Influence of OPRM1 Polymorphism on Postoperative Pain After Intrathecal Morphine Administration in Italian Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the influence of OPRM1 polymorphism on the analgesic efficacy (including visual analog scale [VAS] scores and requirement for rescue analgesia) of a standard dose of intrathecal morphine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Italian cohort of 63 parturients, scheduled for elective cesarean section at a tertiary University Hospital, received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and morphine 100 mcg. For the first 48 hours in the postoperative period the patients received acetaminophen 1 g IV q6hr. Incident pain was treated with ketorolac 30 mg IV. Every 6 hours the following parameters were registered: VAS at rest, VAS during movements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and rescue analgesic medications requirements. Age and anthropometric data, number of pregnancies, educational level, OPRM1 genotype, were also obtained. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients enrolled, 45 (71%) were homozygous genotype A/A (118A group), whereas 18 carried the G variants of OPRM1 (A/G or G/G) (118G group). No significant differences in analgesic rescue doses' administration and in incidence of moderate/severe postoperative pain (VAS>3) between the 2 groups were observed. Pruritus was more frequent in the 118A group than in the 118G group in the first 24 hours of the postoperative period. DISCUSSION: In the Italian population participating in this study there was a different incidence of pruritus in the postcesarean period in response to intrathecal opioids related to OPRM1 gene polymorphism, but not of postoperative pain.

Ultrasound evaluation of the stomach and gastric emptying in pregnant women at term: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the rate of gastric emptying in pregnant women in the third trimester scheduled for elective caesarean section (CS), in view to highlight the aspiration risk. METHODS: A prospective case-control study, with the approval of the Ethics Committee, was performed. At term pregnant women (group A) scheduled for CS and volunteer controls were recruited (group B). The ultrasonographic measurement of the antral area was performed, after a standardized meal, with a Convex probe. The antrum was displayed in the sagittal or parasagittal projections in the right upper quadrant, medial to the mid-clavicular line. The diameters of the antrum were measured and then the antral area was calculated. The measurements were conducted at 10 (T1), 90 (T2) and 240 (T3) minutes from the meal. Anthropometric data were collected for each patient. RESULTS: In group B, antrum distention was observed already after 10 minutes from the meal, and then a gradual decrease in the antral area until 4 hours after the meal was registered. On the contrary, in group A (at term pregnant) there was an initial smaller increase of antral area, followed by a greater increase that lasts up to 90 minutes, and finally a delayed and smaller reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women at term, the stomach does not seem to be able to expand immediately after the meal. The transit of food is completed later than in not pregnant women. The ultrasound of the stomach allows identifying delays gastric emptying and highlighting patients at risk of aspiration.

Mini-laparotomy versus vaginal surgery for class II-III obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

AIM: To compare minilaparotomic and vaginal surgery in selected obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at high surgical risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 37 consecutive class II-III obese patients submitted to minilaparotomic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-seven women matched for demographic characteristics, BMI and stage of disease submitted to vaginal surgery in the same period comprised the control group. RESULTS: No difference was observed concerning intra- and postoperative data among the two groups. The patients who were submitted to general anesthesia exhibited a larger use of supplemental drugs for pain control (p>0.01), a higher incidence of thromboembolic events (p>0.005) and a longer hospitalization (p>0.02). No statistical difference was observed in terms of pattern of recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Obese patients with endometrial cancer unfit for vaginal surgery can be safely managed through mini-laparotomy with the same surgical and oncological outcomes.