Slow Ca2+ Efflux by Ca2+/H+ Exchange in Cardiac Mitochondria Is Modulated by Ca2+ Re-uptake via MCU, Extra-Mitochondrial pH, and H+ Pumping by FOF1-ATPase.

Mitochondrial (m) Ca2+ influx is largely dependent on membrane potential (ΔΨm), whereas mCa2+ efflux occurs primarily via Ca2+ ion exchangers. We probed the kinetics of Ca2+/H+ exchange (CHEm) in guinea pig cardiac muscle mitochondria. We tested if net mCa2+ flux is altered during a matrix inward H+ leak that is dependent on matrix H+ pumping by ATPm hydrolysis at complex V (FOF1-ATPase). We measured [Ca2+]m, extra-mitochondrial (e) [Ca2+]e, ΔΨm, pHm, pHe, NADH, respiration, ADP/ATP ratios, and total [ATP]m in the presence or absence of protonophore dinitrophenol (DNP), mitochondrial uniporter (MCU) blocker Ru360, and complex V blocker oligomycin (OMN). We proposed that net slow influx/efflux of Ca2+ after adding DNP and CaCl2 is dependent on whether the ΔpHm gradient is/is not maintained by reciprocal outward H+ pumping by complex V. We found that adding CaCl2 enhanced DNP-induced increases in respiration and decreases in ΔΨm while [ATP]m decreased, ΔpHm gradient was maintained, and [Ca2+]m continued to increase slowly, indicating net mCa2+ influx via MCU. In contrast, with complex V blocked by OMN, adding DNP and CaCl2 caused larger declines in ΔΨm as well as a slow fall in pHm to near pHe while [Ca2+]m continued to decrease slowly, indicating net mCa2+ efflux in exchange for H+ influx (CHEm) until the ΔpHm gradient was abolished. The kinetics of slow mCa2+ efflux with slow H+ influx via CHEm was also observed at pHe 6.9 vs. 7.6 by the slow fall in pHm until ΔpHm was abolished; if Ca2+ reuptake via the MCU was also blocked, mCa2+ efflux via CHEm became more evident. Of the two components of the proton electrochemical gradient, our results indicate that CHEm activity is driven largely by the ΔpHm chemical gradient with H+ leak, while mCa2+ entry via MCU depends largely on the charge gradient ΔΨm. A fall in ΔΨm with excess mCa2+ loading can occur during cardiac cell stress. Cardiac cell injury due to mCa2+ overload may be reduced by temporarily inhibiting FOF1-ATPase from pumping H+ due to ΔΨm depolarization. This action would prevent additional slow mCa2+ loading via MCU and permit activation of CHEm to mediate efflux of mCa2+. HIGHLIGHTS -We examined how slow mitochondrial (m) Ca2+ efflux via Ca2+/H+ exchange (CHEm) is triggered by matrix acidity after a rapid increase in [Ca2+]m by adding CaCl2 in the presence of dinitrophenol (DNP) to permit H+ influx, and oligomycin (OMN) to block H+ pumping via FOF1-ATP synthase/ase (complex V).-Declines in ΔΨm and pHm after DNP and added CaCl2 were larger when complex V was blocked.-[Ca2+]m slowly increased despite a fall in ΔΨm but maintained pHm when H+ pumping by complex V was permitted.-[Ca2+]m slowly decreased and external [Ca2+]e increased with declines in both ΔΨm and pHm when complex V was blocked.-ATPm hydrolysis supports a falling pHm and redox state and promotes a slow increase in [Ca2+]m.-After rapid Ca2+ influx due to a bolus of CaCl2, slow mCa2+ efflux by CHEm occurs directly if pHe is low.

Mg(2+) differentially regulates two modes of mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake in isolated cardiac mitochondria: implications for mitochondrial Ca(2+) sequestration.

The manner in which mitochondria take up and store Ca(2+) remains highly debated. Recent experimental and computational evidence has suggested the presence of at least two modes of Ca(2+) uptake and a complex Ca(2+) sequestration mechanism in mitochondria. But how Mg(2+) regulates these different modes of Ca(2+) uptake as well as mitochondrial Ca(2+) sequestration is not known. In this study, we investigated two different ways by which mitochondria take up and sequester Ca(2+) by using two different protocols. Isolated guinea pig cardiac mitochondria were exposed to varying concentrations of CaCl2 in the presence or absence of MgCl2. In the first protocol, A, CaCl2 was added to the respiration buffer containing isolated mitochondria, whereas in the second protocol, B, mitochondria were added to the respiration buffer with CaCl2 already present. Protocol A resulted first in a fast transitory uptake followed by a slow gradual uptake. In contrast, protocol B only revealed a slow and gradual Ca(2+) uptake, which was approximately 40 % of the slow uptake rate observed in protocol A. These two types of Ca(2+) uptake modes were differentially modulated by extra-matrix Mg(2+). That is, Mg(2+) markedly inhibited the slow mode of Ca(2+) uptake in both protocols in a concentration-dependent manner, but not the fast mode of uptake exhibited in protocol A. Mg(2+) also inhibited Na(+)-dependent Ca(2+) extrusion. The general Ca(2+) binding properties of the mitochondrial Ca(2+) sequestration system were reaffirmed and shown to be independent of the mode of Ca(2+) uptake, i.e. through the fast or slow mode of uptake. In addition, extra-matrix Mg(2+) hindered Ca(2+) sequestration. Our results indicate that mitochondria exhibit different modes of Ca(2+) uptake depending on the nature of exposure to extra-matrix Ca(2+), which are differentially sensitive to Mg(2+). The implications of these findings in cardiomyocytes are discussed.

Extra-matrix Mg2+ limits Ca2+ uptake and modulates Ca2+ uptake-independent respiration and redox state in cardiac isolated mitochondria.

Cardiac mitochondrial matrix (m) free Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)]m) increases primarily by Ca(2+) uptake through the Ca(2+) uniporter (CU). Ca(2+) uptake via the CU is attenuated by extra-matrix (e) Mg(2+) ([Mg(2+)]e). How [Ca(2+)]m is dynamically modulated by interacting physiological levels of [Ca(2+)]e and [Mg(2+)]e and how this interaction alters bioenergetics are not well understood. We postulated that as [Mg(2+)]e modulates Ca(2+) uptake via the CU, it also alters bioenergetics in a matrix Ca(2+)-induced and matrix Ca(2+)-independent manner. To test this, we measured changes in [Ca(2+)]e, [Ca(2+)]m, [Mg(2+)]e and [Mg(2+)]m spectrofluorometrically in guinea pig cardiac mitochondria in response to added CaCl2 (0-0.6 mM; 1 mM EGTA buffer) with/without added MgCl2 (0-2 mM). In parallel, we assessed effects of added CaCl2 and MgCl2 on NADH, membrane potential (ΔΨm), and respiration. We found that ≥0.125 mM MgCl2 significantly attenuated CU-mediated Ca(2+) uptake and [Ca(2+)]m. Incremental [Mg(2+)]e did not reduce initial Ca(2+)uptake but attenuated the subsequent slower Ca(2+) uptake, so that [Ca(2+)]m remained unaltered over time. Adding CaCl2 without MgCl2 to attain a [Ca(2+)]m from 46 to 221 nM enhanced state 3 NADH oxidation and increased respiration by 15 %; up to 868 nM [Ca(2+)]m did not additionally enhance NADH oxidation or respiration. Adding MgCl2 did not increase [Mg(2+)]m but it altered bioenergetics by its direct effect to decrease Ca(2+) uptake. However, at a given [Ca(2+)]m, state 3 respiration was incrementally attenuated, and state 4 respiration enhanced, by higher [Mg(2+)]e. Thus, [Mg(2+)]e without a change in [Mg(2+)]m can modulate bioenergetics independently of CU-mediated Ca(2+) transport.

Dynamic buffering of mitochondrial Ca2+ during Ca2+ uptake and Na+-induced Ca2+ release.

In cardiac mitochondria, matrix free Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)]m) is primarily regulated by Ca(2+) uptake and release via the Ca(2+) uniporter (CU) and Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger (NCE) as well as by Ca(2+) buffering. Although experimental and computational studies on the CU and NCE dynamics exist, it is not well understood how matrix Ca(2+) buffering affects these dynamics under various Ca(2+) uptake and release conditions, and whether this influences the stoichiometry of the NCE. To elucidate the role of matrix Ca(2+) buffering on the uptake and release of Ca(2+), we monitored Ca(2+) dynamics in isolated mitochondria by measuring both the extra-matrix free [Ca(2+)] ([Ca(2+)]e) and [Ca(2+)]m. A detailed protocol was developed and freshly isolated mitochondria from guinea pig hearts were exposed to five different [CaCl2] followed by ruthenium red and six different [NaCl]. By using the fluorescent probe indo-1, [Ca(2+)]e and [Ca(2+)]m were spectrofluorometrically quantified, and the stoichiometry of the NCE was determined. In addition, we measured NADH, membrane potential, matrix volume and matrix pH to monitor Ca(2+)-induced changes in mitochondrial bioenergetics. Our [Ca(2+)]e and [Ca(2+)]m measurements demonstrate that Ca(2+) uptake and release do not show reciprocal Ca(2+) dynamics in the extra-matrix and matrix compartments. This salient finding is likely caused by a dynamic Ca(2+) buffering system in the matrix compartment. The Na(+)- induced Ca(2+) release demonstrates an electrogenic exchange via the NCE by excluding an electroneutral exchange. Mitochondrial bioenergetics were only transiently affected by Ca(2+) uptake in the presence of large amounts of CaCl2, but not by Na(+)- induced Ca(2+) release.

Modeling the calcium sequestration system in isolated guinea pig cardiac mitochondria.

Under high Ca(2+) load conditions, Ca(2+) concentrations in the extra-mitochondrial and mitochondrial compartments do not display reciprocal dynamics. This is due to a paradoxical increase in the mitochondrial Ca(2+) buffering power as the Ca(2+) load increases. Here we develop and characterize a mechanism of the mitochondrial Ca(2+) sequestration system using an experimental data set from isolated guinea pig cardiac mitochondria. The proposed mechanism elucidates this phenomenon and others in a mathematical framework and is integrated into a previously corroborated model of oxidative phosphorylation including the Na(+)/Ca(2+) cycle. The integrated model reproduces the Ca(2+) dynamics observed in both compartments of the isolated mitochondria respiring on pyruvate after a bolus of CaCl2 followed by ruthenium red and a bolus of NaCl. The model reveals why changes in mitochondrial Ca(2+) concentration of Ca(2+) loaded mitochondria appear significantly mitigated relative to the corresponding extra-mitochondrial Ca(2+) concentration changes after Ca(2+) efflux is initiated. The integrated model was corroborated by simulating the set-point phenomenon. The computational results support the conclusion that the Ca(2+) sequestration system is composed of at least two classes of Ca(2+) buffers. The first class represents prototypical Ca(2+) buffering, and the second class encompasses the complex binding events associated with the formation of amorphous calcium phosphate. With the Ca(2+) sequestration system in mitochondria more precisely defined, computer simulations can aid in the development of innovative therapeutics aimed at addressing the myriad of complications that arise due to mitochondrial Ca(2+) overload.

Activation of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors α and γ mediates remote ischemic preconditioning against myocardial infarction in vivo.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (remote IPC) elicits a protective cardiac phenotype against myocardial ischemic injury. The remote stimulus has been hypothesized to act on major signaling pathways; however, its molecular targets remain largely undefined. We hypothesized that remote IPC exerts its effects by activating the peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) α and γ, which have been previously implicated in cardioprotective signaling. Male New Zealand white rabbits (n = 78) were subjected to a 30-min coronary artery occlusion followed by three hours of reperfusion. Three cycles of remote IPC consisting of 10-min renal ischemia/reperfusion were performed. The animals either received the PPARα-antagonist GW6471 or the PPARγ-antagonist GW9662 alone or combined with remote IPC. Infarct size was determined gravimetrically. Tissue levels of 15d-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)), as well as the PPAR DNA binding were measured using specific assays. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze changes in endothelial nitric oxide synthase or inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA expression in relative quantity (RQ). Data are mean ± SD. As a result, remote IPC significantly reduced the myocardial infarct size (42.2 ± 4.9%* versus 61 ± 1.9%), accompanied by an increased PPAR DNA-binding (189.6 ± 19.8RLU* versus 44.4 ± 9RLU), increased iNOS expression (3.5 ± 1RQ* versus 1RQ), as well as 15d-PGJ(2) levels (179.7 ± 7.9 pg/mL* versus 127.9 ± 7.6 pg/mL). The protective response elicited by remote IPC, as well as the accompanying molecular changes were abolished by inhibiting PPARα (56.8 ± 4.7%; 61.1 ± 14.2RLU; and 1.91 ± 0.96RQ, respectively) or PPARγ (57.4 ± 3.3%; 52.7 ± 16.9RLU; and 1.54 ± 0.25RQ, respectively). (*Significantly different from control P < 0.05). In conclusion, the obtained results indicate that both PPARα and PPARγ play an essential role in remote IPC against myocardial infarction, impinging on the transcriptional control of iNOS expression.

Propofol inhibits desflurane-induced preconditioning in rabbits.

OBJECTIVES: The authors tested the hypothesis that ischemic and desflurane-induced preconditioning are blocked by propofol. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled study. SETTING: A university research laboratory. SUBJECTS: New Zealand white rabbits (n = 52). METHODS: Pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 hours of reperfusion. Rabbits received 0.0 (control) or 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane (30 minutes' duration and a 30-minute memory period) or ischemic preconditioning (5 minutes of ischemia and a 30-minute memory period) in the absence or presence of propofol (10 mg/kg/h intravenously) or its vehicle (10% Intralipid emulsion; B Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The myocardial infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium staining. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way and 2-way analysis of variance when appropriate, followed by a post hoc Duncan test. Data are mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Myocardial infarct size was 56% ± 8% in control animals (n = 7). Desflurane significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the infarct size to 37% ± 6% (n = 7). Desflurane-induced preconditioning was blocked by propofol (65% ± 10%, n = 7) but not by its vehicle (45% ± 11%, n = 5). Propofol and its vehicle alone had no effect on the infarct size (62% ± 8% [n = 6] and 58% ± 3% [n=5], respectively). Ischemic preconditioning reduced infarct size in the absence or presence of propofol to 24% ± 7% (n = 7) and 29% ± 12% (n = 6). CONCLUSION: Desflurane-induced preconditioning markedly reduced infarct size and was blocked by propofol, whereas ischemic preconditioning was not blocked by propofol. The results suggest an important interference between propofol and anesthetic-induced preconditioning and might explain some contradictory findings in studies in humans.

Differential role of Pim-1 kinase in anesthetic-induced and ischemic preconditioning against myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and anesthetic-induced preconditioning against myocardial infarction are mediated via protein kinase B. Pim-1 kinase acts downstream of protein kinase B and was recently shown to regulate cardiomyocyte survival. The authors tested the hypothesis that IPC and anesthetic-induced preconditioning are mediated by Pim-1 kinase. METHODS: Pentobarbital-anesthetized male C57Black/6 mice were subjected to 45 min of coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion. Animals received no intervention, Pim-1 kinase inhibitor II (10 microg/g intraperitoneally), its vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (10 microl/g intraperitoneally), or 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration desflurane alone or in combination with Pim-1 kinase inhibitor II (10 microg/g intraperitoneally). IPC was induced by three cycles of 5 min ischemia-reperfusion each, and animals received IPC either alone or in combination with Pim-1 kinase inhibitor II (10 microg/g intraperitoneally). Infarct size was determined with triphenyltetrazolium chloride, and area at risk was determined with Evans blue (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). Protein expression of Pim-1 kinase, Bad, phospho-Bad, and cytosolic content of cytochrome c were measured using Western immunoblotting. RESULTS: Infarct size in the control group was 47 + or - 2%. Pim-1 kinase inhibitor II (44 + or - 2%) had no effect on infarct size. Desflurane (17 + or - 3%) and IPC (19 + or - 2%) significantly reduced infarct size compared with control (both P < 0.05 vs. control). Blockade of Pim-1 kinase completely abrogated desflurane-induced preconditioning (43 + or - 3%), whereas IPC (35 + or - 3%) was blocked partially. Desflurane tended to reduce cytosolic content of cytochrome c, which was abrogated by Pim-1 kinase inhibitor II. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that Pim-1 kinase mediates at least in part desflurane-induced preconditioning and IPC against myocardial infarction in mice.

Desflurane-induced preconditioning has a threshold that is lowered by repetitive application and is mediated by beta 2-adrenergic receptors.

OBJECTIVE: An optimal administration protocol to induce a maximal effect of anesthetic preconditioning has not been evaluated to date. In this study, desflurane preconditioning was characterized with respect to its threshold, dose dependency, and continuous versus repetitive application. Furthermore, the role of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors in anesthetic preconditioning was tested. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: Laboratory study in a University hospital. SUBJECTS: New Zealand white rabbits in vivo. INTERVENTIONS: Systemic hemodynamics were continuously measured. Rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion and 3 hours of reperfusion. Animals received desflurane continuously for 30 minutes at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5; desflurane for 90 minutes at 0.5 or 1.5 MAC; or repetitively for three 10-minute periods at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 MAC before coronary occlusion. The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor blocker ICI 118,551 (0.2 mg/kg) or saline placebo was given in the absence or presence of 1.0 MAC desflurane. Myocardial infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium staining. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Myocardial infarct size was 61% +/- 5% in control experiments. Desflurane, administered continuously at 0.5 MAC for 30 minutes (52% +/- 4%) or 90 minutes (56% +/- 8%) had no effect, whereas 0.5 MAC of desflurane given repetitively reduced infarct size to 36% +/- 7%. Desflurane administered continuously for 30 minutes at 1.0 or 1.5 MAC reduced infarct size to 35% +/- 5% and 39% +/- 4%, respectively. Repetitive application at 1.0 MAC (37% +/- 6%) or 1.5 MAC (29% +/- 4%) and continuous administration of 1.5 MAC for 90 minutes (32% +/- 6%) did not result in further infarct size reduction. ICI 118,551 did not affect infarct size (53% +/- 2%) but abolished desflurane preconditioning (51% +/- 5%). CONCLUSION: beta(2)-Adrenergic receptors mediate desflurane-induced preconditioning. Desflurane-induced preconditioning has a threshold that can be lowered by repetitive administration.

Desflurane-induced postconditioning is mediated by beta-adrenergic signaling: role of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors, protein kinase A, and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic preconditioning is mediated by beta-adrenergic signaling. This study was designed to elucidate the role of beta-adrenergic signaling in desflurane-induced postconditioning. METHODS: Pentobarbital-anesthetized New Zealand White rabbits were subjected to 30 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion and were randomly assigned to receive vehicle (control), 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane, esmolol (30 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) for the initial 30 min of reperfusion or throughout reperfusion, the beta2-adrenergic receptor blocker ICI 118,551 (0.2 mg/kg), the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 (250 microg/kg), or the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor KN-93 (300 microg/kg) in the presence or absence of desflurane. Protein expression of protein kinase B, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, and phospholamban was measured by Western immunoblotting. Myocardial infarct size was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium staining. RESULTS: Infarct size was 57 +/- 5% in control. Desflurane postconditioning reduced infarct size to 36 +/- 5%. Esmolol given during the initial 30 min of reperfusion had no effect on infarct size (54 +/- 4%) but blocked desflurane-induced postconditioning (58 +/- 5%), whereas esmolol administered throughout reperfusion reduced infarct size in the absence or presence of desflurane to 42 +/- 6% and 41 +/- 7%, respectively. ICI 118,551 and KN-93 did not affect infarct size (62 +/- 4% and 62 +/- 6%, respectively) but abolished desflurane-induced postconditioning (57 +/- 5% and 64 +/- 3%, respectively). H-89 decreased infarct size in the absence (36 +/- 5%) or presence (33 +/- 5%) of desflurane. CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane-induced postconditioning is mediated by beta-adrenergic signaling. However, beta-adrenergic signaling displays a differential role in cardioprotection during reperfusion.

Role of the beta1-adrenergic pathway in anesthetic and ischemic preconditioning against myocardial infarction in the rabbit heart in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic and ischemic preconditioning share similar signal transduction pathways. The authors tested the hypothesis that the beta1-adrenergic signal transduction pathway mediates anesthetic and ischemic preconditioning in vivo. METHODS: Pentobarbital-anesthetized (30 mg/kg) rabbits (n = 96) were instrumented for measurement of systemic hemodynamics and subjected to 30 min of coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion. Sixty minutes before occlusion, vehicle (control), 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration desflurane, or sevoflurane, and esmolol (30.0 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) were administered for 30 min, respectively. Administration of a single 5-min cycle of ischemic preconditioning was instituted 35 min before coronary artery occlusion. In separate groups, the selective blocker esmolol or the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 (250 microg/kg) was given alone and in combination with desflurane, sevoflurane, and ischemic preconditioning. RESULTS: Baseline hemodynamics and area at risk were not significantly different between groups. Myocardial infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium staining) as a percentage of area at risk was 61 +/- 4% in control. Desflurane, sevoflurane, and ischemic preconditioning reduced infarct size to 34 +/- 2, 36 +/- 5, and 23 +/- 3%, respectively. Esmolol did not alter myocardial infarct size (65 +/- 5%) but abolished the protective effects of desflurane and sevoflurane (57 +/- 4 and 52 +/- 4%, respectively) and attenuated ischemic preconditioning (40 +/- 4%). H-89 did not alter infarct size (60 +/- 4%) but abolished preconditioning by desflurane (57 +/- 5%) and sevoflurane (61 +/- 1%). Ischemic preconditioning (24 +/- 7%) was not affected by H-89. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that anesthetic preconditioning is mediated by the beta1-adrenergic pathway, whereas this pathway is not essential for ischemic preconditioning. These results indicate important differences in the mechanisms of anesthetic and ischemic preconditioning.