RESUMO
PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the differences between planned and delivered dose during ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) prostate cancer treatments, by evaluating the dosimetric impact of daily anatomical variations alone, and in combination with prostate intrafraction motion. METHODS: Prostate intrafraction motion was recorded with a transperineal ultrasound probe in 15 patients treated by UHF radiotherapy (36.25 Gy/5 fractions). The dosimetric objective was to cover 99 % of the clinical target volume with the 100 % prescription isodose line. After treatment, planning CT (pCT) images were deformably registered onto daily Cone Beam CT to generate pseudo-CT for dose accumulation (accumulated CT, aCT). The interplay effect was accounted by synchronizing prostatic shifts and beam geometry. Finally, the shifted dose maps were accumulated (moved-accumulated CT, maCT). RESULTS: No significant change in daily CTV volumes was observed. Conversely, CTV V100% was 98.2 ± 0.8 % and 94.7 ± 2.6 % on aCT and maCT, respectively, compared with 99.5 ± 0.2 % on pCT (p < 0.0001). Bladder volume was smaller than planned in 76 % of fractions and D5cc was 33.8 ± 3.2 Gy and 34.4 ± 3.4 Gy on aCT (p = 0.02) and maCT (p = 0.01) compared with the pCT (36.0 ± 1.1 Gy). The rectum was smaller than planned in 50.3 % of fractions, but the dosimetric differences were not statistically significant, except for D1cc, found smaller on the maCT (33.2 ± 3.2 Gy, p = 0.02) compared with the pCT (35.3 ± 0.7 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical variations and prostate movements had more important dosimetric impact than anatomical variations alone, although, in some cases, the two phenomena compensated. Therefore, an efficient IGRT protocol is required for treatment implementation to reduce setup errors and control intrafraction motion.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of 4 atlas-based (multi-ABAS) and 2 deep learning (DL) solutions for head-and-neck (HN) elective nodes (CTVn) automatic segmentation (AS) on CT images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bilateral CTVn levels of 69 HN cancer patients were delineated on contrast-enhanced planning CT. Ten and 49 patients were used for atlas library and for training a mono-centric DL model, respectively. The remaining 20 patients were used for testing. Additionally, three commercial multi-ABAS methods and one commercial multi-centric DL solution were investigated. Quantitative evaluation was assessed using volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95%). Blind evaluation was performed for 3 solutions by 4 physicians. One recorded the time needed for manual corrections. A dosimetric study was finally conducted using automated planning. RESULTS: Overall DL solutions had better DSC and HD95% results than multi-ABAS methods. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 DL solutions. However, the contours provided by multi-centric DL solution were preferred by all physicians and were also faster to correct (1.1 min vs 4.17 min, on average). Manual corrections for multi-ABAS contours took on average 6.52 min Overall, decreased contour accuracy was observed from CTVn2 to CTVn3 and to CTVn4. Using the AS contours in treatment planning resulted in underdosage of the elective target volume. CONCLUSION: Among all methods, the multi-centric DL method showed the highest delineation accuracy and was better rated by experts. Manual corrections remain necessary to avoid elective target underdosage. Finally, AS contours help reducing the workload of manual delineation task.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine whether SBRT of spinal metastasis using a dedicated treatment planning system (TPS) and delivered with a gantry-based LINAC could provide plans of similar quality to the Cyberknife technology. Additional comparison was also done with other commercial TPS used for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Spine SBRT patients, previously treated in our institution with CyberKnife (Accuray, Sunnyvale) using Multiplan TPS, were replanned in VMAT with an dedicated TPS (Elements Spine SRS, Brainlab, Munich) and our clinical TPS (Monaco, Elekta LTD, Stockholm), using exactly the same arc geometry. The comparison was done by assessing differences in dose delivered to PTV, CTV and spinal cord, calculating modulation complexity scores (MCS) and performing quality control (QA) of the plans. RESULTS: Regardless of the vertebra level, in general, no statistical difference was found in PTV coverage between all TPS. Conversely, PTV and CTV D50% were found significantly higher for the dedicated TPS compared to others. In addition, the dedicated TPS also resulted in better gradient index (GI) than clinical VMAT TPS, whatever the vertebral level, and better GI than Cyberknife TPS for the thoracic level only. The D2% to the spinal cord was generally significantly lower with the dedicated TPS compared with others. No significant difference was found in the MCS between both VMAT TPS. All QA were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION: The Elements Spine SRS TPS offers very effective and user-friendly semi-automated planning tools and is secure and promising for gantry-based LINAC spinal SBRT.
Assuntos
Radiocirurgia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Coluna Vertebral , SoftwareRESUMO
Anatomical variations occur during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy (RT) treatment. These variations may result in underdosage to the target volume or overdosage to the organ at risk. Replanning during the treatment course can be triggered to overcome this issue. Due to technological, methodological and clinical evolutions, tools for adaptive RT (ART) are becoming increasingly sophisticated. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the key steps of an H&N ART workflow and tools from the point of view of a group of French-speaking medical physicists and physicians (from GORTEC). Focuses are made on image registration, segmentation, estimation of the delivered dose of the day, workflow and quality assurance for an implementation of H&N offline and online ART. Practical recommendations are given to assist physicians and medical physicists in a clinical workflow.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem , Humanos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Pescoço , Cabeça , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of head-and-neck (HN) organs-at-risk (OAR) automatic segmentation (AS) using four atlas-based (ABAS) and two deep learning (DL) solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients underwent iodine contrast-enhanced planning CT. Fourteen OAR were manually delineated. DL.1 and DL.2 solutions were trained with 63 mono-centric patients and > 1000 multi-centric patients, respectively. Ten and 15 patients with varied anatomies were selected for the atlas library and for testing, respectively. The evaluation was based on geometric indices (DICE coefficient and 95th percentile-Hausdorff Distance (HD95%)), time needed for manual corrections and clinical dosimetric endpoints obtained using automated treatment planning. RESULTS: Both DICE and HD95% results indicated that DL algorithms generally performed better compared with ABAS algorithms for automatic segmentation of HN OAR. However, the hybrid-ABAS (ABAS.3) algorithm sometimes provided the highest agreement to the reference contours compared with the 2 DL. Compared with DL.2 and ABAS.3, DL.1 contours were the fastest to correct. For the 3 solutions, the differences in dose distributions obtained using AS contours and AS + manually corrected contours were not statistically significant. High dose differences could be observed when OAR contours were at short distances to the targets. However, this was not always interrelated. CONCLUSION: DL methods generally showed higher delineation accuracy compared with ABAS methods for AS segmentation of HN OAR. Most ABAS contours had high conformity to the reference but were more time consuming than DL algorithms, especially when considering the computing time and the time spent on manual corrections.
Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Humanos , Órgãos em Risco , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become treatment option for localized prostate cancer but the evidence base remains incomplete. Several clinical studies, both prospective and retrospective, have been published. However, treatment techniques, target volumes and dose constraints lack consistency between studies. Based on the current available literature, the French Genito-Urinary Group (GETUG) suggests that.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact on dose distribution of intrafraction motion during moderate hypofractionated prostate cancer treatments and to estimate minimum non-isotropic and asymmetric (NI-AS) treatment margins taking motion into account. METHODS: Prostate intrafraction 3D displacements were recorded with a transperineal ultrasound probe and were evaluated in 46 prostate cancer patients (876 fractions) treated by moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy (60 Gy in 20 fractions). For 18 patients (346 fractions), treatment plans were recomputed increasing CTV-to-PTV margins from 0 to 6 mm with an auto-planning optimization algorithm. Dose distribution was estimated using the voxel shifting method by displacing CTV structure according to the retrieved movements. Time-dependent margins were finally calculated using both van Herk's formula and the voxel shifting method. RESULTS: Mean intrafraction prostate displacements observed were -0.02 ± 0.52 mm, 0.27 ± 0.78 mm and -0.43 ± 1.06 mm in left-right, supero-inferior and antero-posterior directions, respectively. The CTV dosimetric coverage increased with increased CTV-to-PTV margins but it decreased with time. Hence using van Herk's formula, after 7 min of treatment, a margin of 0.4 and 0.5 mm was needed in left and right, 1.5 and 0.7 mm in inferior and superior and 1.1 and 3.2 mm in anterior and posterior directions, respectively. Conversely, using the voxel shifting method, a margin of 0 mm was needed in left-right, 2 mm in superior, 3 mm in inferior and anterior and 5 mm in posterior directions, respectively. With this latter NI-AS margin strategy, the dosimetric target coverage was equivalent to the one obtained with a 5 mm homogeneous margin. CONCLUSIONS: NI-AS margins would be required to optimally take into account intrafraction motion.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Humanos , Masculino , Movimento , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Radiometria/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Automated planning techniques aim to reduce manual planning time and inter-operator variability without compromising the plan quality which is particularly challenging for head-and-neck (HN) cancer radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of an a priori-multicriteria plan optimization algorithm on a cohort of HN patients. METHODS: A total of 14 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (upper-HN) and 14 "middle-lower indications" (lower-HN) previously treated in our institution were enrolled in this study. Automatically generated plans (autoVMAT) were compared to manual VMAT or Helical Tomotherapy planning (manVMAT-HT) by assessing differences in dose delivered to targets and organs at risk (OARs), calculating plan quality indexes (PQIs) and performing blinded comparisons by clinicians. Quality control of the plans and measurements of the delivery times were also performed. RESULTS: For the 14 lower-HN patients, with equivalent planning target volume (PTV) dosimetric criteria and dose homogeneity, significant decrease in the mean doses to the oral cavity, esophagus, trachea and larynx were observed for autoVMAT compared to manVMAT-HT. Regarding the 14 upper-HN cases, the PTV coverage was generally significantly superior for autoVMAT which was also confirmed with higher calculated PQIs on PTVs for 13 out of 14 patients, whereas PQIs calculated on OARs were generally equivalent. Number of MUs and total delivery time were significantly higher for autoVMAT compared to manVMAT. All plans were considered clinically acceptable by clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Overall superiority of autoVMAT compared to manVMAT-HT plans was demonstrated for HN cancer. The obtained plans were operator-independent and required no post-optimization or manual intervention.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Cefalosporinas , Humanos , Órgãos em Risco , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por ComputadorRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repositioning accuracy of 4 immobilization devices (ID) used for whole breast Helical Tomotherapy treatments: arm float with VacFix® (Par Scientific, Denmark), all-in-one® (AIO®) system (Orfit, Belgium), MacroCast thermoplastic mask (Macromedics, The Netherlands) and BlueBag® system with Arm-Shuttle (Elekta, Sweden). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty four women with breast cancer with PTV including the breast/chest wall and lymph nodes were involved in this study (6 women per group). Pretreatment registration results were first collected using automatic bone registration + manual adjustment on the vertebra followed by independent registrations on different ROIs representing each treated area (axillary, mammary chain, clavicular, breast/chest wall). The differences in translations and rotations between reference registration and the above mentionned ROIs were calculated. A total of 120 MVCT images were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between IDs (p < 0.0001), ROIs (p = 0.0002) and the session number (p < 0.0001) on the observed shifts, when examining 3D translation vectors. 3D-vectors were significantly lower for the BlueBag® than for the VacFix® or for the AIO® (p < 0.0001), but differences were not significant compared to the mask (p = 0.674). Finally, setup margins were overall smaller for the BlueBag® than for other IDs, with values ranging from 1.53 to 1.91 mm on the mammary chain area, 4.52-6.07 mm on the clavicular area, 2.71-4.62 mm on the axillary area, and 3.39-5.10 mm on the breast. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated in this study that the BlueBag® combined with arm shuttle is a robust solution for breast and nodes immobilization during HT treatments.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/instrumentação , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Posicionamento do Paciente , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare two in-beam monitoring devices for prostate radiotherapy: intra-prostatic electromagnetic transmitters (EM-T) (RayPilot®, Micropos Medical) and ultrasound imaging using transperineal probe (TP-US) (Clarity®, Elekta) used concomitantly on phantom and on patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The phantom study evaluated accuracy in presence of known translations and rotations. Then intra-fraction motions were analyzed for 10 prostate cancer patients implanted with the EM-T 8â¯days before the simulation CT (171 sessions). The percent time in which the differences between the systems were 1-5â¯mm were scored for each direction. RESULTS: Experiments on phantom confirmed no interference between the systems and showed deviations of less than 0.5â¯mm when translations were applied progressively. In presence of rotations (5-15°), both systems displayed systematic shifts up to 6.9 and 3.8â¯mm for the TP-US and the EM-T, respectively. Absolute mean differences between displacements observed on patients with EM-T and TP-US were ≤0.55â¯mm in all directions except for one patient (≤1.77â¯mm). With an exception for this patient, a strong correlation was found in left-right direction: differences >2â¯mm were monitored less than 0.22% of the time (mean acquisition time:164 minutes) and never exceeded 5â¯s. Maximum differences were observed in supero-inferior direction with differences >2â¯mm monitored more than 6.5% of the time for 3 patients. Large prostate rotations, the presence of gas and EM-T location in the prostate may explain important differences. CONCLUSION: Apart from the systematic shifts induced by the rotations, the two systems were correlated and represent feasible solutions for monitoring prostate cancer treatment.
Assuntos
Imagens de Fantasmas , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/instrumentação , Fenômenos Eletromagnéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Movimento (Física) , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Ultrassonografia/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Linear energy transfer (LET) plays an important role in radiation response. Recently, the radiation-induced nucleo-shuttling of ATM from cytoplasm to the nucleus was shown to be a major event of the radiation response that permits a normal DNA double-strand break (DSB) recognition and repair. Here, we aimed to verify the relevance of the ATM nucleo-shuttling model for high-LET particles and various radiation types. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ATM- and H2AX-immunofluorescence was used to assess the number of recognized and unrepaired DSB in quiescent fibroblast cell lines exposed to x-rays, γ-rays, 9- and 12-MeV electrons, 3- and 65-MeV protons and 75-MeV/u carbon ions. RESULTS: The rate of radiation-induced ATM nucleo-shuttling was found to be specific to each radiation type tested. By increasing the permeability of the nuclear membrane with statin and bisphosphonates, 2 fibroblast cell lines exposed to high-LET particles were shown to be protected by an accelerated ATM nucleo-shuttling. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are in agreement with the conclusion that LET and the radiation/particle type influence the formation of ATM monomers in cytoplasm that are required for DSB recognition. A striking analogy was established between the DSB repair kinetics of radioresistant cells exposed to high-LET particles and that of several radiosensitive cells exposed to low-LET radiation. Our data show that the nucleo-shuttling of ATM provides crucial elements to predict radiation response in human quiescent cells, whatever the LET value and their radiosensitivity.
Assuntos
Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia/metabolismo , Quebras de DNA de Cadeia Dupla , Reparo do DNA , Transferência Linear de Energia , Tolerância a Radiação , Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia/genética , Carbono/química , Linhagem Celular , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Sobrevivência Celular , Dano ao DNA , Fibroblastos/efeitos da radiação , Raios gama , Histonas/metabolismo , Humanos , Íons , Cinética , Microscopia de Fluorescência , Permeabilidade , Prótons , RadiometriaRESUMO
Iodine-containing contrast media (ICM) are extensively used to improve image quality and information content in x-ray-based examinations, particularly in computed tomography (CT). In parallel, there is increasing evidence that the use of ICM during CT sessions is associated with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) breaks that may influence the estimation of the risks linked to x-ray exposure. Why has iodine been preferred to any other heavy elements to enhance contrast in radiodiagnostics? How to understand such DNA breaks effect? We searched for the answers in the early times of x-ray medical use. It appeared that the maximal ratio between the relative iodine and water mass energy absorption coefficients is reached in the range of 40-60 keV, which defines the energy range in which the dose is preferentially absorbed by ICM. This range does not correspond to the K-edge of iodine but to that of tungsten, the major component of the x-ray tube anode of CT scanners. At such energy, radiolysis of the ICM produces sodium or potassium iodide that prevents a normal DNA breaks repair and influences the individual response to x-ray low-dose. Both contrast enhancement and DNA breaks effect may therefore be caused by tungsten of the anodes of x-ray tubes.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new system based on transperineal ultrasound (TP-US) acquisitions for prostate and post-prostatectomy pre-treatment positioning by comparing this device to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: The differences between CBCT/CT and TP-US/TP-US registrations were analyzed on 427 and 453 sessions for 13 prostate and 14 post-prostatectomy patients, respectively. The inter-operator variability (IOV) of the registration process, and the impact and variability of the probe pressure were also evaluated. RESULTS: CBCT and TP-US shift agreements at ± 5 mm were 76.6%, 95.1%, 96.3% and 90.3%, 85.0%, 97.6% in anterior-posterior, superior-inferior and left-right directions, for prostate and post-prostatectomy patients, respectively. IOV values were similar between the 2 modalities. Displacements above 5 mm due to strong pressures were observed on both localizations, but such pressures were rarely reproduced during treatment courses. CONCLUSIONS: High concordance between CBCT/CT and TP-US/TP-US localization of prostates or prostatic beds was found in this study. TP-US based prepositioning is a feasible method to ensure accurate treatment delivery, and represents an attractive alternative to invasive and/or irradiating imaging modalities.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Whereas post-radiation therapy overreactions (OR) represent a clinical and societal issue, there is still no consensual radiobiological endpoint to predict clinical radiosensitivity. Since 2003, skin biopsy specimens have been collected from patients treated by radiation therapy against different tumor localizations and showing a wide range of OR. Here, we aimed to establish quantitative links between radiobiological factors and OR severity grades that would be relevant to radioresistant and genetic hyperradiosensitive cases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Immunofluorescence experiments were performed on a collection of skin fibroblasts from 12 radioresistant, 5 hyperradiosensitive, and 100 OR patients irradiated at 2 Gy. The numbers of micronuclei, γH2AX, and pATM foci that reflect different steps of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) recognition and repair were assessed from 10 minutes to 24 hours after irradiation and plotted against the severity grades established by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. RESULTS: OR patients did not necessarily show a gross DSB repair defect but a systematic delay in the nucleoshuttling of the ATM protein required for complete DSB recognition. Among the radiobiological factors, the maximal number of pATM foci provided the best discrimination among OR patients and a significant correlation with each OR severity grade, independently of tumor localization and of the early or late nature of reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with a general classification of human radiosensitivity based on 3 groups: radioresistance (group I); moderate radiosensitivity caused by delay of nucleoshuttling of ATM, which includes OR patients (group II); and hyperradiosensitivity caused by a gross DSB repair defect, which includes fatal cases (group III).
Assuntos
Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia/metabolismo , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Quebras de DNA de Cadeia Dupla , Histonas/metabolismo , Lesões por Radiação/classificação , Tolerância a Radiação/fisiologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Análise de Variância , Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia/genética , Biópsia , Linhagem Celular , Reparo do DNA , Fibroblastos/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Testes para Micronúcleos/métodos , Fosforilação , Lesões por Radiação/metabolismo , Lesões por Radiação/patologia , Tolerância a Radiação/genética , Pele/patologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of an intra-modality trans-abdominal ultrasound (TA-US) device against soft-tissue based Cone-Beam Computed tomography (CBCT) registration for prostate and post-prostatectomy pre-treatment positioning. METHODS: The differences between CBCT and US shifts were calculated on 25 prostate cancer patients (cohort A) and 11 post-prostatectomy patients (cohort B), resulting in 284 and 106 paired shifts for cohorts A and B, respectively. As a second step, a corrective method was applied to the US registration results to decrease the systematic shifts observed between TA-US and CBCT results. This method consisted of subtracting the mean difference obtained between US and CBCT registration results during the first 3 sessions from the US registration results of the subsequent sessions. Inter-operator registration variability (IOV) was also investigated for both modalities. RESULTS: After initial review, about 20% of the US images were excluded because of insufficient quality. The average differences between US and CBCT were: 2.8 ± 4.1 mm, -0.9 ± 4.2 mm, 0.4 ± 3.4 mm for cohort A and 1.3 ± 5.0 mm, -2.3 ± 4.6 mm, 0.5 ± 2.9 mm for cohort B, in the anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) and lateral (LR) directions, respectively. After applying the corrective method, only the differences in the AP direction remained significant (p < 0.05). The IOV values were between 0.6-2.0 mm and 2.1-3.5 mm for the CBCT and TA-US modalities, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the obtained results and on the image quality, the TA-US imaging modality is not safely interchangeable with CBCT for pre-treatment repositioning. Treatment margins adaptation based on the correction of the systematic shifts should be considered.
Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Prostatectomia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the present work is to propose and evaluate registration algorithms of three-dimensional (3D) transabdominal (TA) ultrasound (US) images to setup postprostatectomy patients during radiation therapy. METHODS: Three registration methods have been developed and evaluated to register a reference 3D-TA-US image acquired during the planning CT session and a 3D-TA-US image acquired before each treatment session. The first method (method A) uses only gray value information, whereas the second one (method B) uses only gradient information. The third one (method C) combines both sets of information. All methods restrict the comparison to a region of interest computed from the dilated reference positioning volume drawn on the reference image and use mutual information as a similarity measure. The considered geometric transformations are translations and have been optimized by using the adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithm. Validation has been carried out using manual registration by three operators of the same set of image pairs as the algorithms. Sixty-two treatment US images of seven patients irradiated after a prostatectomy have been registered to their corresponding reference US image. The reference registration has been defined as the average of the manual registration values. Registration error has been calculated by subtracting the reference registration from the algorithm result. For each session, the method has been considered a failure if the registration error was above both the interoperator variability of the session and a global threshold of 3.0 mm. RESULTS: All proposed registration algorithms have no systematic bias. Method B leads to the best results with mean errors of -0.6, 0.7, and -0.2 mm in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. With this method, the standard deviations of the mean error are of 1.7, 2.4, and 2.6 mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The latter are inferior to the interoperator registration variabilities which are of 2.5, 2.5, and 3.5 mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Failures occur in 5%, 18%, and 10% of cases in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. 69% of the sessions have no failure. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the best proposed registration algorithm of 3D-TA-US images for postprostatectomy treatment have no bias and are in the same variability range as manual registration. As the algorithm requires a short computation time, it could be used in clinical practice provided that a visual review is performed.
Assuntos
Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Algoritmos , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Posicionamento do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Processos EstocásticosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of transabdominal probe pressure on prostate positioning with an intramodality ultrasound (US) image-guided-radiotherapy system and to quantify pressure variability over the treatment course. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 8 prostate cancer patients (group A) and 17 healthy volunteers underwent 3 consecutive US images with increasing probe pressure levels, and 1 CT acquisition for the group A only. Prostate positions were compared after manual registration of the first US image contour projected on 2 others. Group A's pressure levels were quantified by measuring skin-to-skin distances between corresponding CT-US images. The same methodology was used on paired CT/CBCT-US images acquired during treatments of 18 prostate cancer patients to determine whether the different pressure levels applied to the group A were close to the clinical practices and to quantify pressure variability along the treatment course. RESULTS: 84% of 3D prostate displacements were above 2mm for at least one pressure level. Probe pressures deliberately applied were similar to the ones observed clinically. The latter drastically varied between sessions. CONCLUSION: Even with an intramodality system, probe pressure can impact prostate localization because of the pressure variability along the treatment course. Therefore, margins should be expanded from 0.5 to 1.2mm to ensure treatment accuracy.