Injury Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Trauma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical course of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after trauma is largely unknown. We sought to compare the clinical course of patients with IBD to those without. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of adult patients admitted to a level-1 trauma center from January 1, 2008, through October 1, 2015. Seventy-five patients with IBD were identified. Cases were matched to controls by age, sex, injury severity, and mechanism using 4:1 propensity score-matching analysis. Injury characteristics, clinical course, and infectious and noninfectious complications were compared using bivariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 56 years and mean injury severity score of 15. Of the 75 cases, 44% had ulcerative colitis, 44% had Crohn's disease, and 12% had undetermined type. More cases were on an immunosuppressant (19% vs 2%, P < 0.01) or steroids (8% vs 2%, P = 0.02) on admission compared with controls. More cases had prior abdominal surgery (P = 0.01). Cases had fewer brain injuries (P = 0.02) and higher admission Glasgow Coma Scale (P < 0.01) but required more neurosurgical intervention (P = 0.03). Cases required more orthopedic surgeries (P < 0.01) and more pain management consultations (P = 0.04). In multivariable analysis, IBD was associated with increased odds of operative intervention, pain management consultation, venous thromboembolism, and longer hospital stay (P < 0.05). Patients on immunosuppressants had increased odds of requiring surgery (P = 0.04), particularly orthopedic surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline factors associated with inflammatory bowel disease may place patients at higher risk for surgery and complications after trauma.

Overuse and Limited Benefit of Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer in Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have confirmed a benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTX) in stage II colon cancer. We used the National Cancer Database to explore the use and efficacy of aCTX in patients with both normal-risk (NR) and high-risk (HR) young stage II colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent colectomy between 2010 and 2015. HR patients included at least: lymphovascular or perineural invasion, < 12 lymph nodes, poor/un-differentiation, T4, or positive margins. Rates of aCTX by age and risk were calculated, and adjusted factors associated with aCTX were identified. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable analyses for patients < 50 years. RESULTS: Among the 81,066 stage II patients who underwent colectomy, 6093 (7.5%) were < 50 years old. Of these, 2669 patients were HR. Thirty percent of NR and almost 60% of HR patients < 50 years received aCTX, compared with 8% and 23% of patients > 50 years (P < .001). In NR patients < 50 years, 35.3% with microsatellite-stable tumors and 18% with microsatellite unstable tumors received aCTX (P < .001), whereas 63.6% and 43.2%, respectively, of HR patients did (P < .001). The most significant multivariable predictors of aCTX were risk status and age. On univariate analysis, there was no survival benefit associated with aCTX in patients < 50 years. Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate a survival benefit for aCTX for either group (HR, 0.97; P = .84; NR, 0.1.03; P = .90). CONCLUSION: Young patients with HR and NR colon cancer received aCXT more frequently than older patients with no demonstrable survival benefit. This bears further evaluation to avoid the real risks of over-treatment in this increasing population.

Elective colon resection without curative intent in stage IV colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that elective primary colon resection (ePCR) in patients with asymptomatic colon tumors and unresectable metastases is not required and may expose patients to unnecessary operative risk. METHODS: Stage IV colon cancer patients with liver metastases from 2000 to 2011 were identified with SEER-Medicare data. Liver-based therapy or urgent/emergent colectomies were excluded. Chemotherapy alone was compared to ePCR ±â€¯chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of ePCR. Multivariate Cox regression compared survival. RESULTS: 5139 patients were identified. The ePCR rate decreased over time; 84% underwent ePCR in 2000, compared to 52% in 2011 (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, older patients were more likely to undergo ePCR, as were patients from rural areas (OR 1.65, p < 0.001). The odds of PCR in high poverty areas (>10%) were almost 25% higher than those in low poverty areas (OR 1.23, p = 0.03). African-Americana were less likely to undergo PCR than Caucasians (OR 0.76, p = 0.01). In multivariate survival analysis, PCR was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 0.59, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although ePCR is not recommended with unresectable metastases and the rate has decreased significantly, over 50% of patients with untreated hepatic metastases underwent ePCR in 2011. Disparities exist in use of ePCR that are likely multifactorial and deserve further study.

Staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer: a potential role for advanced laparoscopic techniques.

BACKGROUND: The role of staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer in the age of high-resolution CT scans is under debate. This study's aim is to evaluate the efficacy of staging laparoscopy in this disease. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating patients who underwent operative treatment for radiographic stage I to III pancreatic cancer between July 2003 and October 2012. Radiographic follow-up was 94% at 6 months. RESULTS: Of 274 patients who met inclusion criteria, 136 underwent staging laparoscopy, which identified radiographic occult distant metastases in 2% (3 of 136). However, subsequent laparotomy identified an additional 9% (12 of 136) harboring distant metastases in regions not visualized on standard staging laparoscopy; specifically, the posterior liver surface, paraduodenal retroperitoneum, proximal jejunal mesentery, and lesser sac. The remaining 138 patients underwent initial staging laparotomy, which showed similar results identifying radiographic occult distant disease in 11% (15 of 138). Within 6 months after the operation, peritoneal or subcapsular liver metastases developed in an additional 6% (15 of 257)-disease that potentially could have been diagnosed at the time of operation-providing a false-negative rate of 88% for staging laparoscopy compared with 36% for staging laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of high-resolution CT scans, occult distant metastases can still be found in 11% of patients during the operation. In the absence of reliable risk factors to predict distant metastases, staging laparoscopy should be offered to all patients with radiographic localized disease. However, the results favor extended laparoscopic staging with evaluation of the posterior liver surface, mobilization of the duodenum, evaluation of the proximal jejunal mesentery, and visualization of the lesser sac.