Joint Distribution and Two-Year Outcome in 347 Patients With Monoarthritis of Less Than Sixteen Weeks' Duration.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to investigate the joint distribution and 2-year outcome of patients with recent-onset monoarthritis. METHODS: Adult patients with clinically apparent monoarthritis of ≤16 weeks' duration were included in a multicenter 2-year longitudinal study. Clinical characteristics, joint distribution, development of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (CIRD), as well as classification criteria according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria for RA were studied. Predictors for development of CIRD were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The knee (49.3%), ankle (16.7%), and wrist (14.1%) were the most frequently affected joints among the 347 included patients. A total of 91 patients (26.2%) developed CIRD during follow-up; 21 (6.1%) were diagnosed with RA, and 16 (4.6%) with psoriatic arthritis. Longer duration of joint swelling, joint localization, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity were independent predictors of CIRD. Six of 58 patients (10.3%) with ankle monoarthritis and 21 of 49 patients (42.9%) with wrist monoarthritis developed CIRD during follow-up. The 2010 ACR/EULAR Criteria for RA identified all patients diagnosed with seropositive RA at an early stage, mostly within 3 months. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-fourth of patients with recent-onset monoarthritis developed CIRD over 2 years. Patients presenting with ankle arthritis rarely developed CIRD, whereas patients presenting with wrist arthritis more frequently did so. Longer duration of joint swelling and ACPA and RF positivity were also predictive of CIRD. Our findings facilitate the early identification of patients with monoarthritis who have an unfavorable prognosis.

Treat to target strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis versus routine care - A comparative clinical practice study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the 2-year effect on disease activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of implementing a clinical practice treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients in the Norwegian Very Early Arthritis Cohort 2.0 (NOR-VEAC 2.0), included 2010-2015, were treated according to T2T principles with visits at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 months, then every 6 months plus monthly visits until DAS28 <2.6. These patients were compared to a pre-T2T cohort of patients included in the Norwegian Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (NOR-DMARD) register 2006-2009. Both groups had a clinical diagnosis of RA (≤1 year) and were DMARD naïve. Disease activity and HRQoL outcomes were analysed, and the primary outcome was SDAI remission (≤3.3) at 2years. RESULTS: The T2T cohort included 293 patients (mean (SD) age 54 (13) years, 66% females, disease duration median (25,75 perc) 98 (57,164) days) and the routine care cohort 392 patients (age 54 (13) years, 68% females, 4 (0,30) days since diagnosis). At 2years, the proportion of patients achieving SDAI remission was 46% in the T2T cohort compared to 31% in the routine care cohort. EQ-5D was similar at baseline, but differed significantly between groups at 2years (median (25,75 perc) 0.77 (0.69, 0.85) vs 0.73 (0.59, 0.80), p < 0.001). Methotrexate monotherapy was the dominant DMARD regimen used to achieve SDAI remission in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Higher remission rates and better HRQoL were achieved in patients following a T2T strategy in clinical practice compared to routine care.

Role of erosions typical of rheumatoid arthritis in the 2010 ACR/EULAR rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: results from a very early arthritis cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of erosive disease (erosion criterion) contributes to the number of patients classified as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR RA classification criteria (2010 RA criteria) in an early arthritis cohort. METHODS: Patients from the observational study Norwegian Very Early Arthritis Clinic with joint swelling ≤16 weeks, a clinical diagnosis of RA or undifferentiated arthritis, and radiographs of hands and feet were included. Erosive disease was defined according to the EULAR definition accompanying the 2010 RA criteria. We calculated the additional number of patients being classified as RA based on the erosion criteria at baseline and during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 289 included patients, 120 (41.5%) fulfilled the 2010 RA criteria, whereas 15 (5.2%) fulfilled only the erosion criterion at baseline. 118 patients had radiographic follow-up at 2 years, of whom 6.8% fulfilled the 2010 RA criteria and only one patient fulfilled solely the erosion criterion during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Few patients with early arthritis were classified as RA based on solely the erosion criteria, and of those who did almost all did so at baseline.

Disease Characteristics and Rheumatoid Arthritis Development in Patients with Early Undifferentiated Arthritis: A 2-year Followup Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the 2-year disease course in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) focusing on fulfillment of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria. METHODS: Data were provided by the Norwegian Very Early Arthritis Clinic study, which included patients presenting with ≥ 1 swollen joint of ≤ 16 weeks' duration. UA was defined as patients not fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR RA criteria and who did not have a clinical diagnosis other than RA at baseline. The main outcome was fulfillment of the 2010 RA criteria. Secondary outcomes were disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use, resolution of synovitis without use of DMARD during followup, and final clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: We included 477 patients with UA of whom 47 fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR RA criteria during followup (UA-RA) and 430 did not (UA-non-RA). Of the UA-RA patients, 70% fulfilled the criteria within the first 6 months. UA-RA patients were older, more often positive for rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies, female, and ever smokers, and they more often presented with polyarticular arthritis, small joint involvement, and a swollen shoulder joint. During followup, 53% of UA-RA patients vs 13% of UA-non-RA patients used DMARD (p < 0.001). Overall, 71% of patients with UA achieved absence of clinical synovitis at final followup without use of DMARD. The most frequent final clinical diagnosis was UA (61%). CONCLUSION: Only 9.8% of patients with UA fulfilled the 2010 RA criteria during 2-year followup. Small joint involvement and swollen shoulder joint were among the factors associated with RA development. In two-thirds of patients with UA, the arthritis resolved without use of DMARD.

Diagnostic spectrum and 2-year outcome in a cohort of patients with very early arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the diagnostic spectrum, arthritis persistency and clinical outcomes after 2 years in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) of less than 16 weeks' duration. METHODS: Data from the Norwegian Very Early Arthritis Clinic, a 2-year longitudinal observational study of adults with IA of ≤16 weeks' duration, were used. Exclusion criteria were arthritis due to crystal deposits, trauma, osteoarthritis and septic arthritis. In all patients who had any follow-up information (population A), clinical diagnoses and persistency of arthritis were described. For patients with 2-year follow-up (population B), we also studied other clinical outcomes (disease activity, pain, fatigue, functional disability and health-related quality of life). RESULTS: In population A (n=1017) median (25th-75th percentile) duration of joint swelling was 35.0 (13.0-66.5) days, mean (SD) age 45.7 (14.8) years, 55.2% were females and 17.8% anticitrullinated protein antibodies positive. The most common final diagnoses were undifferentiated arthritis (UA) (41.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (24.1%) and reactive arthritis (18.1%). After 2 years, the arthritis had resolved in 59% of the patients. The remaining 41.0% had persistent disease defined by disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use (32.1%) or persistent joint swelling without DMARD use (8.9%). In population B (n=669), all clinical outcomes improved significantly (P<0.001). Baseline joint pain and fatigue were similar across diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Among 1017 patients with IA of ≤16 weeks' duration, UA was the most common diagnosis after 2 years, and less than one-fourth were diagnosed with RA. Arthritis resolved without DMARDs in the majority of the patients. All clinical parameters improved significantly over a 2-year course.

Self-limiting arthritis among patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a very early arthritis cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To study occurrence of and factors associated with self-limiting arthritis among patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (2010 RA criteria) in patients with ≤16 weeks׳ duration of joint swelling. METHODS: We applied the 2010 RA criteria in 1118 patients included in a 2-year longitudinal cohort. In all, 256 patients fulfilled the 2010 RA criteria at baseline; outcome was defined as either "self-limiting arthritis" (no DMARD use during follow-up, no swollen joints at last assessment, and no final clinical diagnosis of RA) or "persistent disease." The associations between baseline characteristics, including the components of the 2010 RA criteria score, and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: In total, 36 of 256 patients (14.1%) classified as having RA had self-limiting arthritis. These patients differed from patients with persistent disease according to ACPA positivity (11.1% vs. 65.0%, p < 0.001), duration of joint swelling (median = 47.5 vs. 66.0 days, p = 0.002), 2010 RA criteria points (median = 6.0 vs. 7.0, p < 0.001), and ever smoking (52.8% vs. 74.5%, p = 0.01). Having no serology points and no duration points were independent predictors of self-limiting arthritis. The rate of self-limiting arthritis was 2.7% vs. 29.4% among ACPA positive vs. ACPA negative patients (p < 0.001), and 32.5% when duration of joint swelling was <4 weeks vs. 10.6% with longer duration (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Negative ACPA status, short duration of joint swelling and being a never smoker were factors associated with self-limiting arthritis in early arthritis patients classified as having RA at presentation. Our findings contribute to identify patients who potentially do not need DMARDs and who should not be included in early RA clinical drug trials.

Involvement of the multidisciplinary team and outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation among patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease.

BACKGROUND: The last decades have for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases seen a shift towards more physically active rehabilitation programs, often provided as out-patients with less use of inpatient facilities. There is little research on which effect the multidisciplinary team has on health outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and connective tissue disease. This study examined patient reported outcomes for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases receiving rehabilitation care as inpatients in departments of rheumatology, and studied how number of consultations with the multidisciplinary team affected these clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were included in a multi-center prospective observational study if rehabilitation was considered a focus during an inpatient stay at four departments of rheumatology. At admission, discharge, and after 3 and 6 months, 317 patients were assessed with patients reported outcomes (PRO) including health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), short-form 36 (SF-36), pain, fatigue, patient global assessment of disease activity, self-efficacy scales, rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI), and SF-6D utility. Patients stated consultations with the multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: Improvements were short-lived, and at 6 months follow-up period only mental health, pain and utility remained improved with small effect sizes. Extensive involvement of health professionals was not associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease receiving inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation had small and mainly short-term improvements in most PROs. High use of the multidisciplinary team did not enhance or preserve rehabilitation outcomes in inflammatory rheumatic conditions when admitted as inpatients.

Should anti-citrullinated protein antibody and rheumatoid factor status be reassessed during the first year of followup in recent-onset arthritis? A longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: Presence and levels of antibodies contribute to the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. We investigated the longitudinal course of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and immunoglobin M (IgM) rheumatoid factor (RF) during the first year after arthritis onset in patients with very short disease duration. METHODS: Patients (aged 18-75 years) with ≥ 1 swollen joint of ≤ 16 weeks' duration had assessments of ACPA (2nd generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, anti-CCP2) and IgM RF at inclusion and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Frequencies of seroconversions (negative to positive and vice versa) and changes in antibody levels during followup were determined. RESULTS: A total of 281 early arthritis patients (median duration of joint swelling 32 days, 14.2% ACPA positives, 12.8% IgM RF positives) with 978 longitudinally collected serum samples were included. Only 5 patients (1.8%) negative for both antibodies at baseline turned antibody-positive during followup, while 9 antibody-positive patients (3.2%) turned antibody-negative. ACPA was more stable than RF regarding both status and levels. CONCLUSION: Antibody status (ACPA/RF) is a stable phenotype in very early arthritis, as seroconversion was only found in 5% of patients. Repeated measurement of ACPA or RF during the first year after onset of arthritis does not offer major additional information.

Stability of the patient acceptable symptomatic state over time in outcome criteria in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) is the highest level of symptoms beyond which patients consider themselves well. It provides clinically meaningful information to interpret results from scales or questionnaires. Our goal was to determine the PASS in main outcome criteria when assessing patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to evaluate whether the PASS is stable over time. METHODS: We used data from a randomized controlled trial of 330 patients with AS. The PASS was estimated at weeks 2, 6, and 12 for the following patient-reported outcomes: global pain (measured on a visual analog scale [VAS]), nocturnal pain (VAS), patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), and functional impairment (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]). We used an anchoring method based on patients answering yes or no to, "Is your current condition satisfactory, when you take your general functioning and your current pain into consideration?" The PASS was defined as the 75th percentile of the score for patients who considered their state satisfactory. All patients were considered together in the analysis. RESULTS: The values (95% confidence interval) of PASS were 33.5 (29.2-38.6) for pain, 28.0 (23.1-34.1) for night pain, 35.7 (31.3-41.1) for patient's global disease assessment, 31.4 (26.9-37.0) for BASFI, and 34.5 (30.9-38.9) for BASDAI. The PASS estimates were stable over time for all criteria during followup. CONCLUSION: This study provides cutoff values for the PASS for the main outcome measures in AS and shows that PASS values are stable over time.

Transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis.

This study evaluated transdermal fentanyl (TDF) for the treatment of pain from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which was not adequately controlled by nonopioid analgesics and/or weak opioids. Following 1 week of optimization of current analgesic medication, patients (n = 104) started 28-day treatment with 25 microg/h of TDF, with the option to up-titrate until adequate pain control was achieved. Metoclopramide was taken during the 1st week and as needed thereafter. Eighty-four patients completed the treatment phase, and 42 entered the 1-week tapering-off phase. The most frequently used maximum dose was 25 microg/h. The number of patients with pain control increased, particularly in the 1st week of treatment (33% to 77%), to 88% on day 28. From baseline to endpoint, there were reductions in pain (P < 0.001), including in "pain right now" at 24 h, and in degree of pain (mean reduction from "severe" to "moderate"), improvements in function (majority of items in the Health Assessment Questionnaire) (P < 0.001), and in quality of life (Short Form 36 physical P < 0.001, mental P < 0.05). Treatment was assessed favorably: > or = 78% would recommend it. Transdermal fentanyl should be considered in treatment programs for patients with RA.

Benefits of transdermal fentanyl in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: an open-label study to assess pain control.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) for the treatment of pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis of the knee or hip (OA), which was not adequately controlled by non-opioid analgesics and/or weak opioids. METHODS: The study design incorporated a 1-week run-in period when current analgesic medications were optimised, a 28-day treatment period and a 1-week taper-off period. Patients with RA (n = 104) and OA (n = 159) started treatment with TDF 25 microg/h. Patches were replaced every 72 h, with the option to up-titrate until adequate pain control was achieved. Metoclopramide was taken during the first treatment week and as needed thereafter. RESULTS: 203 patients completed the treatment phase, 90 entered the taper-off phase. 25 microg/h was the most frequently used maximum dose (51%). Pain control was increased from 4% to 29% of patients during run-in. The number of patients reaching adequate pain control in the first treatment week was increased to 75%, and increased further to 88% on day 28 and to 80% at endpoint. From baseline (screening) to endpoint, there were significant reductions in pain (p < 0.001) on the Wisconsin Brief Pain Inventory, and significant improvements in quality of life (Short-Form-36: physical p < 0.001; mental health p < 0.05). Eighty per cent of the patients (n = 134) assessed the treatment favourably; nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events, mainly occurring at treatment initiation. Efficacy of metoclopramide appeared limited. TDF could be initiated in patients pre-treated with non-opioid analgesics or weak opioids and tapered off without major complications. CONCLUSIONS: TDF significantly improved pain control and quality of life, and was well tolerated in patients with RA or knee/hip OA who continued to experience pain on their current analgesic treatment. Treatment could be discontinued without issues. Nausea and vomiting was usually mild during treatment initiation. Patients' well being could be further accommodated by optimising prophylactic treatment.