A Consensus Statement on the Administration of Systemic Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide detailed guidance on the administration of systemic bevacizumab in patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) based on a detailed review of the scientific literature and a consensus of experts with real-world clinical experience. METHODS: A bevacizumab consensus working group (N = 10) was composed of adult and pediatric otolaryngologists, adult and pediatric oncologists, and a representative from the RRP Foundation (RRPF), all with experience administering systemic bevacizumab in patients with RRP. After extensive review of the medical literature, a modified Delphi method-based survey series was utilized to establish consensus on the following key areas: clinical and patient characteristics ideal for treatment candidacy, patient perspective in treatment decisions, treatment access, initial dosing, monitoring, guidelines for tapering and discontinuation, and reintensifying therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine statements were identified across nine critical domains, and 45 reached consensus [clinical benefits of bevacizumab (3), patient and disease characteristics for treatment consideration (7), contraindications for treatment (3), shared decision-making (incorporating the patient perspective) (5), treatment access (3), initial dosing and administration (8), monitoring (7), tapering and discontinuation (6), and reintensification (3)]. CONCLUSION: This consensus statement provides the necessary guidance for clinicians to initiate systemic administration of bevacizumab and represents a potential paradigm shift toward nonsurgical treatment options for patients with RRP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Esophageal Baseline Impedance is Associated with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Treatment Response.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of distal esophageal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), a general marker of esophageal mucosal barrier integrity, in predicting laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and symptomatic response to acid reflux therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 173 patients who presented with symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux and underwent 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) testing. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance values were calculated and assessed for their association and ability to predict LPR symptoms, MII-pH results, treatment response, and other markers of LPR. RESULTS: Notably, 153 of the 173 patients were tested off acid suppression medication and included in statistical analysis. Based on the MII-pH probe data, 108 (71%) patients had LPR, 8 (5%) had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 37 (24%) were without pathologic reflux. Distal esophageal MNBI of LPR patients was significantly lower in LPR patients than patients with negative studies (1332 ± 94.8 vs. 2158 ± 173.5, p = 0.001). Among 118 patients who trialed antireflux therapy, a distal esophageal MNBI cutoff value of <1580 Ω was an independent predictor of treatment response (OR = 4.148 [1.877-9.189]). This value better predicted improvement with antireflux therapy for LPR than other objective MII-pH probe data, which were not independent predictors of treatment response. CONCLUSION: Distal esophageal MNBI values may have value in the diagnosis of LPR and potentially predict medication responsiveness in LPR patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:4071-4077, 2024.

Inhaled fosamprenavir for laryngopharyngeal reflux: Toxicology and fluid dynamics modeling.

Objectives: Approximately 25% of Americans suffer from laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a disease for which no effective medical therapy exists. Pepsin is a predominant source of damage during LPR and a key therapeutic target. Fosamprenavir (FOS) inhibits pepsin and prevents damage in an LPR mouse model. Inhaled FOS protects at a lower dose than oral; however, the safety of inhaled FOS is unknown and there are no inhalers for laryngopharyngeal delivery. A pre-Good Lab Practice (GLP) study of inhaled FOS was performed to assess safety and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling used to predict the optimal particle size for a laryngopharyngeal dry powder inhaler (DPI). Methods: Aerosolized FOS, amprenavir (APR), or air (control) were provided 5 days/week for 4 weeks (n = 6) in an LPR mouse model. Organs (nasal cavity, larynx, esophagus, trachea, lung, liver, heart, and kidney) were assessed by a pathologist and bronchoalveolar lavage cytokines and plasma cardiotoxicity markers were assessed by Luminex assay. CFD simulations were conducted in a model of a healthy 49-year-old female. Results: No significant increase was observed in histologic lesions, cytokines, or cardiotoxicity markers in FOS or APR groups relative to the control. CFD predicted that laryngopharyngeal deposition was maximized with aerodynamic diameters of 8.1-11.5 µm for inhalation rates of 30-60 L/min. Conclusions: A 4-week pre-GLP study supports the safety of inhaled FOS. A formal GLP assessment is underway to support a phase I clinical trial of an FOS DPI for LPR. Level of Evidence: NA.