Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion is an option for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in children.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal carcinomas in childhood are rare and frequently present at an advanced stage. Besides lymphatic and distant organ metastasis, peritoneal carcinomatosis may be detected and has a poor prognosis. In addition to surgery and intravenous chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) may be an option for selected patients. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of the method and to discuss possible indications. METHODS: After treating a series of adult patients, HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis from a signet cell carcinoma of the colon was performed intraoperatively in a 12-year-old boy. We gave mitomycin C at a dose of 30 mg/m2 over 90 minutes at maximum temperature of 41.2 degrees C. We performed intraoperative drug level monitoring and daily postoperative liver and kidney function tests and differential blood counts. RESULTS: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion was performed according to protocol without complications. Perfusate and venous drug levels were similar to those in an adult case. The patient had an uneventful recovery, and serum chemistry and blood count returned to normal after a week. The boy lived for 36 months after initial presentation. Sixteen months after HIPEC, still with excellent quality of life, an elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) indicated recurrence. Thirty months after HIPEC, he died of progressive recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion as performed in adults may be beneficial to children with peritoneal carcinomatosis and merits further study.

Investigations on safety of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with Mitomycin C.

AIMS: Previous safety monitoring of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with Mitomycin C (MMC) did not demonstrate any detectable safety hazard to the personnel. Nevertheless, those results have been discussed controversially because of the methodological problems employed in the evaluation of potential exposure. We re-evaluated possible safety hazards of HIPEC by applying different monitoring strategies. METHODS: We monitored air samples in the operation room during HIPEC. In addition, we measured MMC in plasma of the surgeon with a newly developed analytical method. All samples were analysed by HPLC-UV at 360nm. The permeability of the gloves was tested using two in vitro techniques: diffusion cells and a glass cell chamber. In-use and worst-case exposure scenarios were imitated for in vitro experiments. RESULTS: The analysis of the air samples (n=3) could not detect any MMC. We found no drug above the limit of detection (1microg MMC/L) in the plasma samples of the surgeons (n=5). A breakthrough of latex glove material was detected in only one (worst-case exposure scenario) of 40 diffusion cell experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Established methods of safety monitoring could not reveal any detectable risk on in-use exposure conditions. The wearing of doubled latex gloves should prevent the surgeon from dermal exposure to MMC during HIPEC.