Comparison of light-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and the membrane destruction of two mesoporphyrin derivatives in liposomes.

The photodynamic effect requires the simultaneous presence of light, photosensitizer (PS) and molecular oxygen. In this process, the photoinduced damage of cells is caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Besides DNA, the other target of ROS is the membranes, separating internal compartments in living cells. Hence, the ability of ROS formation of porphyrins as PSs, in liposomes as simple models of cellular membranes is of outstanding interest. Earlier we compared the binding parameters and locations of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride (MPCl) and mesoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester (MPE), in small unilamellar vesicles (SUV) made from various saturated phosphatidylcholines. In this study, we used the same kinds of samples for comparing the ROS forming ability. Triiodide production from potassium iodide because of light-induced ROS in the presence of molybdate catalyst was applied, and the amount of product was quantitatively followed by optical spectrometry. Furthermore, we demonstrated and carefully studied SUVs disruption as direct evidence of membrane destruction by the methods of dynamic light scattering (DLS) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), applying unsaturated phosphatidylcholines as membrane components. Although the ROS forming ability is more pronounced in the case of MPCl, we found that the measured disruption was more effective in the samples containing MPE.

Comparison of binding ability and location of two mesoporphyrin derivatives in liposomes explored with conventional and site-selective fluorescence spectroscopy.

Application of porphyrins as photosensitizers is based on their light-triggered generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that may cause oxidative tissue damage and ultimately kill cells. Cellular membranes are the action grounds of many sensitizers due to their hydrophobic or amphiphilic character as well as the location of many of the targets attacked by ROS. Hence, the binding ability and location of porphyrins in liposomes as simple models of cellular membranes are of outstanding interest. Here we compare mesoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester (MPE) and its nonesterified form, mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride (MPCl). Monocomponent small unilamellar vesicles formed of various saturated phosphatidylcholines with incorporated mesoporphyrins were investigated. We determined the binding parameters and the inhomogeneous distribution functions (IDFs) by different fluorescence techniques. We found in general that the binding ability of MPE is considerably greater than that of MPCl. In the case of MPCl, the IDFs suggest that only one of the two binding site types identified earlier for MPE ("site II") exists; the other one ("site I") vanishes while a new one appears ("site III"). We can confirm that "site I" is located between the two lipid layers, "site II" is situated between the hydrocarbon chains, while the location of the novel "site III" is along the outer part of the hydrocarbon chains partially inserted between the lipid head groups.