Combined Targeted Muscle Reinnervation With Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Decreases Long-Term Narcotic Use in Amputees: A Case Control Study.

PURPOSE: Combined targeted muscle reinnervation with regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces ("TMRpni") is a recently described nerve management strategy that leverages beneficial elements of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of TMRpni on long-term opioid consumption after amputation. We hypothesize that TMRpni decreases chronic opioid consumption in amputees. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent TMRpni between 2019 and 2021. These patients were age-matched at a 1:1 ratio with a control group of patients who underwent amputation without TMRpni. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 28.0. RESULTS: Thirty-one age-matched pairs of patients in the TMRpni and control groups were included. At 30 days after surgery, there was no significant difference in number of patients who required an additional refill of their opioid prescriptions (45% vs 55%, P = 0.45) or patients who continued to actively use opioids (36% vs 42%, P = 0.60). However, at 90 days after surgery, there was a significantly lower number of patients from the TMRpni group who reported continued opioid use compared with the control group (10% vs 32%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that TMRpni may translate to decreased rates of chronic opiate use. Continued study is indicated to optimize TMRpni techniques and patient selection and to determine its long-term efficacy.

Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Consulting Fee Payments in Plastic Surgery and Related Specialties.

BACKGROUND: The Physician Payments Sunshine Act was enacted to increase transparency regarding physician and industry financial interests. Consulting fee payments constitute a large proportion of these financial relationships. The authors hypothesized that there are discrepancies among industry-derived consulting payments to medical and surgical specialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of consulting fee payments to plastic surgery and related specialties. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the publicly available Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Program database for 2018. Consulting fee payments to physicians practicing in dermatology, internal medicine, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery were isolated and analyzed to identify discrepancies in consulting payments among these specialties and within plastic surgery. RESULTS: A total of $250,518,240 was paid in consulting fees to specialties analyzed, with the largest average payment made to orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. Nearly half of physicians were paid at least $5000 for consulting fees in 2018. Most payments were not associated with contextual information. Among U.S. plastic surgeons, 4.2% held financial relationships with corporations and were likely to be paid more when consulting for small companies. CONCLUSIONS: Consulting payments make up a large proportion of payments included in the Open Payments Database. Although sex, state, company type, and sole proprietorship did not correlate with higher pay, plastic surgeons who consulted for small companies were paid more per payment than those working for large companies. Future studies are warranted to determine whether these industry financial relationships impact physician behavior.

A Guide to Industry Payments and an Algorithm for Their Management.

BACKGROUND: The Open Payments database was created to increase transparency of industry payment relationships within medicine. The current literature often examines only 1 year of the database. In this study, the authors use 5 years of data to show trends among industry payments to plastic surgeons from 2014 to 2018. In addition, the authors lay out the basics of conflict-of-interest reporting for the new plastic surgeon. Finally, the authors suggest an algorithm for the responsible management of industry relationships. METHODS: This study analyzed nonresearch payments made to plastic surgeons from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Descriptive statistics were calculated using R Statistical Software and visualized using Tableau. RESULTS: A total of 304,663 payments totaling $140,889,747 were made to 8148 plastic surgeons; 41 percent ($58.28 million) was paid to 50 plastic surgeons in the form of royalty or license payments. With royalties excluded, average and median payments were $276 and $25. The average yearly total per physician was $2028. Of the 14 payment categories, 95 percent of the total amount paid was attributable payments in one of six categories. Seven hundred thirty companies reported payments to plastic surgeons from 2014 to 2018; 15 companies (2 percent) were responsible for 80 percent ($66.34 million) of the total sum paid. Allergan was responsible for $24.45 million (29.6 percent) of this amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although discussions on the proper management of industry relationships continue to evolve, the data in this study illustrate the importance of managing industry relationships. The simple guidelines suggested create a basis for managing industry relationships in the career of the everyday plastic surgeon.

Addressing Psychosocial Stressors through a Community-Academic Partnership between a Museum and a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Qualitative Study.

Psychosocial stressors are prevalent and linked to worse health outcomes, but are less frequently addressed than physically apparent medical conditions at primary care visits. Through a community-academic partnership between an art museum and a federally qualified health center, we developed an innovative museum-based intervention and evaluated its feasibility and acceptability among diverse, underserved patients and its perceived effects on psychosocial stressors. Guided by experiential learning and constructivist approaches, the intervention consisted of a single, three-hour session that incorporated group discussions and interactive components, including art-viewing, sketching, and object-handling. We used post-intervention focus groups to elicit feedback qualitatively. From July 2017 to January 2018, 25 patients participated. Focus groups revealed that the intervention exhibited therapeutic qualities, fostered self-reflection, catalyzed social connectivity, and functioned as a gateway to community resources. These findings can guide future research and development of community-based interventions to target the growing burden of psychosocial stressors among the underserved.

Evaluating the Effects of Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Craniosynostosis: National Trends in Hospitalization Charges and Length of Stay in Craniosynostosis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways are multimodal approaches aimed at minimizing postoperative surgical stress, reducing hospitalization time, and lowering hospitalization charges. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery is broadly and increasingly implemented in hospitals across the country. Early reports have shown ERAS to reduce length of stay (LOS) after commonly performed pediatric surgeries. However, LOS and hospital charges after craniosynostosis have not been studied. We hypothesized that extended hospital LOS is correlated with increased hospitalization charges associated with open cranial vault surgery (CVS) and that over a multiyear timeframe, LOS and cost would decrease because of the increased adoption of ERAS in pediatric surgery. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database was analyzed from January 2007 to December 2014. All patients who were diagnosed with craniosynostosis who underwent CVS were included. Variables of interest included demographic data, hospital characteristics, hospitalization data, and total hospital charges. Univariate and generalized linear regression models were used to examine associations between selected variables and the hospitalization charges. RESULTS: There were 54,583 patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis between 2007 and 2014. Of these patients, 22,916 (41.9%) received CVS. The median total hospital charge was $66,605.77 (interquartile range, $44,095.60-$101,071.17). The median LOS was 3 days (interquartile range, 2-4 days), and there was no significant change in LOS by year (P = 0.979). However, despite a stable LOS, mean hospitalization charge increased significantly by year (P < 0.01). Regression analysis demonstrated the proportion of eligible patients who underwent CVS substantially increased over the selected timeframe (P < 0.01). Most procedures were performed in urban teaching hospitals and high-volume hospitals. There was no significant association between hospital volume and hospitalization charge (P = 0.331). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing hospital charges despite constant LOS for craniosynostosis CVS procedures was observed between 2007 and 2014. Although ERAS has reduced LOS for common pediatric surgical procedures, no decrease in LOS for CVS has been observed. The charges significantly increased over the same period including high-volume centers. Further study to safely lower LOS and hospitalization charges for this procedure may reduce the overall health care burden.

Industry Payments by Allergan, Inc to Plastic Surgery and Related Specialties in 2018.

In 2014, payments to medical providers from drug/device manufacturers were made public through the Open Payments Database. Although previous studies have used the Open Payments Database to describe relationships between specialties and industry, few have evaluated specific companies and the effect of their contributions. As a large contributor to industry payments in plastic surgery, Allergan, Inc represents a significant source of potential financial conflicts of interest in the field. In this study, we aimed to describe the quantity, type, and specific products associated with Allergan's payments to both plastic surgeons and physicians of other specialties. In 2018, Allergan paid a total of $48,484,163 in 397,225 payments to 90,386 physicians. Psychiatry and neurology received $11,867,861 in payments, the largest of any specialty, whereas internal medicine received the largest number of individual payments. Plastic surgeons made the most per physician ($3025). Most payments made to plastic surgeons were categorized as "gifts." Payments made in relation to Botox were predominantly made to neurologists, whereas most payments attributed to Natrelle breast implants were made to plastic surgeons (74.4%). Surprisingly, 18.2% of Natrelle payments were made to family medicine physicians. Further study is needed to fully understand the implications of the financial contributions revealed in this study.

Utilization of surgical treatment for sleep apnea: A study of health disparities.

OBJECTIVE: Barriers to surgical treatment for sleep apnea remain understudied. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether specific demographic and socioeconomic characteristics are associated with whether or not patients receive surgery for sleep apnea management. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was analyzed for 2007-2014. Patients aged 18 or older with primary or secondary diagnoses of sleep apnea were selected. Patients were sub-categorized by whether they received related soft-tissue removal or skeletal modifying procedures. Age, race, gender, region, insurance, comorbidities, procedure type, and procedure setting were analyzed between surgical and nonsurgical groups. RESULTS: A total of 449,705 patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of sleep apnea were identified, with 27,841 (5.8%) receiving surgical intervention. Compared with the non-surgical group, patients in the surgical cohort were more likely to be younger, male (74.4% vs. 59.0%), Hispanic (10.2% vs. 6.2%), Asian (3.6% vs. 1.0%) (p < 0.001), and have less clinical comorbidities. Those receiving surgery were more likely to be in the highest income bracket (36.1% versus 25.1%) and utilize private insurance (76.3% vs. 50.8%). Soft-tissue surgeries comprised 88.5% of total procedures while skeletal modifying procedures constituted 11.5% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified multiple demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical discrepancies in the utilization of surgical versus nonsurgical management of sleep apnea in the United States. Future studies should examine the causes for these health disparities in the ultimate effort to provide more equitable healthcare in the United States.

Understanding Breast Implant Illness, Before and After Explantation: A Patient-Reported Outcomes Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant illness (BII) after aesthetic breast augmentation remains a poorly defined syndrome encompassing a wide spectrum of symptoms. While previously published series have observed overall symptomatic improvement after breast implant removal, there is a lack of studies evaluating changes in specific symptoms over time. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of symptoms associated with BII, and to evaluate how these symptoms change after removal of breast implants and total capsulectomy (explantation). We hypothesized that patients presenting with BII would experience both immediate and sustained improvement in constitutional symptoms after explantation. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent explantation by a single surgeon over 2 years was conducted. Repeated-measures analysis of variance accounting for dependency was used to compare symptoms before and after surgery. Multivariate analyses and linear regression models were used to examine the impact of patient- and implant-related factors on changes in symptoms. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty patients met inclusion criteria. Mean preoperative survey score (26.19 ± 11.24) was significantly different from mean postoperative survey score at less than 30 days (9.49 ± 7.56) and greater than 30 days (9.46 ± 7.82, P < 0.001). Patients with a BMI greater than 30 or those with clinically detectable contracture on examination showed greater improvement on their survey scores (P = 0.039, 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although BII encompasses a large range of symptoms, subjects in this study demonstrated significant and sustained improvement in 11 common symptom domains. This improvement was demonstrable within the first 30 days postoperatively and was maintained beyond 30 days. The study demonstrated a strong association of explantation and specific symptom improvement within the patient population studied. Future investigation will further elucidate possible biologic phenomena to better characterize the pathophysiology and mechanism of BII.

National Trends in Hospitalization Charges for Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is significant cost variation among patients undergoing autologous free flap breast reconstruction. Previous studies hypothesize that factors like length of stay and hospital volume are key drivers of cost; however, how these factors have affected cost have not been well studied. Our study analyzes the factors influencing hospital charges relating to these procedures and their trends over a multiyear time frame. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database was analyzed from January 2009 to December 2014. All female patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer or at a high risk for breast cancer who underwent autologous free flap breast reconstruction were included. Variables of interest included demographic data, hospital characteristics, hospitalization data, and total hospital charges. Univariate and generalized linear models were used to examine associations between selected variables and the hospitalization charges, as well as trends in these factors over the years included. RESULTS: There were 659,220 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer or had a high risk of breast cancer between 2009 and 2014. Of these patients, 20,050 (3.0%) received autologous free flap breast reconstruction and were included. The mean total hospital charge was US $98,839.33 (SD = US $61,532.04). Regression analysis showed that the proportion of procedures to the total population of potential patients significantly increased over the selected time frame (P = 0.02). The average total charges also increased significantly (P < 0.01), despite a decrease in length of stay (P = 0.05). Procedures performed in the west were associated with significantly higher charges when compared with other regions (US $147,855.42, P < 0.001). Higher hospital charges were also associated with urban hospitals, regardless of teaching status. CONCLUSIONS: The overall demand for the autologous free flap breast reconstruction is increasing within the patient population, in conjunction with increasing associated hospital charges. This increase in cost is seen despite an overall decrease in length of stay, originally thought to be the main contributor to regional cost variation. Further studies should be done to develop strategies to better target increased hospitalization charges, because the overall health care burden of this procedure is expected to rise if current trends continue.

Outcomes and Predictors of Revision Labiaplasty and Clitoroplasty after Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common gender-affirming procedure for transfeminine patients. Patients undergoing this procedure may require revision labiaplasty and clitoroplasty. This study describes complications and outcomes from the largest reported cohort in the United States to undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty with subsequent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of a single surgeon's experience with penile inversion vaginoplasty with or without revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty between July of 2014 and June of 2016 in a cohort of gender-diverse patients assigned male at birth. Patient demographic data, complications, and quality of life data were collected. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were completed. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty. Of these, 28 patients (23.9 percent) underwent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty, with nine patients (7.7 percent) undergoing both procedures. Patients who underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty necessitating revision were significantly more likely to have granulation tissue (p = 0.006), intravaginal scarring (p < 0.001), and complete vaginal stenosis (p = 0.008). The majority of patients who underwent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty reported satisfaction with their final surgical outcome (82.4 percent) and resolution of their genital-related dysphoria (76.5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed minor postoperative complications following penile inversion vaginoplasty were more likely to require revision surgery to address functional and aesthetic concerns. Patients responded with high levels of satisfaction following revision procedures, with the majority of patients reporting resolution of genital-related dysphoria. Transfeminine patients who undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty should be counseled on the possibility of revisions during their postoperative course. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Analysis of current financial relationships between emergency physicians and industry.

OBJECTIVE: Characterize the frequency and magnitude of all categories of publicly reported financial payments made to emergency physicians (EPs) in the United States (U.S.) in 2017. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of the 2017 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database was exempt from Institutional Review Board Review. We calculated descriptive statistics of the frequency, type, and amount (medians) of general, research, and ownerships transactions made to EPs from industry, described regional differences of median payments to EPs, and characterized the drugs or devices most commonly associated with transactions. RESULTS: In 2017, among 40,899 practicing U.S. EPs, 14,447 (35.4%) received 51,870 general payments from industry totaling $12,870,832. The median per-physician payment was $18.30 (interquartile range [IQR], $13.63-$60.90). The most frequent transaction was food and beverage (89.6%), though most payments by dollar amount were related to speaker and consulting fees (74.5%). Antithrombotics were the most frequently drug or device associated with transactions. Only 35 (0.08%) and 20 (0.05%) EPs had research and ownership relationships with industry, respectively. A significant difference was observed in median payments per physician across all U.S. Census regions (p < 0.01) except when comparing Northeast and West (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Over one-third of U.S. EPs had general payments from industry in 2017, while <1% of EPs had either research and ownership payments during this time period. Consistent with previous research, most payments to EPs are of low monetary value. Antithrombotics remain the most frequent drug associated with payments to EPs.

Electronic health records and technical assistance to improve quality of primary care: Lessons for regional extension centers.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act apportioned $643 million for a Health Information Technology Extension Program, which established Regional Extension Centers (RECs) to support the implementation and use of electronic health records (EHRs). PROBLEM: Little is known, however, about how RECs should assist in EHR implementation and how they should structure ongoing support. GOALS: The purpose of this paper is to describe physicians' experiences with the Primary Care Information Project (PCIP), an REC run by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. STRATEGY: We interviewed 17 physicians enrolled in PCIP to understand the role of the EHRon quality of care and their experience with technical assistance from PCIP. RESULTS: All physicians stated that they felt that the EHR improved the quality of care they delivered to their patients particularly because it helped them track patients. All the physicians found technical assistance helpful but most wanted ongoing assistance months or years after they adopted the EHR.