Patients' and caregivers' perception of multidimensional and palliative care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - protocol of a German multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an inevitably fatal condition that leads to a progressive loss of physical functioning, which results in a high psychosocial burden and organizational challenges related to medical care. Multidimensional and multiprofessional care is advised to meet the complex needs of patients and their families. Many healthcare systems, including Germany, may not be able to meet these needs because non-medical services such as psychological support or social counselling are not regularly included in the care of patients with ALS (pwALS). Specialised neuropalliative care is not routinely implemented nor widely available. Caregivers of pwALS are also highly burdened, but there is still a lack of support services for them. METHODS: This project aims to assess the perceptions and satisfaction with ALS care in Germany in pwALS and their caregivers. This will be achieved by means of a cross-sectional, multicentre survey. The examination will assess, to which extend the patients' needs in the six domains of physical, psychological, social, spiritual, practical and informational are being met by current care structures. This assessment will be linked to mental well-being, subjective quality of life, attitudes toward life-sustaining measures and physician-assisted suicide, and caregiver burden. The study aims to recruit 500 participants from nationwide ALS centres in order to draw comprehensive conclusions for Germany. A total of 29 centres, mostly acquired via the clinical and scientific German Network for Motor Neuron Diseases (MND-NET), will take part in the project, 25 of which have already started recruitment. PERSPECTIVE: It is intended to provide data-based starting points on how current practice of care in Germany is perceived pwALS and their caregivers and how it can be improved according to their needs. Planning and initiation of the study has been completed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at ClinicalTrails.gov; NCT06418646.

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes and neurofilament response during tofersen treatment in SOD1-related ALS-A multicenter observational study over 18 months.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) caused by SOD1 mutations (SOD1-ALS), tofersen received accelerated approval in the United States and is available via expanded access programs (EAP) outside the United States. This multicenter study investigates clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) during tofersen treatment in an EAP in Germany. METHODS: Sixteen SOD1-ALS patients receiving tofersen for at least 6 months were analyzed. The ALS progression rate (ALS-PR), as measured by the monthly change of the ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R), slow vital capacity (SVC), and sNfL were investigated. PRO included the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP2), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), and Net Promoter Score (NPS). RESULTS: Mean tofersen treatment was 11 months (6-18 months). ALS-PR showed a mean change of -0.2 (range 0 to -1.1) and relative reduction by 25%. Seven patients demonstrated increased ALSFRS-R. SVC was stable (mean 88%, range -15% to +28%). sNfL decreased in all patients except one heterozygous D91A-SOD1 mutation carrier (mean change of sNfL -58%, range -91 to +27%, p < .01). MYMOP2 indicated improved symptom severity (n = 10) or yet perception of partial response (n = 6). TSQM-9 showed high global treatment satisfaction (mean 83, SD 16) although the convenience of drug administration was modest (mean 50, SD 27). NPS revealed a very high recommendation rate for tofersen (NPS +80). DISCUSSION: Data from this EAP supported the clinical and sNfL response to tofersen in SOD1-ALS. PRO suggested a favorable patient perception of tofersen treatment in clinical practice.

Serum neurofilament light chain in distinct phenotypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A longitudinal, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in clinical phenotypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: In 2949 ALS patients at 16 ALS centers in Germany and Austria, clinical characteristics and sNfL were assessed. Phenotypes were differentiated for two anatomical determinants: (1) upper and/or lower motor involvement (typical, typMN; upper/lower motor neuron predominant, UMNp/LMNp; primary lateral sclerosis, PLS) and (2) region of onset and propagation of motor neuron dysfunction (bulbar, limb, flail-arm, flail-leg, thoracic onset). Phenotypes were correlated to sNfL, progression, and survival. RESULTS: Mean sNfL was - compared to typMN (75.7 pg/mL, n = 1791) - significantly lower in LMNp (45.1 pg/mL, n = 413), UMNp (58.7 pg/mL n = 206), and PLS (37.6 pg/mL, n = 84). Also, sNfL significantly differed in the bulbar (92.7 pg/mL, n = 669), limb (64.1 pg/mL, n = 1305), flail-arm (46.4 pg/mL, n = 283), flail-leg (53.6 pg/mL, n = 141), and thoracic (74.5 pg/mL, n = 96) phenotypes. Binary logistic regression analysis showed highest contribution to sNfL elevation for faster progression (odds ratio [OR] 3.24) and for the bulbar onset phenotype (OR 1.94). In contrast, PLS (OR 0.20), LMNp (OR 0.45), and thoracic onset (OR 0.43) showed reduced contributions to sNfL. Longitudinal sNfL (median 12 months, n = 2862) showed minor monthly changes (<0.2%) across all phenotypes. Correlation of sNfL with survival was confirmed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study underscored the correlation of ALS phenotypes - differentiated for motor neuron involvement and region of onset/propagation - with sNfL, progression, and survival. These phenotypes demonstrated a significant effect on sNfL and should be recognized as independent confounders of sNfL analyses in ALS trials and clinical practice.

Inspiratory Muscle Dysfunction Mediates and Predicts a Disease Continuum of Hypercapnic Failure in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with chronic hypercapnic failure. The present work aimed to comprehensively investigate inspiratory muscle function as a potential key determinant of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. METHODS: Prospective patient recruitment encompassed 61 stable subjects with COPD across different stages of respiratory failure, ranging from normocapnia to isolated nighttime hypercapnia and daytime hypercapnia. Arterialized blood gas analyses and overnight transcutaneous capnometry were used for patient stratification. Assessment of respiratory muscle function encompassed body plethysmography, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), diaphragm ultrasound, and transdiaphragmatic pressure recordings following cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves (twPdi) and a maximum sniff manoeuvre (Sniff Pdi). RESULTS: Twenty patients showed no hypercapnia, 10 had isolated nocturnal hypercapnia, and 31 had daytime hypercapnia. Body plethysmography clearly distinguished patients with and without hypercapnia but did not discriminate patients with isolated nocturnal hypercapnia from those with daytime hypercapnia. In contrast to ultrasound parameters and transdiaphragmatic pressures, only MIP reflected the extent of hypercapnia across all three stages. MIP values below -48 cmH2O predicted nocturnal hypercapnia (area under the curve = 0.733, p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: In COPD, inspiratory muscle dysfunction contributes to progressive hypercapnic failure. In contrast to invasive tests of diaphragm strength only MIP fully reflects the pathophysiological continuum of hypercapnic failure and predicts isolated nocturnal hypercapnia.

Applying the win ratio method in clinical trials of orphan drugs: an analysis of data from the COMET trial of avalglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials for rare diseases often include multiple endpoints that capture the effects of treatment on different disease domains. In many rare diseases, the primary endpoint is not standardized across trials. The win ratio approach was designed to analyze multiple endpoints of interest in clinical trials and has mostly been applied in cardiovascular trials. Here, we applied the win ratio approach to data from COMET, a phase 3 trial in late-onset Pompe disease, to illustrate how this approach can be used to analyze multiple endpoints in the orphan drug context. METHODS: All possible participant pairings from both arms of COMET were compared sequentially on changes at week 49 in upright forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Each participant's response for the two endpoints was first classified as a meaningful improvement, no meaningful change, or a meaningful decline using thresholds based on published minimal clinically important differences (FVC ± 4% predicted, 6MWT ± 39 m). Each comparison assessed whether the outcome with avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) was better than (win), worse than (loss), or equivalent to (tie) the outcome with alglucosidase alfa (ALG). If tied on FVC, 6MWT was compared. In this approach, the treatment effect is the ratio of wins to losses ("win ratio"), with ties excluded. RESULTS: In the 2499 possible pairings (51 receiving AVA × 49 receiving ALG), the win ratio was 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-4.29, p = 0.005) when FVC was compared before 6MWT. When the order was reversed, the win ratio was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.13-3.62, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: The win ratio approach can be used in clinical trials of rare diseases to provide meaningful insight on treatment benefits from multiple endpoints and across disease domains.

In-depth analysis of data from the RAS-ALS study reveals new insights in rasagiline treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 2016, we concluded a randomized controlled trial testing 1 mg rasagiline per day add-on to standard therapy in 252 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. This article aims at better characterizing ALS patients who could possibly benefit from rasagiline by reporting new subgroup analysis and genetic data. METHODS: We performed further exploratory in-depth analyses of the study population and investigated the relevance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to the dopaminergic system. RESULTS: Placebo-treated patients with very slow disease progression (loss of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised [ALSFRS-R] per month before randomization of ≤0.328 points) showed a per se survival probability after 24 months of 0.85 (95% confidence interval = 0.65-0.94). The large group of intermediate to fast progressing ALS patients showed a prolonged survival in the rasagiline group compared to placebo after 6 and 12 months (p = 0.02, p = 0.04), and a reduced decline of ALSFRS-R after 18 months (p = 0.049). SNP genotypes in the MAOB gene and DRD2 gene did not show clear associations with rasagiline treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the need to consider individual disease progression at baseline in future ALS studies. Very slow disease progressors compromise the statistical power of studies with treatment durations of 12-18 months using clinical endpoints. Analysis of MAOB and DRD2 SNPs revealed no clear relationship to any outcome parameter. More insights are expected from future studies elucidating whether patients with DRD2CC genotype (Rs2283265) show a pronounced benefit from treatment with rasagiline, pointing to the opportunities precision medicine could open up for ALS patients in the future.

Post-hoc Nonparametric Analysis of Forced Vital Capacity in the COMET Trial Demonstrates Superiority of Avalglucosidase Alfa vs Alglucosidase Alfa.

In the COMET trial of patients with late-onset Pompe disease, greater improvement in upright forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted was observed with avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) vs alglucosidase alfa (ALGLU) (estimated treatment difference: 2.43%). The pre-specified mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis demonstrated non-inferiority of AVA (P = 0.0074) and narrowly missed superiority (P = 0.063; 95% CI: -0.13-4.99). We report superiority of AVA in two post-hoc analyses that account for an extreme outlier participant with low FVC and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at baseline: MMRM excluding the outlier (P = 0.013) and non-parametric analysis of all data with repeated measures analysis of covariance (P = 0.019).