Follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta: comparison of helical CT and MRI, and impact on assessing diameter changes.

OBJECTIVES: To compare images of the aorta obtained with helical CT (HCT) scanning and MRI for the follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta (CoA). DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Department of adult congenital heart disease in a tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 37 adults (age range, 16 to 68 years; women, 13) with CoA (after surgery, 34 patients; native, 2 patients; after balloon-angioplasty, 1 patient) MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All patients underwent both HCT and MRI of the thoracic aorta within a mean (+/- SD) time interval of 1.86 +/- 1.11 years. Aortic diameters measured at six intrathoracic levels showed a high correlation (r = 0.79 to 0.94). On average, slightly lower diameters were measured with MRI (1.2 mm). But there was a substantial variation between the two measurements with differences of up to 9 mm. All other pathomorphologic abnormalities were detected and classified similarly with both methods. CONCLUSIONS: HCT and MRI are similarly useful for the noninvasive evaluation of the thoracic aorta in patients with CoA. But there can be a substantial variation in two subsequent measurements without an overall substantial bias toward larger diameter in one of the two methods. In repetitive studies, changes of the diameters should be interpreted with care, especially when assessing the progression of aortic diameters.

Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: The use of helical computed tomography is well established in the evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Nevertheless, normal diameters and their changes during adult life according to this method are not available. We planned to set up normal diameters for the thoracic aorta of adults obtained by helical computed tomography. METHODS: Seventy adults, 17 to 89 years old, without any signs of cardiovascular disease were investigated with helical computed tomography. Aortic diameters were measured at seven predefined thoracic levels. RESULTS: Aortic diameters (mean +/- SD) were 2.98 +/- 0.46 cm at the aortic valve sinus, 3.09 +/- 0.41 cm at the ascending aorta, 2.94 +/- 0.42 cm proximal to the innominate artery, 2.77 +/- 0.37 cm at the proximal transverse arch, 2.61 +/- 0.41 cm at the distal transverse arch, 2.47 +/- 0.40 cm at the isthmus, and 2.43 +/- 0.35 cm at the diaphragm. Men had slightly longer diameters than did women. All diameters increased with age. There was no influence of weight, height, or body surface area. After normalization to the diameter at diaphragmatic level, no statistically significantly influential factor could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study delineates normal intrathoracic aortic diameters for helical computed tomography, including relationships with sex and age. Pathologic dimensions of the aorta should preferably be provided as percentiles or z scores.