Clinical implementation and feasibility of long-course fractionated MR-guided chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer: An R-IDEAL stage 1b/2a evaluation of technical innovation.

Purpose: This R-Ideal stage 1b/2a study describes the workflow and feasibility of long-course fractionated online adaptive MR-guided chemoradiotherapy with reduced CTV-to-PTV margins on the 1.5T MR-Linac for patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer scheduled to undergo chemoradiation were treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac. Daily MR-images were acquired for online contour adaptation and replanning. Contours were manually adapted to match the daily anatomy and an isotropic CTV-to-PTV margin of 6 mm was applied. Time was recorded for all individual steps in the workflow. Feasibility and patient tolerability were defined as on-table time of ≤60 min and completion of >95% of the fractions on the MR-Linac, respectively. Positioning verification and post-treatment MRIs were retrospectively analyzed and dosimetric parameters were compared to standard non-adaptive conventional treatment plans. Results: Nine patients with esophageal cancer were treated with chemoradiation; eight patients received 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions and one received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Four patients received all planned fractions on the MR-Linac, whereas for two patients >5% of fractions were rescheduled to a conventional linac for reasons of discomfort. A total of 183 (86%) of 212 scheduled fractions were successfully delivered on the MR-Linac. Three fractions ended prematurely due to technical issues and 26 fractions were rescheduled on a conventional linac due to MR-Linac downtime (n = 10), logistical reasons (n = 3) or discomfort (n = 13).The median time per fraction was 53 min (IQR = 3 min). Daily adapted MR-Linac plans had similar target coverage, whereas dose to the organs-at-risk was significantly reduced compared to conventional treatment (26% and 12% reduction in mean lung and heart dose, respectively). Conclusion: Daily online adaptive fractionated chemoradiotherapy with reduced PTV margins is moderately feasible for esophageal cancer and results in better sparing of heart and lungs. Future studies should focus on further optimization and acceleration of the current workflow.

CTV-to-PTV margin assessment for esophageal cancer radiotherapy based on an accumulated dose analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the smallest clinical target volume (CTV) to planned target volume (PTV) margins for esophageal cancer radiotherapy using daily online registration to the bony anatomy that yield full dosimetric coverage over the course of treatment. METHODS: 29 esophageal cancer patients underwent six T2-weighted MRI scans at weekly intervals. An online bone-match image-guided radiotherapy treatment of five fractions was simulated for each patient. Multiple conformal treatment plans with increasing margins around the CTV were created for each patient. Then, the dose was warped to obtain an accumulated dose per simulated fraction. Full target coverage by 95% of the prescribed dose was assessed as a function of margin expansion in six directions. If target coverage in a single direction was accomplished, then the respective margin remained fixed for the subsequent dose plans. Margins in uncovered directions were increased in a new dose plan until full target coverage was achieved. RESULTS: The smallest set of CTV-to-PTV margins that yielded full dosimetric CTV coverage was 8 mm in posterior and right direction, 9 mm in anterior and cranial direction and 10 mm in left and caudal direction for 27 out of 29 patients. In two patients the curvature of the esophagus considerably changed between fractions, which required a 17 and 23 mm margin in right direction. CONCLUSION: Accumulated dose analysis revealed that CTV-to-PTV treatment margins of 8, 9 and 10 mm in posterior & right, anterior & cranial and left & caudal direction, respectively, are sufficient to account for interfraction tumor variations over the course of treatment when applying a daily online bone match. However, two patients with extreme esophageal interfraction motion were insufficiently covered with these margins and were identified as patients requiring replanning to achieve full target coverage.

3-Dimensional target coverage assessment for MRI guided esophageal cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the coverage probability for esophageal cancer radiotherapy as a function of a preset margin for online MR-guided and (CB)CT-guided radiotherapy. METHODS: Thirty esophageal cancer patients underwent six T2-weighted MRI scans, 1 prior to treatment and 5 during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at weekly intervals. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) were delineated on each individual scan. Follow-up scans were rigidly aligned to the bony anatomy and to the clinical target volume itself, mimicking two online set-up correction strategies: a conventional CBCT-guided set-up and a MR-guided set-up, respectively. Geometric coverage probability of the propagated CTVs was assessed for both set-up strategies by expanding the reference CTV with an isotropic margin varying from 0 mm to 15 mm with an increment of 1 mm. RESULTS: A margin of 10 mm could resolve the interfractional changes for 118 out of the 132 (89%) analyzed fractions when applying a bone-match registration, whereas the CTV was adequately covered in 123 (93%) fractions when the registration was directly performed at the CTV itself (soft-tissue registration). Closer analyses revealed that target coverage violation predominantly occurred for distal tumors near the junction and into the cardia. CONCLUSION: Online MR-guided soft-tissue registration protocols exhibited modest improvements of the geometric target coverage probability as compared to online CBCT-guided bone match protocols. Therefore, highly conformal target irradiation using online MR-guidance can only be achieved by implementing on-table adaptive workflows where new treatment plans are daily generated based on the anatomy of the day.