RESUMO
PURPOSE: Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced hyperglycemia is a frequent issue, however there are no specific guidelines for this diabetes subtype. Although treat-to-target insulin is recommended in general to correct hyperglycemia, it remains unclear which treatment strategy has a positive effect on outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess whether treating GC-induced hyperglycemia improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for RCTs on adults reporting treatment and outcomes of GC-induced hyperglycemia since the beginning of the data bases until October 21, 2023. Glucose-lowering strategies as compared to usual care were investigated. RESULTS: We found 17 RCTs with 808 patients and included seven trials in the quantitative analysis. Patients with an intensive glucose-lowering strategy had lower standardized mean glucose levels of - 0.29 mmol/l (95%CI -0.64 to -0.05) compared to usual care group patients. There was no increase in hypoglycemic events in the intensively treated groups (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.70-1.17). Overall, we did not have enough trials reporting clinical outcomes for a quantitative analysis with only one trial reporting mortality. CONCLUSION: In GC-induced hyperglycemia, tight glucose control has a moderate effect on mean glucose levels with no apparent harmful effect regarding hypoglycemia. There is insufficient data whether insulin treatment improves clinical outcomes, and data on non-insulin based treatment regimens are currently too sparse to draw any conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered as CRD42020147409 at PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ) on April 28, 2020.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several trials and meta-analyses found a benefit of adjunct corticosteroids for community-acquired pneumonia with respect to short-term outcome, but there is uncertainty about longer-term health effects. Herein, we evaluated clinical outcomes at long term in patients participating in the STEP trial (Corticosteroid Treatment for Community-Acquired Pneumonia). METHODS: This predefined secondary analysis investigated 180-day outcomes in 785 adult patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia included in STEP, a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. The primary endpoint was time to death from any cause at 180 days verified by telephone interview. Additional secondary endpoints included pneumonia-related death, readmission, recurrent pneumonia, secondary infections, new hypertension, and new insulin dependence. RESULTS: From the originally included 785 patients, 727 were available for intention-to-treat analysis at day 180. There was no difference between groups with respect to time to death from any cause (HR for corticosteroid use 1.15, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.95, p = 0.601). Compared to placebo, corticosteroid-treated patients had significantly higher risks for recurrent pneumonia (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.29 to 5.12, p = 0.007), secondary infections (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.03, p = 0.003) and new insulin dependence (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.10 to 69.62, p = 0.041). There was no difference regarding pneumonia-related death, readmission and new hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with community-acquired pneumonia, corticosteroid use was associated with an increased risk for recurrent pneumonia, secondary infections and new insulin dependence at 180 days. Currently, it is uncertain whether these long-term adverse effects outweigh the short-term effects of corticosteroids in moderate CAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT00973154 before the recruitment of the first patient. First posted: September 9, 2009. Last update posted: April 21, 2015.
Assuntos
Coinfecção , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Hipertensão , Insulinas , Pneumonia , Adulto , Humanos , Prednisona , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/induzido quimicamente , Corticosteroides , Método Duplo-Cego , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Insulinas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adrenal function tests (Synacthen test) in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients are currently performed off dialysis. The study aimed to demonstrate equivalence of serum cortisol concentrations pre- and during HD, each for standard-dose (250 µg) and low-dose (1 µg) Synacthen test. METHODS: In a single-center cross-over diagnostic equivalence study, Synacthen tests were performed in four settings, in standard- and low-dose as well as pre- and during HD. Serum cortisol concentration was measured at 30 and 60 min after Synacthen administration, and additionally at 20 min in low dose test. Based on a multivariable linear mixed model the means of cortisol concentration on log-scale were estimated in each dose and test time combination. Differences in means were calculated and the TOST approach was applied to test for equivalence. Equivalence was proven if the 90% confidence interval of the difference of two cortisol means was entirely between - 0.22 and 0.22. RESULTS: In 28 chronic HD patients, serum cortisol concentrations at 30 and 60 min after Synacthen administration in both standard- and low-dose were shown to be equivalent pre- and during HD. In 10 of 56 low-dose tests, the cortisol peak was already reached after 20 min. However, cortisol concentrations at 20 and 30 min after low-dose Synacthen test pre- and during HD showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the adrenal function test may be carried out during an ongoing HD session, leading to a more patient-friendly performance of the test, less organizational effort and potentially earlier diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Adrenal , Hidrocortisona , Humanos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Adrenal/diagnóstico , Cosintropina , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of glucocorticoids in inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, there is uncertainty about the safe cessation of long-term systemic treatment, as data from prospective trials are largely missing. Due to potential disease relapse or glucocorticoid-induced hypocortisolism, the drug is often tapered to sub-physiological doses rather than stopped when the underlying disease is clinically stable, increasing the cumulative drug exposure. Conversely, the duration of exposure to glucocorticoids should be minimized to lower the risk of side effects. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the clinical noninferiority of abrupt glucocorticoid stop compared to tapering after ≥28 treatment days with ≥420 mg cumulative and ≥7.5 mg mean daily prednisone-equivalent dose. 573 adult patients treated systemically for various disorders will be included after their underlying disease has been stabilized. Prednisone in tapering doses or matching placebo is administered over 4 weeks. A 250 mg ACTH-test, the result of which will be revealed a posteriori, is performed at study inclusion; all patients are instructed on glucocorticoid stress cover dosing. Follow-up is for 6 months. The composite primary outcome measure is time to hospitalization, death, initiation of unplanned systemic glucocorticoid therapy, or adrenal crisis. Secondary outcomes include the individual components of the primary outcome, cumulative glucocorticoid doses, signs and symptoms of hypocortisolism, and the performance of the ACTH test in predicting the clinical outcome. Cox proportional hazard, linear, and logistic regression models will be used for statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: This trial aims to demonstrate the clinical noninferiority and safety of abrupt treatment cessation after ≥28 days of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in patients with stabilized underlying disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03153527; EUDRA-CT: 2020-005601-48 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03153527?term=NCT03153527&draw=2&rank=1.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Adrenal , Glucocorticoides , Adulto , Humanos , Insuficiência Adrenal/induzido quimicamente , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Suspensão de TratamentoRESUMO
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies have become the standard of care in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME), resulting in a remarkable decrease in disease-related vision loss. However, the need for regular injections places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and the healthcare system and improvements in vision may not be maintained long term. As a result of its drying potency and duration of action, brolucizumab, an intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy approved for the treatment of nAMD and DME, could decrease injection frequency for patients and provide an efficacious treatment; however, balancing its benefits and risks can be challenging. There have been reports of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients treated with brolucizumab, which, if left untreated, may result in severe vision loss. Recent evidence, however, indicates that early recognition of IOI and prompt and aggressive systemic corticosteroid treatment in response to posterior segment involvement can lead to favorable outcomes in these relatively rare but severe cases. A series of consensus meetings were conducted in 2022 between Swiss medical retina experts and diabetologists, discussing the current data for brolucizumab and exploring various challenges to its use, including the associated risk of IOI. The outcome is a collation of practical insights and guidance for ophthalmologists on the use of brolucizumab in patients with nAMD and DME, including patient selection and assessment, treatment regimen and monitoring, and the recognition and management of adverse events.
RESUMO
The effect of pain and analgesics on stress biomarkers is not well studied. We evaluated the effect of acute pain and analgesics on serum cortisol and copeptin in an experimental pain model in healthy volunteers. Healthy volunteers presented at 8 a.m. for an experimental pain stimulation. Cortisol and copeptin levels were measured before, during and after electrophysiological stimulation, first before and then during opioid delivery. Difference in biomarker levels compared to baseline levels was calculated, and potential influencing factors were evaluated by linear regression analysis. Cortisol decreased by 13% during the 10 min of rest at baseline, but copeptin did not change significantly. Cortisol had a median decrease of -24% or -83 nmol/l (-44 to -124 nmol/l, p = 0.0002) during the electrophysiological stimulation training session, while the median difference for copeptin was -22% or -1.01 pmol/l (-2.35 to 0.08 pmol/l, p = 0.0003). After administration of opioids, cortisol did not decrease but increased by 3% (p = 0.043), indicating an increasing opioids effect on cortisol. This effect was not visible for copeptin (median change -0.003 pmol/l (-0.50 to 0.24), p = 0.45). In this experimental pain model performed in the morning, moderate pain did not have a relevant effect on cortisol or copeptin levels, whereas opioids led to a discrete peak of cortisol.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01975753 (registered on November 5, 2013, before start of recruitment).
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Hidrocortisona , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Biomarcadores , Glicopeptídeos , Humanos , DorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with an increased risk for several chronic conditions and mortality. However, there are data in support of beneficial outcome in acute medical conditions such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), termed "obesity paradox". The aim of this study was to test the association of BMI with clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial of patients hospitalized with CAP. DESIGN AND METHODS: In total, 773 patients hospitalized with CAP were included in this study. Patients were stratified into four groups according to their baseline BMI (underweight <18.5, normal weight 18.5-25, overweight 25-30, and obese >30 kg/m2). The primary endpoint was time to clinical stability (TTCS). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, ICU admission rate, CAP complications, and duration of antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: BMI and TTCS had a U-shaped association with shortest TTCS among patients at an overweight BMI of 28 kg/m2. In patients with obesity, there was a trend towards reduced hazards to reach clinical stability when compared to patients with normal weight (HR 0.82; 95%CI, 0.67-1.02; p = 0.07). In underweight BMI group TTCS was prolonged by 1 day (HR 0.63; 95%CI, 0.45-0.89; p = 0.008). There was no difference in mortality or ICU admission rates between BMI groups (p > 0.05). While in the underweight BMI group the total duration of antibiotic treatment was prolonged by 2.5 days (95%CI, 0.88-4.20, p = 0.003), there was no difference in patients with obesity. CONCLUSIONS: The overweight BMI group had shortest time to clinical stability. While underweight patients face adverse clinical outcomes, there is neither beneficial, nor adverse outcome in patients with obesity hospitalized for CAP. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (registration no. NCT00973154).
Assuntos
Obesidade , Pneumonia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Sobrepeso/complicações , Pneumonia/complicações , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Magreza/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Latent class analysis (LCA) has identified subgroups with meaningful treatment implications in acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed a secondary analysis of three studies to assess whether LCA can identify clinically distinct subgroups in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and whether the treatment effect of adjunctive corticosteroids differs between subgroups. METHODS: LCA was performed on baseline clinical and biomarker data from the Ovidius trial (n=304) and the Steroids in Pneumonia (STEP) trial (n=727), both randomised controlled trials investigating adjunctive corticosteroid treatment in CAP, and the observational TripleP cohort (n=201). Analyses were conducted independently in two cohorts (Ovidius-TripleP combined and the STEP trial). In both cohorts, differences in clinical outcomes and response to adjunctive corticosteroid treatment were examined between subgroups identified through LCA. RESULTS: A two-class model fitted both cohorts best. Class 2 patients had more signs of systemic inflammation compared to class 1. In both cohorts, length of stay was longer and in-hospital mortality rate was higher in class 2. In the Ovidius trial, corticosteroids reduced the median length of stay in class 2 (6.5 versus 9.5â days) but not in class 1 (p-value for interaction=0.02). In the STEP trial, there was no significant interaction for length of stay. We found no significant interaction between class assignment and adjunctive corticosteroid treatment for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In two independent cohorts, LCA identified two classes of CAP patients with different clinical characteristics and outcomes. Given the different response to adjunctive corticosteroids in the Ovidius trial, LCA might provide a useful basis to improve patient selection for future trials.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced hyperglycemia is a frequent adverse effect in hospitalized patients. Guidelines recommend insulin treatment to a target range of 6-10 mmol/L (108-180 mg/dl), but efficacies of particular regimes have not been well-studied. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, hospitalized patients receiving GCs at the medical ward were analyzed by treatment (basal-bolus vs. bolus-only vs. pre-mixed insulin) and compared to a non-insulin-therapy reference group. Coefficients of glucose variation (CV), percentage of glucose readings in range (4-10 mmol/L (72-180 mg/dl)) and hypoglycemia (< 4 mmol/L (< 72 mg/dl)) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 2424 hospitalized patients receiving systemic GCs, 875 (36%) developed GC-induced hyperglycemia. 427 patients (17%) had a previous diagnosis of diabetes. Adjusted relative risk ratios (RRR) for the top tertile of CV (> 29%) were 1.47 (95% Cl 1.01-2.15) for bolus-only insulin, 4.77 (95% CI 2.67-8.51) for basal-bolus insulin, and 4.98 (95% CI 2.02-12.31) for premixed insulin, respectively. Adjusted RRR for percentages of glucose readings in range were 0.98 (95% Cl 0.97-0.99) for basal-bolus insulin, 0.99 (95% Cl 0.98-1.00) for premixed insulin, and 1.01 (95% Cl 1.00-1.01) for bolus-only insulin, respectively. Adjusted RRR for hypoglycemia was 13.17 (95% Cl 4.35-39.90) for basal-bolus insulin, 8.92 (95% Cl 2.60-30.63) for premixed insulin, and 2.99 (95% Cl 1.01-8.87) for bolus-only insulin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines recommend a basal-bolus regimen for treatment of GC-induced hyperglycemia, but we found similar outcomes with pre-mixed and bolus-only insulin regimens. As GC-induced hyperglycemia is a frequent issue in hospitalized patients, it might be reasonable to prospectively study the ideal regimen.
Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Glucocorticoides/farmacologia , Hiperglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Secondary adrenal insufficiency is a frequent issue in patients with renal replacement therapy. There are concerns about metabolism and clearance for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol in addition to hemoconcentration as confounding factors during hemodialysis (HD). Therefore, ACTH testing is currently performed before or in between HD sessions. This review of the literature aims to evaluate the current evidence for validity of testing for adrenal insufficiency in patients on chronic renal replacement therapy. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed database for interventional and observational clinical trials was performed. Case reports and reviews were excluded. The search included all articles published until July 2020. RESULTS: Of 218 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies involving 381 participants were included. Seven studies performed an ACTH test before HD or in between HD sessions. There was no data available regarding ACTH testing during HD. But there was evidence of decreased cortisol levels during HD as compared to afterwards. All included 16 studies measured basal cortisol, and seven studies performed an ACTH test. Seven trials had comparable data of baseline cortisol for a quantitative analysis. Standardized mean difference of overall cortisol was 0.18 nmol/l (95%CI - 0.08 to 0.44) in the case group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing renal replacement therapy, basal serum cortisol values are comparable to healthy volunteers. There is limited data on the validity of stimulated cortisol in these patients, especially during HD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration no. CRD42020199245 .
Assuntos
Insuficiência Adrenal/sangue , Insuficiência Adrenal/diagnóstico , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/sangue , Hidrocortisona/sangue , Diálise Renal , Testes de Função do Córtex Suprarrenal , Glândulas Suprarrenais/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Adrenal/fisiopatologia , HumanosRESUMO
Glucocorticoids are frequently prescribed in inflammatory diseases and have recently experienced a boom in the treatment of COVID-19. Small studies have shown an effect of glucocorticoids on inflammatory marker levels, but definitive proof is lacking. We investigated the influence of prednisone on inflammatory biomarkers in a previous multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that compared a 7-day treatment course of 50-mg prednisone to placebo in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. We compared levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), leukocyte and neutrophil count between patients with and without glucocorticoid treatment at baseline and on days 3, 5, and 7 and at discharge by Wilcoxon tests and analysis of variance. A total of 356 patient data sets in the prednisone group and 355 in the placebo group were available for analysis. Compared to placebo, use of prednisone was associated with reductions in levels of CRP on days 3, 5, and 7 (mean difference of 46%, P < .001 for each time point). For PCT, no such difference was observed. Leukocyte and neutrophil count were higher in the prednisone group at all time points (mean difference of 27% for leukocytes and 33% for neutrophils, P <.001 for all time points). We conclude that after administration of glucocorticoids in community-acquired pneumonia, patients had lower CRP levels and increased leukocyte and neutrophil count as compared to the placebo group. PCT levels were not different between treatment groups. PCT levels thus may more appropriately mirror the resolution of infection compared to more traditional inflammatory markers.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Contagem de Leucócitos/métodos , Pneumonia , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/sangue , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pneumonia/sangue , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
AIM OF THE STUDY: The internal validity of double blinding in randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) has become a target of criticism. The goal of this study was to investigate (a) how accurately the patients and their treating physicians were able to guess their assigned treatment, and (b) predictors for an accurate guess. METHODS: Data on treatment estimation from patients (n = 382) and their physicians (n = 358 guesses) in an RCT investigating the role of adjunct prednisone for community-acquired pneumonia in a tertiary care setting were analysed. At discharge, patients and their physicians had to guess whether they had been assigned to the prednisone or to the placebo group. The alternative possibility was “uncertain”. Percentages and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the proportion of patients guessing correctly. Chance finding was defined as having 50% or less correct guesses. To test for predictors for prednisone treatment guess, a mixed effects logistic regression model was performed. RESULTS: In the prednisone group, 28.9% (55/190; 95% CI 22.6–36.0%) of the patients made a correct guess and the majority (61.6%, 117/190) was uncertain. In the placebo group, 13.0% (25/192; 95% CI 8.8–18.8%) guessed correctly, with the majority being uncertain (69.8%, 134/192). Physicians guessed correctly in 48.3% (87/180, 95% CI 40.8–55.9%) of cases in the prednisone group and in 66.3% (118/178, 95% CI 58.8–73.2%) of cases in the placebo group, which was above chance for the placebo group. The physicians were uncertain in 21.7% (39/180) of cases in the prednisone group, and in 15.2% (27/178) of cases in the placebo group. Significant predictors for guessing prednisone were the occurrence of hyperglycaemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.77, 95% CI 2.39–5.95; p<0.001) and a shorter time to clinical stability (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91–0.99; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that patient blinding was achieved in this study. Physicians made correct guesses more often than patients. Treatment estimation by both patients and physicians was led not only by the expectations of treatment effects of the study drug but also by known side effects of prednisone. Trial registration no.: NCT00973154  .
Assuntos
Método Duplo-Cego , Médicos/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/psicologia , Sujeitos da Pesquisa/psicologia , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Placebos , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , SuíçaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids have been shown to improve outcome in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, glucocorticoids have potential side-effects, and treatment response may vary. It is thus crucial to select patients with high likelihood to respond favourably. In critical illness, cosyntropin testing is recommended to identify patients in need for glucocorticoids. We investigated whether cosyntropin testing predicts treatment response to glucocorticoids in CAP. DESIGN: Predefined secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients with CAP. MEASUREMENTS: We performed 1 µg cosyntropin tests in a randomized trial comparing prednisone 50 mg for 7 days to placebo. We investigated whether subgroups based on baseline and stimulated cortisol levels responded differently to glucocorticoids with regard to time to clinical stability (TTCS) and other outcomes by inclusion of interaction terms into statistical models. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients in the prednisone and 309 patients in the placebo group were evaluated. Neither basal cortisol nor a Δcortisol <250 nmol/L after stimulation nor the combination of basal cortisol and Δcortisol predicted treatment response as measured by TTCS (all P for interaction >0.05). Similarly, we found no effect modification with respect to mortality, rehospitalization, antibiotic treatment duration or CAP-related complications (all P for interaction >0.05). However, glucocorticoids had a stronger effect on shortening length of hospital stay in patients with a baseline cortisol of ≥938 nmol/L (P for interaction = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Neither baseline nor stimulated cortisol after low-dose cosyntropin testing at a dose of 1 µg predicted glucocorticoid responsiveness in mild to moderate CAP. A treatment decision for or against adjunct glucocorticoids in CAP should not be made depending on cortisol values or cosyntropin testing results.
Assuntos
Cosintropina/análise , Glucocorticoides/farmacologia , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Adulto , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Acute systemic inflammatory conditions are accompanied by profound alterations of metabolism. However, the role of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), a recently identified central regulator of metabolism, is largely unknown in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This study aims to characterise the pattern of FGF21 in pneumonia and associations with disease severity and outcome.This is a secondary analysis of two independent multicentre randomised controlled trials in patients presenting to the emergency department with CAP. Primary and secondary efficacy parameters included 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability and duration of antibiotic treatment.A total of 509 patients were included in the analysis. FGF21 levels at admission strongly correlated with disease severity, as measured by the Pneumonia Severity Index. Increased levels of FGF21 were associated with prolonged time to clinical stability, antibiotic treatment and hospitalisation. FGF21 levels at admission were significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors, yielding a 1.61-fold increased adjusted odds ratio of 30-day mortality (95% CI 1.21-2.14; p=0.001). Moreover, FGF21 was found to identify patients for 30-day mortality with superior discriminative power compared with routine diagnostic markers.Moderate-to-severe CAP patients with higher levels of FGF21 were at increased risk for clinical instability, prolonged hospitalisation and 30-day all-cause mortality.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/metabolismo , Fatores de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Pneumonia/metabolismo , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Comorbidade , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are a hallmark of the immune response in inflammatory diseases. However, the role of NETs in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is unknown. This study aims to characterise the impact of NETs on clinical outcomes in pneumonia.This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled, multicentre trial. Patients with CAP were randomly assigned to either 50â mg prednisone or placebo for 7â days. The primary end-point was time to clinical stability; main secondary end-points were length of hospital stay and mortality.In total, 310 patients were included in the analysis. Levels of cell-free nucleosomes as surrogate markers of NETosis were significantly increased at admission and declined over 7â days. NETs were significantly associated with reduced hazards of clinical stability and hospital discharge in multivariate adjusted analyses. Moreover, NETs were associated with a 3.8-fold increased adjusted odds ratio of 30-day mortality. Prednisone treatment modified circulatory NET levels and was associated with beneficial outcome.CAP is accompanied by pronounced NET formation. Patients with elevated serum NET markers were at higher risk for clinical instability, prolonged length of hospital stay and 30-day all-cause mortality. NETs represent a novel marker for outcome and a possible target for adjunct treatments of pneumonia.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Armadilhas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Sobrevida , Suíça , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypernatraemia is common in inpatients and is associated with substantial morbidity. Its differential diagnosis is challenging, and delayed treatment may have devastating consequences. The most important hormone for the regulation of water homeostasis is arginine vasopressin, and copeptin, the C-terminal portion of the precursor peptide of arginine vasopressin, might be a reliable new parameter with which to assess the underlying cause of hypernatraemia. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, observational study conducted in two tertiary referral centres in Switzerland, 92 patients with severe hyperosmolar hypernatraemia (Na+ > 155 mmol/L) were included. After a standardised diagnostic evaluation, the underlying cause of hypernatraemia was identified and copeptin levels were measured. RESULTS: The most common aetiology of hypernatraemia was dehydration (DH) (n = 65 [71%]), followed by salt overload (SO) (n = 20 [22%]), central diabetes insipidus (CDI) (n = 5 [5%]) and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) (n = 2 [2%]). Low urine osmolality was indicative for patients with CDI and NDI (P < 0.01). Patients with CDI had lower copeptin levels than patients with DH or SO (both P < 0.01) or those with NDI. Copeptin identified CDI with an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00), and a cut-off value ≤ 4.4pmol/L showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% to predict CDI. Similarly, urea values were lower in CDI than in DH or SO (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) or NDI. The AUC for diagnosing CDI was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-1.00), and a cut-off value < 5.05 mmol/L showed high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of CDI (98% and 100%, respectively). Copeptin and urea could not differentiate hypernatraemia induced by DH from that induced by SO (P = 0.66 and P = 0.30, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Copeptin and urea reliably identify patients with CDI and are therefore helpful tools for therapeutic management in patients with severe hypernatraemia. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01456533 . Registered on 20 October 2011.
Assuntos
Glicopeptídeos/análise , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Glicopeptídeos/sangue , Glicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipernatremia/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Escore Fisiológico Agudo Simplificado , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , SuíçaRESUMO
Background: Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and harms of adjunctive corticosteroids in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using individual patient data from randomized, placebo-controlled trials and to explore subgroup differences. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and trial registers (all through July 2017). Data from 1506 individual patients in 6 trials were analyzed using uniform outcome definitions. We investigated prespecified effect modifiers using multivariable hierarchical regression, adjusting for pneumonia severity, age, and clustering effects. Results: Within 30 days of randomization, 37 of 748 patients (5.0%) assigned to corticosteroids and 45 of 758 patients (5.9%) assigned to placebo died (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], .46 to 1.21; P = .24). Time to clinical stability and length of hospital stay were reduced by approximately 1 day with corticosteroids (-1.03 days; 95% CI, -1.62 to -.43; P = .001 and -1.15 days; 95% CI, -1.75 to -.55; P < .001, respectively). More patients with corticosteroids had hyperglycemia (160 [22.1%] vs 88 [12.0%]; aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.90; P < .001) and CAP-related rehospitalization (33 [5.0%] vs 18 [2.7%]; aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.32; P = .04). We did not find significant effect modification by CAP severity or degree of inflammation. Conclusions: Adjunct corticosteroids for patients hospitalized with CAP reduce time to clinical stability and length of hospital stay by approximately 1 day without a significant effect on overall mortality but with an increased risk for CAP-related rehospitalization and hyperglycemia.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/etiologia , Razão de Chances , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of adrenal crisis and panhypopituitarism in patients with septic shock is difficult but crucial for outcome. CASE: A 66-year-old woman with metastasized breast cancer presented to the ED with respiratory insufficiency and septic shock after a 2-day history of the flu. After transfer to the ICU, corticosteroids were started in addition to antibiotics, as the patient was vasopressor-nonresponsive. Diabetes insipidus was diagnosed due to polyuria and treated with 4 mg desmopressin. Thereafter, norepinephrine could be tapered rapidly. On day 2, basal cortisol was 136 nmol/L with an increase to 579 nmol/L in low-dose cosyntropin testing. Polyuria had not developed again. Therefore, corticosteroids were stopped. On day 3, the patient developed again nausea, vomiting, and polyuria. Adrenal crisis and diabetes insipidus were postulated. Corticosteroids and desmopressin were restarted. Further testing confirmed panhypopituitarism. MRI showed a new sellar metastasis. After 2 weeks, stimulated cortisol in cosyntropin testing reached only 219 nmol/l, confirming adrenal insufficiency. DISCUSSION: The time course showed that the adrenal glands took 2 weeks to atrophy after loss of pituitary ACTH secretion. Therefore, a misleading result of the cosyntropin test in the initial phase with low basal cortisol and allegedly normal response to exogenous ACTH may be seen. Cosyntropin testing in the critically ill should be interpreted with caution and in the corresponding clinical setting.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A reliable biomarker for quantifying pain or hyperalgesia has yet to be found. A surrogate marker of arginine vasopressin, copeptin, is elevated in a number of states of physiological and psychological stress and may have a role in quantifying pain and/or hyperalgesia. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate copeptin as a biomarker for pain or hyperalgesia developing after 120âmin of sustained electrical stimulation. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomised, double-blinded, crossover trial. SETTING: Single, tertiary university hospital from September 2014 to January 2015. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 16 healthy, opioid-naïve white men with no confounding medication or history of pain. INTERVENTIONS: Copeptin and cortisol were measured five times during an established model of transdermal electrical stimulation designed to assess pain and hyperalgesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in copeptin concentration after 120âmin of sustained electrical stimulation. Secondary outcomes were copeptin and cortisol concentrations after a subsequent period of rest and analyses of copeptin and cortisol concentrations were made in high-dose and low-dose fentanyl groups separately. RESULTS: Total copeptin concentrations were not significantly elevated after 120âmin [9.15âpmolâl (interquartile ranges (IQR), 3.45 to 35.45âpmolâl); Pâ=â0.150] compared with baseline [6.15âpmolâl (IQR, 3.60 to 10.62âpmolâl)]. In the high-dose fentanyl group, there was a significant increase in copeptin within individuals [Pâ=â0.001; median, 37.9âpmolâl (IQR, 8.1 to 62âpmolâl)] after 120âmin, and in the low-dose fentanyl group a significant decrease in copeptin concentrations within individuals [Pâ=â0.006; median, 4.7âpmolâl (IQR, 3.13 to 9.35âpmolâl)]. No correlation between copeptin concentration and either the area under the pain curve or area under the hyperalgesia curve could be found, indicating that the observed differences may be due to other fentanyl-mediated effects. CONCLUSION: Copeptin concentrations do not appear to be associated directly with pain and hyperalgesia. Instead, some fentanyl-mediated effect or effects appear to have greatly increased copeptin concentrations from baseline to 120âmin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02252458.
Assuntos
Glicopeptídeos/sangue , Hiperalgesia/sangue , Hiperalgesia/diagnóstico , Dor/sangue , Dor/diagnóstico , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/efeitos adversos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hyponatraemia is common and its differential diagnosis is challenging. Commonly used diagnostic algorithms have limited diagnostic accuracy. Copeptin, the c-terminal portion of the precursor peptide of arginine vasopressin might help in the differential diagnosis of hyponatraemia. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre observational study. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 298 patients admitted with profound hypoosmolar hyponatraemia (Na < 125 mmol/l) were evaluated. Three experts uninvolved in the patients' care determined the aetiology of hyponatraemia after standardized diagnostic evaluation. RESULTS: Hyponatraemia differential diagnoses were as follows: syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD), 106 patients (35·6%); 'diuretic-induced', 72 (24·2%); 'hypovolaemic', 59 (19·8%); 'hypervolaemic', 33 (11·1%); primary polydipsia (PP), 24 (8·1%); and cortisol deficiency, 4 (1·3%). Copeptin levels <3·9 pmol/l identified patients with PP with high specificity (91%). Further, copeptin levels >84 pmol/l were highly predictive for hypovolaemic hyponatraemia (specificity: 90%). Urinary sodium levels and copeptin/urinary sodium ratio in patients with SIAD were higher and lower as compared to other hyponatraemia aetiologies (P < 0·0001). However, the specificity to identify SIAD was moderate for both parameters (31% and 61%). Fractional uric acid excretion (FEUA ) and fractional urea excretion (FEurea ) were higher in patients with SIAD compared to other hyponatraemia aetiologies (both P < 0·0001). FEurea values >55% and FEUA values >12% had a specificity of 96% and 77% to detect patients with SIAD. These results remained similar after excluding patients taking diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is only limited diagnostic utility of copeptin in the differential diagnosis of profound hyponatraemia. Very low copeptin levels are seen in patients with PP and highest copeptin levels in hypovolaemic hyponatraemia. To discriminate between SIAD and other hyponatraemia aetiologies, FEurea and FEUA levels are valuable irrespective of diuretics use.