Prognostic value of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index in chemosensitive recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas treated with high-dose BEAM therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

High-dose therapy (HDT) is now recommended for patients under 60 years of age with chemosensitive relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, approximately half of these patients will be cured by HDT. Prognostic factors are needed to predict which patients with chemosensitive lymphoma to second-line therapy could benefit from HDT. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of the widely used age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (AA-IPI) calculated at the time of relapse (35 patients) or just before second-line salvage therapy for primary refractory disease (5 patients). The median age was 51 years (range 18-64 years). Thirty-six patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Salvage cytoreductive therapy before HDT was DHAP/ESHAP (cytarabine, cysplatin, etoposide, steroids) in 17 patients, VIM3-Ara-c/MAMI (high-dose cytarabine, ifosfamide, methyl-gag, amsacrine) in 17 patients, CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or reinforced CHOP in 4 patients, high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide in 2 patients. The HDT regimen consisted of BEAM (carmusine, cytarabine, etoposide, melphalan) in all cases. Eleven patients were in partial remission and 29 in complete remission at the time of HDT. Ten patients had an IPI >1, 16 had relapsed early (<6 months after first-line therapy) or disease was refractory to first-line therapy (5 of the 16 patients). The median follow-up was 6.07 years (range 1.24-9.74 years). Overall survival was not statistically different in patients with refractory disease or in those who relapsed early compared with late failures (>6 months after first-line chemotherapy) (P=1), but the AA-IPI >1 was associated with a poor outcome (P=0.03). In conclusion, the AA-IPI could have a prognostic value in patients with chemosensitive recurrent lymphoma treated with BEAM HDT.

Factors affecting hematopoietic recovery after autologous peripheral blood progenitor-cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective study of 123 patients.

PURPOSE: To analyse prognostic factors influencing hematopoietic recovery in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas prospectively treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood progenitor-cells transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated patients with at least two unfavorable factors according to the age-adjusted international prognostic index were included in the LNH 93-3 trial. Patients received three cycles of chemotherapy and PBPC were mobilized using filgrastim. On day 60, a BEAM regimen was initiated followed by PBPC rescue. Among the 123 patients analysed, 60 received G-CSF (5 microg/kg/d) after PBPC transplantation at day 1 and 63 did not. RESULTS: Patients received a mean number of 12.4 x 10(6)/kg (1.86-111.5) CD34+ cells. After transplantation, neutrophil counts exceeded 0.5 x 10(9)/l at a median of 12.4 days (7-41 days) and platelet counts exceeded 50 x 10(9)/l at a median of 15.6 days (9-141 days). Platelets recovery > 50 x 10(9)/l was negatively influenced by BM involvement (20 s 14 days; P = 0.04). The number of CD34+ cells infused (> vs < or = 5 x 10(6)/kg) was correlated with faster platelet recovery (18.7 days vs 13.7 days) (P = 0.007). In 26 patients for whom administration of G-CSF was randomized, time to neutrophil recovery was significantly shorter for patients treated with G-CSF: 10 vs 13 days (P = 0.0005). The incidence of grade 3/4 infection, was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In the patient population treated with the same first-line regimen, BM involvement and infusion of fewer CD34+ cells delayed platelet recovery. Administration of G-CSF after PBPC significantly reduced neutropenia.

Intensified-dose (4 gm/m2) cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in refractory rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of intensified-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CYC), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration for collection of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), for patients with severe, refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Four patients with severe refractory RA were enrolled in this open study. They received a single infusion of CYC (4 gm/m2) at day 0 followed by G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) from day 6 until the last day of leukapheresis (performed at the time of hematopoietic recovery) to harvest peripheral blood HSC. Patients were monitored for disease activity, adverse effects, and hematopoietic reconstitution following this procedure. RESULTS: For all patients, administration of ID-CYC induced an early, dramatic improvement of disease activity. Long-term followup indicates that partial disease relapse was observed for all patients. No adverse effect was directly attributable to the treatment procedure. For most patients, HSC collection was sufficient to provide a graft enriched in CD34+ cells by positive selection as well as an unselected rescue graft. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe, refractory RA can benefit from ID-CYC. This procedure, followed by G-CSF administration, appears safe and technically suitable. In addition, it allows immediate improvement of RA activity that can occasionally persist beyond 6 months.