Indwelling catheter vs intermittent catheterization: is there a difference in UTI susceptibility?

BACKGROUND: Patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) often rely on some type of catheterization for bladder emptying. Intermittent catheterization (IC) is considered the gold standard and is preferred over continuous catheterization, since it is considered to cause fewer urinary tract infections (UTIs) than indwelling catheterization. The main objective of our study was to describe UTI prevalence (at visit) and incidence (within the last 12 months) and urine culture characteristics between patients using an indwelling catheter versus (vs) those performing IC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we prospectively evaluated from 02/2020 to 01/2021 patients with NLUTD undergoing urine cultures for prophylactic reasons or due to UTI symptoms. At visit, all patients underwent a standardized interview on current UTI symptoms as well as UTI history and antibiotic consumption within the past year. Patients using an indwelling catheter (n = 206) or IC (n = 299) were included in the analysis. The main outcome was between-group differences regarding UTI characteristics. RESULTS: Patients using an indwelling catheter were older (indwelling catheter vs IC: median 66 (Q1-Q3: 55-77) vs 55 (42-67) years of age) and showed a higher Charlson comorbidity index (indwelling catheter vs IC: median 4 (Q1-Q3: 2-6) vs 2 (1-4) (both p < 0·001). A total of 40 patients from both groups were diagnosed with a UTI at visit (indwelling catheters vs IC: 8% (16/206) vs 8% (24/299); p = 0·782), and the number of UTIs within the past 12 months was not significantly different between groups. Overall, Escherichia coli (21%), Enterococcus faecalis (17%), and Klebsiella spp. (12%) were the most frequently detected bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with NLUTD, we did not find relevant differences in UTI frequency between groups. These results suggest that UTI-related concerns should not be given undue emphasis when counseling patients for catheter-related bladder emptying methods.

Development of a Sham Protocol to Investigate Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Randomised, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trials.

Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a promising treatment for neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. However, the evidence is limited due to a general lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and, also, inconsistency in the sham and blinding conditions. In the context of much-needed RCTs, we aimed to develop a suitable sham-control protocol for a clinical setting to maintain blinding but avoid meaningful stimulation of the tibial nerve. Three potential electrode positions (lateral malleolus/5th metatarsal/plantar calcaneus) and two electrode sizes (diameter: 2.5 cm/3.2 cm) were tested to determine which combination provided the optimal sham configuration for a TTNS approach, based on a visible motor response. Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent sensory and motor assessments for each sham configuration. Eight out of them came back for an extra TTNS visit. Sensory thresholds were present for all sham configurations, with linear regression models revealing a significant effect regarding electrode position (highest at plantar calcaneus) but not size. In addition, motor thresholds varied with the position-lowest for the 5th metatarsal. Only using this position and 3.2 cm electrodes attained a 100% response rate. Compared to TTNS, sensory and motor thresholds were generally higher for the sham configurations; meanwhile, perceived pain was only higher at the lateral malleolus. In conclusion, using the 5th metatarsal position and 3.2 cm electrodes proved to be the most suitable sham configuration. Implemented as a four-electrode setup with standardized procedures, this appears to be a suitable RCT protocol for maintaining blinding and controlling for nonspecific TTNS effects in a clinical setting.

Urodynamics Are Essential to Predict the Risk for Upper Urinary Tract Damage after Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

We used clinical parameters to develop a prediction model for the occurrence of urodynamic risk factors for upper urinary tract (UUT) damage during the first year after acute spinal cord injury (SCI). A total of 97 patients underwent urodynamic investigation at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after acute SCI, within the framework of a population-based longitudinal study at a single university SCI center. Candidate predictors included demographic characteristics and neurological and functional statuses 1 month after SCI. Outcomes included urodynamic risk factors for UUT damage: detrusor overactivity combined with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, maximum storage detrusor pressure (pDetmax) ≥ 40 cmH2O, bladder compliance < 20 mL/cmH2O, and vesicoureteral reflux. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the prediction model development and internal validation, using the area under the receiver operating curve (aROC) to assess model discrimination. Two models showed fair discrimination for pDetmax ≥ 40 cmH2O: (i) upper extremity motor score and sex, aROC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69-0.89), C-statistic 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87), and (ii) neurological level, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, and sex, aROC 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.89), C-statistic 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85). We identified two models that provided fair predictive values for urodynamic risk factors of UUT damage during the first year after SCI. Pending external validation, these models may be useful for clinical trial planning, although less so for individual-level patient management. Therefore, urodynamics remains essential for reliably identifying patients at risk of UUT damage.

bTUNED: transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To present the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). STUDY DESIGN AND RESULTS: bTUNED (bladder and TranscUtaneous tibial Nerve stimulation for nEurogenic lower urinary tract Dysfunction) is an international multicentre, sham-controlled, double-blind RCT investigating the efficacy and safety of TTNS. The primary outcome is success of TTNS, defined as improvements in key bladder diary variables at study end compared to baseline values. The focus of the treatment is defined by the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are the effect of TTNS on urodynamic, neurophysiological, and bowel function outcome measures, as well as the safety of TTNS. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 240 patients with refractory NLUTD will be included and randomized 1:1 into the verum or sham TTNS group from March 2020 until August 2026. TTNS will be performed twice a week for 30 min during 6 weeks. The patients will attend baseline assessments, 12 treatment visits and follow-up assessments at the study end.

Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in the First Year After Spinal Cord Injury: A Descriptive Study of Urodynamic Findings.

PURPOSE: We aimed to provide a real-world description of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction within the first year after spinal cord injury with a focus on unfavorable urodynamic parameters that are associated with urological morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urodynamic investigations from 97 patients with traumatic or ischemic acute spinal cord injury and managed according to the European Association of Urology Guidelines on Neuro-Urology were analyzed at a single university spinal cord injury center at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after injury. Unfavorable urodynamic parameters were defined as detrusor overactivity in combination with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, maximum storage detrusor pressure of 40 cm H2O or higher, bladder compliance less than 20 mL/cm H2O, and vesicoureteral reflux of any grade. RESULTS: One or more unfavorable urodynamic parameter was observed in 87 out of 97 patients (90%) within the first year after spinal cord injury. Eighty-eight percent of the patients showed detrusor overactivity with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, 39% a maximum storage detrusor pressure of 40 cm H2O or higher, and 7% vesicoureteral reflux. No patient developed a low-compliance bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized urodynamic follow-up schedule, we found unfavorable urodynamic parameters in a majority of the population within the first year after spinal cord injury. As early treatment based on urodynamic findings might reduce the risk of deterioration of upper and lower urinary tract function, thereby improving long-term outcomes, there is need for further research regarding recommendations for a urodynamic follow-up schedule during the first year after spinal cord injury.

Temporal development of unfavourable urodynamic parameters during the first year after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the temporal development of and risk factors for the occurrence of unfavourable urodynamic parameters during the first year after spinal cord injury (SCI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This population-based longitudinal study used data from 97 adult patients with a single-event traumatic or ischaemic SCI who underwent video-urodynamic investigation (UDI) at a university SCI centre. The first occurrences of unfavourable urodynamic parameters (detrusor overactivity combined with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia [DO-DSD], maximum storage detrusor pressure ≥40 cmH2 O, bladder compliance <20 mL/cmH2 O, vesico-ureteric reflux [VUR] and any unfavourable parameter [composite outcome]) were evaluated using time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: The majority of the population (87/97 [90%]) had at least one unfavourable urodynamic parameter. Most unfavourable urodynamic parameters were initially identified during the 1- or 3-month UDI, including 92% of the DO-DSD (78/85), 82% of the maximum storage pressure ≥40 cmH2 O (31/38), and 100% of the VUR (seven of seven) observations. No low bladder compliance was observed. The risk of DO-DSD was elevated in patients with thoracic SCI compared to those with lumbar SCI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-4.89). Risk of maximum storage detrusor pressure ≥40 cmH2 O was higher in males than females (aHR 8.33, 95% CI 2.51-27.66), in patients with a cervical SCI compared to those with lumbar SCI (aHR 14.89, 95% CI 3.28-67.55), and in patients with AIS Grade B or C compared to AIS Grade D SCI (aHR 6.17, 95% CI 1.78-21.39). No risk factors were identified for the composite outcome of any unfavourable urodynamic parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The first UDI should take place within 3 months after SCI as to facilitate early diagnosis of unfavourable urodynamic parameters and timely treatment. Neuro-urological guidelines and individualised management strategies for patients with SCI may be strengthened by considering sex and SCI characteristics in the scheduling of UDIs.

Sex differences in urological management during spinal cord injury rehabilitation: results from a prospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To describe female-male differences in first-line urological management during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. SETTING: Inpatient specialized post-acute SCI rehabilitation in Switzerland. METHODS: Data on bladder storage medication (antimuscarinic and beta-3 agonist) use, suprapubic catheter placement, demographic and SCI characteristics was collected within 40 days of SCI and at rehabilitation discharge from May 2013-September 2021. Prevalence and indicators of bladder storage medication and suprapubic catheter use at discharge were investigated with sex-stratified descriptive and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In 748 patients (219 females, 29%), bladder storage medication use at discharge had a prevalence of 24% (95% CI: 18-29%) for females and 30% (95% CI: 26-34%) for males and was indicated by cervical AIS grade A, B, C and traumatic SCI in both sexes. Thoracic AIS grade A, B, C SCI (males), and lumbar/sacral AIS grade A, B, C SCI (females) predicted higher odds of bladder storage medication use (SCI characteristic*sex interaction, p < 0.01). Prevalence of suprapubic catheter use at discharge was 22% (95% CI: 17-28%) for females and 17% (95% CI: 14-20%) for males. Suprapubic catheter use was indicated by cervical AIS grade A, B, C SCI, and age >60 in both sexes. Females with thoracic grade A, B, C SCI tended to have higher odds of suprapubic catheter use (SCI characteristic*sex interaction, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: We identified sex differences in urological management especially in persons with AIS grade C or higher sub-cervical SCI. There is scope for well-powered, female-specific research in SCI in order to understand the underlying mechanisms and support patient-tailored management.

Randomised Controlled Trials Assessing the Clinical Value of Urodynamic Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: The role of urodynamic studies (UDSs) in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is crucial. Although expert statements and guidelines underline their value for clinical decision-making in various clinical settings, the academic debate as to their impact on patient outcomes continues. Objective: To summarise the evidence from all randomised controlled trials assessing the clinical usefulness of UDS in the management of LUTS. Evidence acquisition: For this systematic review, searches were performed without language restrictions in three electronic databases until November 18, 2020. The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled study design and allocation to receive UDS or not prior to any clinical management. Quality assessment was performed by two reviewers independently, using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed on the uniformly reported outcome parameters. Evidence synthesis: Eight trials were included, and all but two focused on women with pure or predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A meta-analysis of six studies including 942 female patients was possible for treatment success, as defined by the authors (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.07), indicating no difference in efficacy when managing women with UDS. Conclusions: Although UDSs are not replaceable in diagnostics, since there is no other equivalent method to find out exactly what the lower urinary tract problem is, there are little data supporting its impact on outcomes. Randomised controlled trials have focussed on a small group of women with uncomplicated SUI and showed no added value, but these findings cannot be extrapolated to the overall patient population with LUTS, warranting further well-designed trials. Patient summary: Despite urodynamics being the gold standard to assess lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), as it is the only method that can specify lower urinary tract dysfunction, more studies assessing the clinical usefulness of urodynamic studies (UDSs) in the management of LUTS are needed. UDS investigation is not increasing the probability of success in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Urological Management at Discharge from Acute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Analysis from a Population-based Prospective Cohort.

Background: There is limited epidemiological evidence describing contemporary neuro-urological management of persons with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Objective: To describe neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) management at discharge from SCI rehabilitation. Design setting and participants: The population-based Swiss Spinal Cord Injury (SwiSCI) cohort study prospectively collected data from 602 adults undergoing specialized postacute SCI rehabilitation from 2013 to 2020. The management strategy was based on the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-Urology. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Data were collected at discharge using the International SCI Lower Urinary Tract Function Basic Data Set. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for demographics, SCI characteristics, and center, with inverse probability weighting accounting for sampling bias, was used to produce prevalence estimates and identify predictors of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and NLUTD management outcomes. Results and limitations: At discharge (median time after SCI: 5.0 mo [Q1-Q3: 3.0-7.2]), the prevalence of LUTS or managed NLUTD was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79-85%). SCI completeness was the main predictor of LUTS and managed NLUTD. The risk of urinary incontinence was elevated in females (odds ratio 1.98 [95% CI: 1.18-3.32]) and with complete lesions (odds ratio 4.71 [95% CI: 2.52-8.81]). Voiding dysfunction was most commonly managed with intermittent catheterization (prevalence 39% [95% CI: 35-42%]), followed by indwelling catheterization (prevalence 22% [95% CI: 18-25%]). The prevalence of antimuscarinic or mirabegron use was 29% (95% CI: 26-33%). Urodynamic and renal function data were not collected. Conclusions: Our population-based description of urological management in Swiss SCI centers utilizing the EAU Guidelines on Neuro-Urology may be used as a reference for evaluation in other settings. Data further indicate a need for sex-specific neuro-urological management research. Patient summary: At discharge from spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation, a majority of patients have lower urinary tract problems, especially those with complete SCI. Women have a higher risk of urinary incontinence.

Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology.

STUDY DESIGN: Simulations using data from a prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate how prospective cohort data can be employed in randomized controlled trial (RCT) planning to assess feasibility and operational challenges, using TASCI (Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury to prevent neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a nationwide randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial) as a case study. SETTING: Spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation centers in Switzerland. METHODS: TASCI is nested in the multicenter Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI), which prospectively includes patients with acute SCI. In simulations, data from 640 patients, collected by SwiSCI, were used to investigate different scenarios of patient eligibility and study consent, as well as the performance of the randomization list. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the population of interest and the simulation results; multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of discharge within the TASCI intervention time period. RESULTS: The recruitment target of 114 patients is obtainable within the originally envisioned 3-year time period under the most favorable recruitment scenario examined. The distribution of the primary prognostic factor produced imbalance in the randomization lists and informed further discussion of the cut-off values used in stratification. Influxes of patients resulted in overlapping intervention periods for multiple participants, which guided resource allocation. Early discharge was related to the primary prognostic factor and study center, but is only anticipated in about 8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective cohort data are a very valuable resource for planning RCTs.

TASCI-transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with acute spinal cord injury to prevent neurogenic detrusor overactivity: protocol for a nationwide, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), including neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, is one of the most frequent and devastating sequelae of spinal cord injury (SCI), as it can lead to urinary incontinence and secondary damage such as renal failure. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a promising, non-invasive neuromodulatory intervention that may prevent the emergence of the C-fibre evoked bladder reflexes that are thought to cause NDO. This paper presents the protocol for TTNS in acute SCI (TASCI), which will evaluate the efficacy of TTNS in preventing NDO. Furthermore, TASCI will provide insight into the mechanisms underlying TTNS, and the course of NLUTD development after SCI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TASCI is a nationwide, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, conducted at all four SCI centres in Switzerland. The longitudinal design includes a baseline assessment period 5-39 days after acute SCI and follow-up assessments occurring 3, 6 and 12 months after SCI. A planned 114 participants will be randomised into verum or sham TTNS groups (1:1 ratio), stratified on study centre and lower extremity motor score. TTNS is performed for 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 6-9 weeks starting within 40 days after SCI. The primary outcome is the occurrence of NDO jeopardising the upper urinary tract at 1 year after SCI, assessed by urodynamic investigation. Secondary outcome measures assess bladder and bowel function and symptoms, sexual function, neurological structure and function, functional independence, quality of life, as well as changes in biomarkers in the urine, blood, stool and bladder tissue. Safety of TTNS is the tertiary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: TASCI is approved by the Swiss Ethics Committee for Northwest/Central Switzerland, the Swiss Ethics Committee Vaud and the Swiss Ethics Committee Zürich (#2019-00074). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03965299.

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Treating Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Pilot Study for an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) is an effective and safe treatment for idiopathic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), but its value in neurological patients is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind transcutaneous TNS (TTNS) setup for treating neurogenic LUTD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pilot study including nine patients with refractory neurogenic LUTD investigated prospectively at a university neuro-urology department. INTERVENTION: Randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind verum and sham TTNS was performed for 30min twice a week, for 6 wks. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, and safety of the TTNS protocol. Secondarily, potential efficacy was investigated. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were feasible and well tolerated by all nine patients. Using verum TTNS, a motor response could be triggered in all patients and a sensory response in all but one. At the beginning and end of treatment, seven and six (78% and 67%) patients believed to receive verum TTNS, and five and six (56% and 67%) correctly guessed their group allocation, respectively. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. A comparison of baseline versus 6 wks of verum and sham TTNS led to relevant symptom and functional changes in only a limited number of piloted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Verum and sham TTNS combined with the blinding procedures proved feasible and safe. Both interventions and procedures, as well as the randomization process, were well accepted by the patients. While the subsensory threshold TTNS approach in combination with the sham condition is advantageous for patients' blinding, the clinical findings raised some doubt regarding sufficient TNS. Hence, relevant methodological adjustments concerning the adequate stimulation current and corresponding sham condition are needed before starting randomized controlled trials to clarify the value and role of TTNS in neuro-urology. PATIENT SUMMARY: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is a promising treatment option for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, but methodological adjustments in treatment application are required before further prospective studies can be initiated.

Update from TASCI, a Nationwide, Randomized, Sham-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial on Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury to Prevent Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.

Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation has the potential to revolutionize the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with acute spinal cord injury. TASCI is a nationwide randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial for which the preparatory phase has been successfully completed.

Metaepidemiological Inventory of Diagnostic Studies on Urodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Urodynamic investigations have a pivotal role in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms. Despite expert statements and guidelines supporting their usefulness for clinical decision making in various clinical domains, the academic debate remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To provide a metaepidemiological inventory of studies assessing the diagnostic properties of urodynamic investigations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Systematic searches without language restrictions were performed in (Pre-)Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception until August 31, 2018. Checking of reference lists of included studies and reviews complemented searches. Records were compiled and screened for possible inclusion by reading title and abstracts by two teams of two research fellows. Inclusion criteria were as follows: prospective data collection and urodynamic investigations performed either as a diagnostic test or using a therapy monitoring instrument. No a priori selection on clinical domain was done. Double reading was performed on records marked "included." Extraction into a developed and piloted matrix was performed in duplicate and checked by a third research fellow. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Of each included article, study specifics, objective, study design, type of data collection, clinical domain, type and description of test used, and type of outcome were extracted and attributed to a framework. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Electronic searches retrieved 20 841 records. After screening, 299 abstracts were considered relevant. The main reasons for exclusion were as follows: animal studies, no primary data, editorial/opinion based on published data or reviews, primary objective of the study being not the assessment of urodynamic investigations, and post hoc (opportunistic) correlation studies. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive collection of studies assessing the clinical usefulness of urodynamic investigations. The collection is the starting point for a series of systematic reviews assessing the diagnostic properties of urodynamic investigations. PATIENT SUMMARY: The usefulness of urodynamic investigations for clinical decision making is under debate. We established an inventory of diagnostic studies on urodynamics to assess the value of urodynamics in various clinical applications.