Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: Techniques and Outcomes in 107 Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a known sequela of thoracolumbar instrumented fusions. Various surgical options are available to address ASD in patients with intractable symptoms who have failed conservative measures. However, the optimal treatment strategy for symptomatic ASD has not been established. We examined several clinical outcomes utilizing different surgical interventions for symptomatic ASD. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision surgery for thoracolumbar ASD between October 2011 and February 2022. Patients were treated with endoscopic decompression (N = 17), microdiscectomy (N = 9), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF; N = 26), or open laminectomy and fusion (LF; N = 55). The primary outcomes compared between groups were re-operation rates and numeric pain scores for leg and back at 2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperation. Secondary outcomes included time to re-operation, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. RESULTS: Of the 257 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, 107 patients met inclusion criteria with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The mean age of all patients was 67.90 ± 10.51 years. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring, number of previously fused levels, or preoperative numeric leg and back pain scores. The re-operation rates were significantly lower in LF (12.7%) and LLIF cohorts (19.2%) compared with microdiscectomy (33%) and endoscopic decompression (52.9%; P = 0.005). Only LF and LLIF cohorts experienced significantly decreased pain scores at all 4 follow-up visits (2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months; P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) relative to preoperative scores. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic ASD often requires treatment with revision surgery. Fusion surgeries (either stand-alone lateral interbody or posterolateral with instrumentation) were most effective and durable with respect to alleviating pain and avoiding additional revisions within the first 12 months following revision surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study emphasizes the importance of risk-stratifying patients to identify the least invasive approach that treats their symptoms and reduces the risk of future surgeries.

The Use of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Instrumentation in Patients with Spinal Oncologic Tumors: A Systematic Review of Literature and Future Directions.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic spine tumors affect over 30% of patients who have been diagnosed with cancer. While techniques in surgical intervention have undoubtedly evolved, there are some pitfalls when spinal instrumentation is required for stabilization following tumor resection. However, the use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants has become increasingly popular due to improved radiolucency and positive osteobiologic properties. Here, we present a systematic review describing the use of CFR-PEEK-coated instrumentation in the oncologic population while identifying advantages and potential shortcomings of these devices. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted in March 2022 to identify articles detailing the use of CFR-PEEK implants for spinal instrumentation in patients with primary and secondary spine tumors. The search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. RESULTS: An initial search returned a total of 85 articles among the three databases used. After the exclusion of duplicates and screening of abstracts, 21 full-text articles were examined for eligibility. Eleven articles were excluded due to not fitting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ten articles were subsequently eligible for full-text review. CONCLUSIONS: CFR-PEEK possesses a similar safety and efficacy profile to titanium implants but has distinct advantages. It limits artifact, increases early detection of local tumor recurrence, increases radiotherapy dose accuracy, and is associated with low complication rates (9.96%)-making it a promising alternative for the demands unique to the treatment/outcome of spinal oncologic patients.

Size matters - From the working channel to the wavelength of light: Optimizing visualization in endoscopic spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery bases many of its benefits on decreasing tissue disruption. Endoscopic spine surgery has continued to push the boundaries to accomplish successful clinical outcomes through the evolution of the endoscope and working channel. As the indications for endoscopic spine surgery increase, a more profound discussion of cannula size selection for endoscopic spine surgery is required. The intimate relationship between the working channel, the endoscope and how these choices affect workflow and visualization are paramount to maximize outcomes. METHODS: The authors review the nuances of the endoscopic approaches to the various regions of the spine as it relates to the selection of the working channel. The advantages and limitations of various endoscopic working channels were analyzed as to how they address anatomic regional considerations as well as ultimate goals of surgery. RESULTS: In addition to anatomic regional differences and the goals of the surgery other key elements in endoscopic working channel selection included the amount of tissue disruption, regional risk to the neural elements, impact on visualization, optical physics, and the implications for surgical maneuverability/dexterity. CONCLUSION: Understanding the role and use of the endoscope-working channel combination with its effects on visualization is essential for any surgeon aspiring to perform safe and efficient full endoscopic spine surgery.