeito de epinefrina, norepinefrina e fenilefrina no tratamento da hipotensão pós-raquianestesia: estudo clínico comparativo

Abstract Background and objectives: Limited data are present on safety and efficiency of epinephrine for the prophylaxis and treatment of spinal-hypotension. This study was conducted to compare the effect of epinephrine with norepinephrine and phenylephrine on the treatment of spinal-hypotension and ephedrine requirement during cesarean delivery. Methods: One hundred and sixty parturients with uncomplicated pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. They were allocated randomly to receive norepinephrine 5 µg.mL−1 (n = 40), epinephrine 5 µg.mL−1 (n = 40), phenylephrine 100 µg.mL−1 (n = 40) or 0.9% saline infusions (n = 40) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Whenever systolic blood pressure drops to less than 80% of baseline, 5 mg of intravenous ephedrine was administered as rescue vasopressor. The incidence of hypotension, total number of hypotension episodes, the number of patients requiring ephedrine, the mean amount of ephedrine consumption and side effects were recorded. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of maternal hypotension between groups. The number of patients requiring ephedrine was significantly greater in group saline than in group phenylephrine (p< 0.001). However, it was similar between phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine groups. The mean ephedrine consumption was significantly higher in group saline than in norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine groups (p= 0.001). Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference in incidence of hypotension and ephedrine consumption during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with the use of epinephrine when compared to norepinephrine or phenylephrine. Epinephrine can be considered an alternative agent for management of spinal hypotension.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Existem dados limitados sobre segurança e eficiência da epinefrina na profilaxia e tratamento da hipotensão arterial associada à raquianestesia. O presente estudo foi realizado para comparar o efeito da epinefrina com norepinefrina e fenilefrina no tratamento da hipotensão após raquianestesia e necessidade de efedrina durante o parto cesáreo. Método: Foram recrutadas 160 parturientes com gestações não complicadas, submetidas a cesariana eletiva sob raquianestesia. Elas foram alocadas aleatoriamente para receber norepinefrina 5 µg.mL-1 (n = 40), epinefrina 5 µg.mL-1 (n = 40), fenilefrina 100 µg.mL-1 (n = 40) ou infusão de solução fisiológica NaCl a 0,9% (n = 40) imediatamente após a indução da raquianestesia. Sempre que houvesse redução da pressão arterial sistólica para valor inferior a 80% da linha de base, 5 mg de efedrina iv eram administrados como vasopressor de resgate. A incidência de hipotensão, o número total de episódios de hipotensão, o número de pacientes que necessitaram de efedrina, o consumo médio de efedrina e os efeitos colaterais foram registrados. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante na incidência de hipotensão materna entre os grupos. O número de pacientes que necessitaram de efedrina foi significantemente maior no grupo solução fisiológica do que no grupo fenilefrina (p< 0,001). No entanto, foi semelhante entre os grupos fenilefrina, norepinefrina e epinefrina. O consumo médio de efedrina foi significantemente maior no grupo solução fisiológica do que nos grupos norepinefrina, epinefrina e fenilefrina (p = 0,001). Conclusão: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante na incidência de hipotensão e consumo de efedrina durante raquianestesia para parto cesáreo com uso de epinefrina quando comparada à norepinefrina ou fenilefrina. A epinefrina pode ser considerada como agente alternativo para o tratamento da hipotensão após raquianestesia.

[The effect of epinephrine for the treatment of spinal-hypotension: comparison with norepinephrine and phenylephrine, clinical trial]. / O efeito de epinefrina, norepinefrina e fenilefrina no tratamento da hipotensão pós­raquianestesia: estudo clínico comparativo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited data are present on safety and efficiency of epinephrine for the prophylaxis and treatment of spinal-hypotension. This study was conducted to compare the effect of epinephrine with norepinephrine and phenylephrine on the treatment of spinal-hypotension and ephedrine requirement during cesarean delivery. METHODS: One hundred and sixty parturients with uncomplicated pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. They were allocated randomly to receive norepinephrine 5 µg.mL-1 (n=40), epinephrine 5 µg.mL-1 (n=40), phenylephrine 100 µg.mL-1 (n=40) or 0.9% saline infusions (n=40) immediately after induction of spinal anesthesia. Whenever systolic blood pressure drops to less than 80% of baseline, 5 mg of iv ephedrine was administered as rescue vasopressor. The incidence of hypotension, total number of hypotension episodes, the number of patients requiring ephedrine, the mean amount of ephedrine consumption and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of maternal hypotension between groups. The number of patients requiring ephedrine was significantly greater in group saline than in group phenylephrine (p <0.001). However, it was similar between phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine groups. The mean ephedrine consumption was significantly higher in group saline than in norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine groups (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference in incidence of hypotension and ephedrine consumption during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with the use of epinephrine when compared to norepinephrine or phenylephrine. Epinephrine can be considered as an alternative agent for management of spinal hypotension.

Comparison of the effects of preoperative melatonin or vitamin C administration on postoperative analgesia.

The analgesic benefit of melatonin and vitamin C as primary or adjuvant agents has been reported in various studies; however, their analgesic effects in the treatment of postoperative pain remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of single preoperative dose of oral melatonin or vitamin C administration on postoperative analgesia. In this study, we recruited 165 adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into three equal (n = 55) groups. One hour before surgery, patients received orally melatonin (6 mg) in group M, vitamin C (2 g) in group C, or a placebo tablet in group P. Pain, sedation, patient satisfaction, total morphine consumption from a patient-controlled analgesia device, supplemental analgesic requirement, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting were recorded throughout 24 h after surgery. The mean pain score and total morphine consumption were found significantly lower in both M and C groups compared with group P (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between group M and C with respect to pain scores (p = 0.117) and total morphine consumption (p = 0.090). Patients requested less supplemental analgesic and experienced less nausea and vomiting in groups M and C compared with group P. In conclusion, preoperative oral administration of 6 mg melatonin or 2 g vitamin C led to a reduction in pain scores, total morphine consumption, supplemental analgesic requirement, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting compared with placebo.

Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Levobupivacaine with Tramadol or Morphine Addition on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Abdominal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural tramadol or epidural morphine as adjuvant to levobupivacaine in major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Patients in ASA I-II group aged between 18 and 65 years were included in study. Epidural catheter was introduced. Patients were randomised into three groups to receive levobupivacaine (Group L), levobupivacaine+morphine (Group LM) and levobupivacaine+tramadol (Group LT). General anaesthesia was administered to all patients. The solution intended for Group L contained 25 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine+15 mL saline, that for Group LM contained 25 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine+14.5 mL salin+100 µg morphine and that for Group LT contained 25 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine+13 mL salin+100 mg tramadol, which was administered via epidural catheter as loading dose 30 min before the end of the operation. Patient-controlled analgesia device was connected to the epidural catheter to provide postoperative analgesia. Bolus dose was adjusted to 12 mg levobupivacaine in Group L, 12 mg levobupivacaine +1.2 mg morphine in Group LM and 12 mg levobupivacaine+12 mg tramadol in Group LT. Lock-out period was adjusted to 15 min in three groups. Quality of analgesia was evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale; administered and demand doses of levobupivacaine, morphine and tramadol were compared at 30 min, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Visual Analogue Scale scores were significantly higher in Group L than Groups LM and LT. Nausea and vomiting observed in Group L were lesser than those in Groups LM and LT. CONCLUSION: Continuous epidural analgesia using levobupivacaine combined with morphine or tramadol is an effective method for managing postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery.

Retrospective Analysis of Eighty-Nine Caesarean Section Cases with Abnormal Placental Invasion.

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal placental invasion (API) is defined as an abnormal adherence of the placenta to the underlying uterine wall. Undiagnosed API may result in catastrophic maternal haemorrhage during delivery. In the present retrospective analysis, anaesthetic and surgical records were evaluated in patients with API who had undergone caesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: Clinical records of 89 patients with API who had undergone CD were retrospectively reviewed in our clinic between April 2010 and February 2017. RESULTS: Amongst the patients, 87 (97.8%) had a history of previous CD and 68 (76.4%) had placenta previa. In regression analysis, weak positive correlation was found between an increase in packed red blood cell (PRBC) (r=0.420, p=0.001) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (r=0.476, p=0.022) transfusions and time of hospital stay. PRBC and FFP consumptions were significantly greater in intensive care unit (ICU) patients than in non-ICU patients (p<0.001). ICU requirement were significantly greater in patients who had more than average crystalloid (p=0.004) and colloid (p<0.001) infusions. Elective CD was performed in 81 (91%) patients and emergency CD in 8 (9%). PRBC transfusions were 7±4.3 U in patients undergoing emergency CD and 3.85±3 U in patients undergoing elective CD (p=0.034). The number of patients requiring care in ICU was 4 (50%), who underwent emergency CD and 12 (14%) who underwent elective CD, (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: It is crucial that the anaesthesiologist should be familiar with the risk factors and diagnosis of API because of the potential risk of massive haemorrhage. Multidisciplinary approach with surgery and blood bank decreases the amount of bleeding, blood transfusion requirement, ICU and hospital stay in patients with API.

Effect of One-Lung Ventilation on Blood Sevoflurane and Desflurane Concentrations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the blood sevoflurane and desflurane concentrations during one-lung ventilation (OLV). DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 24 patients, 35 to 70 years old who were scheduled for either a major abdominal surgery or thoracotomy. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were divided into the following 4 groups: sevoflurane two-lung ventilation (TLV), sevoflurane OLV, desflurane TLV, and desflurane OLV. Vaporizers were set at 1.5% sevoflurane or 6% desflurane. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the TLV groups, blood samples were taken in 10-minute intervals starting 40 minutes after the start of TLV (T1-T9) for blood gas analysis and gas chromatography. In the OLV groups, the first sample was collected at 40 minutes of TLV (T1), and other samples were collected in 10-minute intervals from the start of OLV (T2-T9). Saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2), hemodynamic variables, and inspired and end-tidal volatiles were recorded. The fraction uptake of the volatile agents (F) was calculated for each patient at the same time points. The mean arterial sevoflurane concentration in the sevoflurane OLV group at T1 decreased from 40.7 ± 4.4 to 30.2 ± 2.5 µg/mL at T3 (p = 0.014, 26% decrease). In the OLV desflurane group, the mean arterial desflurane concentration at T1 declined from 224.6 ± 44.8 to 159.8 ± 32 µg/mL at T3 (p=0.018, 29% decrease). However, the reduction of sevoflurane concentration compared with that of desflurane at T3 was not statistically significant (p = 0.31). In addition, the fraction uptake of the volatile agents values significantly increased at the start of OLV (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: An OLV procedure causes a decrease in the both arterial and venous blood concentrations of sevoflurane and desflurane. This reduction is believed to be due to ventilation-perfusion mismatch.

Determining the effect of long-term dexamethasone and prednisolone treatment on sugammadex

Background/aim: We aimed to investigate the effect of long-term use of dexamethasone and prednisolone on the reversal effect of sugammadex. Materials and methods: TTwenty-four male Wistar albino rats were divided into three groups. Dexamethasone (600 µg/kg) was given to group D, prednisolone (10 mg/kg) was given to group P, and an equivalent volume of saline per day was administered intraperitoneally to group S for 14 days, respectively. The left hemidiaphragm with attached phrenic nerve was maintained in Krebs solution. Sugammadex (30 µmol/L) was applied while rocuronium (10 µmol/L) was present in an organ bath and a single twitch was obtained. The right hemidiaphragm was used for both adult ( ε-subunit) and fetal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) ( ε-subunit) determination using polymerase chain reaction. Results: All animals lost weight, except group S. The mean baseline single-twitch tension was lower in both group D (14.4 ± 1.7 g) and group P (12.68 ± 0.05 g) than group S (16.8 ± 0.5 g) (P < 0.001). When sugammadex was added to the organ bath while rocuronium was present, the single twitch was measured to be lower in both group D (11.7 ± 0.7 g) and group P (11.5 ± 0.78 g) than group S (16.5 ± 0.24 g) (P < 0.001). Ɣ-AChR expression was higher in both dexamethasone and prednisolone than in saline. Conclusion: Long-term medication with dexamethasone and prednisolone caused muscle weakness, resistance to neuromuscular blockers, and upregulation of immature Ɣ-AChR and reduced the neuromuscular reversal effect of sugammadex.

Remifentanil-ketamine vs. propofol-ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized clinical trial / Remifentanil-cetamina vs. propofol-cetamina para sedação em pacientes pediátricos submetidos à colonoscopia: ensaio clínico randômico

Abstract Background and objectives: Pediatric patients frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia for colonoscopy. This study was designed to compare the sedative efficacy of remifentanil-ketamine combination with propofol-ketamine combination in children undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: Seventy patients, between 2 and 16 years of age, scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups. Remifentanil-ketamine group received intravenous ketamine 2 mg.kg−1 and remifentanil 0.25 µg.kg−1 combination, followed by 0.1 µg.kg−1.min−1 remifentanil infusion. Propofol-ketamine group received intravenous propofol 1 and 2 mg.kg−1 ketamine combination, followed by 1 mg.kg−1.h−1 propofol infusion. In the case of children discomfort (cry, movement, and cough), remifentanil 0.1 µg.kg−1 in the remifentanil-ketamine group or propofol 0.5 mg.kg−1 in the propofol-ketamine group were administered to improve children discomfort. Despite the therapy given above, if children still experience discomfort, 1 mg.kg−1 of ketamine was administered as a rescue drug, regardless of the group. Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, drug requirements, gastroenterologists' satisfaction, colonoscopy duration, recovery time, and side effects were recorded throughout the procedure and the recovery period. Results: The percentage of patients with a Ramsay sedation score of 4 or higher during the procedure was 73.5 and 37.1% in remifentanil-ketamine and propofol-ketamine groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure variables were significantly higher only after induction in the remifentanil-ketamine group than in the propofol-ketamine group (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Coadministration of ketamine with either remifentanil or propofol effectively and safely provides sedation and analgesia in children undergoing colonoscopy. Sedation scores were significantly better in remifentanil-ketamine group than in propofol-ketamine group.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Os pacientes pediátricos com frequência precisam de sedação profunda ou anestesia geral para colonoscopia. Este estudo foi desenhado para comparar a eficácia sedativa da combinação de remifentanil-cetamina e de propofol-cetamina em crianças submetidas à colonoscopia. Métodos: Setenta pacientes, entre 2-16 anos, programados para colonoscopia diagnóstica foram alocados randomicamente em dois grupos. O grupo remifentanil-cetamina recebeu a combinação de 2 mg.kg−1 de cetamina por via intravenosa e 0,25 µg.kg−1 de remifentanil; seguido de infusão de remifentanil (0,1 µg.kg−1.min−1). O grupo propofol-cetamina recebeu a combinação de 1 mg.kg−1 de propofol e 2 mg.kg−1 de cetamina; seguido de infusão de propofol (1 mg.kg−1.h−1). Em caso de desconforto das crianças (choro, movimento e tosse), remifentanil (0,1 µg.kg−1) seria administrado ao grupo remifentanil-cetamina ou propofol (0,5 mg.kg−1) ao grupo propofol-cetamina. A despeito da terapia acima citada, caso as crianças ainda sentissem desconforto, cetamina (1 mg.kg−1) seria administrada como fármaco de resgate, independentemente do grupo. Escore de sedação de Ramsay, variáveis hemodinâmicas, necessidade de medicamentos, satisfação dos gastroenterologistas, duração da colonoscopia, tempo de recuperação e efeitos colaterais foram registrados durante o procedimento e o período de recuperação. Resultados: O percentual de pacientes com escore 4 ou mais na escala de sedação de Ramsay durante o procedimento foi de 73,5% e 37,1% nos grupos remifentanil-cetamina e propofol-cetamina, respectivamente, (p = 0,02). As variáveis, pressão arterial sistólica e diastólica, foram significativamente maiores no grupo remifentanil-cetamina do que no grupo propofol-cetamina, mas somente após a indução (p = 0,015). Conclusão: A coadministração de cetamina com remifentanil ou propofol fornece sedação e analgesia de forma eficaz e segura em crianças submetidas à colonoscopia. Os escores de sedação foram significativamente melhores no grupo remifentanil-cetamina do que no grupo propofol-cetamina.

[Remifentanil-ketamine vs. propofol-ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized clinical trial]. / Remifentanil­cetamina vs. propofol­cetamina para sedação em pacientes pediátricos submetidos à colonoscopia: ensaio clínico randômico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric patients frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia for colonoscopy. This study was designed to compare the sedative efficacy of remifentanil-ketamine combination with propofol-ketamine combination in children undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: Seventy patients, between 2 and 16 years of age, scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups. Remifentanil-ketamine group received intravenous ketamine 2mg.kg-1 and remifentanil 0.25µg.kg-1 combination, followed by 0.1µg.kg-1.min-1 remifentanil infusion. Propofol-ketamine group received intravenous propofol 1 and 2mg.kg-1 ketamine combination, followed by 1mg.kg-1.h-1 propofol infusion. In the case of children discomfort (cry, movement, and cough), remifentanil 0.1µg.kg-1 in the remifentanil-ketamine group or propofol 0.5mg.kg-1 in the propofol-ketamine group were administered to improve children discomfort. Despite the therapy given above, if children still experience discomfort, 1mg.kg-1 of ketamine was administered as a rescue drug, regardless of the group. Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, drug requirements, gastroenterologists' satisfaction, colonoscopy duration, recovery time, and side effects were recorded throughout the procedure and the recovery period. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a Ramsay sedation score of 4 or higher during the procedure was 73.5 and 37.1% in remifentanil-ketamine and propofol-ketamine groups, respectively (p=0.02). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure variables were significantly higher only after induction in the remifentanil-ketamine group than in the propofol-ketamine group (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Coadministration of ketamine with either remifentanil or propofol effectively and safely provides sedation and analgesia in children undergoing colonoscopy. Sedation scores were significantly better in remifentanil-ketamine group than in propofol-ketamine group.

Comparison of TIVA with different combinations of ketamine-propofol mixtures in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: Adding ketamine to propofol has been suggested to be useful for sedation and general anesthesia. This study aimed to determine the effect of TIVA with different ratios of ketofol on recovery in children. METHODS: Seventy-five children aged 3-12 years and undergoing adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy surgery were randomized into three groups. Ratios of 1:5, 1:6.7 and 1:10 ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) were prepared in the same syringe for groups I, II and III, respectively. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were performed with 1:5, 1:6.7 and 1:10 ratios of ketofol in groups I, II and III, respectively. A McFarlan infusion dose regimen was used (15 mg/kg/h for 15 min, 13 mg/kg/h for 15 min, 11 mg/kg/h for 30 min) and infusion rates were decreased for the different ratios. Infusion rates were reduced to 67, 80 and 90% of the McFarlan dose regimen for groups I, II and III, respectively. Extubating time, length of stay in PACU, postoperative PAED and FLACC scores were recorded. RESULTS: Extubating time was significantly lower [mean 254.3 ± 92.7 s (95% CI 216.6-292.6, p = 0.001)] in group III than in groups I and II [371.3 ± 153 s (308.1-434.48) and 343.2 ± 123.7 s (292.2-394.3), respectively]. Length of stay in the PACU was lower in group III [median 15 min (interquartile range 15-20, p = 0.001)] than in groups I and II: 20 (15-27.5) and 20 min (20-27.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: TIVA with a 1:10 ratio of ketofol admixture with a 90% reduction of McFarlan regimen can provide improved recovery conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02848963.

Does prophylactic ondansetron reduce norepinephrine consumption in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia?

PURPOSE: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) during cesarean delivery is not rare and frequently leads to materno-fetal discrepancy and collapse. More recently, norepinephrine has been proposed for the prevention and treatment of SAIH with fewer tendencies to decrease heart rate and cardiac output. Ondansetron has been reported to reduce the incidence of SAIH in patients undergoing cesarean section. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of prophylactic ondansetron on the incidence of SAIH, norepinephrine consumption, and adverse effects. METHODS: We recruited 108 parturients with uncomplicated pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The parturients were divided into two groups randomly. The first group (n = 54) received 8 mg ondansetron IV (group O) and the second group (n = 54) received the same volume (4 ml) of saline (group S), 5 min before spinal anesthesia. The incidence of hypotension, cumulative episodes of hypotension, total norepinephrine consumption, and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in demographic data, parturient characteristics, and duration of surgery. No significant difference was found in the incidence of hypotension in the saline and ondansetron groups (p = 0.767). However, the cumulative episodes of hypotension and norepinephrine consumptions were significantly greater in group S than in group O (p = 0.009) (p = 0.009). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Eight milligrams of intravenous ondansetron given 5 min before spinal anesthesia attenuated but did not prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

[Effect of rocuronium administration rate and remifentanil on prevention of rocuronium injection pain in pediatric cases]. / Pediyatrik olgularda roküronyum enjeksiyon agrisinin azaltilmasinda roküronyum uygulama hizi ve remifentanilin etkisi.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of remifentanil administration prior to slow and fast rocuronium infusion on hemodynamic changes and rocuronium injection pain in pediatric patients. METHODS: In total, 120 5-15-year-old ASA score I/II pediatric patients were included in the study. Group A: slow rocuronium injection-saline; group B: slow rocuronium injection (0.6 mg/kg IV)-remifentanyl; group C: fast rocuronium injection-saline; and group D: fast rocuronium injection-remifentanyl. Withdrawal movement after rocuronium injection was recorded based on a 3-point response to withdrawal score. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded. RESULTS: One minute after rocuronium injection, HR values were found to be lower in remifentanil groups (p: 0.0001; 101.4±22.1, p: 0.003; 99.8±18.3 in group B and D, respectively) compared with those in placebo groups (p: 0.025; 107.4±21.7, p: 0.012; 114.0±16.4 in group A and C, respectively). With respect to the response to withdrawal scores, unresponsiveness rates were the highest in group B (66.7%) and group D (70%). The number of non-responder patients was 9 in saline-administered groups (group A and C), whereas it was 20 and 21 in remifentanil-administered groups (group B and D, respectively). Generalized responses were observed predominantly in groups A (20%) and C (20%). Generalized responses were highest in groups A (20%, n=6) and C (20%, n=6). CONCLUSION: There was no impact of infusion speed on rocuronium injection pain in pediatric cases, whereas it is concluded that remifentanil administration prior to rocuronium injection considerably reduced rocuronium injection pain regardless of injection speed and without serious hemodynamic changes.

Sugammadex in a Patient with Brugada Syndrome.

Brugada Syndrome was first described in 1992 by Pedro Brugada as a genetic syndrome that is characterized by ventricular arrhythmias that may result in sudden cardiac arrest. In particular, a right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads are observed. Many perioperative pharmalogical and physiological factors can trigger malignant arrhythmias. Although it is a rare condition, the anaesthestic management of Brugada syndrome is important because of the potentially fatal complications. Many anaesthetics have been administered during the operation of patients with Brugada Syndrome. The use of sugammadex instead of the anaesthetic management of patients with Brugada syndrome is discussed in this study.

The Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Sugammadex Reversal Time in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone has been shown to cause inhibition of sugammadex reversal in functionally innervated human muscle cells. In this prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study, we evaluated the effect of dexamethasone on the reversal time of sugammadex in children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. METHODS: We recruited 60 patients with ASA physical status I to II, between the ages of 3 and 8 years, scheduled for elective tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. After the induction of anesthesia, patients in group D received IV dexamethasone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg within a total volume of 5 mL saline, whereas patients in group S received only 5 mL IV saline as the control group. At the end of surgery, all patients were given a single bolus dose (2 mg/kg) of sugammadex at reappearance of T2. Demographic data, hemodynamic variables, time to recovery (a train-of-four ratio of 0.9), time to tracheal extubation, and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance between 2 groups in time to recovery and time to extubation. Time to recovery was 97.7 ± 23.9 seconds in group D and 91.1 ± 39.5 seconds in group S (P = 0.436; 95% confidence interval, -10.3 to 23.5). Time to extubation was 127.9 ± 23.2 seconds and 123.8 ± 38.7 seconds in group D and in group S, respectively (P = 0.612; 95% confidence interval, -11.9 to 20.05). CONCLUSIONS: IV dexamethasone, given after induction of anesthesia, at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, does not substantively affect the reversal time of sugammadex in pediatric patients undergoing adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy.