Brigatinib in NF2-Related Schwannomatosis with Progressive Tumors.

BACKGROUND: NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN, formerly called neurofibromatosis type 2) is a tumor predisposition syndrome that is manifested by multiple vestibular schwannomas, nonvestibular schwannomas, meningiomas, and ependymomas. The condition is relentlessly progressive with no approved therapies. On the basis of preclinical activity of brigatinib (an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases) in NF2-driven nonvestibular schwannoma and meningioma, data were needed on the use of brigatinib in patients with multiple types of progressive NF2-SWN tumors. METHODS: In this phase 2 platform trial with a basket design, patients who were 12 years of age or older with NF2-SWN and progressive tumors were treated with oral brigatinib at a dose of 180 mg daily. A central review committee evaluated one target tumor and up to five nontarget tumors in each patient. The primary outcome was radiographic response in target tumors. Key secondary outcomes were safety, response rate in all tumors, hearing response, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (median age, 26 years) with progressive target tumors (10 vestibular schwannomas, 8 nonvestibular schwannomas, 20 meningiomas, and 2 ependymomas) received treatment with brigatinib. After a median follow-up of 10.4 months, the percentage of tumors with a radiographic response was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 24) for target tumors and 23% (95% CI, 16 to 30) for all tumors; meningiomas and nonvestibular schwannomas had the greatest benefit. Annualized growth rates decreased for all tumor types during treatment. Hearing improvement occurred in 35% (95% CI, 20 to 53) of eligible ears. Exploratory analyses suggested a decrease in self-reported pain severity during treatment (-0.013 units per month; 95% CI, -0.002 to -0.029) on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Brigatinib treatment resulted in radiographic responses in multiple tumor types and clinical benefit in a heavily pretreated cohort of patients with NF2-SWN. (Funded by the Children's Tumor Foundation and others; INTUITT-NF2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04374305.).

Perspectives of adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1 and cutaneous neurofibromas: Implications for clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: More than 99% of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 develop cutaneous neurofibromas, benign nerve sheath tumors that manifest as nodules on the skin. These cutaneous neurofibromas emerge with age, appearing most commonly in adolescence. Nevertheless, few data have been published on how adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1 feel about cutaneous neurofibromas. The purpose of this study was to assess the perspectives of adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1 and their caregivers regarding cutaneous neurofibroma morbidity, treatment options, and acceptable risks-benefits of treatment. METHODS: An online survey was distributed through the world's largest NF registry. Eligibility criteria included self-reported neurofibromatosis 1 diagnosis, adolescent child ages 12-17 years, ≥1 cutaneous neurofibroma, and ability to read English. The survey was designed to collect details about the adolescent's cutaneous neurofibromas, views on morbidity related to cutaneous neurofibromas, social and emotional impact of cutaneous neurofibromas, communication regarding cutaneous neurofibromas, and views regarding current and potential future cutaneous neurofibroma treatment. RESULTS: Survey respondents included 28 adolescents and 32 caregivers. Adolescents reported having several negative feelings about cutaneous neurofibromas, particularly feeling worried about the potential progression of their cutaneous neurofibromas (50%). Pruritus (34%), location (34%), appearance (31%), and number (31%) were the most bothersome cutaneous neurofibroma features. Topical medication (77%-96%), followed by oral medication (54%-93%), was the most preferred treatment modality. Adolescents and caregivers most often replied that cutaneous neurofibroma treatment should be initiated when cutaneous neurofibromas become bothersome. The majority of respondents were willing to treat cutaneous neurofibromas for at least 1 year (64%-75%). Adolescent and caregivers were least willing to risk pain (72%-78%) and nausea/vomiting (59%-81%) as a cutaneous neurofibroma treatment side effect. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1 are negatively impacted by their cutaneous neurofibromas, and that both adolescents and their caregivers would be willing to try longer-term experimental treatments.

Noninvasive treatment of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs): Results of a randomized prospective, direct comparison of four methods.

BACKGROUND: People with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) suffer disfigurement and pain when hundreds to thousands of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) appear and grow throughout life. Surgical removal of cNFs under anesthesia is the only standard therapy, leaving surgical scars. OBJECTIVE: Effective, minimally-invasive, safe, rapid, tolerable treatment(s) of small cNFs that may prevent tumor progression. METHODS: Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of 4 different treatments were compared in 309, 2-4 mm cNFs across 19 adults with Fitzpatrick skin types (FST) I-IV: radiofrequency (RF) needle coagulation, 755 nm alexandrite laser with suction, 980 nm diode laser, and intratumoral injection of 10 mg/mL deoxycholate. Regional pain, clinical responses, tumor height and volume (by 3D photography) were assessed before, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Biopsies were obtained electively at 3 months. RESULTS: There was no scarring or adverse events > grade 2. Each modality significantly (P < .05) reduced or cleared cNFs, with large variation between tumors and participants. Alexandrite laser and deoxycholate were fast and least painful; 980 nm laser was most painful. Growth of cNFs was not stimulated by treatment(s) based on height and volume values at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline. LIMITATIONS: Intervention was a single treatment session; dosimetry has not been optimized. CONCLUSIONS: Small cNFs can be rapidly and safely treated without surgery.

Multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis conference in the management of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and schwannomatosis in a single tertiary care institution.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of weekly neurofibromatosis (NF) multi-disciplinary conferences (MDC) on the diagnostic and therapeutic plan for patients with NF type 1 (NF1) and schwannomatosis (SWN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients with confirmed or suspected NF1 and SWN discussed in weekly MDC from March to July 2021. Demographic data collected included patient age, sex, pre-conference and post-conference diagnosis, radiological studies reviewed, and provider specialties in attendance. Outcomes reported included changes in imaging interpretation and treatment plans, changes in post-conference diagnosis relative to pre-conference diagnosis, and time to completion of the recommended change in treatment. RESULTS: Data from 17 MDC "pre-conference" lists included 75 patients (38 female, 37 males, mean age (years): 38 (range: 6-80)) with NF1 (52%, 39/75) and SWN (36%, 27/75) discussed over a total of 91 case reviews. 18.7% (14/75) of all patients had NF2-related SWN, and 17.3% (13/75) of all patients had non-NF2 SWN. The MDC led to changes in imaging interpretation in 18.7% and changes in patient management in 74.7% (diagnostic testing (n = 52), surgical plan (n = 24), medical treatment (n = 9), clinical trial status (n = 4), and radiation treatment (n = 1)) of cases. Among patients for whom a change in management was recorded, 91% (62/68) completed at least one recommendation (mean time to completion (days): 41.4 (range: 0-278)). CONCLUSION: Weekly MDC changes the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the majority of patients discussed (74.7%) and promotes a high adherence rate to recommendations (91%).

Recommendations for the collection and annotation of biosamples for analysis of biomarkers in neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis are characterized by potential lifelong morbidity and life-threatening complications. To date, however, diagnostic and predictive biomarkers are an unmet need in this patient population. The inclusion of biomarker discovery correlatives in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials enables study of low-incidence disease. The implementation of a common data model would further enhance biomarker discovery by enabling effective concatenation of data from multiple studies. METHODS: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis biomarker working group reviewed published data on emerging trends in neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis biomarker research and developed recommendations in a series of consensus meetings. RESULTS: Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising assay for neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis biomarker discovery and validation. In addition, we review recommendations for a range of biomarkers in clinical trials, neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis-specific data annotations, and common data models for data integration. CONCLUSION: These Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis consensus guidelines are intended to provide best practices for the inclusion of biomarker studies in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials, data, and sample annotation and to lay a framework for data harmonization and concatenation between trials.

Druggable genomic landscapes of high-grade gliomas.

Background: Despite the putatively targetable genomic landscape of high-grade gliomas, the long-term survival benefit of genomically-tailored targeted therapies remains discouraging. Methods: Using glioblastoma (GBM) as a representative example of high-grade gliomas, we evaluated the clonal architecture and distribution of hotspot mutations in 388 GBMs from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Mutations were matched with 54 targeted therapies, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of drug biochemical properties in reference to the drug's clinical efficacy in high-grade gliomas. We then assessed clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients with high-grade gliomas with targetable mutations reviewed at the Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board (JH MTB; n = 50). Results: Among 1,156 sequence alterations evaluated, 28.6% represented hotspots. While the frequency of hotspot mutations in GBM was comparable to cancer types with actionable hotspot alterations, GBMs harbored a higher fraction of subclonal mutations that affected hotspots (7.0%), compared to breast cancer (4.9%), lung cancer (4.4%), and melanoma (1.4%). In investigating the biochemical features of targeted therapies paired with recurring alterations, we identified a trend toward higher lipid solubility and lower IC50 in GBM cell lines among drugs with clinical efficacy. The drugs' half-life, molecular weight, surface area and binding to efflux transporters were not associated with clinical efficacy. Among the JH MTB cohort of patients with IDH1 wild-type high-grade gliomas who received targeted therapies, trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib conferred radiographic partial response in 75% of patients harboring BRAF or NF1 actionable mutations. Cabozantinib conferred radiographic partial response in two patients harboring a MET and a PDGFRA/KDR amplification. Patients with IDH1 wild-type gliomas that harbored actionable alterations who received genotype-matched targeted therapy had longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS; 7.37 and 14.72 respectively) than patients whose actionable alterations were not targeted (2.83 and 4.2 months respectively). Conclusion: While multiple host, tumor and drug-related features may limit the delivery and efficacy of targeted therapies for patients with high-grade gliomas, genotype-matched targeted therapies confer favorable clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to generate more data on the impact of biochemical features of targeted therapies on their clinical efficacy for high-grade gliomas.

Analysis of treatment sequence and outcomes in patients with relapsed malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Background: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas originating from cellular components within the nerve sheath. The incidence of MPNST is highest in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and MPNST is the leading cause of death for these individuals. Complete surgical resection is the only curative therapeutic option, but is often unfeasible due to tumor location, size, or presence of metastases. Evidence-based choices of chemotherapy for recurrent/refractory MPNST remain elusive. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience in treating patients with relapsed MPNST in order to describe patient outcomes related to salvage regimens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective electronic health record analysis of patients with MPNST who were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2010 to June 2021. We calculated time to progression (TTP) based on salvage chemotherapy regimens. Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. Upfront therapy included single or combined modalities of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Forty-eight patients received at least 1 line of chemotherapy, which included 23 different regimens (excluding active clinical studies). Most patients (n = 42, 87.5%) received a combination of doxorubicin, ifosfamide, or etoposide as first-line chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens and their TTP varied greatly, with irinotecan/temozolomide-based regimens having the longest average TTP (255.5 days, among 4 patients). Conclusions: Patients with advanced or metastatic MPNST often succumb to their disease despite multiple lines of therapy. These data may be used as comparative information in decision-making for future patients and clinical trials.

Impact of Frontline Ivosidenib on Volumetric Growth Patterns in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-mutant Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Tumors.

PURPOSE: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas are usually treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which increases the risk for neurocognitive sequelae during patients' most productive years. We report our experience using off-label first-in-class mutant IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and its impact on tumor volume in IDH-mutant gliomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed patients ages ≥18 years with radiation/chemotherapy-naïve, mutant IDH1, nonenhancing, radiographically active, grade 2/3 gliomas, and ≥2 pretreatment and ≥2 on-treatment ivosidenib MRIs. T2/FLAIR-based tumor volumes, growth rates, and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. log-linear mixed-effect modeling of growth curves adjusted for grade, histology, and age was performed. RESULTS: We analyzed 116 MRIs of 12 patients [10 males, median age 46 years (range: 26-60)]: 8 astrocytomas (50% grade 3) and 4 grade 2 oligodendrogliomas. Median on-drug follow-up was 13.2 months [interquartile range (IQR): 9.7-22.2]. Tolerability was 100%. A total of 50% of patients experienced ≥20% tumor volume reduction on-treatment and absolute growth rate was lower during treatment (-1.2 ± 10.6 cc/year) than before treatment (8.0 ± 7.7 cc/year; P ≤ 0.05). log-linear models in the Stable group (n = 9) showed significant growth before treatment (53%/year; P = 0.013), and volume reduction (-34%/year; P = 0.037) after 5 months on treatment. After treatment, volume curves were significantly lower than before treatment (after/before treatment ratio 0.5; P < 0.01). Median time-to-best response was 11.2 (IQR: 1.7-33.4) months, and 16.8 (IQR: 2.6-33.5) months in patients on drug for ≥1 year. PFS at 9 months was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Ivosidenib was well tolerated and induced a high volumetric response rate. Responders had significant reduction in tumor growth rates and volume reductions observed after a 5-month delay. Thus, ivosidenib appears useful to control tumor growth and delay more toxic therapies in IDH-mutant nonenhancing indolently growing gliomas. See related commentary by Lukas and Horbinski, p. 4709.

Current and Emerging Imaging Techniques for Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Cutaneous Neurofibromas.

A consistent set of measurement techniques must be applied to reliably and reproducibly evaluate the efficacy of treatments for cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). cNFs are neurocutaneous tumors that are the most common tumor in people with NF1 and represent an area of unmet clinical need. This review presents the available data regarding approaches in use or development to identify, measure, and track cNFs, including calipers, digital imaging, and high-frequency ultrasound sonography. We also describe emerging technologies such as spatial frequency domain imaging and the application of imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography that may enable the detection of early cNFs and prevention of tumor-associated morbidity.

Existing and Developing Preclinical Models for Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Cutaneous Neurofibromas.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by a nonfunctional copy of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene that predisposes patients to the development of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs), the skin tumor that is the hallmark of this condition. Innumerable benign cNFs, each appearing by an independent somatic inactivation of the remaining functional NF1 allele, form in nearly all patients with NF1. One of the limitations in developing a treatment for cNFs is an incomplete understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and limitations in experimental modeling. Recent advances in preclinical in vitro and in vivo modeling have substantially enhanced our understanding of cNF biology and created unprecedented opportunities for therapeutic discovery. We discuss the current state of cNF preclinical in vitro and in vivo model systems, including two- and three-dimensional cell cultures, organoids, genetically engineered mice, patient-derived xenografts, and porcine models. We highlight the models' relationship to human cNFs and how they can be used to gain insight into cNF development and therapeutic discovery.

CEST2022: Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI improves the diagnostic performance of multiparametric non-contrast-enhanced MRI techniques in patients with post-treatment high-grade gliomas.

New or enlarged lesions in malignant gliomas after surgery and chemoradiation can be associated with tumor recurrence or treatment effect. Due to similar radiographic characteristics, conventional-and even some advanced MRI techniques-are limited in distinguishing these two pathologies. Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI, a protein-based molecular imaging technique that does not require the administration of any exogenous contrast agent, was recently introduced into the clinical setting. In this study, we evaluated and compared the diagnostic performances of APTw MRI with several non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequences, such as diffusion-weighted imaging, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. Thirty-nine scans from 28 glioma patients were obtained on a 3 T MRI scanner. A histogram analysis approach was employed to extract parameters from each tumor area. Statistically significant parameters (P < 0.05) were selected to train multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate the performance of MRI sequences. Multiple histogram parameters, particularly from APTw and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling images, demonstrated significant differences between treatment effect and recurrent tumor. The regression model trained on the combination of all significant histogram parameters achieved the best result (area under the curve = 0.89). We found that APTw images added value to other advanced MR images for the differentiation of treatment effect and tumor recurrence.

Cutaneous Neurofibroma Heterogeneity: Factors that Influence Tumor Burden in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is one of the most common genetic disorders of the nervous system and predisposes patients to develop benign and malignant tumors. Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) are NF1-associated benign tumors that affect nearly 100% of patients with NF1. cNFs dramatically reduce patients' QOL owing to their unaesthetic appearance, physical discomfort, and corresponding psychological burden. There is currently no effective drug therapy option, and treatment is restricted to surgical removal. One of the greatest hurdles for cNF management is the variability of clinical expressivity in NF1, resulting in intrapatient and interpatient cNF tumor burden heterogeneity, that is, the variability in the presentation and evolution of these tumors. There is growing evidence that a wide array of factors are involved in the regulation of cNF heterogeneity. Understanding the mechanisms underlying this heterogeneity of cNF at the molecular, cellular, and environmental levels can facilitate the development of innovative and personalized treatment regimens.

Target Product Profile for Cutaneous Neurofibromas: Clinical Trials to Prevent, Arrest, or Regress Cutaneous Neurofibromas.

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) are benign tumors of the skin that affect >95% of adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Despite their benign histology, cNFs can significantly impact QOL due to disfigurement, pain, and pruritus. There are no approved therapies for cNFs. Existing treatments are limited to surgery or laser-based treatments that have had mixed success and cannot be readily applied to a large number of tumors. We review cNF treatment options that are currently available and under investigation, discuss the regulatory considerations specific to cNFs, and propose strategies to improve cNF clinical trial design and standardize clinical trial endpoints.

Consensus-Based Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Spinal Deformity and Associated Tumors in Pediatric Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Screening and Surveillance, Surgical Intervention, and Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. METHODS: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. CONCLUSION: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

RAS Signaling Gone Awry in the Skin: The Complex Role of RAS in Cutaneous Neurofibroma Pathogenesis, Emerging Biological Insights.

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) are the most common tumor in people with the rasopathy neurofibromatosis type 1. They number in hundreds or even thousands throughout the body, and currently, there are no effective interventions to prevent or treat these skin tumors. To facilitate the identification of novel and effective therapies, essential studies including a more refined understanding of cNF biology and the role of RAS signaling and downstream effector pathways responsible for cNF initiation, growth, and maintenance are needed. This review highlights the current state of knowledge of RAS signaling in cNF pathogenesis and therapeutic development for cNF treatment.

cNF-Skindex in Adults Living with Neurofibromatosis 1: Severity Strata in France and Validation in United States Adults.

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) contribute to the impairment of QOL in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. The cNF-Skindex, validated in a French population, specifically assesses the cNF-related QOL. In this study, we first defined severity strata using an anchoring approach on the basis of patient's burden. In total, 209 patients answered the anchor question and the cNF-Skindex. We tested the agreement among the three strata, generated by all potential couples of cut-off values of the cNF-Skindex and the three strata defined in the anchor question. The cut-off values 12 and 49 provided the highest Kappa value (κ = 0.685, 95% confidence interval = 0.604-0.765). Second, we validated the score and the strata in a United States population using the answers provided by 220 French and 148 United States adults. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the country of origin was not a factor associated with the score (P = 0.297). The number of cNF along the different severity strata was similar between the French and the United States populations. In conclusion, stratification constitutes a powerful tool to better interpret the cNF-Skindex in daily practice and in clinical trials. This study validates its use in two populations that together constitute a large cohort of patients willing to participate in clinical research.

Long-term safety and efficacy of selumetinib in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 on a phase 1/2 trial for inoperable plexiform neurofibromas.

BACKGROUND: Selumetinib shrank inoperable symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas (PN) in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and provided clinical benefit for many in our previously published phase 1/2 clinical trials (SPRINT, NCT01362803). At the data cutoff (DCO) of the prior publications, 65% of participants were still receiving treatment. This report presents up to 5 years of additional safety and efficacy data from these studies. METHODS: This manuscript includes data from the phase 1 and phase 2, stratum 1 study which included participants with clinically significant PN-related morbidity. Participants received continuous selumetinib dosing (1 cycle = 28 days). Safety and efficacy data through February 27, 2021 are included. PN response assessed by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis: Confirmed partial response (cPR) ≥20% decrease from baseline on 2 consecutive evaluations. Phase 2 participants completed patient-reported outcome measures assessing tumor pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale-11) and interference of pain in daily life (pain interference index). RESULTS: For the 74 children (median age 10.3 years; range 3-18.5) enrolled, overall cPR rate was 70% (52/74); median duration of treatment was 57.5 cycles (range 1-100). Responses were generally sustained with 59% (44) lasting ≥ 12 cycles. Tumor pain intensity (n = 19, P = .015) and pain interference (n = 18, P = .0059) showed durable improvement from baseline to 48 cycles. No new safety signals were identified; however, some developed known selumetinib-related adverse events (AEs) for the first time after several years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: With up to 5 years of additional selumetinib treatment, most children with NF1-related PN had durable tumor shrinkage and sustained improvement in pain beyond that previously reported at 1 year. No new safety signals were identified; however, ongoing monitoring for known selumetinib-related AEs is needed while treatment continues.