Meniscal sizing before allograft: Comparison of three imaging techniques.

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of meniscal sizing is an important issue before allograft transplantation. To date, there is no consensus on the best imaging method. The purpose of this study was to compare plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) arthrography in the assessment of meniscal size. We hypothesized that MRI and CT arthrography had better correlations than plain radiographs. METHODS: All patients operated on by meniscal allograft between January 2005 and May 2015 were screened. Among them, 32 patients had both preoperative radiographs, MRI and CT arthrography of the affected knee. The meniscal dimensions were evaluated, blindly and randomly, using three imaging methods. A correlation analysis between each technique was made. For radiographic methods, an additional comparison was made between original Pollard's method and the modified method (Yoon). Bone dimensions (tibial metaphysis) were also collected, using radiographs and MRI, in order to build new equations allowing determination of meniscal dimensions from those bone measurements. RESULTS: The radiographic methods offered satisfying evaluations of the meniscal dimensions in the sagittal plane, without significant difference when compared with CT arthrography or MRI. In the frontal plane, the radiograph methods were less effective. With new equations, allowing determination of meniscal dimensions from tibial plateau dimensions, the mean correlation coefficient was 0.39 (0.14-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between radiographic methods and MRI depended on which parameter (frontal or sagittal) was measured. Thus, we proposed a new method for sizing of meniscus, easily measurable from bony landmarks, aiming to improve the accuracy of graft selection.

Is distal femoral torsion the same in both of a patient's legs? Morphometric CT study.

INTRODUCTION: The rotational position of the femoral component is a primary driver of success in total knee arthroplasty. However, distal femoral torsion (DFT) varies greatly between individuals. Measuring DFT preoperatively by CT in combination with computer-assisted surgery can significantly improve the rotational positioning of the femoral component. However, a preoperative CT scan is costly and exposes the patient to radiation. These are doubled when the patient is undergoing bilateral arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to determine the DFT in both knees of a patient undergoing bilateral arthroplasty. We hypothesized that DFT was symmetric between a patient's two knees and was independent of frontal alignment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study of TKA cases performed between December 2008 and March 2015, 82 patients (mean age 73years) who underwent two-stage bilateral TKA (164 knees) were included. A preoperative CT scan of each knee was performed to measure the DFT using the surgical posterior condylar angle (PCA) described by Yoshioka. Two observers performed the measurements twice each, to allow calculation of the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The mean PCA was 5.4° (±1.48) in the right knee and 5.4° (±1.45) in the left knee, with a left/right difference ranging from 0 to 2.2° (p=0.8). In the entire cohort, 84.6% of patients had a left/right difference of less than 1°. We found no significant differences in DFT in knees with large or small frontal deformity (deformity<10°, p=0.7; deformity>10°, p=0.5) or the presence of varus or valgus (p=0.9). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (94%) and the interclass correlation coefficient was moderate to good (60% for left knees, 53% for right knees). DISCUSSION: Based on CT scan measurements, the DFT in both knees of an arthritic patient is comparable and this measurement is reproducible. This means that a single, unilateral preoperative CT scan is sufficient for planning purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective cohort study).

Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone grafting in severe varus osteoarthritic knee. Rate and risk factors of non-union in 41 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Using locking plates in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) via a medial opening theoretically allows early weight-bearing without need for bone or bone-substitute grafting. It incurs a risk of non-consolidation in case of large correction (>10°), although rates and risk factors of non-union are not known. The present retrospective study compared OWHTO with correction <10° versus >10°, with a view to determining: (1) complications rates (non-union) according to degree of correction, and (2) risk factors for such complications. HYPOTHESIS: OWHTO with correction greater than 10° without graft shows normal consolidation and allows early weight-bearing. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty-one patients treated by OWHTO for medial osteoarthritis of the knee between January 2101 and November 2015 were included in a retrospective study. HKA angle was assessed by long-leg axis radiographs, preoperatively and at 3 months. Clinical and radiological follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months assessed consolidation in terms of >40% filling of the osteotomy site. Partial (contact) weight-bearing was allowed from the first postoperative day, with full weight-bearing at 6 weeks. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 59±5 years. Mean body-mass index (BMI) was 30.3±5.2; 17 patients (41.5%) had BMI >30. Mean initial HKA angle was 173.5°±3° (range, 167-178°) and mean correction was 10.7°±2.7° (range, 5-15°). There were 27 corrections of 10° or more, and 14 less than 10°. At 3 months, mean HKA was 182.9°±2.5° (range, 178-187°). Twelve cases showed lateral tibial cortex fracture after opening. Thirty-six patients (87.8%) showed consolidation, at a mean 5±3 months. Five patients showed osteotomy site non-union; in all these cases, the lateral cortex was broken initially (P=0.003); all had BMI >30 (mean, 37.2±3.8; P<0.03); none were smokers. On univariate analysis, lateral tibial cortex fracture (OR=10; 95% CI, (1.59-196.30)), BMI >30 (OR=1.18; 95% CI, (1.03-1.41)) and correction ≥10° (OR=10.50; 95% CI, (2.49-53.86)) were associated with delayed consolidation. On multivariate analysis, only degree of osteotomy was significantly associated with delayed consolidation (OR=11.51; 95% CI, (2.13-95.74)). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Obesity and initial lateral cortex fracture appeared as risk factors for non-consolidation of OWHTO with large correction. Systematic bone or bone-substitute grafting may therefore be considered in this population in case of >10° correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective cohort study.

Anterior tibial laxity using the GNRB® device in healthy knees.

BACKGROUND: GRNB® is a non-radiating power tool that allows the evaluation of the anterior tibial translation. HYPOTHESIS: The pressure exerted by the system against the patella and the body mass index (BMI) could affect the anterior tibial translation when we repeat the measurements in healthy knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the measurements of anterior knee laxity in healthy knees carried out by the GNRB® in 69 consecutive patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair in the contralateral knee. Two measurements were carried out, the initial measurements (M1), and then repeated at a mean of seven months (M2) (4.9 to 13months). RESULTS: There were 38 women and 31 men with an average age of 31years. In healthy knees, the Mean average anterior translation was 5.4±4mm with an average patellar force of 35.8 at time M1. The average anterior translation was 4.9±4mm with an average patellar force of 47 at time M2. There was a significant difference between the measurements M1 and M2 (P<0.03). The tightening force was significantly different between the two sets of measurements (P<10-7). There was a negative correlation between the pressure applied on the patella and anterior knee laxity (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The pressure force exerted on the patella during GNRB® affects the measurement of anterior laxity in healthy knees. This raises the problem of the reproducibility of the measurements during repeated examinations at different times.

Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection: Diagnosis and treatment.

Cutibacterium acnes is a commensal skin bacterium, regularly implicated in prosthetic joint infection, particularly of the shoulder. Diagnosis has been improved by progress in bacteriological techniques: longer culture time, liquid medium culture, MALDI-TOF mass spectrography, and universal 16S rRNA PCR, associated by some authors to sonication of ablated implants. C. acnes pathogenicity involves many virulence factors, notably including biofilm formation. C. acnes may lead to infection that is clinically evident or, frequently, relatively asymptomatic. C. acnes is an anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium, susceptible to many antibiotics that are regularly used in bone and joint infection: beta-lactams, quinolone, rifampicin and clindamycin. It shows increasing resistance to clindamycin and natural resistance to metronidazole. Treatment is medical and surgical, associating synovectomy or complete 1- or 2-step revision depending on time to treatment, and antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic therapy is typically for three months with an initial 2-6 weeks' intravenous phase. Prognosis is generally favorable with well-conducted treatment. Late discovery of positive samples after apparently aseptic implant change is an at-risk situation, usually managed by antibiotic therapy, but with late initiation and hence increased risk of failure. Adverse secondary progression requires repeat revision under good conditions.

Hybrid fixation in adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.

Osteochondritis dissecans progresses to osteoarthritis if integration of the fragment is not obtained. The prognosis of osteochondritis dissecans is more severe in adults, as spontaneous integration due to physeal closure does not occur. Hybrid fixation consists in combining screw fixation of the fragment with mosaicplasty through the fragment to promote integration into the native condyle. We describe this technique with reference to 17 patients.

Anatomical knee postero-lateral corner reconstruction: The "Versailles" technique.

Postero-lateral knee instability raises surgical challenges. Of the many available reconstruction techniques, few ensure anatomical reconstruction of the postero-lateral corner (PLC). The "Versailles" technique ensures the anatomical reconstruction of the three main PLC stabilisers (lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, and popliteo-fibular ligament) by using either a hamstring autograft or a tendon allograft.

High failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bimeniscal repair: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Bimeniscal lesions are common in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. However, bimeniscal repair is rarely performed during ACL reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes after ACL reconstruction with bimeniscal repair. HYPOTHESIS: Bimeniscal lesions, even when repaired, are associated with poorer outcomes of ACL reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control design was used. The cases were 15 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, without procedures on any other ligaments, combined with bimeniscal repair, between May 2009 and May 2013 (3.2% of all ACL reconstructions during the study period). This group (2-Mc group) was matched on age, gender, body mass index, and time to surgery to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had no meniscal lesions (0-Mc group) and to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and repair of the medial meniscus (1-Mc group). After a mean follow-up of 3.6 years, clinical outcomes were assessed based on the KOOS, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and knee laxity based on TELOS and GNRB measurements. The primary outcome measure was the rate of ACL re-rupture. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcomes and rate of delayed meniscectomy. RESULTS: The ACL re-rupture rate was significantly higher in the 2-Mc group than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled (20%, vs. 1.7%; P=0.02). The functional scores showed no significant differences across groups. Post-operative differential laxity was significantly greater in the 2-Mc group (3.3mm by TELOS, P=0.02; and 2.5mm by GNRB, P=0.03) than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled. Delayed meniscectomy was performed in none of the 2-Mc group patients and in 2 of the 1-Mc group patients. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction combined with bimeniscal repair is a rarely performed procedure. It is associated with a high ACL re-rupture rate and greater differential laxity. Meniscal outcomes of bimeniscal repair, in contrast, are good. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, matched case-control study.

Actifit® polyurethane meniscal scaffold: MRI and functional outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of the Actifit® polyurethane meniscal scaffold in patients who have pain after partial meniscectomy provides short-term pain relief and better function. But there is a lack of information about medium-term outcomes. The objective of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the MRI and functional outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. It was hypothesized that the results are stable over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients (8 men, 7 women; mean age 30 years, range 19-47, mean BMI 25) were enrolled in the study between February 2008 and January 2011. Five patients also underwent ACL reconstruction and one underwent mosaicplasty. Nine lateral and six medial Actifit® implants were evaluated prospectively before the surgery and at a minimum of 12, 24 and 60 months' follow-up using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the objective and subjective IKDC scores, radiological and MRI analysis with measurement of the ICRS score, Genovese score and extrusion. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6 years (range 5-8.1). Two patients were lost to follow-up. Three patients were re-operated at 7, 19 and 30 months because they had not improved functionally and the implant appeared damaged on MRI. Partial removal of the implant did not improve the functional outcomes (mean subjective IKDC pre- and post-revision: 37.0 vs. 34.9). Two patients were lost to follow-up. In intention to treat (13 cases), the pain (VAS) and subjective IKDC score were improved between the preoperative period and the last follow-up (5.46 vs. 2.92, P=0.007 and 51.2 vs. 66.1, P=0.05). In per protocol (10 cases, failures excluded), the pain (VAS) and subjective IKDC score were improved (5.3 vs. 1.9, P=0.0009; 49.6 vs. 75.4, P=0.002) along with the pain, daily activities and quality of life components of the KOOS (60.6 vs. 86.0, P=0.0008; 70.3 vs. 90.2, P=0.001; 42.7 vs. 71.0, P=0.0058). The functional scores were stable between months 12, 24 and 60. ICRS cartilage score and mean meniscal extrusion were unchanged at the last follow-up (1.6 vs. 1.6 and 2.41 vs. 2.79). In all patients, the meniscal implant had an intermediate signal and reduced size on MRI. DISCUSSION: Despite an abnormal MRI appearance suggesting the meniscal scaffold is not fully mature after 5 years, the functional scores and cartilage status are stable at this time point. However, the failure rate is still high and removing the implant in patients with poor function does not improve the outcome. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective cohort study Level IV.

Long-term assessment of meniscal extrusion after meniscal repair.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic meniscal repair limits the medium-term risk of radiological osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot provide an accurate assessment of meniscal healing but may show harbingers of osteoarthritis such as meniscal extrusion. The objective of this study was to assess long-term meniscal extrusion after meniscal repair. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic meniscal suture is not followed by meniscal extrusion and can, therefore, provide good knee function in the long-term. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal suture on a stable or stabilised knee were included retrospectively. MRI was performed to measure absolute meniscal extrusion (AME), relative meniscal extrusion (RME), anterior sagittal extrusion (ASE), posterior sagittal extrusion (PSE), coronal cartilage coverage index (cCCI), and sagittal cartilage coverage index (sCCI). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 8.8±0.87 years, there was no evidence of meniscal extrusion in these patients with stable or stabilised knees: AME, 1.7±1.03 and 2.3±0.93mm, RME, 17±0.10% and 28±0.12%, ASE, 2.52±1.43 and 1.71±2.42mm, PSE, 0.29±3.49 and 0.22±2.35mm, cCCI, 23±0.08% and 20±0.09%, and sCCI, 49±0,10% and 53±0.09%. CONCLUSION: In the long-term after meniscal repair, osteoarthritis is limited and meniscal function seems preserved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Clinical outcomes after multiligament injured knees: medial versus lateral reconstructions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcomes of multiligament injured knees with respect to the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner (PMC) repair or reconstruction versus the posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction in patients operated according to a codified surgical protocol. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether PMC or PLC was injured. Cruciate ligaments as well as PMC or PLC were reconstructed/repaired in a one-stage procedure. At minimum of 1-year follow-up, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms, Lysholm score and sports activity level were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with a median follow-up time of 57 months (range 12-129) were reviewed. No significant difference was found for functional scores between acute PMC and PLC subgroups. In Group PLC, subjective outcomes tend to be better in the acute than in chronic reconstruction subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: A one-stage protocol with early surgery rather than delayed reconstruction produced better clinical outcomes whatever the injured collateral ligament, medial or lateral. In the future, early and chronic reconstructions as well as each injury pattern should be considered as separate entities in studies on multiple ligament injured knees to reach a better level of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Mid-term survivorship of Mini-keel™ versus Standard keel in total knee replacements: Differences in the rate of revision for aseptic loosening.

INTRODUCTION: To reduce the size of the surgical incision, modular mini-keel tibial components have been developed with or without extensions for the Nexgen™ MIS Tibial Component. Although a smaller component could theoretically result in defective fixation, this has never been evaluated in a large comparative series. Thus, we performed the following case control study to: (1) evaluate intermediate-term survival of a modular "mini-keel" tibial component compared to a reference standard keel component from the same line of products (Nexgen LPS-Flex Tibial Component, Zimmer); (2) to identify any eventual associated factors if the frequency of loosening was increased. HYPOTHESIS: The rate of revision for aseptic tibial loosening is comparable for both components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This comparative, retrospective, single center series of 459 consecutive total knee arthroplasties (TKA) was performed between 2007 and 2010: with 212 modular "mini-keel" (MK) tibial components and 247 "standard" (S) components. Survival, rate of revision for aseptic tibial loosening and identification of a radiolucent line were analyzed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5years, the rate of revision for tibial aseptic loosing was significantly higher in the MK group with 12 cases (5.7%) and 4 cases in the S group (1.6%) (P=0.036). The use of the MK component appears to be a prognostic factor for surgical revision (hazard ratio=3.86 (1.23-11.88), P=0.02) but not for the development of a radiolucent line (HR=1.75 (0.9-3.4), P=0.097). The mean delay before revision was 38months (8-64) in the MK group and 15.2months (8-22) in the S group (P=0.006). Individual factors, such as gender, body mass index (BMI) and pre- or postoperative alignment were not prognostic factors for revision or radiolucent lines. CONCLUSION: The modular "mini-keel" tibial component was associated with a greater risk of revision for tibial component loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case control study, III.

Abnormal rate of intraoperative and postoperative implant positioning outliers using "MRI-based patient-specific" compared to "computer assisted" instrumentation in total knee replacement.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze first intraoperative alignment and reason to abandon the use of patient-specific instrumentation using intraoperative CAS measurement, secondly assess by postoperative CT analysis if CI, based on preoperative 3D-MRI data, improved postoperative component positioning (including femoral rotation) and lower limb alignment as compared with results obtained with CAS. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo TKA were enrolled. Eligible knees were randomized to the group of PSI-TKAs (n = 40) or to the group of CAS-TKAs (n = 40). In the CAS group, CAS determined and controlled cutting block positioning in each plane. In the PSI group, CAS allowed to measure adequacy of intraoperative alignment including femoral component rotation. At 3 months after surgery, implants position were measured and analyzed with full-weight bearing plain radiographs and CT scan. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, there was a significant difference concerning Sagittal Femoral mechanical, Frontal tibial mechanical angle and tibial slope between the two groups (respectively p = 0.01, p = 0.02, p = 0.046). Custom instrumentation was abandoned intraoperatively in seven knees (17.5 %). Abnormal tibial cuts were responsible of the abandon in three out of seven cases, femoral cut in 1/7 and dual abnormalities in 3/7. Postoperatively, tibial slope outliers percentage was higher in the patient specific instrumentation group with six patients (18.18 %) versus one patient (2.5 %) in the CAS group (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Patient specific instrumentation was associated with an important number of hazardous cut and a higher rate of outliers in our series and thus should be used with caution as related to. This study is the first to our acknowledgement to compare intra-operative ancillary and implant positioning of PSI-TKA and CAS-TKA. High rate of malposition are sustained by our findings, as such PSI-TKA should be used with caution, by surgeons capable to switch to conventional instrumentation intra-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized control trial, Level I.

Poor reproducibility of the MRI measurement of distal femoral torsion.

Recent publications on patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty have reported considerable variability in the axial positioning of the cutting guides for the femoral component. These personalized cutting guides are manufactured based on bone shape data, generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). The goal of this study was to compare the reproducibility and accuracy of distal femoral torsion (DFT) values measured using these two imaging modalities. We hypothesized that MRI does not reproducibly and consistently measure DFT and is not as accurate as CT scan. METHODS: Anonymized radiology records from 54 patients that included MRI and CT scans of the knee were read in random order by two observers, on two separate occasions. These records were from patients being considered for a meniscal or osteochondral graft and who had their knee explored, but who had not undergone femoral or tibial surgery and were free of osteoarthritis. The DFT was estimated using the posterior condylar angle (PCA), using both its anatomical and surgical definitions. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the MRI and the differences relative to CT scan measurements were analysed. RESULTS: The average intra-observer difference for the MRI evaluation of the anatomical PCA was 0.8±1.2°; it was 0.4±0.9° for the surgical PCA. More than 1° difference from the average was found in 8 cases (14%) using the anatomical PCA measurement and 4 cases (7.4%) when using the surgical PCA (P=0.4). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.33-0.85) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.47-0.89) for the anatomical and surgical PCA, respectively. The average inter-observer difference for the MRI evaluation of the anatomical PCA was 1.6±1.4°; it was 1.5±1.0° for the surgical PCA. More than 1° difference from the average was found in 27 cases (50%) using the anatomical PCA measurement and 22 cases (40%) when using the surgical PCA (P=0.4). The ICCs were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.14-0.65) and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.06-0.75) for the anatomical and surgical PCA, respectively. The average differences between the CT and MRI measurements were 1.4±1.1° (0.2-5°) and 1.1±0.8° (0-3.6°) for the anatomical and surgical PCA, respectively. Greater than 1° difference between CT and MRI was found in 29 records (54%) for the anatomical PCA and in 18 records (33%) for the surgical PCA (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: DFT measurement on MRI is more reproducible and consistent when using the surgical PCA. MRI measurements differed by more than 1° relative to CT measurements in more than one-third of cases. CASE CONTROL STUDY: Level III.

Small diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 13 years - a follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Theoretically, the properties of second-generation metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings are better for wear, osteolysis and longevity. However, follow-up studies of more than 10 years are rare, in particular with hybrid fixation (cemented stainless steel stems and cementless cup), therefore we evaluated the results of this combination after a mean follow-up of 12.8 years: (1) to analyze the survival rate, (2) to compare it with the survival rate in the same series after 6.4 years (95.8% cup, 94.8% stem), (3) to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcome and (4) to analyze these failures. HYPOTHESIS: The number of revisions would increase after 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 106 total hip arthroplasties (THA) (Cedior™ press-fit cup with cemented Acora™ (n=50) and Exafit™ (n=56) stems and 28mm Metasul™ bearings performed between January 1999 and December 2002. The survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The clinical assessment included the Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Oxford scores. The radiographic assessment evaluated radiolucencies and osteolysis on standard X-rays. A histological analysis was only performed during revision THA. RESULTS: After a mean 12.8 years of follow-up (10-16), 53 THA were reviewed in 48 patients. Thirteen THA revisions (14%) were performed including 11 aseptic revisions (5 stem fractures, 2 cases of impingement and 3 loosenings [1 bipolar and 3 cups] and one case of osteolysis). Overall survival, taking into account revision for aseptic loosening, was 87.6% (CI 95%=77.3 to 99.3%). The mean PMA and Oxford scores at the final follow-up were 17.6±0.8 points (16-18) and 16.5±5.2 points (12-38) respectively. The radiological follow-up mainly identified radiolucencies around the stem in Gruen zones 1 and 7 (17 and 21% respectively). DISCUSSION: The survival rate of hybrid MoM THA in this series decreased after 10 years and is lower than studies evaluating cementless THA with the 28-mm Metasul™ bearings (90.9 to 100% survival). Although the clinical results are satisfactory, survival is lower. However, the role of MoM bearings is relative in these failures, in particular because trunnionoses (stainless steel stem with 28-mm head), impingement and especially 5-stem fractures were the main causes of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: retrospective study.

Knee extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction following chronic disruption.

The management of chronic extensor mechanism disruption can be complex. One of the options is allograft reconstruction. The goal of this study was to present the surgical procedure and provide preliminary results with this technique. The allograft uses the whole extensor mechanism (anterior tibial tubercle, patellar ligament, patella, quadriceps tendon). The native patella can be completely removed if the quality of the bone is poor, otherwise a bone groovecan be created to receive the allograft. The allograft is tightly tensioned with the knee in full extension. This surgical technique was performed 5 times with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Active extension was recovered in all cases. The mean postoperative KOOS was 55.5 the IKS function score was 68.5 and the IKS knee score was 83.

Actifit® scaffold implantation: Influence of preoperative meniscal extrusion on morphological and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal substitutes have been suggested for the treatment of knee pain after partial meniscectomy. However, despite the partial nature of the initial meniscectomy, secondary extrusion of the substitute is common. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate morphological outcomes of meniscal substitute implantation and their potential associations with preoperative meniscal extrusion. HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative absolute meniscal extrusion in the coronal plane predicts poorer morphological and clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who received an Actifit(®) meniscal substitute between 2008 and 2011 were included prospectively. After 1 year and 2 years, the IKDC score and KOOS were determined and magnetic resonance imaging performed. The morphological evaluation consisted in measuring meniscal extrusion and cartilage coverage by the substitute in the coronal and sagittal planes. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Among them, 3 required subsequent removal of the substitute. The mean subjective IKDC score increased from 48.1 preoperatively to 56.4 after 2 years. Over the same period, the function/sports/recreational activities component of the KOOS improved significantly (42.9 vs. 55.0, P=0.04). Positive correlations between preoperative and 1-year values were demonstrated for both cartilage coverage in the coronal and the sagittal planes (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively) and coronal absolute meniscal extrusion (P=0.05). No significant differences were found between preoperative and 2-year values of cartilage coverage in the coronal and sagittal planes (P=0.38). There was a negative correlation linking preoperative meniscal extrusion in the coronal plane to 1-year cartilage coverage in the coronal and sagittal planes (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). Preoperative absolute meniscal extrusion in the coronal plane correlated negatively with the subjective IKDC score after 1 year (P=0.02). DISCUSSION: Preoperative meniscal extrusion in the coronal plane strongly predicts clinical and morphological outcomes. Marked preoperative meniscal extrusion, even in a patient with symptoms after partial meniscectomy, should prompt an appraisal of whether allograft replacement may be more appropriate than a meniscal substitute. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective study.

Post-arthroscopy septic arthritis: Current data and practical recommendations.

Septic arthritis develops after less than 1% of all arthroscopy procedures. The clinical symptoms may resemble those seen after uncomplicated arthroscopy, raising diagnostic challenges. The diagnosis rests on emergent joint aspiration with microscopic smear examination and prolonged culturing on specific media. Urgent therapeutic measures must be taken, including abundant arthroscopic lavage, synovectomy, and the concomitant administration of two effective antibiotics for at least 6 weeks. Preservation of implants or transplants is increasingly accepted, and repeated joint lavage is a component of the treatment strategy. After knee arthroscopy, infection is the most common complication; most cases occur after cruciate ligament reconstruction, and staphylococci are the predominant causative organisms. Emergent synovectomy with transplant preservation and appropriate antibiotic therapy ensures eradication of the infection in 85% of cases, with no adverse effect on final functional outcomes. After shoulder arthroscopy, infection is 10 times less common than neurological complications and occurs mainly after rotator cuff repair procedures; the diagnosis may be difficult and delayed if Propionibacterium acnes is the causative organism. The update presented here is based on both a literature review and a practice survey. The findings have been used to develop practical recommendations aimed at improving the management of post-arthroscopy infections, which are exceedingly rare but can induce devastating functional impairments.

Preoperative hair removal and surgical site infections: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Preoperative hair removal has been used to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) or to prevent hair from interfering with the incision site. We aimed to update the meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials about hair removal for the prevention of SSIs, and conduct network meta-analyses to combine direct and indirect evidence and to compare chemical depilation with clipping. The PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials analysing different hair removal techniques and no hair removal in similar groups. Paired and network meta-analyses were conducted. Two readers independently assessed the study limitations for each selected article according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. No study compared clipping with chemical depilation. Network meta-analyses with shaving as the reference showed significantly fewer SSIs with clipping, chemical depilation, or no depilation [relative risk 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.79; 0.60, 0.36-0.97; and 0.56, 0.34-0.96, respectively]. No significant difference was observed between the absence of depilation and chemical depilation or clipping (1.05, 0.55-2.00; 0.97, 0.51-1.82, respectively] or between chemical depilation and clipping (1.09, 0.59-2.01). This meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials confirmed the absence of any benefit of depilation to prevent surgical site infection, and the higher risk of surgical site infection when shaving is used for depilation. Chemical depilation and clipping were compared for the first time. The risk of SSI seems to be similar with both methods.

Unplanned return to theater: A quality of care and risk management index?

INTRODUCTION: Surgical quality and risk management is a major public health issue. The consequences of unplanned return to theater are social, occupational, financial and even legal. Unscheduled revision surgery is a major adverse event, resulting from serious complications - some of which are thought to be avoidable. The present study sought to assess and analyze the incidence of unplanned return to theater in an orthopedic surgery department. The study hypothesis was that some of the complications involved could be avoided. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A mixed retrospective-prospective study examined a consecutive series of 10,158 patients operated on in an orthopedic and traumatologic surgery department between January 2011 and December 2013. Patients undergoing revision surgery for reasons directly related to the primary procedure were analyzed. Patients were distributed among the following subgroups: infection, implant dislocation; hemorrhagic complication, mechanical complication, problem of primary technique, stiffness, wound healing disorder. Specific indicators of dysfunction liable to have contributed to onset of the complication were applied in each subgroup, to determine the avoidable or unavoidable nature of the event. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four patients (2.2%) underwent revision surgery for reasons directly related to the primary procedure. One hundred and eight cases (48.2%) were considered to have been avoidable: 48 infections (21.4%), 27 implant dislocations (12%), 15 hemorrhagic complications (6.7%), 66 mechanical complications (29.5%), 35 technical problems at primary surgery (15.6%), 21 cases of stiffness (9.3%), and 12 cases of delayed wound healing (5.3%). Mean time to revision surgery was 2.7 ± 2.6 months. Extending the time-window to 1 year recruited extra cases: in 31.7% of cases, onset was after the 90th postoperative day, which is the usual deadline. The rate of unplanned return to theater was higher after unscheduled (traumatic: 3.2%) than scheduled surgery (1.7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Return to surgery in orthopedic and traumatologic surgery is underestimated. Annual incidence was 2.2%, and twice as high (3.2%) following traumatologic compared to scheduled surgery (1.7%). Analysis found that almost half the cases were avoidable. They represent a relevant and easily assessed indicator of treatment quality and associated risk management. A national or even international database in the form of an anonymous registry of revision surgeries would be useful.