Assessing the quality of drug information provided by hospital pharmacies using a fictitious enquiry and simulated real-life conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for drug information (DI) provided by hospital pharmacists call for quality assurance procedures; however, no method of evaluation is internationally agreed on. The procedure should be feasible, reproducible and representative for real-life quality. We tested a new approach using a fictitious enquiry under simulated real-life conditions for quality assessment of DI by German hospital pharmacists. METHODS: A fictitious enquiry was submitted under simulated real-life conditions (study part I; test week announced, but not exact day; response time given). An expert panel determined content-related (three essential, and up to seven additional items of useful information) and structural requirements for answers and performed blinded evaluations. To compare quality of routine DI answers (study part II), five recently answered routine enquiries could retrospectively be evaluated for plausibility (binary scale 0/1) and structural requirements. RESULTS: Of 62 hospital pharmacies opting to participate, 45 (71%) entered study part I and 18 (40%) entered study part II. In study part I, 28 participants (62%) presented three essential contents, 11 (24%) two, five (11%) one, and one none. Additional useful information was given in 44-80%. Structural requirements achieved mixed results with low scores for logical conclusion deduction and reference presentation. In study part II, plausibility for the 90 recently answered routine enquiries was rated good (median 0.91, range 0.53-1). Concerning structural requirements, overall comparable results were achieved with minor variations compared with study part I. Thus, the quality of DI was judged to be comparable between study parts I and II. CONCLUSIONS: An open quality assessment procedure with a fictitious enquiry under simulated real-life conditions can successfully be used for quality measurement of DI of hospital pharmacists and identifies areas for improvement.

CSF penetration of vancomycin in critical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is recommended for ventriculitis. However, penetration into the CNS is relatively poor. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in serum and CSF in critical care patients with proven or suspected CNS infections from neurosurgical procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational pharmacokinetic study in critical care patients with proven or suspected CNS infections receiving intravenous vancomycin. Multiple blood and intraventricular CSF samples were collected. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and simulation were undertaken with ADAPT5 and Pmetrics. RESULTS: A total of 187 blood and CSF samples were collected from 21 patients. The median (range) Cmax and Cmin concentrations in serum were 25.67 (10.60-50.78) and 9.60 (4.46-23.56) mg/L, respectively, with a median daily dose of 2500 (500-4000) mg. The corresponding median concentrations in CSF were 0.65 (<0.24-3.83) mg/L and 0.58 (<0.24-3.95) mg/L, respectively. The median AUC0-24 in serum and CSF was 455.09 and 14.10 mg·h/L, respectively. A three-compartment linear population pharmacokinetic model best fitted the observed data. Vancomycin demonstrated poor penetration into CSF, with a median CSF/serum ratio of 3% and high intersubject pharmacokinetic variability of its penetration. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring in both serum and CSF and higher daily doses may be an option to ensure adequate trough levels and to optimize patient therapy. Novel dosing strategies designed to reduce renal toxicity, such as administration by continuous infusion, should be investigated in further clinical studies to avoid antibiotic underexposure in CSF.

[Medication safety in hospitals : Integration of clinical pharmacists to reduce drug-related problems in the inpatient setting]. / Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit im Krankenhaus : Einbindung von Stationsapothekern zur Reduktion von arzneimittelbezogenen Problemen im stationären Medikationsprozess.

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a significant and often preventable cause for morbidity and mortality. Hospitalization is associated with a high risk for DRPs, especially due to a lack of information transfer at transitions of care. At the same time, interventions during inpatient treatment usually require a change in drug therapy and additionally increase the risk of DRPs. Thereby, DRPs can occur at all levels of the medication process and can be caused by different groups of professionals. One way to improve medication safety in hospitals is to integrate clinical pharmacists into the medication process.According to available data, the integration of a clinical pharmacist in multi-professional teams during admission, hospitalization and discharge can significantly reduce DRPs, costs and increases efficacy of drug therapy. In addition, drug supply with unit-dose systems in combination with digitalization of the medication process can achieve an improvement in medication safety. Improvement in continuity of medical care through a structured medication review and seamless transmission of medically relevant information upon discharge contribute to a significant reduction of hospital readmissions and emergency admissions due to ABPs, as well as health costs. With a university education, the hospital pharmacist specialized in clinical pharmacy is the only professional group that can comprehensively support the physician in the field of drug therapy.

Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of meropenem in neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculitis is a complication of temporary intraventricular drains. The limited penetration of meropenem into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is well known. However, ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic data in patients with ventriculitis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate meropenem pharmacokinetics in the serum and CSF of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis. METHODS: We conducted an observational pharmacokinetic study of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis receiving meropenem. Multiple blood and CSF samples were taken and were described using nonparametric pharmacokinetic modelling with Pmetrics. RESULTS: In total, 21 patients (median age 52 years, median weight 76 kg) were included. The median (range) of peak and trough concentrations in serum were 20.16 (4.40-69.00) mg/L and 2.54 (0.00-31.40) mg/L, respectively. The corresponding peak and trough concentrations in CSF were 1.20 (0.00-6.20) mg/L and 1.28 (0.00-4.10) mg/L, respectively, with a median CSF/serum ratio (range) of 0.09 (0.03-0.16). Median creatinine clearance ranged from 60.7 to 217.6 ml/minute (median 122.5 ml/minute). A three-compartment linear population pharmacokinetic model was most appropriate. No covariate relationships could be supported for any of the model parameters. Meropenem demonstrated poor penetration into CSF, with a median CSF/serum ratio of 9 % and high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of higher-than-standard doses of meropenem and therapeutic drug monitoring in both serum and CSF should be considered to individualise meropenem dosing in neurocritical care patients with ventriculitis.

Decreased Linezolid Serum Concentrations in Three Critically Ill Patients: Clinical Case Studies of a Potential Drug Interaction between Linezolid and Rifampicin.

Linezolid is a valuable treatment option for treating infections caused by multi-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Lack of effective linezolid levels due to the co-administration of rifampicin has been described in healthy subjects. However, the clinical significance of this potential drug interaction (DI) for critically ill patients is still unclear. This was a retrospective analysis of 3 critically ill patients with the combination therapy of linezolid and rifampicin or rifampicin pre-treatment. Despite increasing the dose of linezolid, the majority of observed linezolid trough concentrations in all 3 patients were below 2 mg/l. Furthermore, linezolid trough concentrations remained below 2 mg/l after discontinuation of rifampicin. This potential DI between linezolid and rifampicin could lead to treatment failure. Therefore, we strongly recommend that linezolid serum concentrations be monitored in patients with rifampicin co-administration or rifampicin pretreatment.