Radiological positioning of a proximal interphalangeal joint resurfacing implant: Reliability and functional outcomes correlation.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to define radiological measurements for quantifying the position of a surface replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP) in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, to test the reliability of these measurements, and to explore whether implant position influences patient-reported and clinical outcomes one year after surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed 7 radiographic measurements to quantify the position of the proximal and distal implant components. Two independent surgeons analyzed the 1-year postoperative radiographs of 63 fingers documented in our registry. Inter-rater reliability of these measurements was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations between the radiographic measurements and PIP range of motion (ROM), the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), and pain were determined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Radiographic measurements of patients with the worst and best postoperative ROM were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was only good for 1 measurement (ICC = 0.89), but poor to moderate for the other measurements (ICC ranging from 0.34 to 0.69). These measurements neither correlated with ROM, brief MHQ nor pain based on correlation coefficients ranging from 0.00 to 0.31. There were no relevant differences in the radiographic measurements between patients with the worst and best ROM. CONCLUSION: The position of the CapFlex-PIP implant could not be reliably quantified on plain radiographs. The lack of correlations between implant position and postoperative outcomes can be attributed either to the unreliable measurements or the actual lack of influence of the implant position on pain and function.

Torque acting on biodegradable magnesium screws during intramedullary insertion into a metacarpal bone - a biomechanical study.

Recently, biodegradable implants made from magnesium (Mg) alloys have been developed to obviate the need for later implant removal. Mg-based cannulated compression screws (CCS) are ideal for intramedullary screw (IMS) fixation of metacarpal fractures. The present study aimed at investigating the torque acting on Mg-based CCS at failure and at intramedullary metacarpal insertion. The devices were CE certified Magnezix 2.7 and 3.2 mm CCSs (Syntellix®, Hannover, Germany). Torque at failure was measured in a synthetic bone model using a standardized polyurethane foam block. In a second assessment, insertional torque was measured in ten cadaveric metacarpal bones. Mean torque at failure for the 2.7 mm and 3.2 mm CCSs was 42.8 Ncm (±1.9 Ncm) and 63.0 Ncm (±2.2 Ncm), respectively. In the human cadaver model, the torque distribution curve at metacarpal insertion showed three peaks. The highest reached 53.6% of the lowest torque at failure measured in the synthetic bone model for the 3.2 CCS (31.4 vs. 58.6 Ncm). The mean difference between peak torque at metacarpal insertion and torque at failure was 38.3 Ncm (99% CI [33.6, 43.0 Ncm], p < 0.0001). In terms of torque load, Mg-based CCSs are suitable for IMS fixation of metacarpal fractures. Biodegradable implants may represent an important improvement of this treatment method; confirmation by in-vivo studies is needed.

[Osteosynthesis of metacarpal fractures with 2.0 mm LCP system and functional postoperative treatment]. / Osteosynthese von Metakarpalefrakturen mit 2,0-mm-LCP und funktionelle postoperative Nachbehandlung.

BACKGROUND: Locking head systems are an additional option in the surgical treatment of metacarpal fractures. In this clinic 2.0 mm locking compression plates (LCP) are used, which provide the possibility of functional postoperative treatment even for complex and osteoporotic metacarpal fractures. For simple fractures and good bone quality the LCP system is used as a compression or neutralization plate. Depending on the type and localization of the fracture, different osteosynthesis techniques are used in order to achieve a functional postoperative treatment in as many patients as possible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between July 2009 and December 2010 a total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective trial. All patients underwent surgical treatment with a 2.0 mm LCP system. Postoperative functionality of the hand was restored without immobilization. Clinical and radiological examinations were performed after 6 and 12 weeks and after 6 and 12 months with documentation of the range of motion (ROM), grip strength, fingertip to palm distance and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score. RESULTS: After 6 months a good functional result was achieved in all patients with no cases of malrotation. Radiographs showed a completely consolidated bone healing. CONCLUSION: After osteosynthesis with 2.0 mm LCPs all types of metacarpal fractures can be treated without immobilization.

[Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of breast asymmetry: analysis of the patient's perspective in 51 cases]. / Langzeitresultate nach chirurgischer Behandlung von Brustasymmetrien aus Sicht der Patientinnen: Eine Analyse von 51 Fällen.

INTRODUCTION: Literature provides 3 studies only investigating the long-term outcome after surgical correction of breast asymmetry. The goal of this study was to analyse from a patient's perspective, which factors influence postoperative satisfaction most. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical treatment for breast asymmetry between 2000 and 2009 were included. With help of the visual analogue scale the patients conducted a subjective assessment of their own long-term result using the following parameters: overall satisfaction, symmetry, size, shape, scarring and sensitivity. Anthropometric measurements of the breasts followed. RESULTS: 51 patients (80% follow-up) were seen 2-11 (mean 5±2.5) years postoperatively. The following mean values were recorded for overall satisfaction 8.31 (±1.91), symmetry 7.86 (±2.25), size 8.42 (±1.93), shape 8.12 (±2.03), scarring 7.82 (±1.94) and sensitivity 7.92 (±2.19). Overall satisfaction increased significantly with good scores for the parameters symmetry [p=0.01] and shape [p=0.048]. Neither size [p=0.46] nor scarring [p=0.69] nor sensitivity [p=0.34] had a statistically significant influence on overall satisfaction. Furthermore, overall satisfaction did not depend on the surgical technique, preoperative size, preoperative asymmetry, age of the patient at time of surgery, period of time between the operation and the assessment, resected weight (absolute and difference between left and right) or on postoperative symmetry of the nipple areola complex. CONCLUSION: In our patients, long-term overall satisfaction after surgical correction of breast asymmetry was primarily dependent on symmetry and shape. Size, scarring and sensitivity did not have a statistically significant influence on postoperative overall satisfaction. This also applied to preoperative size, preoperative extent of asymmetry, age of the patient at time of surgery, surgical technique and the time span between the operation and the assessment.

[One-stage reconstruction of facial defects after tumor resection with the Integra system]. / Integra zur einzeitigen Defektdeckung nach Tumorresektion im Gesichtsbereich.

BACKGROUND: In 2010 excellent aesthetic results after basal cell carcinoma excision and one-stage coverage with Integra without split thickness skin graft (STSG) were published in a series of 10 Asian patients. Our aim in this study was to verify these results in a series of Caucasian patients and evaluate this procedure as a possible new standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 6 patients with facial basal cell carcinoma were treated by regular excision with 3 mm safety margins and one-stage coverage with Integra without STSG, followed by a clinical evaluation and fotodocumentation. RESULTS: In 3 patients local infection occurred with a complete loss of the Integra. 2 out of these 3 patients showed an unaesthetic scar and are considering another surgical approach for correction. The other 3 patients had an uneventful course, unfortunately 2 out of these patients (67%) developed an unaesthetic scar as well and are also considering surgical correction. CONCLUSION: Because of aesthetically unsatisfactory results and high infection rates we abandoned this procedure after 6 patients only. Our standard remains excision with 3 mm safety margins, histological analysis and one-stage repair with local facial flaps.