[Care pathway diversity of patients with multiple sclerosis between French regions]. / Diversité des prises en charge des patients atteints de sclérose en plaques entre régions françaises.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyze and to compare data from 2015, focusing on hospital care for patients with multiple sclerosis from three French regions with different characteristics in terms of prevalence, size and number of multiple sclerosis competencies and resource centers. METHODS: All hospital admissions from the PMSI MCO 2015 database, with a principal or related diagnosis (PD-RD) of G35* ("multiple sclerosis") were extracted. We also extracted chemotherapy treatments administered in hospital, during admissions with a significant associated diagnosis (SAD) of G35*, if the PD or RD was coded Z512 ("non-tumor chemotherapy"). The analyzed regions corresponded to those of 2015, some of which have since merged. RESULTS: There were 95,359 hospital admissions for multiple sclerosis in France in 2015 among a total cohort of 21,102 patients, resulting in a total cost of € 54.1m. Patients with MS were managed mainly in the ambulatory setting, which accounted for 88.5 % of all admissions. The Rhône-Alpes region represented 7.6 % of national admissions for MS, 9.6 % of patients, and 14 % of inpatient days, contributing 10.4 % of the national cost of MS care. 58.4 % of stays were managed by the two main multiple sclerosis centers. The Nord-Pas-de-Calais region represented 9.8 % of national admissions, 10 % of patients, 6.6 % of inpatient days, and 9.1 % of the national cost. 29.8 % of stays were managed by the main multiple sclerosis center. The Centre region represented 2.7 % of stays, 2.8 % of patients, 3.1 % of inpatient days, and 2.8 % of the national cost. 28.4 % of stays were managed by the main multiple sclerosis center. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the diversity of multiple sclerosis hospital management and care between these three regions.

Costs of dengue in three French territories of the Americas: an analysis of the hospital medical information system (PMSI) database.

BACKGROUND: Dengue is a major emerging public health concern in tropical and subtropical countries. Severe dengue can lead to hospitalisation and death. This study was performed to assess the economic burden of hospitalisations for dengue from 2007 to 2011 in three French territories of the Americas where dengue is endemic (French Guiana, Martinique and Guadeloupe). METHODS: Data on dengue-associated hospitalisations were extracted from the French national hospital administrative database, Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI). The numbers of stays and the corresponding number of hospitalised patients were determined using disease-specific ICD-10 codes. Associated hospital costs were estimated from the payer perspective, using French official tariffs. RESULTS: Overall, 4183 patients (mean age 32 years; 51 % male) were hospitalised for dengue, corresponding to 4574 hospital stays. In nearly all hospital stays (98 %; 4471), the illness was medically managed and the mean length of stay was 4.3 days. The mean cost per stay was €2522, corresponding to a total hospital cost of €11.5 million over the 5 years assessed. The majority of hospitalisations (80 % of patients) and associated costs (75 % of total hospital costs) were incurred during two epidemics. CONCLUSION: Severe dengue is associated with significant hospital costs that escalate during outbreaks.

Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of pregnancy among women who underwent Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus tubal ligation in France between 2006 and 2010. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospital care in France (nationwide). Anonymised database of all hospital discharge summaries in France. PATIENTS: Recruitment was based on procedure codes in the national database of hospital discharge summaries. The study included all women who underwent tubal sterilization by Essure microinserts or by tubal ligation and subsequently were hospitalised either for all unexpected pregnancies related diagnosis (e.g., miscarriage, legal abortion, or delivery) or for pregnancies following reversal microsurgery or invitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, French hospitals performed 109,277 tubal sterilization procedures: 39,169 Essure sterilizations and 70,108 laparoscopic tubal ligations. The respective indication of both techniques depended on the surgeons' skill. The median age of the two populations was similar, 41 years (range 28-52) for Essure patients and 40 years (range 27-54) for those undergoing tubal ligation (p=0.42). A Cox model has been performed. Following sterilization, after adjustment on age Essure patients became pregnant at a significantly lower rate than laparoscopic ligation patients 0.36% versus 0.46%, respectively (HR=0.62 (040-096)), and their pregnancy rate of post-sterilization procedure was significantly lower (reversal microsurgeries: 0.02% versus 0.19% (p<0.001), IVF treatment: 0.08% versus 0.27%) (p<0.001). The pregnancy rates after IVF were 12.5% and 5.35%, respectively, and 0% and 11.36% after tubal repair. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study of tubal sterilization demonstrates that Essure was associated with lower rates of pregnancy versus tubal ligation.